CHAPTER XIX. THE GREAT PILLAGE.

The revolution was now under weigh, and as it had begun so it continued.

There was practically no resistance by the Catholic nobility and gentry:

in the Lowlands, apparently, almost all were of the new persuasion. The

Duc de Chatelherault might hesitate while his son, the Protestant Earl of

Arran, who had been in France as Captain of the Scots Guard, was escaping

into Switzerland, and thence to England; but, on Arran's arrival there,

the Hamiltons saw their chance of succeeding to the crown in place of the

Catholic Mary. The Regent had but a small body of professional French

soldiers. But the other side could not keep their feudal levies in the

field, and they could not coin the supplies of church plate which must

have fallen into their hands, until they had seized the Mint at

Edinburgh, so money was scarce with them. It was plain to Knox and

Kirkcaldy of Grange, and it soon became obvious to Maitland of

Lethington, who, of course, forsook the Regent, that aid from England

must be sought,--aid in money, and if possible in men and ships.

Meanwhile the reformers dealt with the ecclesiastical buildings of St

Andrews as they had done at Perth, Knox urging them on by his sermons. We

may presume that the boys broke the windows and images with a sanctified

joy. A mutilated head of the Redeemer has been found in a _latrine_ of

the monastic buildings. As Commendator, or lay Prior, James Stewart may

have secured the golden sheath of the arm-bone of the Apostle, presented

by Edward I., and the other precious things, the sacred plate of the

Church in a fane which had been the Delphi of Scotland. Lethington

appears to have obtained most of the portable property of St Salvator's

College except that beautiful monument of idolatry, the great silver mace

presented by Kennedy, the Founder, work of a Parisian silversmith, in

1461: this, with maces of rude native work, escaped the spoilers. The

monastery of the Franciscans is now levelled with the earth; of the

Dominicans' chapel a small fragment remains. Of the residential part of

the abbey a house was left: when the lead had been stripped from the roof

of the church it became a quarry.

"All churchmen's goods were spoiled and reft from them . . . for every

man for the most part that could get anything pertaining to any churchmen

thought the same well-won gear," says a contemporary Diary. Arran

himself, when he arrived in Scotland, robbed a priest of all that he had,

for which Chatelherault made compensation.

By the middle of June the Regent was compelled to remove almost all her

French soldiers out of Fife. Perth was evacuated. The abbey of Scone

and the palace were sacked. The Congregation entered Edinburgh: they

seem to have found the monasteries already swept bare, but they seized

Holyrood, and the stamps at the Mint. The Regent proclaimed that this

was flat rebellion, and that the rebels were intriguing with England.

Knox denied it, in the first part of his History (in origin a

contemporary tract written in the autumn), but the charge was true, and

Knox and Kirkcaldy were, since June, the negotiators. Already his party

were offering Arran (the heir of the crown after Mary) as a husband for

Elizabeth, who saw him but rejected his suit. Arran's father,

Chatelherault, later openly deserted the Regent (July 1). The death of

Henri II., wounded in a tournament, did not accelerate the arrival of

French reinforcements for the Regent. The weaker Brethren, however,

waxed weary; money was scarce, and on July 24, the Congregation evacuated

Edinburgh and Leith, after a treaty which they misrepresented, broke, and

accused the Regent of breaking. {111a}

Knox visited England, about August 1, but felt dissatisfied with his

qualification for diplomacy. Nothing, so far, was gained from Elizabeth,

save a secret supply of 3000 pounds. On the other hand, fresh French

forces arrived at Leith: the place was fortified; the Regent was again

accused of perfidy by the perfidious; and on October 21 the Congregation

proclaimed her deposition on the alleged authority of her daughter, now

Queen of France, whose seal they forged and used in their documents. One

Cokky was the forger; he saw Arran use the seal on public papers. {111b}

Cokky had made a die for the coins of the Congregation--a crown of

thorns, with the words _Verbum Dei_. Leith, manned by French soldiers,

was, till in the summer of 1560 it surrendered to the Congregation and

their English allies, the centre of Catholic resistance.

In November the Congregation, after a severe defeat, fled in grief from

Edinburgh to Stirling, where Knox reanimated them, and they sent

Lethington to England to crave assistance. Lethington, who had been in

the service of the Regent, is henceforth the central figure of every

intrigue. Witty, eloquent, subtle, he was indispensable, and he had one

great ruling motive, to unite the crowns and peoples of England and

Scotland. Unfortunately he loved the crafty exercise of his dominion

over men's minds for its own sake, and when, in some inscrutable way, he

entered the clumsy plot to murder Darnley, and knew that Mary could prove

his guilt, his shiftings and changes puzzle historians. In Scotland he

was called Michael Wily, that is, Macchiavelli, and "the necessary evil."

