Nothing more chanced for the rest of the night. Nor, indeed, had I long

to wait before the dawn broke. Nor till it was broad daylight did I quit

the haunted house. Before I did so, I revisited the little blind room in

which my servant and myself had been for a time imprisoned. I had a

strong impression--for which I could not account--that from that room

had originated the mechanism of the phenomena--if I may use the

term--which had been experienced in my chamber. And though I entered it

now in the clear day, with the sun peering through the filmy window, I

still felt, as I stood on its floors, the creep of the horror which I

had first there experienced the night before, and which had been so

aggravated by what had passed in my own chamber. I could not, indeed,

bear to stay more than half a minute within those walls. I descended the

stairs, and again I heard the footfall before me; and when I opened the

street door, I thought I could distinguish a very low laugh. I gained my

own house, expecting to find my runaway servant there. But he had not

presented himself, nor did I hear more of him for three days, when I

received a letter from him, dated from Liverpool to this effect:

"Honored Sir:--I humbly entreat your pardon,

though I can scarcely hope that you will think

that I deserve it, unless--which Heaven

forbid!--you saw what I did. I feel that it will

be years before I can recover myself; and as to

being fit for service, it is out of the question.

I am therefore going to my brother-in-law at

Melbourne. The ship sails tomorrow. Perhaps the

long voyage may set me up. I do nothing now but

start and tremble, and fancy It is behind me. I

humbly beg you, honored sir, to order my clothes,

and whatever wages are due to me, to be sent to my

mother's, at Walworth--John knows her address."

The letter ended with additional apologies, somewhat incoherent, and

explanatory details as to effects that had been under the writer's

charge.

This flight may perhaps warrant a suspicion that the man wished to go to

Australia, and had been somehow or other fraudulently mixed up with the

events of the night. I say nothing in refutation of that conjecture;

rather, I suggest it as one that would seem to many persons the most

probable solution of improbable occurrences. My belief in my own theory

remained unshaken. I returned in the evening to the house, to bring away

in a hack cab the things I had left there, with my poor dog's body. In

this task I was not disturbed, nor did any incident worth note befall

me, except that still, on ascending and descending the stairs, I heard

the same footfall in advance. On leaving the house, I went to Mr.

J----'s. He was at home. I returned him the keys, told him that my

curiosity was sufficiently gratified, and was about to relate quickly

what had passed, when he stopped me, and said, though with much

politeness, that he had no longer any interest in a mystery which none

had ever solved.

I determined at least to tell him of the two letters I had read, as well

as of the extraordinary manner in which they had disappeared, and I then

inquired if he thought they had been addressed to the woman who had died

in the house, and if there were anything in her early history which

could possibly confirm the dark suspicions to which the letters gave

rise. Mr. J---- seemed startled, and, after musing a few moments,

answered: "I am but little acquainted with the woman's earlier history,

except, as I before told you, that her family were known to mine. But

you revive some vague reminiscences to her prejudice. I will make

inquiries, and inform you of their result. Still, even if we could admit

the popular superstition that a person who had been either the

perpetrator or the victim of dark crimes in life could revisit, as a

restless spirit, the scene in which those crimes had been committed, I

should observe that the house was infested by strange sights and sounds

before the old woman died--you smile--what would you say?"

"I would say this, that I am convinced, if we could get to the bottom of

these mysteries, we should find a living human agency."

"What! you believe it is all an imposture? for what object?"

"Not an imposture in the ordinary sense of the word. If suddenly I were

to sink into a deep sleep, from which you could not awake me, but in

that sleep could answer questions with an accuracy which I could not

pretend to when awake--tell you what money you had in your pocket--nay,

describe your very thoughts--it is not necessarily an imposture, any

more than it is necessarily supernatural. I should be, unconsciously to

myself, under a mesmeric influence, conveyed to me from a distance by a

human being who had acquired power over me by previous _rapport_."

"But if a mesmerizer could so affect another living being, can you

suppose that a mesmerizer could also affect inanimate objects; move

chairs--open and shut doors?"

"Or impress our senses with the belief in such effects--we never having

been _en rapport_ with the person acting on us? No. What is commonly

called mesmerism could not do this; but there may be a power akin to

mesmerism and superior to it--the power that in the old days was called

Magic. That such a power may extend to all inanimate objects of matter,

I do not say; but if so, it would not be against nature--it would only

be a rare power in nature which might be given to constitutions with

certain peculiarities, and cultivated by practice to an extraordinary

degree.

