XLIII.

A family with which I was in close intimacy, indeed on affectionate

terms, was the Wilsons, of Stowlangtoft Hall. Let those who from their

disappointments in life have formed a bad opinion of mankind go among

such people as these!

The father of Henry Wilson resided on his estate at Highbury; he had

been a great merchant, a calling from which so many great things have

emanated in our country, and one which will cease to exist when we reach

our socialistic days; for who would give the energy of his commercial

genius as a servant of the State, and pile up tens of thousands to enrich

Cabinets whose members had better have remained prize-fighters and the

like?

Mr. Wilson purchased two baronets’ estates in Suffolk—one of Sir George

Wombwell, the historic seat of Stowlangtoft; one, Langham Hall, the

property adjoining, of Sir Henry Blake. He also held lands in Norfolk.

Henry Wilson, his son and my kindest and best of friends, resided always

at Stowlangtoft; at one time he represented the county in Parliament.

He was educated at Oxford, where he made friends enough to last for a

lifetime, all of whom, like himself, were thoroughly good men, and many

of them fellow-students of Oriel. There was Rickards, who became his

rector, a college-friend; and one of those who joined the set of Newman

and Manning for a time. There was Porcher, Yarde Buller of Downs,[2]

Kindersley, Mozley; nearly all these were guests from time to time of

Rickards and Wilson; in fact, the only one I do not recall as having met

at the hall or rectory was Newman.

It was a deadly surprise to Rickards when Newman and Manning kicked

against the Reformation and became inceptor-candidates for the Papacy.

The Church, from its own point of view, may have deemed it fortunate that

these two gentlemen took their stroll from Oxford to Rome, or they might

have become Anglican archbishops, and have looked the Holy City up later

in life.

Sir R. Kindersley was a most genial man, quiet and sensible, like most

of those who rise to eminence. He gave his daughter in marriage to

Wilson’s eldest son, and Wilson gave one of his daughters to Kindersley’s

eldest son, and a daughter by this marriage is now Lady Herschell. Miss

Wilson had been long adopted by the Porchers, who wished her and young

Kindersley to be their heirs.

Henry Wilson had a large family by his first wife, who was a Maitland.

He married a second time, the daughter of Lord Henry Fitz-Roy, a son of

the Duke of Grafton. This lady brought him several children. She was a

devoted mother to both families; as conscientious a lady as was ever born

to fulfil great duties. She not only treated her stepchildren exactly as

she did her own, but acquired for them the same affection as she felt for

those which she had brought into the world.

Those who knew her may think themselves happy if they ever see her like

again.

My first acquaintance with Sir R. Kindersley was at a dinner at Trinity

College, which I went to with Dr. J. W. Donaldson, the Greek scholar and

philologer. Donaldson was then head-master at the Bury School. It was my

good fortune on the same occasion to meet Professor Sedgwick, some of

whose anecdotes have served my purpose ever since. A very good one was of

a French general who visited England and enjoyed Sedgwick’s attentions,

among those of many others. On taking final leave of the general he

asked him how he liked the English ladies. After some hesitation the

answer came. It was: “I like them very much. They are very beautiful,

but they have one great fault; they are too virtuous. _Elles sont trop

vertueuses._”

I reminded Kindersley of that pleasant dinner when I met him again, and

he remembered it well.

Wilson was boundless in his hospitality to his neighbours, poor and rich.

Could every parish be under the management of such a squire and such a

rector, poverty would cease to be an evil. Wilson may have felt this

organically; it may have been under its influence that he desired to

establish his family on the soil during succeeding generations. He was an

ardent admirer of enterprise and self-aid; he turned his own name into

his motto—“Will soon will.”

He was bent on building a mansion on the Stowlangtoft estate, and this

he did ultimately on a larger scale than had sufficed for the home of

Sir George Wombwell or of Sir Simonds d’Ewes, his predecessors; but not

before his father died, who left him a purse of twenty-four thousand

pounds a year.

The old Wilson, the London merchant, told me that he met Sir George

Wombwell at his bankers’ to pay him the ninety thousand pounds in notes

which he gave for the Stowlangtoft estate, and that the baronet stuffed

the money into his hinder coat pocket, and so walked away.

The old hall was a very comfortable one, commodious, picturesque. A man

does no good to his family in replacing old mansions by new in country

places, to which the owner resorts, often, only for the shooting season.

This adding on to and rebuilding often ends in disappointment to those

who follow later. I saw recently an advertisement in the paper—“To be

let, Stowlangtoft Hall, with the shooting over seven thousand acres

of land.” My friend Mr. Thornhill, of Riddlesworth Hall, Norfolk,

enlarged his mansion, which had sufficed for his wealthy father; he

wished his descendants to reside there for generations, but his son has

thought differently. I saw an advertisement immediately under the above

concerning Stowlangtoft, which ran thus—“To be sold, the property of Sir

Thomas Thornhill, Bart., the well-known sporting estate of Riddlesworth

Hall.” How little influence can the dead exercise over the living!

We must now speak of old Rickards, a name he had gone by all his life,

with the many who loved him. His hair had always been white, his

complexion red, and he always blushed heartily when he laughed. He had

been a Fellow of Oriel till he wedded Miss Wilmot, a daughter of Sir

Robert Wilmot, of Chadsden Hall, Derbyshire, the liveliest, brightest,

tenderest, sweetest of women; a girl to the last; and I hope still alive,

though all this was fifty years ago. But every one is dead nowadays. Time

was when I saw in the paper the death of some acquaintance almost weekly,

then it got to monthly, then perhaps once in a year, but never now, for

every one I ever knew seems dead and gone. I have a brother left, and a

school-fellow and friend;[3] all others appear children.

But how the newly dead who have lived in us half a century and much more

still survive and perform their parts within us, still laughing, still

blushing, still merry, still sensible and intelligent there, telling us

all they ever told us over again: still glad at seeing us, still shaking

us by the hand, still bidding us welcome. Yes, the obituary notices of

them were premature; they live while we live, they die only when we die.

There is one soothing circumstance, however, attendant on death: we

do not miss ourselves when we are dead; not so much even as we do a

shirt-button when we are alive!

[2] Afterwards Lord Churston.

[3] H. W. Statham, since dead.

Memoirs of Eighty Years · 第 130 / 167 题