I drove with the younger M. Guary through a charming bit of woodland

country, to visit a newly-opened pit--the Lagrange pit. Part of the way

led us through a large forest full of fine, well-grown trees. The

shooting in this forest is good, chiefly deer and pheasants. It belongs

to the domain of the State, and is leased to a former director of Anzin.

That the country is a pleasant land to live in appears from such facts

as this, as well as from the blue, yellow, russet and rose-pink houses

which enliven the long highway from Valenciennes, and are the

habitations of well-to-do people living here on their incomes. From

Valenciennes to the Belgian frontier, indeed, the road is virtually one

long continuous street of houses and gardens, as the railway is between

New York and Philadelphia.

M. Guary pointed out to me the house of another ex-director of Anzin who

has invested in a considerable tract of land here, on which he has put

up a number of exceedingly neat houses. They are built of brick, like

the small houses to which the working-men of Philadelphia are indebted

to the philanthropic enterprise of Mr. Drexel and Mr. Childs; but I

think it would astonish Mr. Drexel and Mr. Childs to know that a brick

house, containing four good 'upright' rooms and two good garret rooms,

all wainscoted in hard wood and well fitted up, well drained, and with a

large cellar and a garden rather wider than the house, running back for

several hundred yards to a fringe of picturesque forest, can be rented

here, from this private proprietor, for 120 francs, or $24 a year.

At an average wage of 4 fr. 50 c. a day, working 25 days in the month,

an average workman at Anzin may easily earn 1,350 francs a year, so that

he may rent such a house as I have here described for a good deal less

than one-tenth of his income. What is the ordinary proportion between

the house-rent and the income of a respectable tradesman or mechanic in

New York? But the Anzin workman who rents such a house as this on such

terms, enjoys also free fuel, free medical attendance, and schooling for

his children.

We called at one of these private houses, seeing the miner, whom M.

Guary knew very well, standing at ease in his doorway and surveying the

scene with a pipe in his mouth. He was a shrewd, stalwart man of about

forty, who glanced down complacently at his own well-developed limbs and

laughed scornfully when I asked him what he thought of a proposition I

had seen made at Paris, by a friend of the workmen, that forty should be

fixed as the age of retiring pensions for miners. 'He may be a friend,'

said the miner, 'but certainly he is not a miner!'

This miner had long done his day's work in the mine, and after his pipe

was going to work in his garden, where his vegetables were coming

forward very well. Nothing could have been better than his

manners--quiet, manly, civil, without the rather aggravating slyness of

the ordinary French peasant, and with absolutely nothing of the

infantine swagger of the small French _bourgeois_. These miners here

wear a picturesque and practical costume, something between the garb of

a sailor and the garb of a fireman, and as their life--like the life of

a fireman or a sailor--is lived a good deal apart from the lives of

other men, and has a constant spice in it of possible danger, they

acquire a certain self-reliance and self-possession which give them a

natural ease and even dignity of carriage. In talking with more than one

of them I thought I detected a slight tone of contempt towards other

workmen and especially towards the peasants, such as tinges the talk of

a sailor about land-lubbers. M. Guary confirmed this, and told me that

the men, especially of the old mining stock, certainly do regard

themselves as rather better than their neighbours.

This may have something to do with the Conservative strength in this

region. Politics do not apparently run very high among the miners,

either here or in the adjoining region of the Pas-de-Calais.

Valenciennes covers three electoral districts, and the Anzin concessions

extend into each of these districts. In the second or St.-Amand

district there was rather a lively contest in September, between M.

Girot, a Republican, and M. de Carpentier, a Boulangist. The latter

received 5,894 votes, but the former was elected, with 8,331 votes. In

the first Valenciennes district the outgoing member, an Imperialist, M.

Renard, was re-elected, receiving 5,803 votes, against 4,856 given to

his Republican competitor.

In the second district another outgoing member, M. Thellier de

Poncheville, a leading Royalist, was also re-elected, receiving 8,690

votes, against 7,263 given to his Republican opponent. In both of these

cases it came within my knowledge that the authorities of the Department

made the most open and unscrupulous efforts to prevent the return of the

outgoing members. Both M. Thellier de Poncheville and M. Renard,

however, sate on M. Pion's Committee on the mines, and the mining

population of the region appear to have a singularly clear notion of the

difference between sense and nonsense in dealing with mining matters.

Our miner, who hit the difference so neatly between 'miners' and the

'friends of miners,' after a little chat on the doorway, asked us, very

politely, to walk in and look at his home. It was very neatly and

adequately furnished, with clocks in each of the ground-floor rooms,

sundry framed mezzotints hanging on the walls, and a goodly show of

neatly-kept crockery. The wife, looking older than her husband, but very

probably his junior, cheerily pointed out to me the local improvement

she had made by transferring the cooking-range from the front room,

looking on the highway, to the back room looking into the garden. 'It is

pleasanter, don't you think?' she said, 'to sit out of the kitchen; and

then, with the kitchen at the back, one can always leave the door open.

That is my idea!' We assured her we thought it an excellent idea and

most creditable to her--a compliment which she received with modest

satisfaction, saying, 'You know the wife must think of these things!' to

which the husband good-naturedly assented, while the daughter, a

well-grown good-looking girl of fourteen, looked up from her household

duties, much interested in our visit. The husband, on his part, had

contrived a convenient wine-cellar under the stairway. 'It will not hold

much wine,'he said with a smile; 'but it is too large for all the wine I

drink.' 'Ah!' said the wife archly, 'he likes cider much better!'

This miner was employed in the new Lagrange pit, and though I was much

struck by the neatness of his person and apparel, I was more struck by

the general absence of anything like the griminess which we commonly

associate with mines and mining among his fellows, whom I found still at

work around the pits. M. Guary told me that this is a characteristic

trait of the Anzin miners. In the buildings attached to each pit there

is a large hall, called the miner's hall, where the men meet when they

go down to and come up from their underworld. There each man has a box,

under lock and key, bearing his number, in which he puts away his

ordinary clothes when he dons his mining suit; the company--I should

mention here--provides every man when he enters the service with a

mining outfit. And to this hall there is attached a lavatory for the use

of the men. The hall is well warmed in winter, and, being always on an

upper floor, is well aired and ventilated in summer. From this hall at

the Lagrange pit we walked into an adjoining room, where we found the

miners going down the shaft in a great metallic basket, while the coal

came up. While we stood there, there came up a magnificent lump of coal,

of a very brilliant and even lustrous surface, around which the

admiring miners crowded. This is a new vein, and the coal found in it,

M. Guary tells me, burns with an unusually clear and intense flame.

A miner with whom I talked a little had been to see the Exposition, and

it was curious to perceive that he had been much more interested in the

Anzin part of it than in anything else. He spoke indeed almost

disrespectfully of the Eiffel Tower, and he was entirely convinced that

the workmen at Anzin were much better off than the workmen at Paris, as

to which I am not prepared to dispute his opinion. He had not seen the

President, which did not appear to disturb him much; but he thought the

beer at the Exposition 'very dear and very bad.' The engines, however,

he frankly admired, though 'everybody can see that it is not possible to

make better engines than are made at Anzin.'

