I had caused the country in the rear of the grand vizier's army to be

ravaged: but these people, as well as their horses and especially their

camels, will live almost upon nothing. Scarcely an hour passed in which

I did not lose a score of men by the dysentery, or by the cannon from

the lines, which the infidels advanced more and more every night toward

my intrenchments. I was less the besieger than the besieged. My affairs

toward the city went on better. A bomb which fell into a magazine of

powder completed its destruction and occasioned the loss of three

thousand men.

At length I recovered from my illness; and, on August 15th,

notwithstanding the ill-advice of persons who were not fond of battles,

the matter was fixed. I calculated that listlessness and despair would

produce success.

I did not sleep, as Alexander did before the battle of Arbela; but the

Turks did, who were no Alexanders: opium and predestination will make

philosophers of us. I gave brief and explicit instructions touching

whatever might happen. I quitted my intrenchments one hour after

midnight: the darkness first and then a fog rendered my first

undertakings mere chance. Some of my battalions, on the right wing,

fell, unintentionally, while marching, into a part of the Turkish

intrenchments. A terrible confusion among them, who never have either

advanced posts or spies; and, among us, a similar confusion, which it

would be impossible to describe: they fired from the left to the centre,

on both sides, without knowing where. The janizaries fled from their

intrenchments: I had time to throw into them fascines and gabions, to

make a passage for my cavalry who pursued them, I know not how: the fog

dispersed and the Turks perceived a dreadful breach. But for my second

line, which I ordered to march there immediately, to stop this breach,

I should have been lost. I then wished to march in order: impossible! I

was better served than I expected. La Colonie, at the head of his

Bavarians, rushed forward and took a battery of eighteen pieces of

cannon. I was obliged to do better than I wished. I sustained the

Bavarians; and the Turks, after having fled to the heights, lost all the

advantages of their ground. A large troop of their cavalry wished to

charge mine, which were too much advanced; a whole regiment was cut in

pieces; but two others, who arrived opportunely to their aid, decided

the victory. It was then that I received a cut from a sabre; it was, I

believe, my thirteenth wound, and probably my last. Everything was over

at eleven o'clock in the morning. Viard, during the battle, retained the

garrison of Belgrad, which capitulated the same day. I forgot that there

was no Boufflers there: I played the generous man: I granted the honors

of war to the garrison, who, not knowing what they meant, did not avail

themselves of them. Men, women, and children, chariots and camels,

issued forth all at once, pell-mell, by land and by water.

At Vienna the devotees cried out, "A miracle!" those who envied me cried

out, "Good-fortune!" Charles VI was, I believe, among the former: and

Guido Stahrenberg among the latter. I was well received, as might have

been expected.

Here is my opinion respecting this victory, in which I have more cause

for justification than for glory; my partisans have spoken too favorably

of it, and my enemies too severely. They would have had much more reason

to propose cutting off my head on this occasion than on that of Zenta,

for there I risked nothing. I was certain of conquering: but here, not

only I might have been beaten, but totally ruined and lost in a storm,

for the enemy's artillery to the left, on the shores of the Danube, had

destroyed my bridges. I was, indeed, superior in saics and in workmen

and artillerymen to protect or repair them: I had a corps also at

Semlin.

Could I anticipate the tardiness or disinclination of the authorities

who engaged in this war, where there were so many vices of the interior

in administration, and so much ignorance in the chiefs of the civil and

commissariat departments? Hence it was that I was in want of everything

necessary to commence the siege, and to take Belgrad before the arrival

of the grand vizier, and which hindered me afterward from checking him

on the heights. This, however, I should have done--but for my cursed

fever--before his artillery arrived. And then that unlucky dysentery,

which put my army into the hospital, or rather into the burying-ground,

for each regiment had one behind its camp--could I anticipate that also?

