To which he immediately replied with the well-known lines:--

"I do not love you, Dr Fell,

But why, I cannot tell,

But this I know full well,

I do not love you, Dr Fell."[1]

Delinquents, however, were not always treated thus mildly by Fell, and

Acton Cremer, for the crime of courting a wife while only a bachelor of

arts, was set as an imposition the translation into English of the whole

of Scheffer's history of Lapland. As vice-chancellor, Fell himself

visited the drinking taverns and ordered out the students. In the

university elections he showed great energy in suppressing corruption.

Fell's building operations almost rivalled the plans of the great

ecclesiastical architects of the middle ages. In his own college he

completed in 1665 the north side of Wolsey's great quadrangle, already

begun by his father but abandoned during the Commonwealth; he rebuilt in

1672 the east side of the Chaplain's quadrangle "with a straight passage

under it leading from the cloister into the field," occupied now by the

new Meadow Buildings; the lodgings of the canon of the 3rd stall in the

passage uniting the Tom and Peckwater quadrangles (c. 1674); a long

building joining the Chaplain's quadrangle on the east side in

1677-1678; and lastly the great tower gate, begun in June 1681 on the

foundation laid by Wolsey and finished in November 1682, to which the

bell "great Tom," after being recast, was transferred from the cathedral

in 1683. In 1670 he planted and laid out the Broad Walk. He spent large

sums of his own on these works, gave L500 for the restoration of Banbury

church, erected a church at St Oswald's, Worcester, and the parsonage

house at Woodstock at his own expense, and rebuilt Cuddesdon palace.

Fell disapproved of the use of St Mary's church for secular purposes,

and promoted the building of the Sheldonian theatre by Archbishop

Sheldon. He was treasurer during its construction, presided at the

formal opening on the 9th of July 1669, and was nominated with Wren

curator in July 1670. In the theatre was placed the University Press,

the establishment of which had been a favourite project of Laud, which

now engaged a large share of Fell's energy and attention, and which as

curator he practically controlled. "Were it not you ken Mr Dean

extraordinarily well," writes Sir L. Jenkins to J. Williamson in 1672,

"it were impossible to imagine how assiduous and drudging he is about

his press."[2] He sent for type and printers from Holland, declaring

that "the foundation of all success must be laid in doing things well,

which I am sure will not be done with English letters." Many works,

including a Bible, editions of the classics and of the early fathers,

were produced under his direction and editing, and his press became

noted not only in England but abroad. He published annually one work,

generally a classical author annotated by himself, which he distributed

to all the students of his college on New Year's day. On one occasion he

surprised the Press in printing surreptitiously Aretino's _Postures_,

when he seized and destroyed the plates and impressions. Ever "an eager

defender and maintainer of the university and its privileges," he was

hostile to the Royal Society, which he regarded as a possible rival, and

in 1686 he gave an absolute refusal to Obadiah Walker, afterwards the

Roman Catholic master of University College, though licensed by James

II., to print books, declaring he would as soon "part with his bed from

under him" as his press. He conducted it on strict business principles,

and to the criticism that more great works were not produced replied

that they would not sell. He was, however, not free from fads, and his

new spelling (of which one feature was the substitution of _i_ for _y_

in such words as _eies_, _daies_, _maiest_) met with great disapproval.

Fell also did much to encourage learning in the university. While still

a young man at Christ Church he had shown both his zeal and his charity

by reading gratuitously with the poor and neglected students of the

college. He bore himself a high reputation as a Grecian, a Latinist and

a philologist, and he found time, in spite of his great public

employments, to bring out with the collaboration of others his great

edition of St Cyprian in 1682, an English translation of _The Unity of

the Church_ in 1681, editions of _Nemesius of Emesa_ (1671), of _Aratus

and of Eratosthenes_ (1672), _Theocritus_ (1676), _Alcinous on Plato_

(1677), _St Clement's Epistles to the Corinthians_ (1677), _Athenagoras_

(1682), _Clemens Alexandrinus_ (1683), _St Theophilus of Antioch_

(1684), _Grammatica rationis sive institutiones logicae_ (1673 and

1685), and a critical edition of the New Testament in 1675. The first

volumes of _Rerum Anglicarum scriptores_ and of _Historiae Britannicae_,

&c. were compiled under his patronage in 1684. He had the MSS. of St.