One curious thing he told me of the young miners who are drafted away

into the military service. 'When they come back,' he said, 'some of them

at first try other trades, but all that are of any use sooner or later

come back to the mine. It is of no use,' he said reflectively, 'for any

man to try to be a miner if he is not trained as a boy.' This is exactly

Jack Tar's notion as to sailors.

From the Lagrange pit we drove, still through pleasant woods and fresh

green farming-lands, to Thiers, where the company has a large number of

working-men's houses, together with a considerable church, a lay and a

religious school, and other institutions.

There we paid a visit to a delightful little old lady, with a face, full

of wrinkled sweetness and humour, which Denner might have painted. She

insisted upon showing us all over her home, and a little miracle it was

of thrift and neatness and order; from the spotlessly clean little

bedrooms with the high Flemish beds, the crucifix hanging over the bed,

and prints--not always devout--on the walls, to the sitting-room with

its shining mirror, highly polished tin and brass candlesticks and

platters, and abundant china. She was a staunch Imperialist, and had

portraits of the Emperor, with prints of Solferino and of Sedan. 'There

it was that they betrayed him!' said the little old lady, with deep

indignation in her voice. I had not the heart to ask her who these

traitors were. The garrets I found filled with new-mown hay. 'It keeps

there till we sell it,' she said, 'and then it smells so sweet!' which

was undeniable. Behind her house (her son and his wife were both absent

at their work) she showed us the garden, very trimly kept and gay with

the old familiar flowers, and an arbour, in which she took especial

pride, none of her neighbours possessing anything of the sort.

At Thiers I talked with an officer of the company who had served for

some time in one of the great mines of Southern France. The differences

in the habits and character of the mining populations there and here he

found very great, and, on the whole, he evidently thought the Northern

miners much superior, in most essential points, to their fellows at the

South. Certainly, according to him, they are neater in their persons,

more cool and sensible, less credulous, less addicted to politics, and

much more thrifty. 'The women, when they are well-behaved and good

managers,' he said, 'have more influence with the men in the North. In

the South and in Auvergne, I have sometimes thought the worst women had

more influence with the men than the best.'

He had an odd theory as to the effect of great altitudes on human

character. 'In Auvergne and in Savoy,' he said, 'the higher up you go

the more excitable and quarrelsome you find the people. Here in Flanders

the people are placid, like the plains.' He called my attention, too, to

the prevalence among the miners here at Anzin of a peculiar type of

blonds with a sort of ruddy russet hair and beard, not quite the glowing

Titianesque auburn, and yet by no means red. It is certainly a marked

and peculiar tint, and may be seen faithfully reproduced in a large

picture of the Anzin miners exhibited this year at Paris. I had supposed

it to 'hark back' to the Scandinavians, who made themselves so much at

home in all these fat and accessible regions after Charlemagne passed

away.

'No,' said my philosophic engineer, 'it is due to the potash. These

miners are so addicted to washing themselves and use such quantities of

strong soap, that it has permanently affected their hair.' Upon which

another engineer, also familiar with Auvergne, broke in: 'That's all

very well; but I have seen many miners in Auvergne with the same tint of

hair and beard, and you know that there they wash their faces, at the

most, once a week!'

This last speaker was an exceedingly shrewd man and, as I found, a

strong Conservative. He had been asked to stand as a candidate for mayor

in his commune, but had declined, though his personal popularity made

his election almost a matter of form. I asked him why. 'Let myself be

elected to a political office by my workmen!' he said; 'how can a

sensible man think of such a thing? Ask men to give you their votes, and

what authority will be left to you? No, I think I know my business too

well for that. They tried that sort of thing, you know, during the war,

and a beautiful business they made of it! I suspect it was the Germans

who suggested it!'

What I am told of the morals of the people here reminds me of the

traditional reputation of certain sections of Pennsylvania settled by

the Germans in the last century, and of the Dutch in Long Island. There

is a good deal of drinking. _Buvettes_ are forbidden within the limits

of the _cités ouvrières_, but in the communes they are very numerous,

averaging, I am assured, as many as twenty to every 1,200 inhabitants.

To open a _buvette_ nothing is needed but a police permission, and the

_buvettes_ are kept, for the most part, by the wives of miners and other

artisans, as a means of adding to the family income. Beer is very cheap,

costing only two sous a litre. Wine and spirits are more costly, though

a great deal of gin is made, and inexpensively made, in the country.

There is much sociability among the people, and great practical

liberality as to the conduct of young girls, the ancient practice known

as 'bundling' in New England being still in vogue among these worthy

Flemings. M. Baudrillart, who evidently inclines to a favourable

judgment of these Northern populations, puts the truth on this point

very considerately.

'Conspicuous historical examples,' he observes, 'prove to me that the

flesh is weak in this province of Flanders. The severity of public

opinion does not always make up for the laxity of the control exercised

by principle. Unmarried mothers are numerous, and incidents of this sort

are often regarded as simple errors of youth and inexperience, to be

remedied by marriage. The marriage-tie when formed, however, is not less

respected than among our rural populations in general, and cases of

flagrant misconduct on the part of married women are rare.'

Offences against persons and property are not relatively numerous here.

On the contrary, while the proportion of persons accused of crime is 12

to the hundred thousand, for all France, in this Department of the Nord

it falls to 8-1/3 to the hundred thousand, and this notwithstanding the

numbers crowded into the great manufacturing towns of the department. In

the Department of the Seine, which includes Paris, the proportion rises

to 28 to the hundred thousand, and in the agricultural Department of the

Eure, which is the champion criminal Department of France, to 30 to the

hundred thousand. One might almost imagine that M. Zola must have gone

to the Eure for his studies of French peasant-life.

Without being particularly devout, the people of this region, I am told,

are fond of their religious observances, and much dislike the

persecution of the Church and the laicisation of the schools.

At Thiers the church, which is a large one, fronting on an extensive

Place Publique, was very handsomely decorated on Corpus Christi Sunday

by the people of the commune. Flags and garlands were put up, too, all

about the Place Publique. The Anzin Company are now building a large

school for girls very near this church; and I visited, with M. Guary,

one afternoon, the boys' school at Thiers. It is very well installed in

a large building, with a playground and a gymnasium roofed in, but not

walled. The teacher--a lay teacher, and a very quiet, sensible man--who

lives in the school-building with his wife, told me he preferred to keep

it thus, and the boys liked it better. They were at their lessons when I

visited the school, and a very sturdy, comely lot of lads they were.

