TITLES.

But a very short time had elapsed, at the date of this story, since the

titles of Lord and Lady had been restricted to members of the Royal

Family alone, when used with the Christian name only. A great deal of

this feeling was still left; and it will be commonly found (I do not say

universally) that when persons of the sixteenth century used the

definite article instead of the possessive pronoun, before a title and a

Christian name, they meant to indicate that they regarded him of whom

they spoke as a royal person. Let me instance Lord Guilford Dudley.

Those who called him "_the_ Lord Guilford" were partisans of Lady Jane

Grey: those from whose lips he was "my Lord Guilford _Dudley_" were

against her. This is perhaps still more remarkable in the case of

Arthur Lord Lisle, whom many persons looked upon as the legitimate son

of Edward the Fourth. As a Viscount, his daughters of course had no

claim to the title of Lady; those who gave it regarded him as a Prince.

Oddly enough, his friends generally give the higher title, his servants

the lower. From his agent Husee it is always _Mrs_ Frances, never Lady;

but from Sir Francis Lovell her sister is the "Lady Elyzabeth

Plantagenet."

Robin Tremayne A Story of the Marian Persecution · 第 56 / 57 题