The scenes of outrage, the frantic persecutions, were fast b

This etext was produced by David Widger

[NOTE: There is a short list of bookmarks, or pointers, at the end of the

file for those who may wish to sample the author's ideas before making an

entire meal of them. D.W.]

MOTLEY'S HISTORY OF THE NETHERLANDS, PG EDITION, VOLUME 9.

THE RISE OF THE DUTCH REPUBLIC

JOHN LOTHROP MOTLEY, D.C.L., LL.D.

1855

1564-1565 [CHAPTER V.]

Return of the three seigniors to the state council--Policy of

Orange--Corrupt character of the government--Efforts of the Prince

in favor of reform--Influence of Armenteros--Painful situation of

Viglius--His anxiety to retire--Secret charges against him

transmitted by the Duchess to Philip--Ominous signs of the times--

Attention of Philip to the details of persecution--Execution of

Fabricius, and tumult at Antwerp--Horrible cruelty towards the

Protestants--Remonstrance of the Magistracy of Bruges and of the

four Flemish estates against Titelmann--Obduracy of Philip--Council

of Trent--Quarrel for precedence between the French and Spanish

envoys--Order for the publication of the Trent decrees in the

Netherlands--Opposition to the measure--Reluctance of the Duchess--

Egmont accepts a mission to Spain--Violent debate in the council

concerning his instructions--Remarkable speech of Orange--Apoplexy

of Viglius--Temporary appointment of Hopper--Departure of Egmont--

Disgraceful scene at Cambray--Character of the Archbishop--Egmont in

Spain--Flattery and bribery--Council of Doctors--Vehement

declarations of Philip--His instructions to Egmont at his departure

--Proceedings of Orange in regard to his principality--Egmont's

report to the state council concerning his mission--His vainglory--

Renewed orders from Philip to continue the persecution--Indignation

of Egmont--Habitual dissimulation of the King--Reproof of Egmont by

Orange--Assembly of doctors in Brussels--Result of their

deliberations transmitted to Philip--Universal excitement in the

Netherlands--New punishment for heretics--Interview at Bayonne

between Catharine de Medici and her daughter, the Queen of Spain--

Mistaken views upon this subject--Diplomacy of Alva--Artful conduct

of Catharine--Stringent letters from Philip to the Duchess with

regard to the inquisition--Consternation of Margaret and of Viglius

--New proclamation of the Edicts, the Inquisition, and the Council

of Trent--Fury of the people--Resistance of the leading seigniors

and of the Brabant Council--Brabant declared free of the

inquisition--Prince Alexander of Parma betrothed to Donna Maria of

Portugal--Her portrait--Expensive preparations for the nuptials--

Assembly of the Golden Fleece--Oration of Viglius--Wedding of Prince

Alexander.

The remainder of the year, in the spring of which the Cardinal had left

the Netherlands, was one of anarchy, confusion, and corruption. At first

there had been a sensation of relief.

Philip had exchanged letters of exceeding amity with Orange, Egmont, and

Horn. These three seigniors had written, immediately upon Granvelle's

retreat, to assure the King of their willingness to obey the royal

commands, and to resume their duties at the state council. They had,

however, assured the Duchess that the reappearance of the Cardinal in the

country would be the signal for their instantaneous withdrawal. They

appeared at the council daily, working with the utmost assiduity often

till late into the night. Orange had three great objects in view, by

attaining which the country, in his opinion, might yet be saved, and the

threatened convulsions averted. These were to convoke the states-

general, to moderate or abolish the edicts, and to suppress the council

of finance and the privy council, leaving only the council of state. The

two first of these points, if gained, would, of course, subvert the whole

absolute policy which Philip and Granvelle had enforced; it was,

therefore, hardly probable that any impression would be made upon the

secret determination of the government in these respects. As to the

council of state, the limited powers of that body, under the

administration of the Cardinal, had formed one of the principal

complaints against that minister. The justice and finance councils

were sinks of iniquity. The most barefaced depravity reigned supreme.

A gangrene had spread through the whole government. The public

functionaries were notoriously and outrageously venal. The

administration of justice had been poisoned at the fountain, and the

people were unable to slake their daily thirst at the polluted stream.

There was no law but the law of the longest purse. The highest

dignitaries of Philip's appointment had become the most mercenary

hucksters who ever converted the divine temple of justice into a den of

thieves. Law was an article of merchandise, sold by judges to the

highest bidder. A poor customer could obtain nothing but stripes and

imprisonment, or, if tainted with suspicion of heresy, the fagot or the

sword, but for the rich every thing was attainable. Pardons for the most

atrocious crimes, passports, safe conducts, offices of trust and honor,

were disposed of at auction to the highest bidder. Against all this sea

of corruption did the brave William of Orange set his breast, undaunted

and unflinching. Of all the conspicuous men in the land, he was the only

one whose worst enemy had never hinted through the whole course of his

public career, that his hands had known contamination. His honor was

ever untarnished by even a breath of suspicion. The Cardinal could

accuse him of pecuniary embarrassment, by which a large proportion of

his revenues were necessarily diverted to the liquidation of his debts,

but he could not suggest that the Prince had ever freed himself from

difficulties by plunging his hands into the public treasury, when it

might easily have been opened to him.

