THE STRATEGIC FEATURES OF THE GULF OF MEXICO AND THE CARIBBEAN SEA.

_June, 1897._

The importance, absolute and relative, of portions of the earth's

surface, and their consequent interest to mankind, vary from time to

time. The Mediterranean was for many ages the centre round which

gathered all the influences and developments of those earlier

civilizations from which our own, mediately or immediately, derives.

During the chaotic period of struggle that intervened between their

fall and the dawn of our modern conditions, the Inland Sea, through

its hold upon the traditions and culture of antiquity, still retained

a general ascendency, although at length its political predominance

was challenged, and finally overcome, by the younger, more virile, and

more warlike nationalities that had been forming gradually beyond the

Alps, and on the shores of the Atlantic and Northern oceans. It was,

until the close of the Middle Ages, the one route by which the East

and the West maintained commercial relations; for, although the trade

eastward from the Levant was by long and painful land journeys, over

mountain range and desert plain, water communication, in part and up

to that point, was afforded by the Mediterranean, and by it alone.

With the discovery of the passage by the Cape of Good Hope this

advantage departed, while at the same instant the discovery of a New

World opened out to the Old new elements of luxury and a new sphere of

ambition. Then the Mediterranean, thrown upon its own productive

resources alone, swayed in the East by the hopeless barbarism of the

Turk, in the West by the decadent despotism of Spain, and, between the

two, divided among a number of petty states, incapable of united and

consequently of potent action, sank into a factor of relatively small

consequence to the onward progress of the world. During the wars of

the French Revolution, when the life of Great Britain, and

consequently the issue of the strife, depended upon the vigor of

British commerce, British merchant shipping was nearly driven from

that sea; and but two per cent of a trade that was increasing mightily

all the time was thence derived. How the Suez Canal and the growth of

the Eastern Question, in its modern form, have changed all that, it is

needless to say. Yet, through all the period of relative

insignificance, the relations of the Mediterranean to the East and to

the West, in the broad sense of those expressions, preserved to it a

political importance to the world at large which rendered it

continuously a scene of great political ambitions and military

enterprise. Since Great Britain first actively intervened in those

waters, two centuries ago, she at no time has surrendered willingly

her pretensions to be a leading Mediterranean Power, although her

possessions there are of purely military, or rather naval, value.

The Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico, taken together, form an

inland sea and an archipelago. They too have known those mutabilities

of fortune which receive illustration alike in the history of

countries and in the lives of individuals. The first scene of

discovery and of conquest in the New World, these twin sheets of

water, with their islands and their mainlands, became for many

generations, and nearly to our own time, a veritable El Dorado,--a

land where the least of labor, on the part of its new possessors,

rendered the largest and richest returns. The bounty of nature, and

the ease with which climatic conditions, aided by the unwarlike

character of most of the natives, adapted themselves to the

institution of slavery, insured the cheap and abundant production of

articles which, when once enjoyed, men found indispensable, as they

already had the silks and spices of the East. In Mexico and in Peru

were realized also, in degree, the actual gold-mine sought by the

avarice of the earlier Spanish explorers; while a short though

difficult tropical journey brought the treasures of the west coast

across the Isthmus to the shores of the broad ocean, nature's great

highway, which washed at once the shores of Old and of New Spain. From

the Caribbean, Great Britain, although her rivals had anticipated her

in the possession of the largest and richest districts, derived nearly

twenty-five per cent of her commerce, during the strenuous period when

the Mediterranean contributed but two per cent.

But over these fair regions too passed the blight, not of despotism

merely, for despotism was characteristic of the times, but of a

despotism which found no counteractive, no element of future

deliverance, in the temperament or in the political capacities of the

people over whom it ruled. Elizabeth, as far as she dared, was a

despot; Philip II. was a despot; but there was already manifest in her

subjects, while there was not in his, a will and a power not merely to

resist oppression, but to organize freedom. This will and this power,

after gaining many partial victories by the way, culminated once for

all in the American Revolution. Great Britain has never forgotten the

lesson then taught; for it was one she herself had been teaching for

centuries, and her people and statesmen were therefore easy learners.

A century and a quarter has passed since that warning was given, not

to Great Britain only, but to the world; and we to-day see, in the

contrasted colonial systems of the two states, the results, on the one

hand of political aptitude, on the other of political obtuseness and

backwardness, which cannot struggle from the past into the present

until the present in turn has become the past--irreclaimable.