In his mission to England Lethington was successful. By December 21 the

English diplomatist, Sadleyr, informed Arran that a fleet was on its way

to aid the Congregation, who were sacking Paisley Abbey, and issuing

proclamations in the names of Francis and Mary. The fleet arrived while

the French were about to seize St Andrews (January 23, 1560), and the

French plans were ruined. The Regent, who was dying, found shelter in

Edinburgh Castle, which stood neutral. On February 27, 1560, at Berwick,

the Congregation entered into a regular league with England, Elizabeth

appearing as Protectress of Scotland, while the marriage of Mary and

Francis endured.

Meanwhile, owing to the Huguenot disturbances in France (such as the

Tumult of Amboise, directed against the lives of Mary's uncles the

Cardinal and Duc de Guise), Mary and Francis could not help the Regent,

and Huntly, a Catholic, presently, as if in fear of the western clans,

joined the Congregation. Mary of Guise had found the great northern

chief treacherous, and had disgraced him, and untrustworthy he continued

to be. On May 7 the garrison of Leith defeated with heavy loss an Anglo-

Scottish attack on the walls; but on June 16 the Regent made a good end,

in peace with all men. She saw Chatelherault, James Stewart, and the

Earl Marischal; she listened patiently to the preacher Willock; she bade

farewell to all, and died, a notable woman, crushed by an impossible

task. The garrison of Leith, meanwhile, was starving on rats and

horseflesh: negotiations began, and ended in the Treaty of Edinburgh

(July 6, 1560).

This Treaty, as between Mary, Queen of France and Scotland, on one hand,

and England on the other, was never ratified by Mary Stuart: she appears

to have thought that one clause implied her abandonment of all her claims

to the English succession, typified by her quartering of the Royal

English arms on her own shield. Thus there never was nor could be amity

between her and her sister and her foe, Elizabeth, who was justly

aggrieved by her assumption of the English arms, while Elizabeth

quartered the arms of France. Again, the ratification of the Treaty as

regarded Mary's rebels depended on their fulfilling certain clauses

which, in fact, they instantly violated.

Preachers were planted in the larger town, some of which had already

secured their services; Knox took Edinburgh. "Superintendents,"--by no

means bishops--were appointed, an order which soon ceased to exist in the

Kirk: their duties were to wander about in their provinces,

superintending and preaching. By request of the Convention (which was

crowded by persons not used to attend), some preachers drew up, in four

days, a Confession of Faith, on the lines of Calvin's rule at Geneva:

this was approved and passed on August 17. The makers of the document

profess their readiness to satisfy any critic of any point "from the

mouth of God" (out of the Bible), but the pace was so good that either no

criticism was offered or it was very rapidly "satisfied." On August 24

four acts were passed in which the authority of "The Bishop of Rome" was

repudiated. All previous legislation, not consistent with the new

Confession, was rescinded. Against celebrants and attendants of the Mass

were threatened (1) confiscation and corporal punishment; (2) exile; and

(3) for the third offence, Death. The death sentence is not known to

have been carried out in more than one or two cases. (Prof. Hume-Brown

writes that "the penalties attached to the breach of these enactments"

(namely, the abjuration of Papal jurisdiction, the condemnation of all

practices and doctrines contrary to the new creed, and of the celebration

of Mass in Scotland) "were those approved and sanctioned by the example

of every country in Christendom." But not, surely, for the same

offences, such as "the saying or hearing of Mass"?--' History of

Scotland,' ii. 71, 72: 1902.) Suits in ecclesiastical were removed into

secular courts (August 29).

In the Confession the theology was that of Calvin. Civil rulers were

admitted to be of divine institution, their duty is to "suppress

idolatry," and they are not to be resisted "when doing that which

pertains to their charge." But a Catholic ruler, like Mary, or a

tolerant ruler, as James VI. would fain have been, apparently may be

resisted for his tolerance. Resisted James was, as we shall see,

whenever he attempted to be lenient to Catholics.

The Book of Discipline, by Knox and other preachers, never was ratified

by the Estates, as the Confession of Faith had been. It made admirable

provisions for the payment of preachers and teachers, for the

Universities, and for the poor; but somebody, probably Lethington, spoke

of the proposals as "devout imaginations." The Book of Discipline

approved of what was later accepted by the General Assembly, The Book of

Common Order in Public Worship. This book was not a stereotyped Liturgy,

but it was a kind of guide to the ministers in public prayers: the

minister may repeat the prayers, or "say something like in effect." On

the whole, he prayed "as the Spirit moved him," and he really seems to

have been regarded as inspired; his prayers were frequently political

addresses. To silence these the infatuated policy of Charles I. thrust

the Laudian Liturgy on the nation.

The preachers were to be chosen by popular election, after examination in

knowledge and as to morals. There was to be no ordination "by laying on

of hands." "Seeing the miracle is ceased, the using of the ceremony we

deem not necessary"; but, if the preachers were inspired, the miracle had

not ceased, and the ceremony was soon reinstated. Contrary to Genevan

practice, such festivals as Christmas and Easter were abolished. The

Scottish Sabbath was established in great majesty. One "rag of Rome" was

retained, clerical excommunication--the Sword of Church Discipline. It

was the cutting off from Christ of the excommunicated, who were handed

over to the devil, and it was attended by civil penalties equivalent to

universal boycotting, practical outlawry, and followed by hell fire:

"which sentence, lawfully pronounced on earth, is ratified in heaven."