It was soon, however, sufficiently obvious that as desperate a struggle

was to be made with the many-headed monster of general corruption as with

the Cardinal by whom it had been so long fed and governed. The Prince

was accused of ambition and intrigue. It was said that he was determined

to concentrate all the powers of government in the state council, which

was thus to become an omnipotent and irresponsible senate, while the King

would be reduced to the condition of a Venetian Doge. It was, of course,

suggested that it was the aim of Orange to govern the new Tribunal of

Ten. No doubt the Prince was ambitious. Birth, wealth, genius, and

virtue could not have been bestowed in such eminent degree on any man

without carrying with them the determination to assert their value.

It was not his wish so much as it was the necessary law of his being

to impress himself upon his age and to rule his fellow-men. But he

practised no arts to arrive at the supremacy which he felt must always

belong to him, what ever might be his nominal position in the political

hierarchy. He was already, although but just turned of thirty years,

vastly changed from the brilliant and careless grandee, as he stood at

the hour of the imperial abdication. He was becoming careworn in face,

thin of figure, sleepless of habit. The wrongs of which he was the daily

witness, the absolutism, the cruelty, the rottenness of the government,

had marked his face with premature furrows. "They say that the Prince is

very sad," wrote Morillon to Granvelle; "and 'tis easy to read as much in

his face. They say he can not sleep." Truly might the monarch have

taken warning that here was a man who was dangerous, and who thought too

much. "Sleekheaded men, and such as slept o' nights," would have been

more eligible functionaries, no doubt, in the royal estimation, but, for

a brief period, the King was content to use, to watch, and to suspect the

man who was one day to be his great and invincible antagonist. He

continued assiduous at the council, and he did his best, by entertaining

nobles and citizens at his hospitable mansion, to cultivate good

relations with large numbers of his countrymen. He soon, however, had

become disgusted with the court. Egmont was more lenient to the foul

practices which prevailed there, and took almost a childish pleasure in

dining at the table of the Duchess, dressed, as were many of the younger

nobles, in short camlet doublet with the wheat-sheaf buttons.