Causes superficially very diverse but essentially the same, in that

they arose from and still depend upon a lack of local political

capacity, have brought the Mediterranean and the Caribbean, in our own

time, to similar conditions, regarded as quantities of interest in the

sphere of international relations. Whatever the intrinsic value of the

two bodies of water, in themselves or in their surroundings, whatever

their present contributions to the prosperity or to the culture of

mankind, their conspicuous characteristics now are their political and

military importance, in the broadest sense, as concerning not only the

countries that border them, but the world at large. Both are land-girt

seas; both are links in a chain of communication between an East and a

West; in both the chain is broken by an isthmus; both are of

contracted extent when compared with great oceans, and, in consequence

of these common features, both present in an intensified form the

advantages and the limitations, political and military, which

condition the influence of sea power. This conclusion is notably true

of the Mediterranean, as is shown by its history. It is even more

forcibly true of the Caribbean, partly because the contour of its

shores does not, as in the Mediterranean peninsulas, thrust the power

of the land so far and so sustainedly into the sea; partly because,

from historical antecedents already alluded to, in the character of

the first colonists, and from the shortness of the time the ground has

been in civilized occupation, there does not exist in the Caribbean or

in the Gulf of Mexico--apart from the United States--any land power at

all comparable with those great Continental states of Europe whose

strength lies in their armies far more than in their navies. So far as

national inclinations, as distinct from the cautious actions of

statesmen, can be discerned, in the Mediterranean at present the Sea

Powers, Great Britain, France, and Italy, are opposed to the Land

Powers, Germany, Austria, and Russia; and the latter dominate action.

It cannot be so, in any near future, in the Caribbean. As affirmed in

a previous paper, the Caribbean is pre-eminently the domain of sea

power. It is in this point of view--the military or naval--that it is

now to be considered. Its political importance will be assumed, as

recognized by our forefathers, and enforced upon our own attention by

the sudden apprehensions awakened within the last two years.

It may be well, though possibly needless, to ask readers to keep

clearly in mind that the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico, while

knit together like the Siamese twins, are distinct geographical

entities. A leading British periodical once accused the writer of

calling the Gulf of Mexico the Caribbean Sea, because of his

unwillingness to admit the name of any other state in connection with

a body of water over which his own country claimed predominance. The

Gulf of Mexico is very clearly defined by the projection, from the

north, of the peninsula of Florida, and from the south, of that of

Yucatan. Between the two the island of Cuba interposes for a distance

of two hundred miles, leaving on one side a passage of nearly a

hundred miles wide--the Strait of Florida--into the Atlantic, while on

the other, the Yucatan Channel, somewhat broader, leads into the

Caribbean Sea. It may be mentioned here, as an important military

consideration, that from the mouth of the Mississippi westward to Cape

Catoche--the tip of the Yucatan Peninsula--there is no harbor that can

be considered at all satisfactory for ships of war of the larger

classes. The existence of many such harbors in other parts of the

regions now under consideration practically eliminates this long

stretch of coast, regarded as a factor of military importance in the

problem before us.

In each of these sheets of water, the Gulf of Mexico and the

Caribbean, there is one position of pre-eminent commercial importance.

In the Gulf the mouth of the Mississippi is the point where meet all

the exports and imports, by water, of the Mississippi Valley. However

diverse the directions from which they come, or the destinations to

which they proceed, all come together here as at a great crossroads,

or as the highways of an empire converge on the metropolis. Whatever

value the Mississippi and the myriad miles of its subsidiary

water-courses represent to the United States, as a facile means of

communication from the remote interior to the ocean highways of the

world, all centres here at the mouth of the river. The existence of

the smaller though important cities of the Gulf coast--Mobile,

Galveston, or the Mexican ports--does not diminish, but rather

emphasizes by contrast, the importance of the Mississippi entrance.

They all share its fortunes, in that all alike communicate with the

outside world through the Strait of Florida or the Yucatan Channel.

In the Caribbean, likewise, the existence of numerous important ports,

and a busy traffic in tropical produce grown within the region itself,

do but make more striking the predominance in interest of that one

position known comprehensively, but up to the present somewhat

indeterminately, as the Isthmus. Here again the element of decisive

value is the crossing of the roads, the meeting of the ways, which,

whether imposed by nature itself, as in the cases before us, or

induced, as sometimes happens, in a less degree, by simple human

dispositions, are prime factors in mercantile or strategic

consequence. For these reasons the Isthmus, even under the

disadvantages of land carriage and transshipment of goods, has ever

been an important link in the communications from East to West, from

the days of the first discoverers and throughout all subsequent

centuries, though fluctuating in degree from age to age; but when it

shall be pierced by a canal, it will present a maritime centre

analogous to the mouth of the Mississippi. They will differ in this,

that in the latter case the converging water routes on one side are

interior to a great state whose resources they bear, whereas the roads

which on either side converge upon the Isthmus lie wholly upon the

ocean, the common possession of all nations. Control of the latter,

therefore, rests either upon local control of the Isthmus itself, or,

indirectly, upon control of its approaches, or upon a distinctly

preponderant navy. In naval questions the latter is always the

dominant factor, exactly as on land the mobile army--the army in the

field--must dominate the question of fortresses, unless war is to be

impotent.

We have thus the two centres round which revolve all the military study

of the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico. The two sheets of water,

taken together, control or affect the approaches on one side to these

two supreme centres of commercial, and therefore of political and

military, interest. The approaches on the other side--the interior

communications of the Mississippi, that is, or the maritime routes

in the Pacific converging upon the Isthmus--do not here concern us.

