CHAPTER IV.

THE DISTRIBUTION AND COMPOSITION OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FORESTS.

The forests of the United States, Map, Fig. 44, may be conveniently

divided into two great regions, the Eastern or Atlantic Forest,

and the Western or Pacific Forest. These are separated by the great

treeless plains which are west of the Mississippi River, and east of

the Rocky Mountains, and which extend from North Dakota to western

Texas.[1]

[Illustration: Fig. 44. Forest Regions of the United States. _U. S.

Forest Service._]

The Eastern Forest once consisted of an almost unbroken mass, lying in

three quite distinct regions, (1) the northern belt of conifers, (2)

the southern belt of conifers, and (3) the great deciduous (hardwood)

forest lying between these two.

(1) The northern belt of conifers or "North Woods" extended

thru northern New England and New York and ran south along the

Appalachians. It reappeared again in northern Michigan, Wisconsin and

Minnesota. White pine, Fig. 45, was the characteristic tree in the

eastern part of this belt, tho spruce was common, Fig. 56, p. 213,

and white and Norway pine and hemlock distinguished it in the western

part. Altho the more valuable timber, especially the pine, has been

cut out, it still remains a largely unbroken forest mainly of spruce,

second growth pine, hemlock and some hardwood.

[Illustration: Fig. 45. Interior of Dense White Pine Forest, Cass

Lake, Minn. _U. S. Forest Service._]

(2) The southern pine forest formerly extended from the Potomac River

in a belt from one to two hundred miles wide along the Atlantic coast,

across the Florida peninsula, and along the gulf of Mexico, skipping

the Mississippi River and reappearing in a great forest in Louisiana

and Eastern Texas. It was composed of almost pure stands of pine, the

long-leaf, Fig. 46, the short-leaf, and the loblolly, with cypress

in the swamps and bottom lands. In southern Florida the forest is

tropical, Fig. 47, like that of the West Indies, and in southern Texas

it partakes of the character of the Mexican forest.

[Illustration: Fig. 46. Long-leaf Pine Forest. Oscilla, Georgia. _U.

S. Forest Service._]

[Illustration: Fig. 47. Semi-tropical Forest, Florida. Live Oak,

Surrounded by Cabbage Palmetto, and Hung With Spanish Moss. _U. S.

Forest Service._]

(3) Between these north and south coniferous belts, lay the great

broad-leaf or hardwood forest, Fig. 48, which constituted the greater

part of the Eastern Forest and characterized it. It was divided into

two parts by an irregular northeast and southwest line, running from

southern New England to Missouri. The southeast portion consisted

of hardwoods intermixed with conifers. The higher ridges of the

Appalachian Range, really a leg of the northern forest, were occupied

by conifers, mainly spruce, white pine, and hemlock. The northwest

portion of the region, particularly Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, was

without the conifers. It was essentially a mixed forest, largely oak,

with a variable mixture of maples, beech, chestnut, yellow poplar,

hickory, sycamore, elm, and ash, with birch appearing toward the north

and pine toward the south.

[Illustration: Fig. 48. Broad-leaf Forest, Protected from Cattle and

Fire. Hancock Co., Indiana. _U. S. Forest Service._]

Taking the Eastern Forest as a whole, its most distinguishing feature

was the prevalence of broad-leaved trees, so that it might properly be

called a deciduous forest. The greatest diversity of trees was to be

found in Kentucky, Tennessee and North Carolina, and this region is

still the source of the best hardwood lumber.

This great eastern forest, which once extended uninterruptedly from

the Atlantic to the Mississippi and beyond, has now been largely

lumbered off, particularly thru the middle or hardwood portion, making

way for farms and towns. The north and south coniferous belts are

still mainly unbroken, and are sparsely settled, but the big timber

is cut out, giving place to poorer trees. This is particularly true of

the white pine, "the king of American trees," only a little of which,

in valuable sizes, is left in Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota. In

the same way in the south, the long-leaf pine, once the characteristic

tree, is fast being lumbered out.

[Illustration: Fig. 49. Irrigated Ranch on Treeless Alkali Plain. Rio

Blanco Co., Colorada. _U. S. Forest Service._]

The Western or Pacific forest extends two great legs, one down the

Rocky Mountain Range, and the other along the Pacific coast. Between

them lies the great treeless alkali plain centering around Nevada,

Fig. 49. In these two regions coniferous trees have almost a monopoly.

Broad-leaved trees are to be found there, along the river beds and in

ravines, but they are of comparatively little importance. The forest

is essentially an evergreen forest. Another marked feature of this

western forest, except in the Puget Sound region, is that the trees,

in many cases, stand far apart, their crowns not even touching, so

that the sun beats down and dries up the forest floor, Fig. 50.