The Prince felt more unwilling to compromise his personal dignity by

countenancing the flagitious proceedings and the contemptible supremacy

of Armenteros, and it was soon very obvious, therefore, that Egmont was a

greater favorite at court than Orange. At the same time the Count was

also diligently cultivating the good graces of the middle and lower

classes in Brussels, shooting with the burghers at the popinjay, calling

every man by his name, and assisting at jovial banquets in town-house or

guild-hall. The Prince, although at times a necessary partaker also in

these popular amusements, could find small cause for rejoicing in the

aspect of affairs. When his business led him to the palace, he was

sometimes forced to wait in the ante-chamber for an hour, while Secretary

Armenteros was engaged in private consultation with Margaret upon the

most important matters of administration. It could not be otherwise than

galling to the pride and offensive to the patriotism of the Prince, to

find great public transactions entrusted to such hands. Thomas de

Armenteros was a mere private secretary--a simple clerk. He had no right

to have cognizance of important affairs, which could only come before his

Majesty's sworn advisers. He was moreover an infamous peculator. He was

rolling up a fortune with great rapidity by his shameless traffic in

benefices, charges, offices, whether of church or state. His name of

Armenteros was popularly converted into Argenteros, in order to symbolize

the man who was made of public money. His confidential intimacy with the

Duchess procured for him also the name of "Madam's barber," in allusion

to the famous ornaments of Margaret's upper lip, and to the celebrated

influence enjoyed by the barbers of the Duke of Savoy, and of Louis the

Eleventh. This man sold dignities and places of high responsibility at

public auction. The Regent not only connived at these proceedings, which

would have been base enough, but she was full partner in the disgraceful

commerce. Through the agency of the Secretary, she, too, was amassing a

large private fortune. "The Duchess has gone into the business of

vending places to the highest bidders," said Morillon, "with the bit

between her teeth." The spectacle presented at the council-board was

often sufficiently repulsive not only to the cardinalists, who were

treated with elaborate insolence, but to all men who loved honor and

justice, or who felt an interest in the prosperity of government. There

was nothing majestic in the appearance of the Duchess, as she sat

conversing apart with Armenteros, whispering, pinching, giggling, or

disputing, while important affairs of state were debated, concerning

which the Secretary had no right to be informed. It was inevitable that

Orange should be offended to the utmost by such proceedings, although he

was himself treated with comparative respect. As for the ancient

adherents of Granvelle, the Bordeys, Baves, and Morillons, they were

forbidden by the favorite even to salute him in the streets. Berlaymont

was treated by the Duchess with studied insult. "What is the man talking

about?" she would ask with languid superciliousness, if he attempted to

express his opinion in the state-council. Viglius, whom Berlaymont

accused of doing his best, without success, to make his peace with the

seigniors, was in even still greater disgrace than his fellow-

cardinalists. He longed, he said, to be in Burgundy, drinking

Granvelle's good wine. His patience under the daily insults which he

received from the government made him despicable in the eyes of his own

party. He was described by his friends as pusillanimous to an incredible

extent, timid from excess of riches, afraid of his own shadow. He was

becoming exceedingly pathetic, expressing frequently a desire to depart

and end his days in peace. His faithful Hopper sustained and consoled

him, but even Joachim could not soothe his sorrows when he reflected that

after all the work performed by himself and colleagues, "they had only

been beating the bush for others," while their own share in the spoils

had been withheld. Nothing could well be more contumelious than

Margaret's treatment of the learned Frisian. When other councillors were

summoned to a session at three o'clock, the President was invited at

four. It was quite impossible for him to have an audience of the Duchess

except in the presence of the inevitable Armenteras. He was not allowed

to open his mouth, even when he occasionally plucked up heart enough to

attempt the utterance of his opinions. His authority was completely

dead. Even if he essayed to combat the convocation of the states-general

by the arguments which the Duchess, at his suggestion, had often used for

the purpose, he was treated with the same indifference. "The poor

President," wrote Granvelle to the King's chief secretary, Gonzalo Perez,

"is afraid, as I hear, to speak a word, and is made to write exactly what

they tell him." At the same time the poor President, thus maltreated and

mortified, had the vanity occasionally to imagine himself a bold and

formidable personage. The man whom his most intimate friends described

as afraid of his own shadow, described himself to Granvelle as one who

went his own gait, speaking his mind frankly upon every opportunity, and

compelling people to fear him a little, even if they did not love him.

But the Cardinal knew better than to believe in this magnanimous picture

of the doctor's fancy.

Viglius was anxious to retire, but unwilling to have the appearance of

being disgraced. He felt instinctively, although deceived as to the

actual facts, that his great patron had been defeated and banished.

He did not wish to be placed in the same position. He was desirous,

as he piously expressed himself, of withdrawing from the world, "that he

might balance his accounts with the Lord, before leaving the lodgings of

life." He was, however, disposed to please "the master" as well as the

Lord. He wished to have the royal permission to depart in peace.

In his own lofty language, he wished to be sprinkled on taking his leave

"with the holy water of the court." Moreover, he was fond of his salary,

although he disliked the sarcasms of the Duchess. Egmont and others had

advised him to abandon the office of President to Hopper, in order, as he

was getting feeble, to reserve his whole strength for the state-council.

Viglius did not at all relish the proposition. He said that by giving

up the seals, and with them the rank and salary which they conferred,

he should become a deposed saint. He had no inclination, as long as he

remained on the ground at all, to part with those emoluments and honors,

and to be converted merely into the "ass of the state-council." He had,

however, with the sagacity of an old navigator, already thrown out his

anchor into the best holding-ground during the storms which he foresaw

were soon to sweep the state. Before the close of the year which now

occupies, the learned doctor of laws had become a doctor of divinity

also; and had already secured, by so doing, the wealthy prebend of Saint

Bavon of Ghent. This would be a consolation in the loss of secular

dignities, and a recompence for the cold looks of the Duchess. He did

not scruple to ascribe the pointed dislike which Margaret manifested

towards him to the awe in which she stood of his stern integrity of

character. The true reason why Armenteros and the Duchess disliked him

was because, in his own words, "he was not of their mind with regard to

lotteries, the sale of offices, advancement to abbeys, and many other

things of the kind, by which they were in such a hurry to make their

fortune." Upon another occasion he observed, in a letter to Granvelle,

that "all offices were sold to the highest bidder, and that the cause of

Margaret's resentment against both the Cardinal and himself was, that

they had so long prevented her from making the profit which she was now

doing from the sale of benefices, offices, and other favors."

The Duchess, on her part, characterized the proceedings and policy, both

past and present, of the cardinalists as factious, corrupt, and selfish

in the last degree. She assured her brother that the simony, rapine, and

dishonesty of Granvelle, Viglius, and all their followers, had brought

affairs into the ruinous condition which was then but too apparent. They

were doing their best, she said, since the Cardinal's departure, to show,

by their sloth and opposition, that they were determined to allow nothing

to prosper in his absence. To quote her own vigorous expression to

Philip--"Viglius made her suffer the pains of hell." She described him

as perpetually resisting the course of the administration, and she threw

out dark suspicions, not only as to his honesty but his orthodoxy.