Augustine in the Bodleian and other libraries at Oxford generously

collated for the use of the Benedictines at Paris, then preparing a new

edition of the father.

Fell spent such large sums in his building, in his noble patronage of

learning, and in charities, that sometimes there was little left for his

private use. Occasionally in his schemes he showed greater zeal than

prudence. He was the originator of a mission to India which was warmly

taken up by the East India Company. He undertook himself to train as

missionaries four scholars at Oxford, procured a set of Arabic types,

and issued from these the Gospels and Acts in the Malay language in

1677. But this was scarcely the best method of communicating the gospel

to the natives of India, and the mission collapsed. He affected to

despise public opinion, and was masterful and despotic in his dealings

with others, especially with those upon whom he was conferring favours.

Having generously undertaken at his own charge to publish a Latin

version of Wood's _History and Antiquities of the University of Oxford_,

with the object of presenting the history of the university in a manner

worthy of the great subject to European readers, and of extending its

fame abroad, he arrogated to himself the right of editing the work. "He

would correct, alter, dash out what he pleased.... He was a great man

and carried all things at his pleasure." In particular he struck out all

the passages which Wood had inserted in praise of Hobbes, and

substituted some disparaging epithets. He called the philosopher's

_Leviathan_ "monstrosissimus" and "publico damno notissimus." To the

printed remonstrance of Hobbes, Fell inserted an insulting reply in the

_History_ to "irritabile illud et vanissimum Malmesburiense animal," and

to the complaint of Wood at this usage answered only that Hobbes "was an

old man, had one foot in the grave; that he should mind his latter end,

and not trouble the world any more with his papers." In small things as

in great he loved to rule and direct. "Let not Fell," writes R. South to

R. Bathurst, "have the fingering and altering of them (i.e. his Latin

verses), for I think that, bating the want of _siquidems_ and

_quinetiams_, they are as good as his Worship can make." Wood styles him

"a valde vult person." He was not content with ruling his own college,

but desired to govern the whole university. He prevented Gilbert

Ironside, who "was not pliable to his humour," from holding the office

of vice-chancellor. He "endeavoured to carry all things by a high hand;

scorn'd in the least to court the Masters when he had to have anything

pass'd the convocation. Severe to other colleges, blind as to his own,

very partiall and with good words, and flatterers and tell-tales could

get anything out of him." According to Bishop Burnet, who praises his

character and his administration, Fell was "a little too much heated in

the matter of our disputes with the dissenters." "He had much zeal for

reforming abuses, and managed it perhaps with too much heat and in too

peremptory a way." "But," he adds, "we have so little of that among us

that no wonder if such men are censured by those who love not such

patterns nor such severe task-masters." And Wood, whose adverse

criticism must be discounted a little on account of the personal

dispute,--after declaring that Fell "was exceeding partial in his

government even to corruption; went thro' thick and thin; grasped at all

yet did nothing perfect or effectually; cared not what people said of

him, was in many things very rude and in most pedantic and

pedagogical,"--concludes with the acknowledgment, "yet still aimed at

the public good." Roger North, who paid Fell a visit at Oxford, speaks

of him in terms of enthusiasm:--"The great Dr Fell, who was truly great

in all his circumstances, capacities, undertakings and learning, and

above all for his superabundant public spirit and goodwill.... O the

felicity of that age and place when his authority swayed!"

In November 1684, at the command of the king, Fell deprived Locke, who

had incurred the royal displeasure by his friendship with Shaftesbury,

and was suspected as the author of certain seditious pamphlets, of his

studentship at Christ Church, summarily and without hearing his defence.

Fell had in former years cultivated Locke's friendship, had kept up a

correspondence with him, and in 1663 had written a testimonial in his

favour; and the ready compliance of one who could on occasion offer a

stout resistance to any invasion of the privileges of the university has

been severely criticised. It must, however, be remembered in extenuation

that the legal status of a person on the foundation of a collegiate body

had not then been decided in the law-courts. With regard to the justice

of the proceeding Fell had evidently some doubts, and he afterwards

expressed his regret for the step which he was now compelled to take.