Some of them were _en pénitence_, having slighted their lessons, as the

teacher slily intimated, by reason of the great Church festival. This I

thought not unlikely, and he did not appear to regard it as an

absolutely unpardonable offence, while the juvenile criminals themselves

were evidently quite cheery in their minds. In a room near the

gymnasium were racks filled with wooden guns. These the teachers pointed

out with pride. They were a gift from the company to his battalion of

boys, who delighted in their regular military drill. He thought them,

after only eighteen months' training, one of the best boy-battalions in

the department, and would have liked to take them to Paris to compete

for the athletic prizes. But to take up even a picked company of ten

would have cost 400 francs, which he thought, and I agreed with him,

might be better spent in Thiers. 'And then,' he said with a smile, 'what

a life I should have led in Paris, with those ten boys to look after!'

The Anzin Company used to spend 80,000 francs a year on keeping up its

own schools. But it is so heavily taxed for the 'school palaces' which

have been put up, and for the public schools, that it has materially

reduced this outlay, though it still expends a large sum in various ways

for the advantage of the children of its own workmen attending the

public schools; and still keeps up certain religious schools, especially

for the little children and the girls.

One of these schools for little children which I visited at St.-Waast,

kept by the Sisters, was a model. The little creatures, ranged in

categories according to their years, were pictures of health and good

humour, as they sate in rows at their little desks, or marched about,

singing in choruses. One exercise, through which a number of them, from

six to eight years old, were conducted by two of the Sisters, might have

been studied from a fresco by Fra Angelico representing the heavenly

choirs, and gave the most intense delight evidently to the singing

children as well as to the smiling and kindly Sisters. There is a large

church, too, at St.-Waast and a _cité ouvrière_.

The commune, I believe, formerly was a part of the wide domain of the

famous Abbey of St.-Waast which grew up near Arras over the burial-place

of St.-Vadasius, to whom after the victory of Clovis over the Germans at

Tolbiac in 495 the duty was confided of teaching the Frankish king his

Christian catechism. He had a tough pupil, but he taught him, so well

that King Clovis conceived a great affection for him, and got St.-Rémi

to make him bishop, first of Arras, and then of Cambrai.

At the time of the Revolution the great abbey near Arras, which bore his

name, was one of the richest of the religious communities which,

according to the very important _Avis aux députés des trois ordres de la

province d'Artois_, so thoroughly and instructively analysed by M.

Baudrillart, held among them in 1789 two-thirds of the land of that

province. M. Baudrillart's analysis of this _Avis_ shows conclusively

that a judicious and systematic overhauling of these ecclesiastical

properties was absolutely necessary; but it also shows conclusively that

the people of Artois who desired this wished to see it done decently and

in order. They had a strong love of their provincial independence. Even

Maximilian Robespierre, who was then bestirring himself in public

matters at Arras, addressed his first political publication, which he

called a 'manifesto,' not to the people of Artois, but to 'the Artesian

nation.' This from the future executioner of the French federalists is

sufficiently edifying as to the great 'national' impulse to which we are

asked by a certain school of political rhapsodists to attribute that

outbreak of chaos in France called the 'great French Revolution.'

What the Tiers-Etat of the great and solidly constituted province of

Artois really wanted before 1789 is clearly set forth in this remarkable

_Avis_. They did not want the 'Rights of Man,' or the downfall of

tyrants, or any vague nonsense of that sort. They wanted a more fair and

equitable system of taxation, and a better system of agriculture. They

had some practical ideas, too, as to how these things could be got, for

they knew that these things had been got in England. 'The Englishman of

our times,' they said, 'gets an income of 48,000 pounds from a square

mile of land, whereas the Artesian can hardly get 12,000 pounds from the

same area. Yet the soil of Artois is in nowise inferior to that of

England. The enormous difference can only be attributed to the

encouragement and the distinctions which the English Government bestows

upon agriculture, and to the better system of the English

administration.'

This passage reads almost like an extract from the diary of Arthur

Young, and it is noteworthy that Arthur Young at this same time, while

he was commending in his diary the admirable quality of the deep,

'level, fertile plain of Flanders and Artois,' also expressed his

opinion that 'nowhere in the world was human labour better rewarded than

there.' Taken together, however, the _Avis_ and the diary of Arthur

Young prove that the leaders of the Tiers-Etat of Artois in 1787 were

neither radicals nor revolutionists, but practical men, who wished to

see the value of their property improved, and the natural advantages of

their province more adequately developed. To this end they thought it

necessary that the constitution of the Provincial Estates should be

reformed. Thanks to a combination, as the _Avis_ declares, of the

municipalities of the towns with the _noblesse_ and the higher order of

the clergy, the _curés_--'that most interesting class of men who are

alone in a position to make the needs of the people understood and to

work for their relief--were entirely excluded from the Provincial

Estates in 1669, as were also the farmers, who alone can supply the

means of perfecting our agriculture.'

'Here,' said the _Avis_, 'is the true cause of the prostration of our

rural interests.' They proposed to apply a remedy by recasting the

representation in the Provincial Estates, and giving 'two deputies out

of three to the rural population.'

This having been done, so that agriculture might get in Artois the voice

which the author of the _Avis_ believed it to have in England, they then

proposed a reconstruction of the system of taxation. On this point they

inclined to adopt, from the South of France, the system of paying the

taxes not in money but in kind. The system of the tithes, too, needed a

complete overhauling, not with the mere object of abolishing the tithes,

but in order that the gross inequalities which the _Avis_ sets forth as

existing, in regard to the impact of the tithes, both territorial and

personal, might be done away with, and the support of religion put upon

a sound basis. This led naturally to a demand for the release of great

areas of valuable soil in Artois from the control of religious

communities, like the Abbey of St.-Waast, not a few of which were no

longer in a condition to put these possessions to the best uses, either

for the Church or for the country. In Artois, as in French Flanders, the

extent of these ecclesiastical domains which had once been an advantage

to the people, is admitted to have become disadvantageous to French

agriculture with the decline of the feudal aristocracy and the growth of

the royal power. Short leases only were granted in general by the Church

and the monasteries, and under these short leases the farmers hesitated

to improve their holdings.

The authors of the _Avis_ desire that it may be made possible to obtain

leases of even twenty-five years which should not be treated by the

Treasury as an 'alienation' of the property leased. With such leases,

they say, 'the farmer would not hesitate to lay out money upon his land,

because he would feel sure of getting the benefit of the outlay. This,'

they add, 'is one of the principal means which the English Government

has employed in bringing agriculture to the state of perfection in which

we now see it in that monarchy.'

As the greater part of the _cahiers_ of grievances prepared by the

Tiers-Etat of Artois for the States-General of 1789 have been lost, this

_Avis_ is of great value, as setting before us the real objects of that

order in Artois. The _cahiers_ of the Artesian _noblesse_ and the clergy

for the States-General are all preserved, and in respect of the general

objects to be aimed at in the States-General, these _cahiers_ go much

farther than the _Avis_. They seem to show that in Artois, as throughout

the kingdom, the _noblesse_ and the clergy were much more enamoured of

what are now called the 'principles of 1789' than were the body of the

agricultural population.