Philip lent a greedy ear to these scandalous hints concerning the late

omnipotent minister and his friends. It is an instructive lesson in

human history to look through the cloud of dissimulation in which the

actors of this remarkable epoch were ever enveloped, and to watch them

all stabbing fiercely at each other in the dark, with no regard to

previous friendship, or even present professions. It is edifying to see

the Cardinal, with all his genius and all his grimace, corresponding on

familiar terms with Armenteros, who was holding him up to obloquy upon

all occasions; to see Philip inclining his ear in pleased astonishment to

Margaret's disclosures concerning the Cardinal, whom he was at the very

instant assuring of his undiminished confidence; and to see Viglius, the

author of the edict of 1550, and the uniform opponent of any mitigation

in its horrors, silently becoming involved without the least suspicion of

the fact in the meshes of inquisitor Titelmann.

Upon Philip's eager solicitations for further disclosures, Margaret

accordingly informed her brother of additional facts communicated to her,

after oaths of secrecy had been exchanged, by Titelmann and his colleague

del Canto. They had assured her, she said, that there were grave doubts

touching the orthodoxy of Viglius. He had consorted with heretics during

a large portion of his life, and had put many suspicious persons into

office. As to his nepotism, simony, and fraud, there was no doubt at

all. He had richly provided all his friends and relations in Friesland

with benefices. He had become in his old age a priest and churchman, in

order to snatch the provostship of Saint Bavon, although his infirmities

did not allow him to say mass, or even to stand erect at the altar.

The inquisitors had further accused him of having stolen rings, jewels,

plate, linen, beds, tapestry, and other furniture, from the

establishment, all which property he had sent to Friesland, and of having

seized one hundred thousand florins in ready money which had belonged to

the last abbe--an act consequently of pure embezzlement. The Duchess

afterwards transmitted to Philip an inventory of the plundered property,

including the furniture of nine houses, and begged him to command Viglius

to make instant restitution. If there be truth in the homely proverb,

that in case of certain quarrels honest men recover their rights, it is

perhaps equally certain that when distinguished public personages attack

each other, historians may arrive at the truth. Here certainly are

edifying pictures of the corruption of the Spanish regency in the

Netherlands, painted by the President of the state-council, and of the

dishonesty of the President painted by the Regent.

A remarkable tumult occurred in October of this year, at Antwerp. A

Carmelite monk, Christopher Smith, commonly called Fabricius, had left a

monastery in Bruges, adopted the principles of the Reformation, and taken

to himself a wife. He had resided for a time in England; but, invited by

his friends, he had afterwards undertaken the dangerous charge of gospel-

teacher in the commercial metropolis of the Netherlands. He was,

however, soon betrayed to the authorities by a certain bonnet dealer,

popularly called Long Margaret, who had pretended, for the sake of

securing the informer's fee, to be a convert to his doctrines. He was

seized, and immediately put to the torture. He manfully refused to

betray any members of his congregation, as manfully avowed and maintained

his religious creed. He was condemned to the flames, and during the

interval which preceded his execution, he comforted his friends by

letters of advice, religious consolation and encouragement, which he

wrote from his dungeon. He sent a message to the woman who had betrayed

him, assuring her of his forgiveness, and exhorting her to repentance.

His calmness, wisdom, and gentleness excited the admiration of all.

When; therefore, this humble imitator of Christ was led through the

streets of Antwerp to the stake, the popular emotion was at once visible.

To the multitude who thronged about the executioners with threatening

aspect, he addressed an urgent remonstrance that they would not

compromise their own safety by a tumult in his cause. He invited all,

however, to remain steadfast to the great truth for which he was about to

lay down his life. The crowd, as they followed the procession of

hangmen, halberdsmen, and magistrates, sang the hundred and thirtieth

psalm in full chorus. As the victim arrived upon the market-place,

he knelt upon the ground to pray, for the last time. He was, however,

rudely forced to rise by the executioner, who immediately chained him to

the stake, and fastened a leathern strap around his throat. At this

moment the popular indignation became uncontrollable; stones were

showered upon the magistrates and soldiers, who, after a slight

resistance, fled for their lives. The foremost of the insurgents dashed

into the enclosed arena, to rescue the prisoner. It was too late. The

executioner, even as he fled, had crushed the victim's head with a sledge

hammer, and pierced him through and through with a poniard. Some of the

bystanders maintained afterwards that his fingers and lips were seen to

move, as if in feeble prayer, for a little time longer, until, as the

fire mounted, he fell into the flames. For the remainder of the day,

after the fire had entirely smouldered to ashes, the charred and half-

consumed body of the victim remained on the market-place, a ghastly

spectacle to friend and foe. It was afterwards bound to a stone and cast

into the Scheld. Such was the doom of Christopher Fabricius, for having

preached Christianity in Antwerp. During the night an anonymous placard,

written with blood, was posted upon the wall of the town-house, stating

that there were men in the city who would signally avenge his murder.

Nothing was done, however, towards the accomplishment of the threat.