But such scruples, however strong, would, with a man of Fell's political

and religious opinions, yield immediately to an order from the

sovereign, who possessed special authority in this case as a visitor to

the college; and such subservience, however strange to modern notions,

would probably only be considered natural and proper at that period.

Fell, who had never married, died on the 10th of July 1686, worn out,

according to Wood, by his overwhelming public duties. He was buried in

the divinity chapel in the cathedral, below the seat which he had so

often occupied when living, where a monument and an epitaph, now moved

elsewhere, were placed to his memory. "His death," writes John Evelyn,

"was an extraordinary losse to the poore church at this time"; but for

himself Fell was fortunate in the time of his departure; for a few

months more of life would have necessitated a choice, most painful to a

man of his character and creed, between fidelity to his sovereign and to

his church. With all his faults, which were the defects which often

attend eminent qualities such as his, Fell was a great man, "the

greatest governor," according to Speaker Onslow, "that has ever been

since his time in either of the universities," and of his own college,

to which he left several exhibitions for the maintenance of poor

scholars, he was a second founder. He was a worthy upholder of the

Laudian tradition at Oxford, an enlightened and untiring patron of

learning, and a man of exemplary morals and great piety which remained

unsullied in the midst of a busy life and much contact with the world. A

sum of money was left by John Cross to perpetuate Fell's memory by an

annual speech in his praise, but the _Felii laudes_ have been

discontinued since 1866. There are two interesting pictures of Fell at

Christ Church, one where he is represented with his two friends

Allestree and Dolben, and another by Vandyck. The statue placed on the

N.E. angle of the Great Quadrangle bears no likeness to the bishop, who

is described by Hearne as a "thin grave man."

Besides the learned works already mentioned Fell wrote the lives of his

friends Dr Henry Hammond (1661), Richard Allestree, prefixed to his

edition of the latter's sermons (1684), and Dr Thomas Willis, in Latin.

His _Seasonable advice to Protestants showing the necessity of

maintaining the Established Religion in opposition to Popery_ was

published in 1688. Some of his sermons, which Evelyn found dull, were

printed, including _Character of the Last Daies_, preached before the

king, 1675, and a _Sermon preached before the House of Peers Dec. 22,

1680_. _The Interest of England stated_ (1659), advocating the

restoration of the king,[3] and _The Vanity of Scoffing_ (1674), are

also attributed to him. Fell probably had some share in the composition

of _The Whole Duty of Man_, and in the subsequent works published under

the name of the author of _The Whole Duty_, which included _Reasons of

the Decay of Christian Piety_, _The Ladies Calling_, _The Gentleman's

Calling_, _The Government of the Tongue_, _The Art of Contentment_, and

_The Lively Oracles given us_, all of which were published in one volume

with notes and a preface by Fell in 1684.

AUTHORITIES.--Wood's _Athenae Oxonienses_ and _Fasti_ (ed. Bliss);

Wood's _Life and Times_, ed. by A. Clark; Burnet's _Hist. of His Own

Time_, ed. 1833; J. Welch, _Alumni Westmonasterienses_; Thomas Hearne,

_Collections_, ed. by C.E. Doble and others; _History of the Univ. of

Oxford_ (1814); _Christ Church_, by Rev. H.L. Thompson; _Fortnightly

Review_, lix. 689 (May 1896); _Macmillan's Magazine_ (Aug. 1875); _A

Specimen of the several sorts of Letter given to the University by

Dr J. F(ell)_ (1695); _Notes and Queries_, ser. vi. 2, and ser. vii.

166; _Calendars of State Papers, Dom. Series_ (1660-1675). Fell's

books and papers were bequeathed by his nephew Henry Jones to the

Bodleian library. A few of his letters are to be found in _Add. MSS._

Brit. Mus. 11046, and some are printed in _Life of James II._, by Ch.

J. Fox, _Appendix_; _Gent. Mag._ 77, p. 633; _Academy_, 8, p. 141;

_Athenaeum_ for 1887 (2), p. 311; J. Gutch, _Collectanea Curiosa_, i.

269; and in _Cal. of State Papers, Dom. Series_. (P. C. Y.)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Fairbanks, Erastus" to "Fens" Volume 10, Slice 2 · 第 33 / 37 题