Do not imagine, then, that I am apologizing for Tegnér, I am merely

trying to account for him. From his Homer, whom he loved above all other

poets, he had in a measure derived that artistic paganism which

perceptibly colored his personality. There was nothing of the scholarly

prig or pedant about him. In his lectures he gave himself, his own view

of life, and his own interpretation of his authors. And it was because

of the greatness of the man, the unhackneyed vigor of his speech, and

the power of his intellect that the students flocked to his lecture-hall

and listened with enthusiasm to his teaching.

I am not by any means sure, however, that much of his popularity was

also due to what, at this stage of his career, may without disrespect

be called his immaturity. That wholesome robustness in his acceptance

of life which finds utterance in his early songs must have established a

quick bond of sympathy between him and his youthful hearers. The

instincts of the predatory man were yet strong in him. The tribal

feeling which we call patriotism, the juvenile defiance which carries a

chip on its shoulder as a challenge to the world, the boastful

self-assertion which is always ridiculous in every nation but our

own--impart a splendid martial resonance to his first notable poem,

"War-Song for the Scanian Reserves" (1808). There was a charming, frank

ferocity in this patriotic bugle-blast which found an echo in every

Swedish heart. The rapid dactylic metres, with the captivating rhymes,

alternating with the more contemplative trochees, were admirably adapted

for conveying the ebullient indignation and wrath which hurls its

gauntlet into the face of fate itself,[28] checked, as it were, and

cooled by soberer reflection and retrospective regret. It is the sorrow

for the yet recent loss of Finland which inspires the elegiac tones in

Tegnér's war-song; and it is his own ardent, youthful spirit, his own

deep and sincere love of country, which awakes the martial melody with

the throbbing of the drum and the rousing alarum of trumpets. What can

be more delightfully--shall I say juvenile--than this reference to the

numerical superiority of the Muscovites:

"Many, are they? Well, then, of the many

Sweden shall drink the red blood and be free!

Many? We count not the warriors' numbers

Only the fallen shall numbered be."

[28]

"Vi Kaste var handske

Mot ödet sjelf."

It is with no desire to disparage Tegnér that I say that this strain,

which is that of all his early war-songs, is extremely becoming to him.

It is not a question of the legitimacy of the sentiment, but of the

fulness and felicity of its expression. As long as we have wars we must

have martial bards, and with the exception of the German, Theodor

Körner, I know none who can bear comparison with Tegnér. English

literature can certainly boast no war-poem which would not be drowned in

the mighty music of Tegnér's "Svea," "The Scanian Reserves," and that

magnificent, dithyrambic declamation, "King Charles, the Young Hero."

Tennyson's "Charge of the Light Brigade" is technically a finer poem

than anything Tegnér has written, but it lacks the deep virile bass, the

tremendous volume of breath and voice, and the captivating martial lilt

which makes the heart beat willy nilly to the rhythm of the verse.

The popularity which Tegnér gained by "The Scanian Reserves" was the

immediate cause of his appointment to a professorship at the University

of Lund, and his next notable poem, "Svea," which won him the great

prize of the Swedish Academy, raised him to a height of fame which

naturally led to further promotion. According to the curious custom of

Sweden, a professor may, even though he has never studied theology, take

orders and accept the charge of a parish. He is regarded as being, by

dint of his learning, in the regular line of clerical promotion; and the

elevation from a professorship (though it be not a theological one) into

a bishopric is no infrequent occurrence. There was therefore nothing

anomalous in Tegnér's appointment (February, 1812) as pastor of Stäfvie

and Lackalänge, and his subsequent promotion (February, 1824) to the

bishopric of Wexiö. His pastorate he was permitted to combine with his

professorship of Greek, to which he was simultaneously transferred from

that of æsthetics, and the office was chiefly valuable to him on account

of the addition which it procured him to his income. The nearness of his

parish to Lund enabled him to preach in the country on Sundays as

regularly as he lectured in the city on week-days. His other pastoral

duties he could not very well discharge _in absentia_, and they probably

remained in a measure undischarged. He had not sought the parish; it was

the parish which had sought him; and he exerted himself to the utmost to

fill the less congenial office as conscientiously as he did his academic

chair. The peasants of Stäfvie and Lackalänge were always welcome at his

hospitable board; he gave them freely his advice, and in order to recall

and emphasize his own kinship with them, he invited a peasant woman to

become the godmother of his youngest son, and selected all the sponsors

from the same class.