The King, when he received the intelligence of the transaction, was

furious with indignation, and wrote savage letters to his sister,

commanding instant vengeance to be taken upon all concerned in so foul

a riot. As one of the persons engaged had, however, been arrested and

immediately hanged, and as the rest had effected their escape, the affair

was suffered to drop.

The scenes of outrage, the frantic persecutions, were fast becoming too

horrible to be looked upon by Catholic or Calvinist. The prisons swarmed

with victims, the streets were thronged with processions to the stake.

The population of thriving cities, particularly in Flanders, were

maddened by the spectacle of so much barbarity inflicted, not upon

criminals, but usually upon men remarkable for propriety of conduct and

blameless lives. It was precisely at this epoch that the burgomasters,

senators, and council of the city of Bruges (all Catholics) humbly

represented to the Duchess Regent, that Peter Titelmann, inquisitor of

the Faith, against all forms of law, was daily exercising inquisition

among the inhabitants, not only against those suspected or accused of

heresy, but against all, however untainted their characters; that he was

daily citing before him whatever persons he liked, men or women,

compelling them by force to say whatever it pleased him; that he was

dragging people from their houses, and even from the sacred precincts of

the church; often in revenge for verbal injuries to himself, always under

pretext of heresy, and without form or legal warrant of any kind. They

therefore begged that he might be compelled to make use of preparatory

examinations with the co-operation of the senators of the city, to suffer

that witnesses should make their depositions without being intimidated by

menace, and to conduct all his subsequent proceedings according to legal

forms, which he had uniformly violated; publicly declaring that he would

conduct himself according to his own pleasure.

The four estates of Flanders having, in a solemn address to the King,

represented the same facts, concluded their brief but vigorous

description of Titelmann's enormities by calling upon Philip to suppress

these horrible practices, so manifestly in violation of the ancient

charters which he had sworn to support. It may be supposed that the

appeal to Philip would be more likely to call down a royal benediction

than the reproof solicited upon the inquisitor's head. In the privy

council, the petitions and remonstrances were read, and, in the words of

the President, "found to be in extremely bad taste." In the debate which

followed, Viglius and his friends recalled to the Duchess, in earnest

language, the decided will of the King, which had been so often

expressed. A faint representation was made, on the other hand, of the

dangerous consequences, in case the people were driven to a still deeper

despair. The result of the movement was but meagre. The Duchess

announced that she could do nothing in the matter of the request until

further information, but that meantime she had charged Titelmann to

conduct himself in his office "with discretion and modesty." The

discretion and modesty, however, never appeared in any modification of

the inquisitor's proceedings, and he continued unchecked in his infamous

career until death, which did not occur till several years afterwards.

In truth, Margaret was herself in mortal fear of this horrible personage.

He besieged her chamber door almost daily, before she had risen,

insisting upon audiences which, notwithstanding her repugnance to the

man, she did not dare to refuse. "May I perish," said Morillon, "if she

does not stand in exceeding awe of Titelmann." Under such circumstances,

sustained by the King in Spain, the Duchess in Brussels, the privy

council, and by a leading member of what had been thought the liberal

party, it was not difficult for the inquisition to maintain its ground,

notwithstanding the solemn protestations of the estates and the

suppressed curses of the people.

Philip, so far from having the least disposition to yield in the matter

of the great religious persecution, was more determined as to his course

than ever. He had already, as easy as August of this year, despatched

orders to the Duchess that the decrees of the Council of Trent should be

published and enforced throughout the Netherlands. The memorable quarrel

as to precedency between the French and Spanish delegates had given some

hopes of a different determination. Nevertheless, those persons who

imagined that, in consequence of this quarrel of etiquette, Philip would

slacken in his allegiance to the Church, were destined to be bitterly

mistaken. He informed his sister that, in the common cause of

Christianity, he should not be swayed by personal resentments.

How, indeed, could a different decision be expected? His envoy at Rome,

as well as his representatives at the council, had universally repudiated

all doubts as to the sanctity of its decrees. "To doubt the

infallibility of the council, as some have dared to do," said Francis de

Vargas, "and to think it capable of error, is the most devilish heresy of

all." Nothing could so much disturb and scandalize the world as such a

sentiment. Therefore the Archbishop of Granada told, very properly, the

Bishop of Tortosa, that if he should express such an opinion in Spain,

they would burn him. These strenuous notions were shared by the King.

Therefore, although all Europe was on tip-toe with expectation to see how

Philip would avenge himself for the slight put upon his ambassador,

Philip disappointed all Europe.