The _noblesse_ and the clergy of Artois wished to see the States-General

called at regular intervals, like the English Parliament. They wished

the Provincial Estates to be maintained and to be convened annually, and

they wished a provincial administration to be established under a system

which should give the Tiers-Etat a representation equal to that of both

the other orders united, and in which decisions should be reached not by

a vote of the orders collectively, but by the members of the whole body

voting individually, so that a measure as to which all the members for

the Tiers-Etat should be of one mind, might at any time be carried if

they could secure the adhesion of even a small number of the members

from either of the other orders. Clearly it was not necessary, in the

case of Artois, that the Tiers-Etat should be declared to be

'everything,' in order that justice might there be done to the wishes

and the interests of the Tiers-Etat! And if not in the case of Artois,

why in the case of any other French province?

The _Avis_ shows that in Artois before 1789 the representatives of the

Tiers-Etat had confidence in the liberality and the common sense of the

_noblesse_ and of the clergy, and that they were disposed to consider

all the abuses there needing reformation in the spirit of practical

compromise which had presided over and made possible the development of

liberty and of progress in Holland and in England, but of which no

traces are to be found in the chaotic history of the 'National Assembly'

of 1789. The authors of the _Avis_, for example, point out, in dealing

with the questions of the tithes and of the seignorial dues in Artois,

that it is the unequal and irregular impact, above all, of those

impositions to which most of the evils flowing from them must be

imputed; the ill-feeling they engender between the farmer and his

landlord or his pastor, the bad blood they breed between the different

orders. If the charges of one sort and another upon one field of a

farmer's holding amounted, as was sometimes the case, to one-fifth of

the value of the crop, while upon other fields of his holding the

charges amounted to no more than one-thirtieth of the value of the crop,

the farmer not unnaturally gave his chief care to the fields which were

least heavily encumbered, without much troubling himself as to their

agricultural merits relatively to the other fields.

But while the authors of the _Avis_ earnestly desired to see all this

changed, and called for the most complete revision and re-organisation

of the agricultural system in Artois, they raised no philosophical

clamour against privileges as privileges, and they had sense enough to

see that no community could afford to bring about the abolition of the

most obnoxious 'privileges' at the cost of any flagrant violations of

the Rights of Property. 'Whatever may have been the origin of these

rights,' say the authors of the _Avis_, 'their antiquity has made them

property to be respected in the hands of those who possess it. To

deprive these owners of these rights would be an injustice and an act of

violence of which no citizen can possibly dream. The privileged orders

must be asked to divest themselves of their privileges.'

Here is a recognition of 'vested interests' for which we may look in

vain from the motley mob of the 'National Assembly' into which the

States-General of 1789 so rapidly resolved, or--to speak more

exactly--dissolved, themselves! With men of the Tiers-Etat, in a

province like Artois, who could see things so plainly and state them so

fairly before the convocation of the States-General, what became the

French Revolution, plunging the whole realm into anarchy, might surely

have been made a reasonable and orderly evolution of liberty. Such a

document goes a good way in support of the contention that with ordinary

firmness, consistency, and courage on the part of the luckless Louis

XVI., the convocation of the States-General in 1789, instead of leading

France, as it actually led her, through a quagmire of blood and rapine,

into what George Sand felicitously called the 'merciless practical joke

of the Consulate,' and the stern reality of the despotic First Empire,

might easily have resulted in converting the absolute monarchy of Louis

XIV. into such a limited and constitutional monarchy as France really

enjoyed under Louis XVIII. The pathway to the Inferno of the Terror was

really paved with the good intentions of the king.

Beyond St.-Waast lies the considerable town of St.-Amand-aux-Eaux, to

which General Dumouriez transferred himself, on the pretence of taking

the waters there, while he was working out his plans for saving France

by marching on Paris and upsetting the Assembly. The plans miscarried

mainly through his own fault, but it is a curious vindication of the

patriotism of Dumouriez in making them that, while he was explaining to

the lunatics in Paris, in January 1793, the absurdity of attempting to

overthrow the English power in India, and the German empire in Europe,

before feeding and clothing their armies on the frontier, de

Beurnonville, whom Dumouriez was destined to seize and arrest at

St.-Amand, was himself writing from the headquarters at Sarrelouis to

Cochon Lapparent at Paris that everything was going to the dogs, and

that the Government was mad about chimeras. 'We think of nothing,' he

said, 'but giving liberty to people who don't ask us to do it, and with

all the will in the world to be free ourselves, we don't know how to

be!'

St.-Amand now has a population of ten or twelve thousand souls. Part of

the Anzin property lies within the communal limits, but the place is a

busy place and has industries of its own. It is connected with Anzin and

with Valenciennes by a steam tramway, and I went there with M. Guary one

fine summer morning to see what is left of the once magnificent

Benedictine monastery of the seventeenth century, which was the great

feature of St.-Amand a hundred years ago. A picture preserved in the

collection at Valenciennes gives a fair notion of the extent and

magnificence of the abbey, the demolition of which has been going on

from 1793 to this day. M. Guary remembers the stately ruins as much

more extensive in his youth than they now are, and as the good people of

St.-Amand have very recently allowed the local architect to put up,

under the very shadow of the exquisitely beautiful belfry still

standing, one of the most dismal and commonplace brick school-houses I

have seen in France, it is to be presumed that a few more years will see

everything pulled down, and replaced, perhaps, by a miniature

reproduction in steel and iron of the Eiffel Tower.

Before the deviltries of 1789 began, the marketplace of St.-Amand must

have been one of the most picturesque in Northern Europe. The market is

still held there, and the place was full when we crossed it of peasant

women and peasants, carts laden with vegetables, tables set out with all

manner of utensils, with fruits, with knicknacks. All was bustle and

animation. It was the old picture, save for the uncomely modifications

of our modern costume. But of the splendid architectural frame in which

that picture once was set, how little now is left!

Beside the lofty belfry, one of the most graceful seventeenth-century

buildings now to be anywhere seen, a few arches of one of the cloisters

and one of the great abbatial gatehouses converted into a town-hall! The

Vandal Directory of Chauny dealt more rationally with Prémontré than the

'patriots' of St.-Amand with their superb abbey. Had they preserved it,

their town would now have possessed not only an architectural monument

of interest and importance, but ample space and the best possible

'installations' for all its public uses and offices.