"That such a power might extend over the dead--that is, over certain

thoughts and memories that the dead may still retain--and compel, not

that which ought properly to be called the Soul, and which is far beyond

human reach, but rather a phantom of what has been most earth-stained on

earth to make itself apparent to our senses--is a very ancient though

obsolete theory, upon which I will hazard no opinion. But I do not

conceive the power to be supernatural. Let me illustrate what I mean

from an experiment which Paracelsus describes as not difficult, and

which the author of the 'Curiosities of Literature' cites as credible: A

flower perishes; you burn it. Whatever were the elements of that flower

while it lived are gone, dispersed, you know not whither; you can never

discover nor re-collect them. But you can, by chemistry, out of the

burned dust of that flower, raise a spectrum of the flower, just as it

seemed in life. It may be the same with the human being. The soul has as

much escaped you as the essence or elements of the flower. Still you may

make a spectrum of it. And this phantom, though in the popular

superstition it is held to be the soul of the departed, must not be

confounded with the true soul; it is but the _eidolon_ of the dead form.

Hence, like the best attested stories of ghosts or spirits, the thing

that most strikes us is the absence of what we hold to be the soul; that

is, of superior emancipated intelligence. These apparitions come for

little or no object--they seldom speak when they do come; if they speak,

they utter no ideas above those of an ordinary person on earth.

Wonderful, therefore, as such phenomena may be (granting them to be

truthful), I see much that philosophy may question, nothing that it is

incumbent on philosophy to deny--viz., nothing supernatural. They are

but ideas conveyed somehow or other (we have not yet discovered the

means) from one mortal brain to another. Whether, in so doing, tables

walk by their own accord, or fiend-like shapes appear in a magic circle,

or bodyless hands rise and remove material objects, or a Thing of

Darkness, such as presented itself to me, freeze our blood--still am I

persuaded that these are but agencies conveyed, as by electric wires, to

my own brain from the brain of another. In some constitutions there is a

natural chemistry, and those constitutions may produce chemic

wonders--in others a natural fluid, call it electricity, and these may

produce electric wonders. But the wonders differ from Natural Science in

this--they are alike objectless, purposeless, puerile, frivolous. They

lead on to no grand results; and therefore the world does not heed, and

true sages have not cultivated them. But sure I am, that of all I saw or

heard, a man, human as myself, was the remote originator; and I believe

unconsciously to himself as to the exact effects produced, for this

reason: no two persons, you say, have ever experienced exactly the same

thing. Well, observe, no two persons ever experience exactly the same

dream. If this were an ordinary imposture, the machinery would be

arranged for results that would but little vary; if it were a

supernatural agency permitted by the Almighty, it would surely be for

some definite end. These phenomena belong to neither class; my

persuasion is that they originated in some brain now far distant; that

that brain had no distinct volition in anything that occurred; that what

does occur reflects but its devious, motley, ever-shifting, half-formed

thoughts; in short, that it has been but the dreams of such a brain put

in action and invested with a semi-substance. That this brain is of

immense power, that it can set matter into movement, that it is

malignant and destructive, I believe; some material force must have

killed my dog; the same force might, for aught I know, have sufficed to

kill myself, had I been as subjugated by terror as the dog--had my

intellect or my spirit given me no countervailing resistance in my

will."

"It killed your dog! that is fearful! indeed it is strange that no

animal can be induced to stay in that house; not even a cat. Rats and

mice are never found in it."

"The instincts of the brute creation detect influences deadly to their

existence. Man's reason has a sense less subtle, because it has a

resisting power more supreme. But enough; do you comprehend my theory?"

"Yes, though imperfectly--and I accept any crotchet (pardon the word),

however odd, rather than embrace at once the notion of ghosts and

hobgoblins we imbibed in our nurseries. Still, to my unfortunate house

the evil is the same. What on earth can I do with the house?"

"I will tell you what I would do. I am convinced from my own internal

feelings that the small unfurnished room at right angles to the door of

the bedroom which I occupied forms a starting-point or receptacle for

the influences which haunt the house; and I strongly advise you to have

the walls opened, the floor removed--nay, the whole room pulled down. I

observe that it is detached from the body of the house, built over the

small back-yard, and could be removed without injury to the rest of the

building."

"And you think, if I did that----"

"You would cut off the telegraph wires. Try it. I am so persuaded that I

am right that I will pay half the expense if you will allow me to

direct the operations."

"Nay, I am well able to afford the cost; for the rest, allow me to write

to you."