This was not the only occasion on which Tegnér demonstrated his

superiority to all snobbish pretensions. He was not only not ashamed of

his peasant descent, but he was proud of it. Once (1811) during a visit

to Rämen, he took it into his head that he desired to know, from actual

experience, the kind of lives which his ancestors must have lived; and

to that end he dressed himself in wadmal, loaded a dray with pig-iron,

greased its axles, harnessed his team, and drove it to the nearest city,

a distance of ten to twelve miles. He induced three of his

brothers-in-law, two of whom were army officers and one a government

clerk, to follow his example. Up hill and down hill they trudged, and

arrived late in the afternoon, footsore and with blistered hands, in the

town, where they reported at the office of a commission merchant, sold

their iron and obtained their receipts. That of Tegnér was made out to

Esaias Esaiasson, which would have been his name, if his father had

never risen from the soil. The four sham peasants now bought seed-corn

with the money they had obtained for their iron, loaded again their

wagons, and started for home. But they had forgotten to take into

account the robustness of the rustic appetite, and before they had

proceeded far their bag of provisions was empty. To add to their

discomfort the rain began to pour down, but they would not seek

shelter. After midnight they arrived at Rämen, hungry and drenched, not

having slept for two nights, but happy and proud of their feat of

endurance.

It was in 1811 that Tegnér's poem "Svea" received the prize of the

Swedish Academy; and the fact that it recalled (in single passages at

least) Oehlenschläger's "The Golden Horns," does not seem to have

weighed in the verdict. It is not in any sense an imitation; but there

is an audible reminiscence which is unmistakable in the metre and

cadence of the short-lined verses, descriptive of the vision. Never, I

fancy, had the Swedish language been made to soar with so strong a

wing-beat, never before had it been made to sing so bold a melody. To

me, I admit, "Svea" is too rhetorical to make any deep impression. It

has a certain stately academic form, which, as it were, impedes its

respiration and freedom of movement. When, for all that, I speak of

wing-beat and melody, it must be borne in mind that Sweden had produced

no really great poet[29] before Tegnér; and that thus, relatively

considered, the statement is true. But Tegnér seems himself to have

been conscious of the strait-jacket in which the old academic rules

confined him, for in the middle of the poem he suddenly discards the

stilted Alexandrines with which he had commenced and breaks into a

rapturous old-Norse chant, the abrupt metres of which recall the

_fornyrdhalag_ of the Elder Edda. Soon after "Svea" followed, in 1812,

"The Priestly Consecration," the occasion of which was the poet's own

ordination. Here the oratorical note and a certain clerical rotundity of

utterance come very near spoiling the melody. "At the Jubilee in Lund"

(1817) is very much in the same strain, and begins with the statement so

characteristic of Tegnér:

"Thou who didst the brave twin stars enkindle,

Reason and Religion, guard the twain!

Each shines by other; else they fade and dwindle.[30]

Fill with clearness every human brain:

Faith and hope in every bosom reign!"

[29] Carl Michael Bellman, the Swedish Béranger (1740-1795), whose

wanton music resounded through the latter half of the eighteenth

century, would, no doubt, by many be called a great poet. But his

Bacchanalian strain, though at times exquisite and captivating,

lacks the universality of sentiment and that depth of resonance of

which greatness can alone be predicated. Both his wild mirth and his

sombre melancholy exhale the aroma of ardent spirits.

[30] This line reads literally: "Guard them both; they are willingly

reconciled."

He was, in fact, never very orthodox; and if he had belonged to the

American branch of his denomination would surely have been tried for

heresy. Rarely has a deadlier foe of priestly obscurantism and mediæval

mysteries worn the episcopal robes. With doctrinal subtleties and

ingenious hair-splitting he had no patience; conduct was with him the

main, if not the only, thing to be considered. The Christian Church, as

he conceived it, was primarily a civilizer, and the expression of the

highest ethical sentiment of the age.