These approaches, in terms of military art, are known as the

"communications." Communications are probably the most vital and

determining element in strategy, military or naval. They are literally

the most radical; for all military operations depend upon communications,

as the fruit of a plant depends upon communication with its root. We

draw therefore upon the map the chief lines by which communication

exists between these two centres and the outside world. Such lines

represent the mutual dependence of the centres and the exterior, by

which each ministers to the others, and by severance of which either

becomes useless to the others. It is from their potential effect upon

these lines of communication that all positions in the Gulf or the

Caribbean derive their military value, or want of value.

It is impossible to precede or to accompany a discussion of this sort

with a technical exposition of naval strategy. Such definitions of the

art as may be needed must be given _in loco_, cursorily and

dogmatically. Therefore it will be said here briefly that the

strategic value of any position, be it body of land large or small, or

a seaport, or a strait, depends, 1, upon situation (with reference

chiefly to communications), 2, upon its strength (inherent or

acquired), and, 3, upon its resources (natural or stored). As strength

and resources are matters which man can accumulate where suitable

situation offers, whereas he cannot change the location of a place in

itself otherwise advantageous, it is upon situation that attention

must primarily be fixed. Strength and resources may be artificially

supplied or increased, but it passes the power of man to move a port

which lies outside the limits of strategic effect. Gibraltar in

mid-ocean might have fourfold its present power, yet would be

valueless in a military sense.

The positions which are indicated on the map by the dark squares have

been selected, therefore, upon these considerations, after a careful

study of the inherent advantages of the various ports and coast-lines

of the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf. It is by no means meant that there

are not others which possess merits of various kinds; or that those

indicated, and to be named, exhaust the strategic possibilities of the

region under examination. But there are qualifying circumstances of

degree in particular cases; and a certain regard must be had to

political conditions, which may be said to a great extent to

neutralize some positions. Some, too, are excluded because

overshadowed by others so near and so strong as practically to embrace

them, when under the same political tenure. Moreover, it is a

commonplace of strategy that passive positions, fortified places,

however strong, although indispensable as supports to military

operations, should not be held in great number. To do so wastes force.

Similarly, in the study of a field of maritime operations, the number

of available positions, whose relative and combined influence upon the

whole is to be considered, should be narrowed, by a process of gradual

elimination, to those clearly essential and representative. To embrace

more confuses the attention, wastes mental force, and is a hindrance

to correct appreciation. The rejection of details, where permissible,

and understandingly done, facilitates comprehension, which is baffled

by a multiplication of minutiae, just as the impression of a work of

art, or of a story, is lost amid a multiplicity of figures or of

actors. The investigation precedent to formulation of ideas must be

close and minute, but that done, the unbiassed selection of the most

important, expressed graphically by a few lines and a few dots, leads

most certainly to the comprehension of decisive relations in a

military field of action.

In the United States, Pensacola and the Mississippi River have been

rivals for the possession of a navy-yard. The recent decision of a

specially appointed board in favor of the latter, while it commands

the full assent of the writer, by no means eliminates the usefulness

of the former. Taken together, they fulfil a fair requirement of

strategy, sea and land, that operations based upon a national

frontier, which a coast-line is, should not depend upon a single place

only. They are closer together than ideal perfection would wish; too

easily, therefore, to be watched by an enemy without great dispersal

of his force, which Norfolk and New York, for instance, are not; but

still, conjointly, they are the best we can do on that line, having

regard to the draught of water for heavy ships. Key West, an island

lying off the end of the Florida Peninsula, has long been recognized

as the chief, and almost the only, good and defensible anchorage upon

the Strait of Florida, reasonable control of which is indispensable to

water communication between our Atlantic and Gulf seaboards in time of

war. In case of war in the direction of the Caribbean, Key West is the

extreme point now in our possession upon which, granting adequate

fortification, our fleets could rely; and, so used, it would

effectually divert an enemy's force from Pensacola and the

Mississippi. It can never be the ultimate base of operations, as

Pensacola or New Orleans can, because it is an island, a small island,

and has no resources--not even water; but for the daily needs of a

fleet--coal, ammunition, etc.--it can be made most effective. Sixty

miles west of it stands an antiquated fortress on the Dry Tortugas.

These are capable of being made a useful adjunct to Key West, but at

present they scarcely can be so considered. Key West is 550 miles

distant from the mouth of the Mississippi, and 1200 from the Isthmus.

The islands of Santa Lucia and of Martinique have been selected

because they represent the chief positions of, respectively, Great

Britain and France on the outer limits of the general field under

consideration. For the reasons already stated, Grenada, Barbadoes,

Dominica, and the other near British islands are not taken into

account, or rather are considered to be embraced in Santa Lucia, which

adequately represents them. If a secondary position on that line were

required, it would be at Antigua, which would play to Santa Lucia the

part which Pensacola does to the Mississippi. In like manner the

French Guadeloupe merges in Martinique. The intrinsic importance of

these positions consists in the fact that, being otherwise suitable

and properly defended, they are the nearest to the mother-countries,

between whom and themselves there lies no point of danger near which

it is necessary to pass. They have the disadvantage of being very

small islands, consequently without adequate natural resources, and

easy to be blockaded on all sides. They are therefore essentially

dependent for their usefulness in war upon control of the sea, which

neither Pensacola nor New Orleans is, having the continent at their

backs.