These were the two motives which induced me to attack, and to risk all

or nothing, for I was as certainly lost one way as another. I threw up

intrenchments against intrenchments: I knew a little more upon that

subject than my comrade the grand vizier; and I had plenty of troops in

health to guard them. I obliged him for want of provisions--for, as I

have already said, I caused all the country in his rear to be

ravaged--to decamp, and, consequently, Belgrad to surrender. Thus, if

this manuscript should be read, give me neither praise, my dear reader,

nor blame. After all, I extricated myself, perhaps, as Charles VI said,

his confessor, and the pious souls who trust in God, and who wished me

at the Devil, by the protection of the Virgin Mary, for the battle was

fought on Assumption Day.

Europe was getting embroiled elsewhere. Some charitable souls advised

the Emperor to send me to negotiate at London, reckoning that they might

procure for another the easy glory of terminating the war.

I was not such a fool as to fall into this snare, and I set off for

Hungary at the commencement of June, with a fine sword worth eighty

thousand florins which the Emperor had presented to me.

BURSTING OF THE SOUTH SEA BUBBLE

A.D. 1720

LOUIS ADOLPHE THIERS

Never, perhaps, was there a time when rash monetary speculation

seized with a firmer grip upon people and governments than during

the early part of the eighteenth century. Concurrently with the

delusive "Mississippi Scheme" of John Law (1717), which resulted in

financial panic in France, a similarly disastrous enterprise was

carried on in England. This was the attempt to turn the South Sea

Company into a concern for enriching quickly both its private and

its governmental investors. The collapse of this scheme, in the same

year as that of Law's, caused even more serious and widespread ruin.

Thiers' relation of the origin and development of the South Sea

Company, of the forming and collapse of the "bubble," and of the

spread of the speculative mania which manifested itself in so many

other extravagant projects, makes a fitting counterpart to this

historian's narrative of the rise and fall of the contemporary

scheme in his own country.

The South Sea Company was originated by the celebrated Harley, Earl of

Oxford, in the year 1711, with the view of restoring public credit,

which had suffered by the dismissal of the Whig ministry, and of

providing for the discharge of the army and navy debentures and other

parts of the floating debt, amounting to nearly ten millions sterling. A

company of merchants, at that time without a name, took his debt upon

themselves, and the government agreed to secure them for a certain

period the interest of 6 per cent. To provide for this interest,

amounting to six hundred thousand pounds per annum, the duties upon

wines, vinegar, India goods, wrought silks, tobacco, whale-fins, and

some other articles were rendered permanent. The monopoly of the trade

to the South Seas was granted, and the company, being incorporated by

act of Parliament, assumed the title by which it has ever since been

known. The minister took great credit to himself for his share in this

transaction, and the scheme was always called by his flatterers "the

Earl of Oxford's masterpiece."

Even at this early period of its history the most visionary ideas were

formed by the company and the public of the immense riches of the

eastern coast of South America. Everybody had heard of the gold and

silver mines of Peru and Mexico; everyone believed them to be

inexhaustible, and that it was only necessary to send the manufactures

of England to the coast to be repaid a hundred-fold in gold and silver

ingots by the natives. A report industriously spread, that Spain was

willing to concede four ports on the coasts of Chile and Peru for the

purposes of traffic, increased the general confidence, and for many

years the South Sea Company's stock was in high favor.

Philip V of Spain, however, never had any intention of admitting the

English to a free trade in the ports of Spanish America. Negotiations

were set on foot, but their only result was the _assiento_ contract, or

the privilege of supplying the colonies with negroes for thirty years,

and of sending once a year a vessel, limited both as to tonnage and

value of cargo, to trade with Mexico, Peru, or Chile. The latter

permission was only granted upon the hard condition that the King of

Spain should enjoy one-fourth of the profits, and a tax of 5 per cent.

on the remainder. This was a great disappointment to the Earl of Oxford

and his party, who were reminded, much oftener than they found

agreeable, of the

"_Parturiunt montes, nascitur ridiculus mus._"

But the public confidence in the South Sea Company was not shaken. The

Earl of Oxford declared that Spain would permit two ships, in addition

to the annual ship, to carry out merchandise during the first year; and

a list was published in which all the ports and harbors of these coasts

were pompously set forth as open to the trade of Great Britain. The

first voyage of the annual ship was not made till the year 1717, and in

the following year the trade was suppressed by the rupture with Spain.