Like all the Benedictine abbeys, St.-Amand was a home of letters and of

arts. What remains of its noble library is to be found, as I have said,

in the collection at Valenciennes. Of the treasury which the abbey

contained in the way of sculpture, painting, brass and iron work,

carving in wood, no such account can be given. Such of these as escaped

destruction were looted, sold, and dispersed. There is a tradition, well

or ill-founded, that some exceedingly fine sixteenth-century monuments

executed by Guyot de Beaugrant, the sculptor of the matchless

chimney-piece which, in the Chambre Échévinale at Bruges, commemorates

the expulsion of the French under Francis I. from Flanders, were brought

here and set up in the abbey. If so, no trace of them remains. In the

gatehouse, of which the local authorities have taken possession, a few

fine old books, relics of the abbatial library, are still kept, and the

vaulted chapter-room on the upper floor, used now as a council chamber,

contains four interesting _dessus de porte_ painted here by Watteau. The

subjects are scriptural, of course; but as, in spite of all her efforts,

the obliging damsel who acted as our cicerone could not possibly manage

the blinds and sashes of the lofty window in the octagonal room which

they adorn, it was impossible to make out to what period of the artist's

career they belong. Upon one of them--the 'Woman taken in Adultery'--we

got light enough thrown to show that its colouring is admirable. It can

hardly have been painted while Watteau was at work in Paris on his

endless reproductions of the then popular St.-Nicholas, but must

probably have been executed after his study of Rubens in the Luxembourg,

and his failure to win the first prize at Rome had opened to him his

true path to fame, and carried him into the French Academy of Fine Arts

as 'the painter of festivals and of gallantry.'

The fine old church of St.-Amand has fared better than the abbey. It has

been judiciously restored, and the third Napoleon made it an historical

monument. Despite the Radicalism of the place, we found it thronged

with people of both sexes--the men, indeed, almost in a

majority--attending a high mass. It was rather startling, as we emerged

from this service on our way back to Anzin, to come upon a large cabaret

which bore for its sign the words, in glaring gilt letters, 'Au Nouveau

Bethléhem, Estaminet Barbès.' Whether this is the conventicle of a sect

of believers in the revolutionary Barbès I could not learn. But it is

just possible that the Barbès, whom it celebrates, may be the

enterprising proprietor of the place, and that the sacred name he has

given it is a relic of that familiar use of holy things which never

scandalised the good people of the Middle Ages, particularly in Flanders

and in France. Does not the best old inn in the comfortable town of

Châlons-sur-Marne to this day bear the name of 'La Haute Mère de Dieu'?

I have already said that the miners of Anzin have been practically

enjoying all the advantages of co-operation, while the 'true

Republicans' of M. Doumer have been 'studying' and going to sleep over

that 'beautiful and generous idea.' As a matter of fact, the

'Co-operative Society of the Anzin Miners,' now known in commerce as

'Léon Lemaire et Cie of Anzin,' was founded, I find, even before the

Co-operative Association of the Glass-workers at St.-Gobain.

It was organised in 1865, two years before the passage of the Imperial

law affecting co-operation.

M. Casimir Périer, a son of the Minister of Louis Philippe, and the

father of the present Republican deputy of the same name, was then a

director of the Anzin Company. He had seen what M. Doumer fantastically

imagines to be the purely French and republican 'idea' of co-operation

carried out in England, the 'beautiful and generous idea,' as even every

French schoolboy ought to know, being of English and not of French

origin.

M. Périer had been particularly struck by the great success of the

Rochdale experiment--an experiment begun and carried out, as Mr.

Holyoake has set forth at length, by weavers, who, being nearly at the

end of their tether, and worn out with distress, had associated

themselves into a company under the name of the 'Equitable Pioneers of

Rochdale.' He looked thoroughly into the history of this experiment, and

having convinced himself that the 'beautiful and generous' idea might

bear as good fruit at Anzin as at Rochdale, he went to work in earnest,

got the society organised, accepted the honorary chairmanship of it, and

set it on its feet on February 21, 1865. M. Cochin took the same matter

up at St.-Gobain, and in 1867 the Imperial law, about which M. Doumer

and his 'true Republicans' have been cackling and dabbling for ten

consecutive years, was enacted, and the co-operative associations became

legally constituted bodies. The statutes which now govern the Anzin

Association were adopted on December 8, 1867, and the Association was

formally launched.

The authorities at first could not be made to understand that a

co-operative association was not a mercantile speculation, and for some

time the Anzin Association was compelled to pay a regular fee for a

licence, or 'patent,' as it is called in France. This exaction, however,

was long ago given up.

Under the original statutes the profits derived from the sale to the

members of the Association, and to them only (a rule never departed

from), of all the goods purchased by the Association, were to be divided

into a hundred parts. Of these, seventy parts were to be distributed at

the end of each year to the members, proportionally to the sales and

deliveries made to each of them. Twenty parts were to be set aside for a

reserve fund; and the remaining ten parts were to be used by the

governing committee chiefly in paying the salaries of the manager and

employees of the Association.

Such was the success from the outset of the Anzin experiment that within

six years, at a general meeting held on April 24, 1872, the Association

adopted a resolution suspending the payment over into the reserve fund

of the twenty parts of the profits set aside to be so paid, and ordering

these twenty parts also to be paid over to the members semi-annually.

The reserve fund had already reached proportions which made it

unnecessary and even undesirable to increase it.

The Association was originally constituted for a term of twenty years,

from December 10, 1867. At a general meeting held on March 27, 1887, its

life was prolonged for another twenty years, or to December 10, 1907.

It might edify M. Doumer as to the nationality of the 'beautiful and

generous' idea which his 'true Republicans' find it so difficult to

'study,' if he would take the trouble to visit this Anzin region. He

would find the establishments of the Association currently known by the

English name of 'stores.' I found one of them flourishing in every

commune which I visited in the vicinity of Anzin; at St.-Waast, where

the experiment was first made, at Denain, where during the past year it

has been found necessary to establish two stores instead of one--at

Anzin, at Fresnes, at Thiers, at Abscon, at Vieux-Condé! The

Association, indeed, which began in 1865 with fifty-one members and a

subscribed capital of 2,150 francs, now conducts no fewer than fifteen

'stores,' and now consists of no fewer than 3,118 families.

The capital of the Association, originally fixed at 30,000 francs, in

600 shares of fifty francs each, was increased by a vote of a general

meeting in April 1882 to 250,000 francs. The 'firm-name' is now 'Lemaire

and Company,' the present manager being M. Léon Lemaire, who can use

this 'firm-name' only for the affairs of the Association. The manager

(or _gérant_) is elected at a general meeting to serve for three years,

but he is always re-eligible. His salary is fixed by the governing

committee, and the amount of it is charged to the general expenses. The

governing committee has power also to present the manager, if it thinks

proper, with a certain sum each year taken from the ten parts of the

profits which are set apart by the statutes of the Association to be

used for such purposes by the Committee. All the persons employed by the

Association in various capacities are taken, as far as is found

compatible with the interests of the business, from among the families

of the members. This is particularly the case with regard to the young

girls, of whom forty-eight are now employed in the different drapery and

mercery stores, and an excellent practice has been adopted of calling in

a certain number of girls when there is a special pressure of business

to serve for a short period, these girls being regularly registered, and

thus constituting a sort of reserve corps, from which the permanent

employees are taken as vacancies are made.