It is in this respect that the pre-eminent intrinsic advantages of

Cuba, or rather of Spain in Cuba, are to be seen; and also, but in

much less degree, those of Great Britain in Jamaica. Cuba, though

narrow throughout, is over six hundred miles long, from Cape San

Antonio to Cape Maysi. It is, in short, not so much an island as a

continent, susceptible, under proper development, of great

resources--of self-sufficingness. In area it is half as large again as

Ireland, but, owing to its peculiar form, is much more than twice as

long. Marine distances, therefore, are drawn out to an extreme degree.

Its many natural harbors concentrate themselves, to a military

examination, into three principal groups, whose representatives are,

in the west, Havana; in the east, Santiago; while near midway of the

southern shore lies Cienfuegos. The shortest water distance separating

any two of these is 335 miles, from Santiago to Cienfuegos. To get

from Cienfuegos to Havana 450 miles of water must be traversed and the

western point of the island doubled; yet the two ports are distant by

land only a little more than a hundred miles of fairly easy country.

Regarded, therefore, as a base of naval operations, as a source of

supplies to a fleet, Cuba presents a condition wholly unique among the

islands of the Caribbean and of the Gulf of Mexico; to both which it,

and it alone of all the archipelago, belongs. It is unique in its

size, which should render it largely self-supporting, either by its

own products, or by the accumulation of foreign necessaries which

naturally obtains in a large and prosperous maritime community; and it

is unique in that such supplies can be conveyed from one point to the

other, according to the needs of a fleet, by interior lines, not

exposed to risks of maritime capture. The extent of the coast-line,

the numerous harbors, and the many directions from which approach can

be made, minimize the dangers of total blockade, to which all islands

are subject. Such conditions are in themselves advantageous, but they

are especially so to a navy inferior to its adversary, for they convey

the power--subject, of course, to conditions of skill--of shifting

operations from side to side, and finding refuge and supplies in

either direction.

Jamaica, being but one-tenth the size of Cuba, and one-fifth of its

length, does not present the intrinsic advantages of the latter

island, regarded either as a source of supplies or as a centre from

which to direct effort; but when in the hands of a power supreme at

sea, as at the present Great Britain is, the questions of supplies, of

blockade, and of facility in direction of effort diminish in

importance. That which in the one case is a matter of life and death,

becomes now only an embarrassing problem, necessitating watchfulness

and precaution, but by no means insoluble. No advantages of position

can counterbalance, in the long-run, decisive inferiority in organized

mobile force,--inferiority in troops in the field, and yet much more

in ships on the sea. If Spain should become involved in war with Great

Britain, as she so often before has been, the advantage she would have

in Cuba as against Jamaica would be that her communications with the

United States, especially with the Gulf ports, would be well under

cover. By this is not meant that vessels bound to Cuba by such routes

would be in unassailable security; no communications, maritime or

terrestrial, can be so against raiding. What is meant is that they can

be protected with much less effort than they can be attacked; that the

raiders--the offence--must be much more numerous and active than the

defence, because much farther from their base; and that the question

of such raiding would depend consequently upon the force Great Britain

could spare from other scenes of war, for it is not likely that Spain

would fight her single-handed. It is quite possible that under such

conditions advantage of position would more than counterbalance a

_small_ disadvantage in local force. "War," said Napoleon, "is a

business of positions;" by which that master of lightning-like

rapidity of movement assuredly did not mean that it was a business of

getting into a position and sticking there. It is in the utilization

of position by mobile force that war is determined, just as the effect

of a chessman depends upon both its individual value _and_ its

relative position. While, therefore, in the combination of the two

factors, force and position, force is intrinsically the more valuable,

it is always possible that great advantage of position may outweigh

small advantage of force, as 1 + 5 is greater than 2 + 3. The

positional value of Cuba is extremely great.

Regarded solely as a naval position, without reference to the force

thereon based, Jamaica is greatly inferior to Cuba in a question of

general war, notwithstanding the fact that in Kingston it possesses an

excellent harbor and naval station. It is only with direct reference

to the Isthmus, and therefore to the local question of the Caribbean

as the main scene of hostilities, that it possesses a certain

superiority which will be touched on later. It is advisable first to

complete the list, and so far as necessary to account for the

selection, of the other points indicated by the squares.