In August, 1564, he wrote to the Duchess Regent, that the decrees were

to be proclaimed and enforced without delay. They related to three

subjects, the doctrines to be inculcated by the Church, the reformation

of ecclesiastical moral, and the education of the people. General police

regulations were issued at the same time, by which heretics were to be

excluded from all share in the usual conveniences of society, and were

in fact to be strictly excommunicated. Inns were to receive no guests,

schools no children, alms-houses no paupers, grave-yards no dead bodies,

unless guests, children, paupers, and dead bodies were furnished with the

most satisfactory proofs of orthodoxy. Midwives of unsuspected Romanism

were alone to exercise their functions, and were bound to give notice

within twenty-four hours of every birth which occurred; the parish clerks

were as regularly to record every such addition to the population, and

the authorities to see that Catholic baptism was administered in each

case with the least possible delay. Births, deaths, and marriages could

only occur with validity under the shadow of the Church. No human being

could consider himself born or defunct unless provided with a priest's

certificate. The heretic was excluded, so far as ecclesiastical dogma

could exclude him, from the pale of humanity, from consecrated earth, and

from eternal salvation.

The decrees contained many provisions which not only conflicted with the

privileges of the provinces, but with the prerogatives of the sovereign.

For this reason many of the lords in council thought that at least the

proper exceptions should be made upon their promulgation. This was also

the opinion of the Duchess, but the King, by his letters of October, and

November (1564), expressly prohibited any alteration in the ordinances,

and transmitted a copy of the form according to which the canons had been

published in Spain, together with the expression of his desire that a

similar course should be followed in the Netherlands. Margaret of Parma

was in great embarrassment. It was evident that the publication could no

longer be deferred. Philip had issued his commands, but grave senators

and learned doctors of the university had advised strongly in favor of

the necessary exceptions. The extreme party, headed by Viglius, were in

favor of carrying out the royal decisions. They were overruled, and

the Duchess was induced to attempt a modification, if her brother's

permission could be obtained. The President expressed the opinion that

the decrees, even with the restrictions proposed, would "give no

contentment to the people, who, moreover, had no right to meddle with

theology." The excellent Viglius forgot, however, that theology had been

meddling altogether too much with the people to make it possible that the

public attention should be entirely averted from the subject. Men and

women who might be daily summoned to rack, stake, and scaffold, in the

course of these ecclesiastical arrangements, and whose births, deaths,

marriages, and position in the next world, were now to be formally

decided upon, could hardly be taxed with extreme indiscretion, if they

did meddle with the subject.

In the dilemma to which the Duchess was reduced, she again bethought

herself of a special mission to Spain. At the end of the year (1564), it

was determined that Egmont should be the envoy. Montigny excused himself

on account of private affairs; Marquis Berghen "because of his

indisposition and corpulence." There was a stormy debate in council

after Egmont had accepted the mission and immediately before his

departure. Viglius had been ordered to prepare the Count's instructions.

Having finished the rough draught, he laid it before the board. The

paper was conceived in general terms and might mean any thing or nothing.

No criticism upon its language was, however, offered until it came to the

turn of Orange to vote upon the document. Then, however, William the

Silent opened his lips, and poured forth a long and vehement discourse,

such as he rarely pronounced, but such as few except himself could utter.

There was no shuffling, no disguise, no timidity in his language.

He took the ground boldly that the time had arrived for speaking out.

The object of sending an envoy of high rank and European reputation like

the Count of Egmont, was to tell the King the truth. Let Philip know it

now. Let him be unequivocally informed that this whole machinery of

placards and scaffolds, of new bishops and old hangmen, of decrees,

inquisitors, and informers, must once and forever be abolished. Their

day was over. The Netherlands were free provinces, they were surrounded

by free countries, they were determined to vindicate their ancient

privileges. Moreover, his Majesty was to be plainly informed of the

frightful corruption which made the whole judicial and administrative

system loathsome. The venality which notoriously existed every where,

on the bench, in the council chamber, in all public offices, where purity

was most essential, was denounced by the Prince in scathing terms.

He tore the mask from individual faces, and openly charged the Chancellor

of Brabant, Engelbert Maas, with knavery and corruption. He insisted

that the King should be informed of the necessity of abolishing the two

inferior councils, and of enlarging the council of state by the admission

of ten or twelve new members selected for their patriotism, purity, and

capacity. Above all, it was necessary plainly to inform his Majesty that

the canons of Trent, spurned by the whole world, even by the Catholic

princes of Germany, could never be enforced in the Netherlands, and that

it would be ruinous to make the attempt. He proposed and insisted that

the Count of Egmont should be instructed accordingly. He avowed in

conclusion that he was a Catholic himself and intended to remain in the

Faith, but that he could not look on with pleasure when princes strove to

govern the souls of men, and to take away their liberty in matters of

conscience and religion.

Here certainly was no daintiness of phraseology, and upon these leading

points, thus slightly indicated, William of Orange poured out his

eloquence, bearing conviction upon the tide of his rapid invective.

His speech lasted till seven in the evening, when the Duchess adjourned

the meeting. The council broke up, the Regent went to supper, but the

effect of the discourse upon nearly all the members was not to be

mistaken. Viglius was in a state of consternation, perplexity, and

despair. He felt satisfied that, with perhaps the exception of

Berlaymont, all who had listened or should afterwards listen to the

powerful arguments of Orange, would be inevitably seduced or bewildered.