The operations of the Association cover all manner of commodities

excepting butcher's meat, it having been found that there are

insuperable difficulties in the way of dealing in butcher's meat over so

wide an area. These difficulties do not exist in the case of what the

French call _charcuterie_. A central pork butchery has been established

just outside the _octroi_ at Anzin, and the business done in that line

now averages about 30,000 kilogrammes a year, the difference per

kilogramme between the buying and the selling prices averaging about

eighteen francs. It is the iron rule of the Association never to sell at

a figure beyond the average ruling retail prices in the shops, it being

quite clear that if it should now and then be necessary, in order to

cover the Association, to sell at prices equivalent with the shop

prices, the members would still have a real advantage in the eventual

distribution of the profits.

It is impossible to examine the statutes, and the rules adopted under

them, without being struck by the precision, clearness, and efficiency

of the methods prescribed to keep the accountability of all the

different agents of the Association within easily definable limits, and

to simplify, in the final adjustment, the necessarily complicated

accounts of so many stores dealing with customers many of whom must,

from the force of circumstances, be allowed a credit of a fortnight as

cash. The proof of all such methods, of course, is the net result. In

the case of the Co-operative Association of Anzin this proof is

conclusive in favour both of the methods and of the men by whom they

have for now more than twenty years been administered.

The operations of the Association for the first semester of its

existence closed on February 22, 1866, with sales amounting to 71,020

fr. 10 c., and with the payment to the members of an 8 per cent.

dividend, amounting in all to 8,228 francs. From that day to this, the

semi-annual dividend has never fallen below eight per cent., excepting

for the half-year ending August 22, 1868, when it was declared at 7-1/2

per cent. By August 1872 it readied 12 per cent. and stood there for

three semesters. It then fell to 10 per cent., and stood there from

February 28, 1874, to August 28, 1878, when it rose to 11. By August 31,

1879, it rose to 12, and by February 29, 1884, to 13 per cent., at which

figure it has stood ever since down to February 28, 1889, with two

exceptions--August 31, 1884, when it rose to 14, and February 28, 1887,

when it fell to 12-1/4.

The total amount of sales made to the members between February 1866 and

February 1889 was 38,864,999 francs; and the total amount of dividends

paid to the members during that period has been 4,585,557 fr. 69 c.,

showing an average dividend during these twenty-three years of

11.80 per cent.

It appears to me that this is a very good account rendered of a very

good stewardship, and involves, for the workmen interested, a number of

useful practical lessons on the true relations of capital to labour,

including the relations of their own capital to their own labour. There

are now about 800 Co-operative Associations of Consumers in France; but

the Anzin Association is by far the most important of them all. As the

existing associations are estimated to consist on an average of 550

members each, we have 440,000 heads of families, and a total presumable

population, therefore, of not far from 2,000,000, more or less

successfully availing themselves of the co-operative principle in

France. The net profits vary greatly in the returns of these

associations, from 1 to 14 per cent. The Co-operative Coal Association

of Roubaix shows a net profit of 21 per cent., and the Co-operative

Bakery of the same busy and thriving city a profit of 23 per cent. But

the Anzin Association not only covers more ground than any of the rest:

it covers it in a more equably satisfactory fashion. During the past

year, on an employed capital of 156,150 francs, it made sales amounting

to 2,303,836 francs, with a gross profit of 450,497 fr. 61 c., and a net

profit of 310,106 fr. 30 c. Each man had spent an average of 738 fr. 28

c., and received a net profit of 99 fr. 45 c. In other words, every

holder of a 50 franc share paid for his share out of a single year's net

profit, and pocketed 49 francs to boot!

As indicating the scale of comfort attained in their daily life by these

miners and their families, it is of interest to glance over the

schedule of the goods and commodities supplied by these co-operative

stores, it being premised that the stores do not keep or sell what are

regarded as 'articles of luxury,' so that in these schedules we have the

present scale of the necessaries and comforts of ordinary life among the

more industrious and thrifty of the French working-classes. That even in

the seventeenth century the French artisans, and the more prosperous of

the French peasants, lived much more comfortably than one would infer

from the pictures usually painted even by such historians as Michelet,

who, with all his theories and all his imagination, took more trouble

than M. Thiers to keep within hailing distance of the facts, would seem

to be shown by the inventories and the wills of artisans and peasants

disinterred during the last quarter of a century from the local archives

of Troyes and other important towns.

Here, in the Anzin district, to-day, we find these co-operative stores

supplying to 3,000 families of the working-class 12,000 metrical

quintals or bales of the finest quality of wheat flour, 3,000 of these

going to the houses of the members, and 9,000 to the bakery of the

Association, which turns out, on an average, 1,100 loaves, of 3 kilos

each, per day. With this bread the members take from the stores annually

110,000 kilos of the best butter, 50,000 kilos of coffee, 37,000 kilos

of chicory, 4,000 kilos of chocolate, 13,000 Marolles cheeses from the

land of Brétigny--where Edward III. was scared by a tremendous

thunderstorm, which made him 'think of the day of judgment,' into giving

peace to France and liberty to her captive king--200,000 kilos of

potatoes, 6,000 kilos of prunes d'Enté, 11,000 kilos of rice, 15,000

bottles of wine, 12,000 bottles of vinegar, 33,000 bottles of spirits of

various sorts, 45,000 kilos of salt, 6,000 boxes of sardines, 100,000

kilos of maize and corn, 34,000 kilos of bran, 90,000 kilos of sugar,

20,000 kilos of beans, 30,000 kilos of ham, sausages, and other products

of the pork-butchery. That butcher's meat, which, for the reasons I have

mentioned, the stores cannot supply, plays a large proportional part in

the obviously good dietary of these families, may, I think, be inferred

from the fact that the stores annually dispose of 10,000 pots of the

best French mustard, and of 1,000 kilos of white pepper. Vegetables and

fruits are supplied in abundance by the country, and in many cases by

the allotments of the workmen themselves, while beer, as I have said, is

everywhere abundant and cheap.

That the miners and working-people of Anzin are well lodged and well fed

may be considered to be beyond a doubt. Let us now see what they do in

the way of clothing themselves, and of furnishing their houses.

They buy from the stores annually 30,000 francs'-worth of kitchen and

household utensils, which are both well made and cheap in all this part

of France, 600 kilos of mattrass wool, 4,400 yards of sheeting, 500 wool

and cotton blankets and bedspreads, 9,000 towels, 44,000 pairs of

sabots, 10,000 pairs of shoes, 4,600 caps and hats, 2,200 pairs of

stockings, 3,700 shirts and 6,000 mètres of shirting, 17,000 mètres of

_piqué_, 2,000 undervests and 2,000 mètres of flannel, 6,000

handkerchiefs, 52,000 mètres of linen goods, 17,000 mètres of lustrines;

7,200 mètres of merinos, 7,000 mètres of muslins, 14,000 mètres of

_Indiennes_, 57,000 francs'-worth of mercers' wares, 24,000 mètres of

calicoes, and, finally, 3,100 yards of velvet. When we remember that

this is the annual outlay for keeping up the household wardrobe, not the

original outlay in establishing it, it seems to me that the workpeople

of Anzin ought to be, and indeed one need only walk and drive about the

region to see that they are, at least as well clothed as they are housed

and fed.