Of these, three are so nearly together at the Isthmus that, according

to the rule before adopted, they might be reduced very properly to a

single representative position. Being, however, so close to the great

centre of interest in the Caribbean, and having different specific

reasons constituting their importance, it is essential to a full

statement of strategic conditions in that sea to mention briefly each

and all. They are, the harbor and town of Colon, sometimes called

Aspinwall; the harbor and city of Cartagena, 300 miles to the eastward

of Colon; and the Chiriqui Lagoon, 150 miles west of Colon, a vast

enclosed bay with many islands, giving excellent and diversified

anchorage, the shores of which are nearly uninhabited. Colon is the

Caribbean terminus of the Panama Railroad, and is also that of the

canal projected, and partly dug, under the De Lesseps scheme. The

harbor being good, though open to some winds, it is naturally

indicated as a point where Isthmian transit may begin or end. As there

is no intention of entering into the controversy about the relative

merits of the Panama and Nicaragua canal schemes, it will be

sufficient here to say that, if the former be carried through, Colon

is its inevitable issue on one side. The city of Cartagena is the

largest and most flourishing in the neighborhood of the Isthmus, and

has a good harbor. With these conditions obtaining, its advantage

rests upon the axiomatic principle that, other things being nearly

equal, a place where commerce centres is a better strategic position

than one which it neglects. The latter is the condition of the

Chiriqui Lagoon. This truly noble sheet of water, which was visited by

Columbus himself, and bears record of the fact in the name of one of

its basins,--the Bay of the Admiral,--has every natural adaptation for

a purely naval base, but has not drawn to itself the operations of

commerce. Everything would need there to be created, and to be

maintained continuously. It lies midway between Colon and the mouth of

the river San Juan, where is Greytown, which has been selected as the

issue of the projected Nicaragua Canal; and therefore, in a peculiar

way, Chiriqui symbolizes the present indeterminate phase of the

Isthmian problem. With all its latent possibilities, however, little

can be said now of Chiriqui, except that a rough appreciation of its

existence and character is essential to an adequate understanding of

Isthmian conditions.

The Dutch island of Curaçao has been marked, chiefly because, with its

natural characteristics, it cannot be passed over; but it now is, and

it may be hoped will remain indefinitely, among the positions of which

it has been said that they are neutralized by political circumstances.

Curaçao possesses a fine harbor, which may be made impregnable, and it

lies unavoidably near the route of any vessel bound to the Isthmus and

passing eastward of Jamaica. Such conditions constitute undeniable

military importance; but Holland is a small state, unlikely to join

again in a general war. There is, indeed, a floating apprehension that

the German Empire, in its present desires of colonial extension, may

be willing to absorb Holland, for the sake of her still extensive

colonial possessions. Improbable as this may seem, it is scarcely more

incomprehensible than the recent mysterious movements upon the

European chess-board, attributed by common rumor to the dominating

influence of the Emperor of Germany, which we puzzled Americans for

months past have sought in vain to understand.

The same probable neutrality must be admitted for the remaining

positions that have been distinguished: Mujeres Island, Samana Bay,

and the island of St. Thomas. The first of these, at the extremity of

the Yucatan Peninsula, belongs to Mexico, a country whose interest in

the Isthmian question is very real; for, like the United States, she

has an extensive seaboard both upon the Pacific and--in the Gulf of

Mexico--upon the Atlantic Ocean. Mujeres Island, however, has nothing

to offer but situation, being upon the Yucatan Passage, the one road

from all the Gulf ports to the Caribbean and the Isthmus. The

anchorage is barely tolerable, the resources _nil_, and defensive

strength could be imparted only by an expense quite disproportionate

to the result obtained. The consideration of the island as a possible

military situation does but emphasize the fact, salient to the most

superficial glance, that, so far as position goes, Cuba has no

possible rival in her command of the Yucatan Passage, just as she has

no competitor, in point of natural strength and resources, for the

control of the Florida Strait, which connects the Gulf of Mexico with

the Atlantic.

Samana Bay, at the northeast corner of Santo Domingo, is but one of

several fine anchorages in that great island, whose territory is now

divided between two negro republics--French and Spanish in tongue. Its

selection to figure in our study, to the exclusion of the others, is

determined by its situation, and by the fact that we are seeking to

take a comprehensive glance of the Caribbean as a whole, and not

merely of particular districts. For instance, it might be urged

forcibly, in view of the existence of two great naval ports like

Santiago de Cuba and Port Royal in Jamaica, close to the Windward

Passage, through which lies the direct route from the Atlantic

seaboard to the Isthmus, that St. Nicholas Mole, immediately on the

Passage, offers the natural position for checking the others in case

of need. The reply is that we are not seeking to check anything or

anybody, but simply examining in the large the natural strategic

features, and incidentally thereto noting the political conditions, of

a maritime region in which the United States is particularly

interested; political conditions, as has been remarked, having an

unavoidable effect upon military values.

The inquiry being thus broad, Samana Bay and the island of St. Thomas

are entitled to the pre-eminence here given to them, because they

represent, efficiently and better than any other positions, the

control of two principal passages into the Caribbean Sea from the

Atlantic. The Mona Passage, on which Samana lies, between Santo

Domingo and Puerto Rico, is particularly suited to sailing-vessels

from the northward, because free from dangers to navigation. This, of

course, in these days of steam, is a small matter militarily; in the

latter sense the Mona Passage is valuable because it is an alternative

to the Windward Passage, or to those to the eastward, in case of

hostile predominance in one quarter or the other. St. Thomas is on the

Anegada Passage, actually much used, and which better than any other

represents the course from Europe to the Isthmus, just as the Windward

Passage does that from the North American Atlantic ports. Neither of

these places can boast of great natural strength nor of resources; St.