"The Church," he writes, "can surely not be re-established in its former

religious significance, for the system upon which it rests has slept

away three centuries of history; and it is of no use that this man or

that man yet pretends to believe in the somnambulist. But the church has

also a civic significance as an integral part of the social order of

humanity. If you abandon that to the spirit of laxity and drowsiness, I

can see no reason why the clergy and the whole religious apparatus

should not be, and ought not to be, abolished and their costs covered

into the treasury."

These are not highly episcopal sentiments; but they are in keeping with

Tegnér's whole personality and his conception of his duty. His first

concern was to purge his diocese of drunken clergymen, a task in which

he encountered many unforeseen difficulties.

"It is nowadays less difficult," he says, "to get rid of a king than a

drunken clergyman."

He was, indeed, very moderate in his demands, stipulating only that no

shepherd of souls should show himself drunk in public. But the bibulous

parsons frequently had influential relatives, who exerted themselves

with the government to thwart the bishop's reformatory schemes. If

Tegnér had not been the masterful, tireless, energetic prelate that he

was, his ardor would have cooled; and he would have contented himself

with drawing the revenues of his office, and left with the lukewarm

government the responsibility for frustrating his purposes. But this was

contrary to his nature. He could not calmly contemplate abuses which it

was his duty to remedy; and no discouragement ever sufficed to dampen

his noble zeal. The marked and fanatical pietism which then was much

diffused among the Småland peasantry he fought with his cheerful gospel

of reason and sanity. Just as poetry to him meant the highest bloom of

life, and his radiant lyre resounded with noble music like the statue of

Memnon, when touched by the rays of the dawn; so religion was, in its

essence, perfect sanity of soul, a beautiful equilibrium of mind, and

complete self-mastery. His Christ was not primarily the bleeding, the

scourged, the crucified, but rather a benigner and lovelier Phoebus

Apollo, the bringer of clearness and light, the dispeller of the

unwholesome mists and barbaric gloom that yet brood over the human soul.

Like Goethe, he cherished a veritable abhorrence of the mystic symbolism

of the mediæval church; and was rather inclined to minimize the

significance of Christ's death and passion. He had undeniably imparted

into his Christianity a great deal of sunny Hellenic paganism--a fact

which in his familiar correspondence with Franzén he scarcely cares to

disguise.

Having this conception of the episcopal office, he could not escape

emphasizing his function as the supervisor of the schools of his

diocese. If he was to be a civilizer on any great scale, the chance

which was here afforded him to impress his ideals upon the rising

generation was not one to be neglected. And, as a matter of fact, Tegnér

was indefatigable in his labors as an educator. His many speeches at

school celebrations preached, as ever, a gospel derived from Greece

rather than Judæa; and half-improvised though some of them appear to be,

they contain passages of lofty eloquence.

It was inevitable that a bishop of such commanding personality, who

wielded his authority at times somewhat ruthlessly, should make enemies.

But, on the other hand, the beautiful beneficence and sincere humanity

of the man often obliterated the ill-feeling which his official severity

had aroused. To the widows of deceased clergymen in his diocese he was a

veritable guardian, to their children a father, to his peasantry a

friend, adviser, and monitor. He was an expert at detecting errors in

ecclesiastical balance-sheets; and woe to the cleric who dared present

to him inaccurate accounts of income and expenditures. By sheer dint of

his personal superiority and that quality of soul which George Eliot

calls dynamic, he impressed himself strongly upon all with whom he came

in contact; and though he was feared, he was also beloved as few. A very

delightful instance of the reverence with which he was regarded is

recorded by Böttiger.

One summer evening he arrived at a remote parsonage which had never, in

the memory of man, been visited by a bishop. Some time after his arrival

Tegnér observed two young ladies, the daughters of the house, coming

across the yard carrying between them a big tub, full of water. When he

asked them, in a friendly way, why they subjected themselves to such

hard labor, one of them replied: "Should we not regard it as an honor to

be allowed to water the bishop's horses?"

In order to give a clear and coherent idea of Tegnér in his prime, I

have been obliged to anticipate events. Many literary achievements which

I have left unrecorded belong to the period previous to his assumption

of the bishopric of Wexiö. Unhappily Professor Böttiger's edition is

very chary of dates, and as Dr. Brandes has truly observed, is arranged

with the obvious purpose of falsifying the sequence of Tegnér's poems

and confusing the reader. The three periods--previous to 1812, 1812-40,

and 1840-46--are entirely arbitrary, and plainly devised with a view to

concealing, in so far as they are capable of concealment, the unhappy

events which undermined the strength of the Titan and wrecked his

splendid powers. But such a purpose is utterly futile, as long as the

poems themselves had once escaped into publicity.