The President lay awake, tossing and tumbling in his bed, recalling the

Prince's oration, point by point, and endeavoring, to answer it in order.

It was important, he felt, to obliterate the impression produced.

Moreover, as we have often seen, the learned Doctor valued himself upon

his logic.

It was absolutely necessary, therefore, that in his reply, next day, his

eloquence should outshine that of his antagonist. The President thus

passed a feverish and uncomfortable night, pronouncing and listening to

imaginary harangues. With the dawn of day he arose and proceeded to

dress himself. The excitement of the previous evening and the subsequent

sleeplessness of his night had, however, been too much for his feeble and

slightly superannuated frame. Before he had finished his toilet,

a stroke of apoplexy stretched him senseless upon the floor.

His servants, when they soon afterwards entered the apartment,

found him rigid, and to all appearance dead. After a few days,

however, he recovered his physical senses in part, but his reason

remained for a longer time shattered, and was never perhaps fully

restored to its original vigor.

This event made it necessary that his place in the council should be

supplied. Viglius had frequently expressed intentions of retiring,

a measure to which he could yet never fully make up his mind. His place

was now temporarily supplied by his friend and countryman, Joachim

Hopper, like himself a, Frisian doctor of ancient blood and extensive

acquirements, well versed in philosophy and jurisprudence; a professor of

Louvain and a member of the Mechlin council. He was likewise the

original founder and projector of Douay University, an institution which

at Philip's desire he had successfully organized in 1556, in order that a

French university might be furnished for Walloon youths, as a substitute

for the seductive and poisonous Paris. For the rest, Hopper was a mere

man of routine. He was often employed in private affairs by Philip,

without being entrusted with the secret at the bottom of them. His mind

was a confused one, and his style inexpressibly involved and tedious.

"Poor master Hopper," said Granvelle, "did not write the best French in

the world; may the Lord forgive him. He was learned in letters, but knew

very little of great affairs." His manners were as cringing as his

intellect was narrow. He never opposed the Duchess, so that his

colleagues always called him Councillor "Yes, Madam," and he did his best

to be friends with all the world.

In deference to the arguments of Orange, the instructions for Egmont were

accordingly considerably modified from the original draughts of Viglius.

As drawn up by the new President, they contained at least a few hints to

his Majesty as to the propriety of mitigating the edicts and extending

some mercy to his suffering people. The document was, however, not very

satisfactory to the Prince, nor did he perhaps rely very implicitly upon

the character of the envoy.

Egmont set forth upon his journey early in January (1565). He travelled

in great state. He was escorted as far as Cambray by several nobles of

his acquaintance, who improved the occasion by a series of tremendous

banquets during the Count's sojourn, which was protracted till the end of

January. The most noted of these gentlemen were Hoogstraaten, Brederode,

the younger Mansfeld, Culemburg, and Noircarmes. Before they parted with

the envoy, they drew up a paper which they signed with their blood, and

afterwards placed in the hands of his Countess. In this document they

promised, on account of their "inexpressible and very singular affection"

for Egmont, that if, during his mission to Spain, any evil should befal

him, they would, on their faith as gentlemen and cavaliers of honor, take

vengeance, therefore, upon the Cardinal Granvelle, or upon all who should

be the instigators thereof.

[Green v. P., Archives, etc., i. 345, from Arnoldi, Hist. Denkwurd,

p. 282., It is remarkable that after the return of the Count from.

Spain, Hoogstraaten received this singular bond from the Countess,

and gave it to Mansfeld, to be burned in his presence. Mansfeld,

however, advised keeping it, on account of Noircarmes, whose

signature was attached to the document, and whom he knew to be so

false and deceitful a man that it might be well to have it within

their power at some future day to reproach him therewith.--Ibid.

It will be seen in the sequel that Noircarmes more than justified

the opinion of Mansfeld, but that the subsequent career of Mansfeld

himself did not entitle him to reproach any of Philip's noble

hangmen.]

Wherever Brederode was, there, it was probable, would be much severe

carousing. Before the conclusion, accordingly, of the visit to Cambray,

that ancient city rang with the scandal created by a most uproarious

scene. A banquet was given to Egmont and his friends in the citadel.

Brederode, his cousin Lumey, and the other nobles from Brussels, were all

present. The Archbishop of Cambray, a man very odious to the liberal

party in the provinces, was also bidden to the feast. During the dinner,

this prelate, although treated with marked respect by Egmont, was the

object of much banter and coarse pleasantry by the ruder portion of the

guests. Especially these convivial gentlemen took infinite pains to

overload him with challenges to huge bumpers of wine; it being thought

very desirable, if possible; to place the Archbishop under the table.