Thomas, because it is a small island with the inherent weaknesses

attending all such, which have been mentioned; Samana Bay, because,

although the island on which it is is large and productive, it has not

now, and gives no hope of having, that political stability and

commercial prosperity which bring resources and power in their train.

Both places would need also considerable development of defensive

works to meet the requirements of a naval port. Despite these defects,

their situations on the passages named entitle them to paramount

consideration in a general study of the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of

Mexico. Potentially, though not actually, they lend control of the

Mona and Anegada Passages, exactly as Kingston and Santiago do of the

Windward.

For, granting that the Isthmus is in the Caribbean the predominant

interest, commercial, and therefore concerning the whole world, but

also military, and so far possessing peculiar concern for those

nations whose territories lie on both oceans, which it now severs and

will one day unite--of which nations the United States is the most

prominent--granting this, and it follows that entrance to the

Caribbean, and transit across the Caribbean to the Isthmus, are two

prime essentials to the enjoyment of the advantages of the latter.

Therefore, in case of war, control of these two things becomes a

military object not second to the Isthmus itself, access to which

depends upon them; and in their bearing upon these two things the

various positions that are passed under consideration must be

viewed--individually first, and afterwards collectively.

The first process of individual consideration the writer has asked the

reader to take on faith; neither time nor space permits its

elaboration here; but the reasons for choosing those that have been

named have been given as briefly as possible. Let us now look at the

map, and regard as a collective whole the picture there graphically

presented.

Putting to one side, for the moment at least, the Isthmian points, as

indicating the end rather than the precedent means, we see at the

present time that the positions at the extremes of the field under

examination are held by Powers of the first rank,--Martinique and

Santa Lucia by France and Great Britain, Pensacola and the Mississippi

by the United States.

Further, there are held by these same states of the first order two

advanced positions, widely separated from the first bases of their

power; namely, Key West, which is 460 miles from Pensacola, and

Jamaica, which is 930 miles from Santa Lucia. From the Isthmus, Key

West is distant 1200 miles; Jamaica, 500 miles.

Between and separating these two groups, of primary bases and advanced

posts, extends the chain of positions from Yucatan to St. Thomas. As

far as is possible to position, apart from mobile force, these

represent control over the northern entrances--the most important

entrances--into the Caribbean Sea. No one of this chain belongs to any

of the Powers commonly reckoned as being of the first order of

strength.

The entrances on the north of the sea, as far as, but not including,

the Anegada Passage, are called the most important, because they are

so few in number,--a circumstance which always increases value;

because they are so much nearer to the Isthmus; and, very especially

to the United States, because they are the ones by which, and by which

alone,--except at the cost of a wide circuit,--she communicates with

the Isthmus, and, generally, with all the region lying within the

borders of the Caribbean.

In a very literal sense the Caribbean is a mediterranean sea; but

the adjective must be qualified when comparison is made with the

Mediterranean of the Old World or with the Gulf of Mexico. The

last-named bodies of water communicate with the outer oceans by passages

so contracted as to be easily watched from near-by positions, and for

both there exist such positions of exceptional strength,--Gibraltar

and some others in the former case, Havana and no other in the latter.

The Caribbean, on the contrary, is enclosed on its eastern side by

a chain of small islands, the passages between which, although

practically not wider than the Strait of Gibraltar, are so numerous

that entrance to the sea on that side may be said correctly to extend

over a stretch of near 400 miles. The islands, it is true, are so many

positions, some better, some worse, from which military effort to

control entrance can be exerted; but their number prevents that

concentration and that certainty of effect which are possible to

adequate force resting upon Gibraltar or Havana.

On the northern side of the sea the case is quite different. From the

western end of Cuba to the eastern end of Puerto Rico extends a

barrier of land for 1200 miles--as against 400 on the east--broken

only by two straits, each fifty miles wide, from side to side of which

a steamer of but moderate power can pass in three or four hours. These

natural conditions, governing the approach to the Isthmus, reproduce

as nearly as possible the strategic effect of Ireland upon Great

Britain. There a land barrier of 300 miles, midway between the

Pentland Firth and the English Channel--centrally situated, that is,

with reference to all the Atlantic approaches to Great Britain--gives

to an adequate navy a unique power to flank and harass either the one

or the other, or both. Existing political conditions and other

circumstances unquestionably modify the importance of these two

barriers, relatively to the countries affected by them. Open

communication with the Atlantic is vital to Great Britain, which the

Isthmus, up to the present time, is not to the United States. There

are, however, varying degrees of importance below that which is vital.