It was during the period while his sky was yet unclouded that Tegnér

enriched Swedish literature with a series of lyrics which in point of

lucidity of thought and brilliancy of diction have rarely been

surpassed. It may be admitted, without materially detracting from his

merit, that in some of them the foreign models from which they were in a

measure fashioned shimmer through. Just as the Germans, Gottsched and

Bodmer, held foreign models to be indispensable, and only disagreed as

to which were the best, so the Swedish Academy, which in its

predilections was French, had no scruple in recommending this or that

literary form for imitation. That degree of literary independence which

Germany reached with Goethe and Schiller, who discarded all models, the

Scandinavian countries did not reach until a much later period; and

Tegnér was one of those who stimulated that national self-respect

without which independence is impossible.

A strong spiritual kinship drew him to Schiller, whose splendor of

imagery and impassioned rhetoric were the very gifts which he himself in

a superlative degree possessed. The breath of political and religious

liberalism which pervades the writings of the German poet was also

highly congenial to Tegnér, and last, but not least, they were both

light-loving, beauty-worshipping Hellenists, and, though externally

conformists, hid joyous pagan souls under imperfect Christian draperies.

Small blame it is therefore to Tegnér that Schiller's poems furnished

him with frequent suggestions and sometimes also with metres. Schiller

had, in "The Gods of Greece," sung a glorious elegy on the Olympian age

which stimulated his Swedish rival to write "The Asa Age," in which he

regretted, though in a rather half-hearted way, the disappearance of

Odin, Thor, and Freya. The poem, it must be admitted, falls much below

Tegnér at his best. Schiller's "Three Words of Faith," in which liberty,

virtue, and God are declared to be the only essentials of religion,

finds a parallel (which even retains the metre) in Tegnér's "The

Eternal," in which truth, justice, and beauty are substituted. A kindred

poetic creed is far more consciously proclaimed in the famous poem

_Sangen_ (Poetry), which was primarily a protest against the gloomy and

morbid view of poetry entertained by the Swedish Romanticists (the

so-called Phosphorists). Tegnér here declares that the poet "with

heavenly joy embraces life," that "he knows no weak lament" (at its

misery), "no dissonance which is not dissolved" (in harmony). His temple

stands in light and flame; and at its base a fountain gurgles, a draught

from which is an elixir of strength and a panacea for all ills.

"Well, then," he continues, "from this fountain will I drink, if I am

worthy of such a draught. With healthy eyes will I look about me in the

sick world. My golden lyre shall not resound with sorrows which I myself

have invented. For the poet's sorrows are none; and the sky of song is

forever bright."

Peter Amadeus Atterbom, the leader of the Phosphorists, replied with

much moderation and good sense to the obvious reflections upon his

school which this poem contained. He intimates plainly enough that

Tegnér's philosophy of life, in so far as it ignores sin and sorrow,

which are too real to be banished by song, is a hopelessly shallow one.

"The undissolved dissonances," he says, "in the sense in which Mr.

Tegnér uses the expression, certainly betray a disease of the soul, but

this disease is not peculiar to a temperament which is fostered by a

personal emotional affinity for lugubrious topics and ideas given by

birth and developed by circumstances; but it is inherent in the weakness

(which at times doubtless surprises even the strongest ...) of desiring

to set up its sorrowful view of the world as a theory, and treat it as

absolutely true and fundamentally valid for all. Sorrow, as such, is no

more a diseased state than is joy; both are alike primordial, necessary,

indispensable elements and halves of human life. Who would venture to

assert that the day might dispense with the night? And does not the

latter's glorious starry sky rival in majesty (though different in kind)

the former's bright and dazzling blitheness?"