Umbrellas even have come to be regarded as 'necessities' here, and the

stores annually supply 1,300 of these useful but essentially fugitive

articles. The men are clothed by their village tailors and bootmakers

chiefly, so that the masculine wardrobe is represented in the accounts

of the stores less extensively than the feminine. But the Anzin miners

nevertheless annually invest in scarves and cravats to the number of

more than 4,000. Each man on going into the employ of the company

receives, as I have said, a complete mining outfit, the cost of which is

not defrayed out of his wages. But the miners annually buy, on an

average, 500 new mining-suits for themselves.

Tables, chairs, bedsteads, bureaux, well made and often handsome, are to

be had in all these communes at very low prices; and I went into no

house in any of them which did not seem to me well equipped in these

particulars. Engravings, coloured and plain and lithographs, are to be

found in them all, and though the people are obviously not much addicted

to literature, I found in one miner's house at Thiers quite a collection

of books, and most of them good, sensible, and instructive books,

installed in an upper chamber, in which the housewife said, her 'man'

liked to sit and read when it was too hot out of doors in the garden.

This good dame, by the way, was of the opinion that 'the house gives you

the character of the wife,' and that 'the conduct of the husband depends

upon the character of the wife.' Her own 'man' was evidently an

excellent and orderly person, so I considered it a legitimate compliment

to assure her that I entirely agreed with her.

I hope, for the future of France, that she may be right. For there seems

to be a tendency here, as there certainly is in other parts of France,

to insist on sending their girls to the religious schools, even when

they allow their boys to attend the lay schools, where they are exposed

to having the 'true Republican' deputies and functionaries of the time

get up--as M. Doumer did the other day, at the opening of a new lay

school in the Aisne--and propound the doctrine that 'morals have nothing

to do with religion.'

The lay schools are attended, for example, in Anjou by 22,451 boys, and

only 3,562 girls: while the free congreganist schools are attended by

25,360 girls, and only 5,232 boys.

Adding the number together, this gives us a total of 30,592 children in

the religious, as against 26,013 in the anti-religious or irreligious

schools of one province.

If my good housewife at Thiers is right as to the influence of the

character of the women in France upon the conduct of the men, there is

hope in these figures, which I am assured pretty fairly represent the

state of things in Flanders as well as in Anjou, with the difference

that the proportion of boys attending the religious schools is probably

larger in Flanders than in Anjou. M. Doumer's doctrine that 'morals

should be taught independently of religion' certainly did not commend

itself to all his constituents. The _Journal de St.-Quentin_, commenting

upon it, plainly said, 'The verdicts of our assize courts show us every

day the result of the atheistic instructions recommended by M. Doumer

and the rest of the Masonic Brothers. The truth simply is that if some

remedy be not soon found for the situation created by these people, who

are as stupid as they are mischievous, in a few years we shall be

obliged either to decuple the gendarmerie, or to allow every citizen to

go about armed with a revolver, in order to protect himself against our

much too liberally emancipated young scolos!'

Curiously enough this voice from St.-Quentin in France substantially

echoes another voice from another St. Quentin in California--the seat of

the State Penitentiary in that young and active and opulent American

commonwealth. In California the plan of giving instruction in morality,

independently of religion, has been tried much longer than in France,

and certainly in circumstances much more favourable to its success. The

result, as set forth in an Official Report of the resident director,

cited by Mr. Montgomery, ex-assistant Attorney-General of the United

States, in his treatise on 'The School Question,' is that, while the

illiterate convicts in the California penitentiary, at the date of the

report, numbered 112, against 985 who could read and write, '_among the

younger convicts they could all read and write_'.

I have already spoken of many of the advantages offered by the Anzin

Company to its workmen and miners, as amounting really to a kind of

participation in the profits of the company. This, I think, must be

admitted to be clearly the case with regard to certain regulations

affecting workmen's pensions, established here by the governing council

of the company in December 1886.

These regulations are to affect workmen who contribute to what is known

as the 'National Retiring Fund for Old Age.' This fund was established

originally in 1850 under the presidency of Louis Napoleon. It was

re-organised by a law passed in July 1886, and by a decree issued in

December 1886. It is under the guarantee of the State, and is

administered by a committee co-operating with the Ministry of Commerce.

Its object is to enable working-men and others to secure annuities up

to the amount of 1,200 francs a year, at or after the age of fifty, by

the payment of small regular assessments on their wages. The smallest

sums are received by the fund, which of course is managed on principles

not unlike those of the great life insurance companies. A running

account is kept with the treasury to meet the current expenses of the

fund, but all the rest of the money received by it is invested in the

French public funds, or in securities guaranteed by the State. No part

of the compound interest received by the fund is deducted to meet the

expenses of administration. It all goes to the account of the

depositors, the current expenses being met by the Deposit Fund, which

manages the Retiring Fund. If at any time before that fixed for his

enjoyment of the retiring pension, the depositor should be made

incapable of work by some illness or accident, he is at once put into

possession, without awaiting the age fixed in the original agreement, of

a pension or annuity proportioned to the amount of his actual payments

and to his age at the time when the incapacity is medically and legally

established.

Every year a certain amount is voted by the Chamber as a subvention to

this fund, and out of this annual appropriation these 'premature

pensions' may be increased by the committee in charge of the fund. This

is a sort of practical State socialism beyond a doubt. But it is at

least as respectable as the expenditure made in this year's budget of

6,500,000 francs, or about one fifth of the whole amount of the French

naval pension list, on annuities of indemnification 'to the victims of

the _coup d'état_ of 1851,' the _coup d'état_ of 1851 having been simply

a collision between the Legislature of that year, trying to suppress the

Executive, with the Executive trying to suppress the Legislature, with

the result that the Executive carried the day, and that the French

people, by an overwhelming majority, approved the victory of the

Executive.

Why the socialistic principles at the bottom of the National Retiring

Fund for workmen should not be extended to others than working-men it is

not easy to see. The French pension-list is now very heavy. It figures

in this year's budget at nearly a hundred millions of francs, exclusive

of the military and naval pensions, which amount to about one hundred

and twenty-five millions more, and without counting the _débits de

tabac_, which are in fact a kind of pensions used freely by deputies and

other functionaries of influence to reward services of all sorts. Of

these about two hundred were given away in 1888, the list filling five

pages of the huge reports of the Finance Ministry.

