HOW OLD

then are the mounds? If our conclusions are correct the oldest mound

in our region cannot exceed 800 years, and the most recent must have

been completed upwards of 400 years ago. Look at further

considerations, which lead to these conclusions. We learn, that 200

years ago, viz.: in 1683, the "Clistinos" and "Assinipouals" (Crees

and Assiniboines) were in their present country. The Crees were at

that time in the habit of visiting both Lake Superior and Hudson's Bay

for the purpose of trade. They were then extensive nations and no

trace of a nation which preceded them was got from them. The fallen

tree on the top of the grand mound, judging by the concentric rings of

its trunk is 150 or 200 years old, and yet its stump stands in a foot

or more of mould that must have taken longer than that time to form.

Even among savage nations it would take upwards of half a dozen

generations of men, to lose the memory of so great a catastrophe as

the destruction of a former populous race. Then some 400 years ago

would agree with the time of extermination of the Hochelagans, or with

the destruction of the Eries, who according to Labontan were blotted

out before the French came to the continent. The Hochelagans, Eries,

and Takawgamis being northern in their habitat, I take it were among

the last of the Toltecans who survived. The white man but arrived upon

the scene to succeed the farmer, the metal worker and the potter, who

had passed away so disastrously, and to be the avenger of the lost

race, in driving before him the savage red man.

The Mound Builders · 第 27 / 31 题