There is no dense "forest cover" or canopy as in the Eastern Forest.

Moreover these western forests are largely broken up, covering but a

part of the mountains, many of which are snow-clad, and interrupted

by bare plains. Along the creeks there grow a variety of hardwoods. It

was never a continuous forest as was the Eastern Forest. The openness

of this forest on the Rockies and on the eastern slopes of the Sierra

Nevadas is in marked contrast to the western slopes of the Sierras,

where there are to be seen the densest and most remarkable woods of

the world, Fig. 51. This is due to the peculiar distribution of the

rainfall of the region. The precipitation of the moisture upon the

northwest coast where the trees are dripping with fog a large part of

the time, is unequaled by that of any other locality on the continent.

But the interior of this region, which is shut off by the high

Sierra Nevadas from the western winds, has a very light and irregular

rainfall. Where the rainfall is heavy, the forests are dense; and

where the rainfall is light, the trees are sparse.

[Illustration: Fig. 50. Open Western Forest, Bull Pine. Flagstaff,

Arizona. _U. S. Forest Service._]

Along the Rockies the characteristic trees are Engelmann's spruce,

bull pine, Douglas fir, and lodgepole pine. As one goes west, the

variety of trees increases and becomes, so far as conifers are

concerned, far greater than in the east. Of 109 conifers in the United

States, 80 belong to the western forests and 28 to the eastern. The

Pacific forest is rich in the possession of half a dozen leading

species--Douglas fir, western hemlock, sugar pine, bull pine, cedar

and redwood.

[Illustration: Fig. 51. Dense Forest of Puget Sound Region, Red Fir

and Red Cedar. Pierce Co., Washington. _U. S. Forest Service._]

But the far western conifers are remarkable, not only for their

variety, but still more for the density of their growth, already

mentioned, and for their great size, Fig. 52. The pines, spruces and

hemlocks of the Puget Sound region make eastern trees look small, and

both the red fir and the redwood often grow to be over 250 feet high,

and yield 100,000 feet, B.M., to the acre as against 10,000 feet,

B.M., of good spruce in Maine. The redwood, Fig. 53, occupies a belt

some twenty miles wide along the coast from southern Oregon to a point

not far north of San Francisco and grows even taller than the famous

big trees. The big trees are the largest known trees in diameter,

occasionally reaching in that measurement 35 feet.

[Illustration: Fig. 52. Virgin Forest of Red Fir, Red Cedar, Western

Hemlock, and Oregon Maple. Ashford, Washington. _U. S. Forest

Service._]

[Illustration: Fig. 53. Redwood Forest. Santa Cruz Co., Calif. _U. S.

Forest Service._]

The big tree, Fig. 54, occurs exclusively in groves, which, however,

are not pure, but are scattered among a much larger number of trees of

other kinds.

[Illustration: Fig. 54. Big Tree Forest. Sierra National Forest,

California. _U. S. Forest Service._]

The great and unsurpassed Puget Sound forest is destined to be before

long the center of the lumber trade of this country.

These two great forests of the east and the west both run northward

into British America, and are there united in a broad belt of

subarctic forest which extends across the continent. At the far north

it is characterized by the white spruce and aspen. The forest is open,

stunted, and of no economic value.

Taking all the genera and species together, there is a far greater

variety in the eastern than in the western forests. A considerable

number of genera, perhaps a third of the total, grow within both

regions, but the species having continental range are few. They

are the following: Larch (_Larix laricina_), white spruce (_Picea

canadensis_), dwarf juniper (_Juniperus communis_), black willow

(_Salix nigra_), almond leaf willow (_Salix amygdaloides_), long leaf

willow (_Salix fluviatilis_), aspen (_Populus tremuloides_), balm of

Gilead (_Populus balsamifera_), and hackberry (_Celtis occidentalis_).

[Footnote 1: ORIGINAL FOREST REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES.

Area Area

Thousand acres Per cent.

Northern forest 158,938 8.4

Hardwood forest 328,183 17.3

Southern forest 249,669 13.1

Rocky Mountains forest 155,014 8.1

Pacific forest 121,356 6.4

Treeless area 887,787 46.7

--------- -----

Total land area 1,900,947 100.0

]

THE DISTRIBUTION AND COMPOSITION OF NORTH AMERICAN FORESTS.

REFERENCES:[A]

Sargent, _Forest Trees_, Intro., pp. 3-10.

Bruncken, pp. 5-16.

Roth, _First Book_, pp. 209-212.

Shaler, I, pp. 489-498.

Fernow, _For. Inves._, pp. 45-51.

Fernow, _Economics_, pp. 331-368.

[Footnote A: For general bibliography, see p. 4.]

Wood and Forest · 第 4 / 8 章