The name of the South Sea Company was thus continually before the

public. Though their trade with the South American states produced

little or no augmentation of their revenues, they continued to flourish

as a monetary corporation. Their stock was in high request, and the

directors, buoyed up with success, began to think of new means for

extending their influence. The Mississippi scheme of John Law, which so

dazzled and captivated the French people, inspired them with an idea

that they could carry on the same game in England. The anticipated

failure of his plans did not divert them from their intention. Wise in

their own conceit, they imagined they could avoid his faults, carry on

their schemes forever, and stretch the cord of credit to its extremest

tension without causing it to snap asunder.

It was while Law's plan was at its greatest height of popularity, while

people were crowding in thousands to the Rue Quincampoix, and ruining

themselves with frantic eagerness, that the South Sea directors laid

before Parliament their famous plan for paying off the national debt.

Visions of boundless wealth floated before the fascinated eyes of the

people in the two most celebrated countries of Europe. The English

commenced their career of extravagance somewhat later than the French;

but as soon as the delirium seized them they were determined not to be

outdone.

Upon January 22, 1720, the House of Commons resolved itself into a

committee of the whole house to take into consideration that part of the

King's speech at the opening of the session which related to the public

debts, and the proposal of the South Sea Company toward the redemption

and sinking of the same. The proposal set forth at great length, and

under several heads, the debts of the state, amounting to thirty million

nine hundred eighty-one thousand seven hundred twelve pounds, which the

company was anxious to take upon itself, upon consideration of 5 per

cent. per annum, secured to it until midsummer, 1727; after which time

the whole was to become redeemable at the pleasure of the legislature,

and the interest to be reduced to 4 per cent. It was resolved, on

February 2d, that the proposals were most advantageous to the country.

They were accordingly received, and leave was given to bring in a bill

to that effect.

Exchange Alley was in a fever of excitement. The company's stock, which

had been at 130 the previous day, gradually rose to 300, and continued

to rise with the most astonishing rapidity during the whole time that

the bill in its several stages was under discussion. Sir Robert Walpole

was almost the only statesman in the House who spoke out boldly against

it. He warned them, in eloquent and solemn language, of the evils that

would ensue. It countenanced, he said, "the dangerous practice of

stock-jobbing, and would divert the genius of the nation from trade and

industry. It would hold out a dangerous lure to decoy the unwary to

their ruin, by making them part with the earnings of their labor for a

prospect of imaginary wealth. The great principle of the project was an

evil of first-rate magnitude; it was to raise artificially the value of

the stock by exciting and keeping up a general infatuation, and by

promising dividends out of funds which could never be adequate to the

purpose."

The bill was two months in its progress through the House of Commons.

During this time every exertion was made by the directors and their

friends, and more especially by the chairman, the noted Sir John Blunt,

to raise the price of the stock. The most extravagant rumors were in

circulation. Treaties between England and Spain were spoken of whereby

the latter was to grant a free trade to all her colonies; and the rich

produce of the mines of Potosi-la-Paz was to be brought to England until

silver should become almost as plentiful as iron. For cotton and woollen

goods, which could be supplied to them in abundance, the dwellers in

Mexico were to empty their golden mines. The company of merchants

trading to the South Seas would be the richest the world ever saw, and

every hundred pounds invested in it would produce hundreds per annum to

the stockholder. At last the stock was raised by these means to near

400, but, after fluctuating a good deal, settled at 330, at which price

it remained when the bill passed the Commons by a majority of 172

against 55.

Contrary to all expectation South Sea stock fell when the bill received

the royal assent. On April 7th the shares were quoted at 310, and on the

following day at 290. Already the directors had tasted the profits of

their scheme, and it was not likely that they should quietly allow the

stock to find its natural level without an effort to raise it.

