LETTER 127.

To John Temple, Esq; Pall Mall.

Silleri, April 18.

Indeed?

"Is this that haughty, gallant, gay Lothario,

That dear perfidious--"

Absolutely, my dear Temple, the sex ought never to forgive Lucy for

daring to monopolize so very charming a fellow. I had some thoughts of

a little _badinage_ with you myself, if I should return soon to

England; but I now give up the very idea.

One thing I will, however, venture to say, that love Lucy as much as

you please, you will never love her half so well as she deserves;

which, let me tell you, is a great deal for one woman, especially, as

you well observe, one handsome woman, to say of another.

I am, however, not quite clear your idea is just: _cattism_, if

I may be allowed the expression, seeming more likely to be the vice of

those who are conscious of wanting themselves the dear power of

pleasing.

Handsome women ought to be, what I profess myself, who am however

only pretty, too vain to be envious; and yet we see, I am afraid, too

often, some little sparks of this mean passion between rival beauties.

Impartially speaking, I believe the best natured women, and the most

free from envy, are those who, without being very handsome, have that

_je ne sçai quoi_, those nameless graces, which please even without

beauty; and who therefore, finding more attention paid to them by men

than their looking-glass tells them they have a right to expect, are

for that reason in constant good humor with themselves, and of course

with every body else: whereas beauties, claiming universal empire, are

at war with all who dispute their rights; that is, with half the sex.

I am very good natured myself; but it is, perhaps, because, though a

pretty woman, I am more agreable than handsome, and have an infinity of

the _je ne sçai quoi_.

_A propos_, my dear Temple, I am so pleased with what

Montesquieu says on this subject, that I find it is not in my nature to

resist translating and inserting it; you cannot then say I have sent

you a letter in which there is nothing worth reading.

I beg you will read this to the misses, for which you cannot fail of

their thanks, and for this reason; there are perhaps a dozen women in

the world who do not think themselves handsome, but I will venture to

say, not one who does not think herself agreable, and that she has this

nameless charm, this so much talked of _I know not what_, which is

so much better than beauty. But to my Montesquieu:

"There is sometimes, both in persons and things, an invisible charm,

a natural grace, which we cannot define, and which we are therefore

obliged to call the _je ne sçai quoi_.

"It seems to me that this is an effect principally founded on

surprize.

"We are touched that a person pleases us more than she seemed at

first to have a right to do; and we are agreably surprized that she

should have known how to conquer those defects which our eyes shewed

us, but which our hearts no longer believe: 'tis for this reason that

women, who are not handsome, have often graces or agreablenesses and

that beautiful ones very seldom have.

"For a beautiful person does generally the very contrary of what we

expected; she appears to us by degrees less amiable, and, after having

surprized us pleasingly, she surprizes us in a contrary manner; but

the agreable impression is old, the disagreable one new: 'tis also

seldom that beauties inspire violent passions, which are almost always

reserved for those who have graces, that is to say, agreablenesses,

which we did not expect, and which we had no reason to expect.

"Magnificent habits have seldom grace, which the dresses of

shepherdesses often have.

"We admire the majesty of the draperies of Paul Veronese; but we are

touched with the simplicity of Raphael, and the exactness of Corregio.

"Paul Veronese promises much, and pays all he promises; Raphael and

Corregio promise little, and pay much, which pleases us more.

"These graces, these agreablenesses, are found oftener in the mind

than in the countenance: the charms of a beautiful countenance are

seldom hidden, they appear at first view; but the mind does not shew

itself except by degrees, when it pleases, and as much as it pleases;

it can conceal itself in order to appear, and give that species of

surprize to which those graces, of which I speak, owe their existence.

"This grace, this agreableness, is less in the countenance than in

the manner; the manner changes every instant, and can therefore every

moment give us the pleasure of surprize: in one word, a woman can be

handsome but in one way, but she may be agreable in a hundred

thousand."

I like this doctrine of Montesquieu's extremely, because it gives

every woman her chance, and because it ranks me above a thousand

handsomer women, in the dear power of inspiring passion.

Cruel creature! why did you give me the idea of flowers? I now envy

you your foggy climate: the earth with you is at this moment covered

with a thousand lovely children of the spring; with us, it is an

universal plain of snow.

Our beaux are terribly at a loss for similies: you have lilies of

the valley for comparisons; we nothing but what with the idea of

whiteness gives that of coldness too.

This is all the quarrel I have with Canada: the summer is delicious,

the winter pleasant with all its severities; but alas! the smiling

spring is not here; we pass from winter to summer in an instant, and

lose the sprightly season of the Loves.

A letter from the God of my idolatry--I must answer it instantly.

Adieu! Yours, &c.

A. Fermor.

The History of Emily Montague · 第 152 / 298 题