The strength of the preachers lay in this terrible weapon, borrowed from

the armoury of Rome.

Private morals were watched by the elders, and offenders were judged in

kirk-sessions. Witchcraft, Sabbath desecration, and sexual laxities were

the most prominent and popular sins. The mainstay of the system is the

idea that the Bible is literally inspired; that the preachers are the

perhaps inspired interpreters of the Bible, and that the country must

imitate the old Hebrew persecution of "idolaters," that is, mainly

Catholics. All this meant a theocracy of preachers elected by the

populace, and governing the nation by their General Assembly in which

nobles and other laymen sat as elders. These peculiar institutions came

hot from Geneva, and the country could never have been blessed with them,

as we have observed, but for that instrument of Providence, Cardinal

Beaton. Had he disposed of himself and Scotland to Henry VIII. (who

would not have tolerated Presbyterian claims for an hour), Scotland would

not have received the Genevan discipline, and the Kirk would have groaned

under bishops.

The Reformation supplied Scotland with a class of preachers who were pure

in their lives, who were not accessible to bribes (a virtue in which they

stood almost alone), who were firm in their faith, and soon had learning

enough to defend it; who were constant in their parish work, and of whom

many were credited with prophetic and healing powers. They could

exorcise ghosts from houses, devils from men possessed.

The baldness of the services, the stern nature of the creed, were

congenial to the people. The drawbacks were the intolerance, the

spiritual pretensions of the preachers to interference in secular

affairs, and the superstition which credited men like Knox, and later,

Bruce, with the gifts of prophecy and other miraculous workings, and

insisted on the burning of witches and warlocks, whereof the writer knows

scarcely an instance in Scotland before the Reformation.

The pulpit may be said to have discharged the functions of the press (a

press which was all on one side). When, in 1562, Ninian Winzet, a

Catholic priest and ex-schoolmaster, was printing a controversial

tractate addressed to Knox, the magistrates seized the manuscript at the

printer's house, and the author was fortunate in making his escape. The

nature of the Confession of Faith, and of the claims of the ministers to

interfere in secular affairs, with divine authority, was certain to cause

war between the Crown and the Kirk. That war, whether open and armed, or

a conflict in words, endured till, in 1690, the weapon of excommunication

with civil penalties was quietly removed from the ecclesiastical armoury.

Such were the results of a religious revolution hurriedly effected.

The Lords now sent an embassy to Elizabeth about the time of the death of

Amy Robsart, and while Amy's husband, Robert Dudley, was very dear to the

English queen, to urge, vainly, her marriage with Arran. On December 5,

1560, Francis II. died, leaving Mary Stuart a mere dowager; while her

kinsmen, the Guises, lost power, which fell into the unfriendly hands of

Catherine de Medici. At once Arran, who made Knox his confidant, began

to woo Mary with a letter and a ring. Her reply perhaps increased his

tendency to madness, which soon became open and incurable by the science

of the day.

Here we must try to sketch Mary, _la, Reine blanche_, in her white royal

mourning. Her education had been that of the learned ladies of her age;

she had some knowledge of Latin, and knew French and Italian. French was

to her almost a mother-tongue, but not quite; she had retained her Scots,

and her attempts to write English are, at first, curiously imperfect. She

had lived in a profligate Court, but she was not the wanton of hostile

slanders. She had all the guile of statesmanship, said the English

envoy, Randolph; and she long exercised great patience under daily

insults to her religion and provocations from Elizabeth. She was

generous, pitiful, naturally honourable, and most loyal to all who served

her. But her passions, whether of love or hate, once roused, were

tyrannical. In person she was tall, like her mother, and graceful, with

beautiful hands. Her face was somewhat long, the nose long and straight,

the lips and chin beautifully moulded, the eyebrows very slender, the

eyes of a reddish brown, long and narrow. Her hair was russet, drawn

back from a lofty brow; her smile was captivating; she was rather

fascinating than beautiful; her courage and her love of courage in others

were universally confessed. {118}

In January, 1561, the Estates of Scotland ordered James Stuart, Mary's

natural brother, to visit her in France. In spring she met him, and an

envoy from Huntly (Lesley, later Bishop of Ross), who represented the

Catholic party, and asked Mary to land in Aberdeen, and march south at

the head of the Gordons and certain northern clans. The proposal came

from noblemen of Perthshire, Angus, and the north, whose forces could not

have faced a Lowland army. Mary, who had learned from her mother that

Huntly was treacherous, preferred to take her chance with her brother,

who, returning by way of England, moved Elizabeth to recognise the

Scottish queen as her heir. But Elizabeth would never settle the

succession, and, as Mary refused to ratify the Treaty of Edinburgh,

forbade her to travel home through England.

A Short History of Scotland · 第 19 / 33 章