Immediately their busy emissaries were set to work. Every person

interested in the success of the project endeavored to draw a knot of

listeners round him, to whom he expatiated on the treasures of the South

American seas. Exchange Alley was crowded with attentive groups. One

rumor alone, asserted with the utmost confidence, had an immediate

effect upon the stock. It was said that Earl Stanhope had received

overtures in France from the Spanish government to exchange Gibraltar

and Port Mahon for some places on the coast of Peru, for the security

and enlargement of the trade in the South Seas. Instead of one annual

ship trading to those ports, and allowing the King of Spain 25 per cent.

out of the profits, the company might build and charter as many ships as

it pleased, and pay no percentage whatever to any foreign potentate.

"Visions of ingots danced before their eyes," and stock rose rapidly. On

April 12th, five days after the bill had become law, the directors

opened their books for a subscription of a million, at the rate of three

hundred pounds for every one hundred pounds capital. Such was the

concourse of persons of all ranks that this first subscription was found

to amount to above two millions of original stock. It was to be paid in

five payments, of sixty pounds each for every one hundred pounds. In a

few days the stock advanced to 340, and the subscriptions were sold for

double the price of the first payment. To raise the stock still higher

it was declared in a general court of directors, on April 21st, that the

midsummer dividend should be 10 per cent., and that all subscriptions

should be entitled to the same. These resolutions answering the end

designed, the directors, to improve the infatuation of the moneyed men,

opened their books for a second subscription of a million, at 4 per

cent. Such was the frantic eagerness of people of every class to

speculate in these funds that in the course of a few hours no less than

a million and a half was subscribed at that rate.

In the mean time innumerable joint-stock companies started up

everywhere. They soon received the name of "bubbles," the most

appropriate that imagination could devise. The populace are often most

happy in the nicknames they employ. None could be more apt than that of

"bubbles." Some of them lasted for a week or a fortnight, and were no

more heard of, while others could not even live out that short span of

existence. Every evening produced new schemes and every morning new

projects. The highest of the aristocracy were as eager in this hot

pursuit of gain as the most plodding jobber in Cornhill. The Prince of

Wales became governor of one company, and is said to have cleared forty

thousand pounds by his speculations. The Duke of Bridgewater started a

scheme for the improvement of London and Westminster, and the Duke of

Chandos another. There were nearly a hundred different projects, each

more extravagant and deceptive than the other. To use the words of the

_Political State_, they were "set on foot and promoted by crafty knaves,

then pursued by multitudes of covetous fools, and at last appeared to

be, in effect, what their vulgar appellation denoted them to be--bubbles

and mere cheats." It was computed that near one million and a half

sterling was won and lost by these unwarrantable practices, to the

impoverishment of many a fool and the enriching of many a rogue.

Some of these schemes were plausible enough, and, had they been

undertaken at a time when the public mind was unexcited, might have been

pursued with advantage to all concerned. But they were established

merely with a view of raising the shares in the market. The projectors

took the first opportunity of a rise to sell out, and next morning the

scheme was at an end. Maitland, in his _History of London_, gravely

informs us that one of the projects which received great encouragement

was for the establishment of a company "to make deal boards out of

sawdust." This is, no doubt, intended as a joke; but there is abundance

of evidence to show that dozens of schemes, hardly a whit more

reasonable, lived their little day, ruining hundreds ere they fell. One

of them was for a wheel for perpetual motion--capital one million;

another was "for encouraging the breed of horses in England, and

improving of glebe and church lands, and repairing and rebuilding

parsonage and vicarage houses." Why the clergy, who were so mainly

interested in the latter clause, should have taken so much interest in

the first, is only to be explained on the supposition that the scheme

was projected by a knot of the fox-hunting parsons, once so common in

England. The shares of this company were rapidly subscribed for.