Taking into consideration that of the 1200-mile barrier to the

Caribbean 600 miles is solid in Cuba, that after the 50-mile gap of

the Windward Passage there succeeds 300 miles more of Haiti before the

Mona Passage is reached, it is indisputable that a superior navy,

resting on Santiago de Cuba or Jamaica, could very seriously incommode

all access of the United States to the Caribbean mainland, and

especially to the Isthmus.

In connection with this should be considered also the influence upon

our mercantile and naval communication between the Atlantic and the

Gulf coasts exercised by the peninsula of Florida, and by the

narrowness of the channels separating the latter from the Bahama Banks

and from Cuba. The effect of this long and not very broad strip of

land upon our maritime interests can be realized best by imagining it

wholly removed, or else turned into an island by a practicable channel

crossing its neck. In the latter case the two entrances to the channel

would have indeed to be assured; but our shipping would not be forced

to pass through a long, narrow waterway, bordered throughout on one

side by foreign and possibly hostile territories. In case of war with

either Great Britain or Spain, this channel would be likely to be

infested by hostile cruisers, close to their own base, the very best

condition for a commerce-destroying war; and its protection by us

under present circumstances will exact a much greater effort than with

the supposed channel, or than if the Florida Peninsula did not exist.

The effect of the peninsula is to thrust our route from the Atlantic

to the Gulf 300 miles to the southward, and to make imperative a base

for control of the strait; while the case is made worse by an almost

total lack of useful harbors. On the Atlantic, the most exposed side,

there is none; and on the Gulf none nearer to Key West than 175

miles,[2] where we find Tampa Bay. There is, indeed, nothing that can

be said about the interests of the United States in an Isthmian canal

that does not apply now with equal force to the Strait of Florida. The

one links the Atlantic to the Gulf, as the other would the Atlantic to

the Pacific. It may be added here that the phenomenon of the long,

narrow peninsula of Florida, with its strait, is reproduced

successively in Cuba, Haiti, and Puerto Rico, with the passages

dividing them. The whole together forms one long barrier, the

strategic significance of which cannot be overlooked in its effect

upon the Caribbean; while the Gulf of Mexico is assigned to absolute

seclusion by it, if the passages are in hostile control.

[2] There is Charlotte Harbor, at 120 miles, but it can be used

only by medium-sized vessels.

The relations of the island of Jamaica to the great barrier formed by

Cuba, Haiti, and Puerto Rico are such as to constitute it the natural

stepping-stone by which to pass from the consideration of entrance

into the Caribbean, which has been engaging our attention, to that of

the transit across, from entrance to the Isthmus, which we must next

undertake.

In the matters of entrance to the Caribbean, and of general interior

control of that sea, Jamaica has a singularly central position. It is

equidistant (500 miles) from Colon, from the Yucatan Channel, and from

the Mona Passage; it is even closer (450 miles) to the nearest

mainland of South America at Point Gallinas, and of Central America at

Cape Gracias-á-Dios; while it lies so immediately in rear of the

Windward Passage that its command of the latter can scarcely be

considered less than that of Santiago. The analogy of its situation,

as a station for a great fleet, to that for an army covering a

frontier which is passable at but a few points, will scarcely escape a

military reader. A comparatively short chain of swift lookout

steamers, in each direction, can give timely notice of any approach by

either of the three passages named; while, if entrance be gained at

any other point, the arms stretched out towards Gallinas and

Gracias-á-Dios will give warning of transit before the purposes of

such transit can be accomplished undisturbed.

With such advantages of situation, and with a harbor susceptible of

satisfactory development as a naval station for a great fleet, Jamaica

is certainly the most important single position in the Caribbean Sea.

When one recalls that it passed into the hands of Great Britain, in

the days of Cromwell, by accidental conquest, the expedition having

been intended primarily against Santo Domingo; that in the two

centuries and a half which have since intervened it has played no part

adequate to its advantages, such as now looms before it; that, by all

the probabilities, it should have been reconquered and retained by

Spain in the war of the American Revolution; and when, again, it is

recalled that a like accident and a like subsequent uncertainty

attended the conquest and retention of the decisive Mediterranean

positions of Gibraltar and Malta, one marvels whether incidents so

widely separated in time and place, all tending towards one end--the

maritime predominance of Great Britain--can be accidents, or are

simply the exhibition of a Personal Will, acting through all time,

with purpose deliberate and consecutive, to ends not yet discerned.

Nevertheless, when compared to Cuba, Jamaica cannot be considered the

preponderant position of the Caribbean. The military question of

position is quantitative as well as qualitative; and situation,

however excellent, can rarely, by itself alone, make full amends for

defect in the power and resources which are the natural property of

size--of mass. Gibraltar, the synonym of intrinsic strength, is an

illustration in point; its smallness, its isolation, and its

barrenness of resource constitute limits to its offensive power, and

even to its impregnability, which are well understood by military men.