The fact was that Tegnér's cheery sun-worship was as much temperamental

as was Atterbom's sentimental reveries and nocturnal melancholy. The

Phosphorist is unquestionably right, however, in asserting that as a

theory of life the one is as limited and imperfect as the other. It was

because of the abhorrence of all the darker phases of existence that

Tegnér's bright Hellenic muse never struck those notes which thrill

with deepest resonance through the human heart. Tegnér's acquaintance

with suffering during the early part of his career was chiefly a

literary one, and like Goethe he went far out of his way to avoid the

sight of it. As there can be no victory without combat--no laurel

without dust--the Mount of Transfiguration is not reached except through

the valley of the Shadow of Death.

There are, however, many fair flowers to be plucked in Tempe and the

blooming vales of Arcady. Goethe had in 1798 published "Hermann and

Dorothea," the form of which was Greek, though the theme was Teutonic;

and Tegnér's "Children of the Lord's Supper" (1820), which Longfellow

has translated so admirably into English, derived its inspiration

primarily from the German idyl:

"Pentecost, day of rejoicing, had come, the church of the village

Stood, gleaming white in the morning sheen. On the spire of the belfry,

Decked with a brazen cock, the friendly flames of the spring sun

Glanced like the tongues of fire beheld by Apostles aforetime."

Thus run the beautiful, stately hexameters, which, whatever cavilling

critics may say, are delightfully adapted for epic narrative in any

fairly polysyllabic language. And Swedish, which is the most sonorous of

all Germanic tongues, and full of Gothic strength, produces the most

delectable effects in the long, rolling line of slow-marching dactyls

and spondees. The tempered realism of Tegnér, which shuns all that is

harsh and trite, accords well with the noble classical verse. He employs

it, as it were, to dignify his homely tale, as Raphael draped the

fishermen of Galilee in the flowing robes of Greek philosophers. The

description of the church, the rustic youth, and the patriarchal

clergyman has, however, the note of experience and the touch of earth

which we miss in the more declamatory passages. If, however, declamation

is anywhere in place it is in the three orations of the rural parson,

which occupy the larger portion of the poem. It is all very lovely and

edifying; full of sacred eloquence and a grand amplitude of phrase which

is distinctly clerical.

The romantic tale of "Axel" (1822), modelled after Byron's narrative

poems, rejoiced in a greater popularity, in spite of the carping

criticism with which it was received by the _Svensk Litteratur-Tidning,_

the organ of the Phosphorists. Though, to be sure, the merits of the

poem are largely ignored in this review, it is undeniable that the

faults which are emphasized do exist. First, the frequent violations of

probability (which, by the way, ought not to have been so offensive to a

romanticist) draw tremendous draughts upon the reader's credulity; and

secondly, the lavish magnificence of imagery rarely adds to the

vividness of the situations, but rather obscures and confuses them. It

reminds one of a certain style of barocque architecture in which the

rage for ornamentation twists every line into a scroll or spiral or

arabesque, until whatever design there originally was is lost in a riot

of decoration. The metaphors exist for their own sake, and are in nowise

subordinate to the themes which they profess to illustrate. Take, for

instance, the oft-quoted passage:

"The night drew near, and in the west

Upon its couch lay Evening dreaming,

And silent, like the priests of Egypt,

The stars pursued their radiant paths,

And earth stood in the starry eve,

As blissful as a bride who stands,

The garland in her dusky hair,

Beneath the baldaquin and blushes.

Tired of the games of day, and warm,

The Naïad rested, still and smiling,

The glow of evening shone resplendent,

A gorgeous rose upon her breast;

And merry Cupid, who had slept

When sun was high, awoke and rode

Upon the moonbeams up and down,

With bow and arrow, through the forest."

This is all very magnificent; but the images tread so close upon each

other's heels, that they come near treading each other down, and

tumbling together in a confused jumble. I claim no originality in

calling attention to the fact that it must have been a colossal Naïad

who could wear the evening glow like "a gorgeous rose upon her breast."

Likewise former critics have questioned whether the stars gain in the

least in vividness by being compared to the priests of Egypt,[31] who

were certainly far less familiar to the reader's vision.

[31] L. Dietrichson: Indledning i Studiet af Sveriges Litteratur.

Kjöbenhavn, 1862. See also Svensk Litteratur-Tidning as quoted in B.

E. Malmström: Grunddragen af Svenska Vitterhetens Historia, vol. v.,

p. 423. Oerebro.

Essays on Scandinavian Literature · 第 13 / 16 段