But the most absurd and preposterous of all, and which showed, more

completely than any other, the utter madness of the people, was one

started by an unknown adventurer, entitled "_A Company for carrying on

an Undertaking of Great Advantage, but Nobody to know What It Is_." Were

not the facts stated by scores of credible witnesses, it would be

impossible to believe that any person could have been duped by such a

project. The man of genius who essayed this bold and successful inroad

upon public credulity merely stated in his prospectus that the required

capital was half a million, in five thousand shares of one hundred

pounds each, deposit two pounds per share. Each subscriber paying his

deposit would be entitled to one hundred pounds per annum per share. How

this immense profit was to be obtained he did not condescend to inform

them at that time, but promised that in a month full particulars should

be duly announced, and a call made for the remaining ninety-eight pounds

of the subscription. Next morning, at nine o'clock, this great man

opened an office in Cornhill. Crowds of people beset his door, and when

he shut up, at three o'clock, he found that no less than one thousand

shares had been subscribed for and the deposits paid. He was thus, in

five hours, the winner of two thousand pounds. He was philosopher enough

to be contented with his venture, and set off the same evening for the

Continent. He was never heard of again.

It is time, however, to return to the great South Sea gulf, that

swallowed the fortunes of so many thousands of the avaricious and the

credulous. On May 29th the stock had risen as high as 500, and about

two-thirds of the government annuitants had exchanged the securities of

the state for those of the South Sea Company. During the whole of the

month of May the stock continued to rise, and on the 28th it was quoted

at 550. In four days after this it took a prodigious leap, rising

suddenly from 550 to 890. It was now the general opinion that the stock

could rise no higher, and many persons took that opportunity of selling

out, with a view of realizing their profits. Many noblemen and persons

in the train of the King, and about to accompany him to Hanover, were

also anxious to sell out. So many sellers and so few buyers appeared in

the alley on June 3d that the stock fell at once from 890 to 640. The

directors were alarmed and gave their agents orders to buy. Their

efforts succeeded. Toward evening confidence was restored, and the stock

advanced to 750. It continued at this price with some slight

fluctuation, until the company closed its books on June 22d.

It would be needless and uninteresting to detail the various arts

employed by the directors to keep up the price of stock. It will be

sufficient to state that it finally rose to 1000 per cent. It was quoted

at this price in the commencement of August. The bubble was then

full-blown and began to quiver and shake preparatory to its bursting.

Many of the government annuitants expressed dissatisfaction against the

directors. They accused them of partiality in making out the lists for

shares in each subscription. Further uneasiness was occasioned by its

being generally known that Sir John Blunt, the chairman, and some others

had sold out. During the whole of the month of August the stock fell,

and on September 2d it was quoted at 700 only.

Day after day it continued to fall, until it was as low as 400. In a

letter dated September 13th, from Mr. Broderick, M.P., to Lord

Chancellor Middleton, and published in Coxe's _Walpole_, the former

says: "Various are the conjectures why the South Sea directors have

suffered the cloud to break so early. I made no doubt but they would do

so when they found it to their advantage. They have stretched credit so

far beyond what it would bear that specie proves insufficient to support

it. Their most considerable men have drawn out, securing themselves by

the losses of the deluded, thoughtless numbers, whose understandings

have been overruled by avarice and the hope of making mountains out of

mole-hills. Thousands of families will be reduced to beggary. The

consternation is inexpressible--the rage beyond description, and the

case altogether so desperate that I do not see any plan or scheme so

much as thought of for averting the blow; so that I cannot pretend to

guess what is next to be done." Ten days afterward, the stock still

falling, he writes: "The company have yet come to no determination, for

they are in such a wood that they know not which way to turn. By several

gentlemen lately come to town, I perceive the very name of a South Sea

man grown abominable in every country. A great many goldsmiths are

already run off, and more will; daily I question whether one-third, nay,

one-fourth, of them can stand it."

At a general court of the Bank of England, held soon afterward, the

governor informed them of the several meetings that had been held on the

affairs of the South Sea Company, adding that the directors had not yet

thought fit to come to any decision upon the matter. A resolution was

then proposed, and carried without a dissentient voice, empowering the

directors to agree with those of the South Sea to circulate their bonds

to what sum and upon what terms and for what time they might think

proper. Thus both parties were at liberty to act as they might judge

best for the public interest.

The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 13 · 第 3 / 37 段