About ten days after I received a letter from Mr. J----, telling me that

he had visited the house since I had seen him; that he had found the two

letters I had described, replaced in the drawer from which I had taken

them; that he had read them with misgivings like my own; that he had

instituted a cautious inquiry about the woman to whom I rightly

conjectured they had been written. It seemed that thirty-six years ago

(a year before the date of the letters) she had married, against the

wish of her relations, an American of very suspicious character; in

fact, he was generally believed to have been a pirate. She herself was

the daughter of very respectable tradespeople, and had served in the

capacity of a nursery governess before her marriage. She had a brother,

a widower, who was considered wealthy, and who had one child of about

six years old. A month after the marriage, the body of this brother was

found in the Thames, near London Bridge; there seemed some marks of

violence about his throat, but they were not deemed sufficient to

warrant the inquest in any other verdict than that of "found drowned."

The American and his wife took charge of the little boy, the deceased

brother having by his will left his sister the guardianship of his only

child--and in the event of the child's death, the sister inherited. The

child died about six months afterward--it was supposed to have been

neglected and ill-treated. The neighbors deposed to having heard it

shriek at night. The surgeon who had examined it after death said that

it was emaciated as if from want of nourishment, and the body was

covered with livid bruises. It seemed that one winter night the child

had sought to escape--crept out into the back-yard--tried to scale the

wall--fallen back exhausted, and had been found at morning on the stones

in a dying state. But though there was some evidence of cruelty, there

was none of murder; and the aunt and her husband had sought to palliate

cruelty by alleging the exceeding stubbornness and perversity of the

child, who was declared to be half-witted. Be that as it may, at the

orphan's death the aunt inherited her brother's fortune. Before the

first wedded year was out, the American quitted England abruptly, and

never returned to it. He obtained a cruising vessel, which was lost in

the Atlantic two years afterward. The widow was left in affluence; but

reverses of various kinds had befallen her; a bank broke--an investment

failed--she went into a small business and became insolvent--then she

entered into service, sinking lower and lower, from housekeeper down to

maid-of-all-work--never long retaining a place, though nothing decided

against her character was ever alleged. She was considered sober,

honest, and peculiarly quiet in her ways; still nothing prospered with

her. And so she had dropped into the workhouse, from which Mr. J----

had taken her, to be placed in charge of the very house which she had

rented as mistress in the first year of her wedded life.

Mr. J---- added that he had passed an hour alone in the unfurnished room

which I had urged him to destroy, and that his impressions of dread

while there were so great, though he had neither heard nor seen

anything, that he was eager to have the walls bared and the floors

removed as I had suggested. He had engaged persons for the work, and

would commence any day I would name.

The day was accordingly fixed. I repaired to the haunted house--we went

into the blind dreary room, took up the skirting, and then the floors.

Under the rafters, covered with rubbish, was found a trap-door, quite

large enough to admit a man. It was closely nailed down, with clamps and

rivets of iron. On removing these we descended into a room below, the

existence of which had never been suspected. In this room there had been

a window and a flue, but they had been bricked over, evidently for many

years. By the help of candles we examined this place; it still retained

some moldering furniture--three chairs, an oak settle, a table--all of

the fashion of about eighty years ago. There was a chest of drawers

against the wall, in which we found, half-rotted away, old-fashioned

articles of a man's dress, such as might have been worn eighty or a

hundred years ago by a gentleman of some rank--costly steel buttons and

buckles, like those yet worn in court-dresses, a handsome court

sword--in a waistcoat which had once been rich with gold lace, but which

was now blackened and foul with damp, we found five guineas, a few

silver coins, and an ivory ticket, probably for some place of

entertainment long since passed away. But our main discovery was in a

kind of iron safe fixed to the wall, the lock of which it cost us much

trouble to get picked.

In this safe were three shelves, and two small drawers. Ranged on the

shelves were several small bottles of crystal, hermetically stoppered.

They contained colorless volatile essences, of the nature of which I

shall only say that they were not poisonous--phosphor and ammonia

entered into some of them. There were also some very curious glass

tubes, and a small pointed rod of iron, with a large lump of rock

crystal, and another of amber--also a loadstone of great power.

In one of the drawers we found a miniature portrait set in gold, and

retaining the freshness of its colors most remarkably, considering the

length of time it had probably been there. The portrait was that of a

man who might be somewhat advanced in middle life, perhaps forty-seven

or forty-eight.