Jamaica, by its situation, flanks the route from Cuba to the Isthmus,

as indeed it does all routes from the Atlantic and the Gulf to that

point; but, as a military entity, it is completely overshadowed by the

larger island, which it so conspicuously confronts. If, as has just

been said, it by situation intercepts the access of Cuba to the

Isthmus, it is itself cut off by its huge neighbor from secure

communication with the North American Continent, now as always the

chief natural source of supplies for the West Indies, which do not

produce the great staples of life. With the United States friendly or

neutral, in a case of war, there can be no comparison between the

advantages of Cuba, conferred by its situation and its size, and those

of Jamaica, which, by these qualities of its rival, is effectually cut

off from that source of supplies. Nor is the disadvantage of Jamaica

less marked with reference to communication with other quarters than

the United States--with Halifax, with Bermuda, with Europe. Its

distance from these points, and from Santa Lucia, where the resources

of Europe may be said to focus for it, makes its situation one of

extreme isolation; a condition emphasized by the fact that both

Bermuda and Santa Lucia are themselves dependent upon outside sources

for anything they may send to Jamaica. At all these points, coal, the

great factor of modern naval war, must be stored and the supply

maintained. They do not produce it. The mere size of Cuba, the amount

of population which it has, or ought to have, the number of its

seaports, the extent of the industries possible to it, tend naturally

to an accumulation of resources such as great mercantile communities

always entail. These, combined with its nearness to the United States,

and its other advantages of situation, make Cuba a position that can

have no military rival among the islands of the world, except Ireland.

With a friendly United States, isolation is impossible to Cuba.

The aim of any discussion such as this should be to narrow down, by a

gradual elimination, the various factors to be considered, in order

that the decisive ones, remaining, may become conspicuously visible.

The trees being thus thinned out, the features of the strategic

landscape can appear. The primary processes in the present case have

been carried out before seeking the attention of the reader, to whom

the first approximations have been presented under three heads. First,

the two decisive centres, the mouth of the Mississippi and the

Isthmus. Second, the four principal routes, connecting these two

points with others, have been specified; these routes being, 1,

between the Isthmus and the Mississippi themselves; 2, from the

Isthmus to the North American coast, by the Windward Passage; 3, from

the Gulf of Mexico to the North American coast, by the Strait of

Florida; and, 4, from the Isthmus to Europe, by the Anegada Passage.

Third, the principal military positions throughout the region in

question have been laid down, and their individual and relative

importance indicated.

From the subsequent discussion it seems evident that, as

"communications" are so leading an element in strategy, the position

or positions which decisively affect the greatest number or extent of

the communications will be the most important, so far as situation

goes. Of the four principal lines named, three pass close to, and are

essentially controlled by, the islands of Cuba and Jamaica, namely,

from the Mississippi to the Isthmus by the Yucatan Channel, from the

Mississippi to the Atlantic coast of America by the Strait of Florida,

and from the Isthmus to the Atlantic coast by the Windward Passage.

The fourth route, which represents those from the Isthmus to Europe,

passes nearer to Jamaica than to Cuba; but those two islands exercise

over it more control than does any other one of the archipelago, for

the reason that any other can be avoided more easily, and by a wider

interval, than either Jamaica or Cuba.

Regarded as positions, therefore, these two islands are the real

rivals for control of the Caribbean and of the Gulf of Mexico; and it

may be added that the strategic centre of interest for both Gulf and

Caribbean is to be found in the Windward Passage, because it furnishes

the ultimate test of the relative power of the two islands to control

the Caribbean. For, as has been said before, and cannot be repeated

too often, it is not position only, nor chiefly, but mobile force,

that is decisive in war. In the combination of these two elements

rests the full statement of any case. The question of position has

been adjudged in favor of Cuba, for reasons which have been given. In

the case of a conflict between the powers holding the two islands, the

question of controlling the Windward Passage would be the test of

relative mobile strength; because that channel is the shortest and

best line of communications for Jamaica with the American coast, with

Halifax, and with Bermuda, and as such it must be kept open. If the

power of Jamaica is not great enough to hold the passage open by

force, she is thrown upon evasion--upon furtive measures--to maintain

essential supplies; for, if she cannot assert her strength so far in

that direction, she cannot, from her nearness, go beyond Cuba's reach

in any direction. Abandonment of the best road in this case means

isolation; and to that condition, if prolonged, there is but one

issue.

The final result, therefore, may be stated in this way: The advantages

of situation, strength, and resources are greatly and decisively in

favor of Cuba. To bring Jamaica to a condition of equality, or

superiority, is needed a mobile force capable of keeping the Windward

Passage continuously open, not only for a moment, nor for any

measurable time, but throughout the war. Under the present conditions

of political tenure, in case of a war involving only the two states

concerned, such a question could admit of no doubt; but in a war at

all general, involving several naval powers, the issue would be less

certain. In the war of 1778 the tenure, not of the Windward Passage

merely, but of Jamaica itself, was looked upon by a large party in

Great Britain as nearly hopeless; and it is true that only a happy

concurrence of blundering and bad luck on the part of its foes then

saved the island. It is conceivable that odds which have happened once

may happen again.

The Interest of America in Sea Power, Present and Future · 第 18 / 19 题