This pleasantry was alternated with much rude sarcasm concerning the new

bishoprics. The conversation then fell upon other topics, among others,

naturally upon the mission of Count Egmont. Brederede observed that it

was a very hazardous matter to allow so eminent a personage to leave the

land at such a critical period. Should any thing happen to the Count,

the Netherlands would sustain an immense loss. The Archbishop, irritated

by the previous conversation, ironically requested the speaker to be

comforted, "because," said he, "it will always be easy to find a new

Egmont." Upon this, Brederode, beside himself with rage, cried out

vehemently, "Are we to tolerate such language from this priest?"

Gulemburg, too, turning upon the offender, observed, "Your observation

would be much more applicable to your own case. If you were to die,

't would be easy to find five hundred of your merit, to replace you in

the see of Cambray." The conversation was, to say the least, becoming

personal. The Bishop, desirous of terminating this keen encounter of

wits, lifted a goblet full of wine and challenged Brederode to drink.

That gentleman declined the invitation. After the cloth had been

removed, the cup circulated more freely than ever. The revelry became

fast and furious. One of the younger gentlemen who was seated near the

Bishop snatched the bonnet of that dignitary from his head and placed it

upon his own. He then drained a bumper to his health, and passed the

goblet and the cap to his next neighbor. Both circulated till they

reached the Viscount of Ghent, who arose from his seat and respectfully

restored the cap to its owner. Brederode then took a large "cup of

silver and gold," filled it to the brim, and drained it to the confusion

of Cardinal Granvelle; stigmatizing that departed minister, as he

finished, by an epithet of more vigor than decency. He then called upon

all the company to pledge him to the same toast, and denounced as

cardinalists all those who should refuse. The Archbishop, not having

digested the affronts which had been put upon him already, imprudently

ventured himself once more into the confusion, and tried to appeal to

the reason of the company. He might as well have addressed the crew of

Comus. He gained nothing but additional insult. Brederode advanced upon

him with threatening gestures. Egmont implored the prelate to retire, or

at least not to take notice of a nobleman so obviously beyond the control

of his reason. The Bishop, however, insisted--mingling reproof, menace;

and somewhat imperious demands--that the indecent Saturnalia should

cease. It would have been wiser for him to retire. Count Hoogstraaten,

a young man and small of stature, seized the gilt laver, in which the

company had dipped their fingers before seating themselves at table:

"Be quiet, be quiet, little man," said Egmont, soothingly, doing his best

to restrain the tumult. "Little man, indeed," responded the Count,

wrathfully; "I would have you to know that never did little man spring

from my race." With those words he hurled the basin, water, and all, at

the head of the Archbishop. Hoogstraaten had no doubt manifested his

bravery before that day; he was to display, on future occasions, a very

remarkable degree of heroism; but it must be confessed that the chivalry

of the noble house of Lalaing was not illustrated by this attack upon a

priest. The Bishop was sprinkled by the water, but not struck by the

vessel. Young Mansfeld, ashamed of the outrage, stepped forward to

apologize for the conduct of his companions and to soothe the insulted

prelate. That personage, however, exasperated, very naturally, to the

highest point, pushed him rudely away, crying, "Begone, begone! who is

this boy that is preaching to me?" Whereupon, Mansfeld, much irritated,

lifted his hand towards the ecclesiastic, and snapped his fingers

contemptuously in his face. Some even said that he pulled the

archiepiscopal nose, others that he threatened his life with a drawn

dagger. Nothing could well have been more indecent or more cowardly than

the conduct of these nobles upon this occasion. Their intoxication,

together with the character of the victim, explained, but certainly could

not palliate the vulgarity of the exhibition. It was natural enough that

men like Brederode should find sport in this remarkable badgering of a

bishop, but we see with regret the part played by Hoogstraaten in the

disgraceful scene.

The prelate, at last, exclaiming that it appeared that he had been

invited only to be insulted, left the apartment, accompanied by

Noircarmes and the Viscount of Ghent, and threatening that all his

friends and relations should be charged with his vengeance. The next

day a reconciliation was effected, as well as such an arrangement was

possible, by the efforts of Egmont, who dined alone with the prelate.

In the evening, Hoogstraaten, Culemburg, and Brederode called upon the

Bishop, with whom they were closeted for, an hour, and the party

separated on nominal terms of friendship.

This scandalous scene; which had been enacted not only before many

guests, but in presence of a host of servants, made necessarily a great

sensation throughout the country. There could hardly be much difference

of opinion among respectable people as to the conduct of the noblemen who

had thus disgraced themselves. Even Brederode himself, who appeared to

have retained, as was natural, but a confused impression of the

transaction, seemed in the days which succeeded the celebrated banquet,

to be in doubt whether he and his friends had merited any great amount of

applause. He was, however, somewhat self-contradictory, although always

vehement in his assertions on the subject. At one time he maintained--

after dinner, of course--that he would have killed the Archbishop if they

had not been forcibly separated; at other moments he denounced as liars

all persons who should insinuate that be had committed or contemplated

any injury to that prelate; offering freely to fight any man who disputed

either of his two positions.

The Rise of the Dutch Republic — Volume 09: 1564-65 · 第 1 / 4 段