THE ISSUES OF THE WAR.

DEDICATION OF A NEW EDITION OF THE SPEECH ON THE BARBARISM OF

SLAVERY,[152] JULY 4, 1863.

TO THE YOUNG MEN OF THE UNITED STATES I DEDICATE THIS NEW

EDITION OF A SPEECH ON THE BARBARISM OF SLAVERY, IN TOKEN OF

HEARTFELT GRATITUDE TO THEM FOR BRAVE AND PATRIOTIC SERVICE

RENDERED IN THE PRESENT WAR FOR CIVILIZATION.

It is now more than three years since I deemed it my duty, in the

Senate, to expose the Barbarism of Slavery. This phrase, though common

now, was new then. The speech was a reply, strict and logical, to

assumptions of Senators, asserting the “divine origin” of Slavery, its

“ennobling” character, and that it was the “black marble keystone” of

our national arch. Listening to these assumptions, which were of daily

recurrence, I felt that they ought to be answered; and considering

their effrontery, it seemed to me that they should be answered

frankly and openly, by exhibiting Slavery _as it really is_, without

reserve,--careful that I should “nothing extenuate, nor set down aught

in malice.” This I did.

In that debate was joined the issue still pending in the Trial by

Battle. The inordinate assumptions for Slavery naturally ripened in

Rebellion and War. If Slavery were in reality all that was claimed by

its representatives, they must have failed in duty, if they did not

vindicate and advance it. Not easily could they see a thing so “divine”

and so “ennobling,” constituting the “black marble keystone” of our

national arch, discredited by popular vote, even if not yet consigned

to sacrifice.

The election of Mr. Lincoln was a judgment against Slavery, and its

representatives were aroused.

Meanwhile, for more than a generation, an assumption of Constitutional

Law, hardly less baleful, had become rooted side by side with Slavery,

so that the two shot up in rank luxuriance together. It was assumed,

that, under the Constitution, a State was privileged at any time, in

the exercise of its own discretion, to withdraw from the Union. This

absurdity found little favor at first, even among the representatives

of Slavery. To say that two and two make five could not be more

irrational. But custom and constant repetition gradually produced

an impression, until, at last, all the maddest for Slavery were the

maddest also for this disorganizing ally.

It was then, conjoined with this constitutional assumption, that the

assumption for Slavery grew into noxious vigor, so that, at last, when

Mr. Lincoln was elected, it broke forth in flagrant war; but the war

was declared in the name of State Rights.

Therefore there are two _apparent_ rudiments to this war. One is

Slavery, and the other is State Rights. But the latter is only a cover

for the former. If Slavery were out of the way, there would be no

trouble from State Rights.

The war, then, is for Slavery, and nothing else. It is an insane

attempt by arms to vindicate the lordship asserted in debate. With

madcap audacity it seeks to install this Barbarism as the truest

Civilization. Slavery is announced as the “corner-stone” of the new

edifice. This is enough.

The question is presented between Barbarism and Civilization,--not

merely between two different forms of Civilization, but between

Barbarism on the one side and Civilization on the other side.

Such is the issue, simply stated. On the one side are women and

children at the auction-block, families rudely separated, human flesh

lacerated and seamed by the bloody scourge, labor extorted without

wages; and all this frightful, many-sided wrong is the declared

foundation of a mock Commonwealth. On the other side is the Union of

our fathers, with the image of Liberty on its coin and the sentiment of

Liberty in its Constitution, now arrayed under a patriotic Government,

which insists that no such mock Commonwealth, having such declared

foundation, shall be permitted on the national territory, purchased

with money and blood, to impair the unity of our jurisdiction, and to

insult the moral sense of mankind.

Therefore the battle waged by the Union is for Civilization itself, and

it must have aid and God-speed from all not openly for Barbarism. Every

one must give his best efforts, and especially the young men to whom I

now appeal.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 09 (of 20) · 第 128 / 133 题