It was a remarkable face--a most impressive face. If you could fancy

some mighty serpent transformed into a man, preserving in the human

lineaments the old serpent type, you would have a better idea of that

countenance than long descriptions can convey; the width and flatness of

frontal--the tapering elegance of contour disguising the strength of

the deadly jaw--the long, large, terrible eye, glittering and green as

the emerald--and withal a certain ruthless calm, as if from the

consciousness of an immense power.

Mechanically I turned round the miniature to examine the back of it, and

on the back was engraved a pentacle; in the middle of the pentacle a

ladder, and the third step of the ladder was formed by the date 1765.

Examining still more minutely, I detected a spring; this, on being

pressed, opened the back of the miniature as a lid. Withinside the lid

was engraved, "Marianna to thee--Be faithful in life and in death to

----." Here follows a name that I will not mention, but it was not

unfamiliar to me. I had heard it spoken of by old men in my childhood as

the name borne by a dazzling charlatan who had made a great sensation in

London for a year or so, and had fled the country on the charge of a

double murder within his own house--that of his mistress and his rival.

I said nothing of this to Mr. J----, to whom reluctantly I resigned the

miniature.

We had found no difficulty in opening the first drawer within the iron

safe; we found great difficulty in opening the second: it was not

locked, but it resisted all efforts, till we inserted in the chinks the

edge of a chisel. When we had thus drawn it forth, we found a very

singular apparatus in the nicest order. Upon a small thin book, or

rather tablet, was placed a saucer of crystal; this saucer was filled

with a clear liquid--on that liquid floated a kind of compass, with a

needle shifting rapidly round; but instead of the usual points of the

compass were seven strange characters, not very unlike those used by

astrologers to denote the planets. A peculiar but not strong nor

displeasing odor came from this drawer, which was lined with a wood that

we afterward discovered to be hazel. Whatever the cause of this odor, it

produced a material effect on the nerves. We all felt it, even the two

workmen who were in the room--a creeping, tingling sensation from the

tips of the fingers to the roots of the hair. Impatient to examine the

tablet, I removed the saucer. As I did so the needle of the compass went

round and round with exceeding swiftness, and I felt a shock that ran

through my whole frame, so that I dropped the saucer on the floor. The

liquid was spilled--the saucer was broken--the compass rolled to the end

of the room--and at that instant the walls shook to and fro, as if a

giant had swayed and rocked them.

The two workmen were so frightened that they ran up the ladder by which

we had descended from the trap-door; but seeing that nothing more

happened, they were easily induced to return.

Meanwhile I had opened the tablet; it was bound in plain red leather,

with a silver clasp; it contained but one sheet of thick vellum, and on

that sheet were inscribed, within a double pentacle, words in old

monkish Latin, which are literally to be translated thus: "On all that

it can reach within these walls--sentient or inanimate, living or

dead--as moves the needle, so work my will! Accursed be the house, and

restless be the dwellers therein."

We found no more. Mr. J---- burned the tablet and its anathema. He razed

to the foundations the part of the building containing the secret room

with the chamber over it. He had then the courage to inhabit the house

himself for a month, and a quieter, better-conditioned house could not

be found in all London. Subsequently he let it to advantage, and his

tenant has made no complaints.

FOOTNOTE:

[Q] Reprinted by special permission from "Great Ghost Stories."

Copyright, 1918, by Dodd, Mead and Company.

* * * * *

Transcriber's Notes:

Obvious punctuation errors repaired.

Page 43, "by" changed to "my" (replied my uncle)

Page 61, "the the" changed to "the" (find the gasoline)

Page 109, "elvation" changed to "elevation" (the rear elevation)

Page 131, "ge" changed to "we" (then we got interested)

Page 132, "inspiried" changed to "inspired" (murmured Tusky, inspired)

Page 144, "Hut" changed to "Huh" ("Huh!" said Billy, grimly)

Page 177, "Wiliams" changed to "Williams" (quarreling," said Mrs.

Williams)

Page 333, "forbiding" changed to "forbidding" (forbidding the

performance)

Page 347, "matinee" changed to "matinee" (dress after the matinee)

Page 385, "well" changed to "will" (nobody will ever)

Page 391, "notural" changed to "nocturnal" (nocturnal adventure to

which)

Page 404, "succeded" changed to "succeeded" (I succeeded at last)

Page 407, "someing" changed to "something" (there was something)

End of Project Gutenberg's The Boy Scouts Book of Stories, by Various

The Boy Scouts Book of Stories · 第 22 / 22 段