The National Retiring Fund for Old Age is managed by a high committee of

sixteen, which must include two deputies, two state councillors, two

presidents of mutual aid societies, and one manufacturer. Workmen who

choose to avail themselves of the fund may break off and renew their

payments into it as they like, and increase or diminish the amount of

their annual deposits without affecting by any interruption the value of

their previously acquired interest in the fund. Deposits may be made in

the name of any person at or after the age of three years, so that a

father may in this way, if he likes, form a small property for his

children. The authorisation of the father, however, is not required to

validate deposits made in the name or for the benefit of a child, unless

these deposits are made by the children themselves, in which case they

merely show the authority of their parents as guardians until they have

attained the age of sixteen. Married women may make deposits

independently of their husbands, but unless these deposits are gifts to

them, they are held to be equally the property of the husband and wife

where these are not legally separated. In case of the absence either of

the husband or of the wife for more than a year, a justice of the peace

may authorise the deposit of money to the exclusive benefit of the

partner on the spot. Deposits of one franc are received from one person,

but in no case can one person deposit more than one thousand francs a

year. The capital deposited may be alienated to the fund or reserved. In

the latter case the capital may be returned, but without interest, to

the representatives of the depositor in case of death. Any reserved

capital may be alienated for the purpose of increasing the income at a

certain age, to be named by the depositor when he signs the alienation.

The pension incomes are guaranteed by the State. They become payable at

any full year of age selected by the depositor between fifty and

sixty-five years. After sixty-five the pension-income is paid to the

depositor from and after the first quarter-day following the deposit. Up

to 360 francs the pension-incomes are not liable to be seized for debt.

If they accrue from a capital presented to the depositor the donor may

have them declared unsellable to their full amount.

Funds deposited in the National Sayings Bank may be transferred in

whole, or in part, to the National Retiring Fund for Old Age.

Under the conditions of this fund an annual alienated deposit of 10

francs, begun at the age of thirty years, will secure the depositor at

fifty an annuity of 28 fr. 62 c., at fifty-five of 47 fr. 89 c., at

sixty of 81 fr. 43 c., and at sixty-five of 145 fr. 97 c.

The regulations adopted by the Anzin Council in 1886 are intended to

duplicate the results of this system of the National Retiring Fund for

the benefit of any workman who chooses to make himself a depositor in

the National Fund to the amount of 1-1/2 per cent. of his annual wages.

Suppose, for example, a miner earning 1,500 francs a year chooses to

deposit in the National Retiring Fund 22 fr. 50 c. a year. Upon

verification of this the Anzin Company will pay into the same fund for

him annually an equal sum. This would give the miner who began his

deposit of 22 fr. 50 c. a year at the age of thirty, a pension-income at

the age of fifty of 128 fr. 74 c., or just about the pension-income

which he would draw at the age of sixty-five from the National Fund if

he began a payment of 10 francs a year into that fund at the age of

thirty-two. A miner who began his annual deposit of 22 fr. 50 c. in the

National Fund at the age of twenty-one, taking advantage then of the

regulations of the Anzin Council, would enjoy at fifty a pension-income

of very nearly 250 francs a year.

Under the Anzin regulations, the two payments made by and for the

workmen concerned are inscribed in an individual bank-book which becomes

his property. The sums paid in by the company are alienated, and to the

exclusive advantage of the workman, while he is left at liberty to

alienate or reserve his own payments. If he is married, of course his

personal payments are held to be made one-half for the benefit of his

wife.

In the case of subterranean miners, the company will begin to carry out

this system as soon as they enter its service, and without regard to

their nationality. In the case of the surface workmen, they must be

eighteen years of age, and must have been in the service of the company

for at least three years without interruption. The reasons for the

difference are obvious.

The payments of the company cease at fifty years, but the workman is

not obliged to draw his pension-income then, as by continuing his

personal payments he can put it off, thereby increasing it until he

attains the age of 55, 60, or 65.

To meet the case of miners drawn into the army, the company, as long as

the miner so drawn and returning to its service shall remain in its

service, will pay in fractions, and within a period equal to that of his

military service, into the National Fund for his benefit a sum equal to

the percentage he would himself have paid into the National Fund upon

his wages, calculating them as being the same during the period of his

military service that they would have been had he remained there at work

in the mine.

In the case of a workman who falls ill or is injured, the company, if he

is a member of a mutual aid society, which will make his personal

percentage payments for him, will pay itself an equal sum during his

illness or incapacity for at least one calendar year. After that each

case must be separately dealt with.

Furthermore, and in addition to these general conditions, the company

will grant to workmen long in its service, who shall have made their

regular payments to the National Retiring Fund under these regulations,

when they give up work, supplementary pensions calculated at the rate of

3 francs a year for fifteen years of service for the miners, and of 1

fr. 50 c. a year for fifteen years for the surface workmen. These

supplementary pensions are doubled for married workmen, so that they may

amount to 90 francs a year for miners, and to 45 francs a year for

surface workmen.

On the whole, I think the miners of Anzin knew what they were about when

they stood aloof from the 'strike' in the Pas-de-Calais. To do this was

to aid the 'strikers' themselves much more effectually than by joining

in the strike. For surely the spectacle of such an orderly prosperity as

exists at Anzin, the result of equitable relations maintained for years

between Capital and Labour, is the strongest possible argument in

support of the reasonable demands of Labour. But what are the reasonable

demands of Labour?

It appeared from an inquiry made by the 'Society of Mineral Industries'

after the great strike of 1883, that, out of ten coal-producing

companies in the North of France which maintained Assistance Funds for

the miners, the Anzin Company alone did this entirely at the expense of

the company. The nine other companies reported a joint revenue of

821,133 francs in 1882 for these Assistance Funds, of which amount the

workmen furnished 603,097 francs. The outlay for 1882 exceeded the

revenues and amounted to 849,839 fr. 49 c. But, in addition to the

603,097 francs furnished by the workmen to these funds, the nine

companies in question expended themselves, in pensions, medical service,

school subventions, free fuel, hospitals and other contributions to the

welfare of these 32,849 miners and workmen, no less than 2,942,694 fr.

91 c. So that while the workmen expended on an average 3 per cent. of

their wages in maintaining Assistance Funds, these nine companies

(excluding Anzin, where no demand was made on the workmen) expended for

the benefit of the workmen and their families an amount equal to 9 per

cent. of the wages paid by them, and to 24 per cent. of the interest and

dividends paid to the stockholders. On the average the companies thus

spent about 50 c. for every ton of coal extracted.

Could labour reasonably demand more than this of capital?

Under the leadership of deputies like MM. Basly and Camélinet, backed

by the revolutionary press of Paris, the miners in another part of

France, at Decazeville, went on 'strike' in January 1888. They began by

brutally murdering M. Watrin, one of the best managers in the country.

They kept the whole region idle and in terror for three months and a

half. They inflicted great loss on the company and disturbed all the

industries of France. They themselves lost 630,427 francs of wages. The

company finally granted an increase of wages representing only 1-1/2 per

cent. of the wages sacrificed by the strike. The Municipal Council of

Paris, which had fomented the strike, magnificently gave the miners

10,000 francs of money which did not belong to them. All the Radical

press together subscribed 70,000 more. The Decazeville charities gave

2,231! And the next year all the miners testified that they had been

quite content with the wages before the strike, and gave a banquet to

the chief engineer!

France and the Republic A Record of Things Seen and Learned in the French Provinces During the 'Centennial' Year 1889 · 第 12 / 17 章