"M. Wolfers seeks his inspiration in the study of the nature and the

forms of his marvellous domain, and his vision of things is specially

defined in his jewels. The detail therein contributes largely to the

spirit of the entire work, which borrows its character from the

decoration itself or from the subject of that decoration. He never

allows himself to stray into the regions of fancy; at most, he permits

his imagination to approach the confines of ornamental abstraction.

Nevertheless, he interprets Nature, but is never dominated by it. He has

too true, too exact a sense of the decorative principle to conform to

the absolute reality of the things he admires and reproduces. His art,

by virtue of this rule, is thus a modified translation of real forms. He

has too much taste to introduce into the composition of one and the same

jewel flowers or animals which have no parallel symbol or, at least,

some family likeness or significance. He will associate swans with

water-lilies--the flowers which frame, as it were, the life of those

grand poetic birds; or he will put the owl or the bat with the

poppy--that triple evocation of Night and Mystery; or the heron with the

eel--symbols of distant, melancholy streams. He rightly judges that in

art one must endeavour to reconcile everything, both the idea and the

materials whereby one tries to make that idea live and speak. Inspired,

doubtless, by the fact that the ancients chose black stones for the

carving of the infernal or fatal deities, M. Wolfers uses a dark

amethyst for his owls, which gives them a special significance. The

Grecians used the aqua-marina exclusively for the engraving of their

marine gods, by reason of its similarity to the colour of the sea, just

as they never carved the features of Bacchus in anything but

amethyst--that stone whose essence suggests the purple flow of wine."

M. van Strydonck expresses himself to me in the following terms on the

subject of his art:--

"I am of opinion that the jewel can be produced without the aid of

stones, enamels, etc. I do not exclude them entirely, but they should

not be used unless it be to give the finishing touch, or occasionally to

relieve an _ensemble_ lacking in vigour of colour. My preference is for

oxydations, for in general effect they are more harmonious to the eye,

and by careful seeking one can find all the tones required. I think you

will share my opinion that it is much easier to use enamels, by means of

which one's object is instantly attained. Yet it is seldom one produces

a beautiful symphony of colour. Enamel can only be employed in small

quantities. Why? Because, in the first place, he who uses it must have a

profound knowledge of colours and a special colourist's eye; he must

remember, moreover, that he is appealing to a _clientèle_ composed

principally of ladies, who in most cases regard the jewel simply as a

means to complete such and such a toilette.

"It seems to me, indeed," continues M. van Strydonck, "that translucent

enamel is the most suitable because it simply serves as an auxiliary--a

basis necessary to the completion of the _ensemble_--and adds value to

workmanship and design; and there is nothing to prevent its alliance

with the beautiful oxydations which come almost naturally from gold."

Note how, little by little, enamel is being abandoned in favour of

stones, such as onyx, agate, and malachite, materials of no special

value, which can be cut in different ways, and whose colour gives fine

effects infinitely preferable to those of inferior enamels.

Of course, I do not despise the fine stone, which, by its bold colour,

often relieves the work, but this is not altogether the object of the

jewel, unless profit be the sole object of the maker; and I ought to add

that the revival of the jewel in recent years has not been favourably

regarded by certain firms, who saw therein a distinct diminution of

gain, the fact being that their large stock of fine stones--beautiful

in themselves, but out of place in works such as I have

mentioned--threatens to remain on their hands.

One cannot truly say that Belgian _eventaillistes_ exist, for it is only

very occasionally that such water-colour painters as MM. Cassiers,

Stacquet, and Uytterschaut carry out their delightful landscapes and

seascapes in the shape required for a fan.

Something has been done in lacework in connection with the fan, and on

this point I should mention in terms of praise M. Van Cutsem, a

Brussels designer, who has made numerous models for M. Bart and M.

Sacré, amongst which may be noted several happy experiments in the

direction of the "modern style."

To conclude, let me refer to the lace by Mlle. Bienaimé, admirably

mounted by M. Goosens, of Brussels.

(_Belgian_)

A FAN PAINTED ON SILK

BY

H. CASSIERS.

[Illustration]

[Illustration:

PLATE 1]

[Illustration: _Design for a Necklet in Silver and Enamel_

L. VAN STRYDONCK

PLATE 2]

[Illustration: _Pendant with Chain. The masque is an Iris with red

Enamel for the hair. The Orchid's petals are in translucent Enamel of

opalescent tones_

PH. WOLFERS

PLATE 3]

[Illustration: _Pendant and Chain set with Brilliants and Pearls. The

Figure in Gold, the Serpent in black and brown Enamel_

PH. WOLFERS

PLATE 4]

[Illustration: _Necklet, with Ornaments of transparent Enamel_

PH. WOLFERS

PLATE 5]

[Illustration: _Parure de Corsage, set with Emeralds, Brilliants and

transparent Pearls_

PH. WOLFERS

PLATE 6]

[Illustration: FIG. A

FIG. B

_A. Waist-band Buckle. The Serpent in green Bronze, the Crab in

Silver-gilt_

_B. Pendant. The Pheasants in green and yellow-brown Enamel, the centre

Stone a pale-green Ceylon Sapphire_

PH. WOLFERS

PLATE 7]

[Illustration: _Coiffure, set with Brilliants; the petals in Opal, the

Serpent in Gold touched with a slight patina_

PH. WOLFERS

PLATE 8]

[Illustration: FIG. A

FIG. B

FIG. C

FIG. D

_A, B, and D. Silver Belt-Clasps_

_C. Silver Buckles_

PAUL DUBOIS

PLATE 9]

MODERN DANISH JEWELLERY.

BY GEORG BROCHNER.

[Illustration]

Emanating from England--and, I am tempted to add, with THE STUDIO for

its pioneer--the new movement, the rejuvenation, the second Renaissance,

or whatever one may be pleased to call it, in matters of Fine, and more

especially Applied Art, is like a mighty wave making its way over many

lands. But, as with the waves of the ocean, its movements are often

fitful and impulsive, its progress irregular and spasmodic. Why this is

so it is often futile to speculate upon, and even where a plausible

explanation is apparently near at hand, it may on closer investigation

prove more or less of a fallacy. Thus it may appear natural enough that

a small country should be unable to vie with large and rich empires in

the matter of jewellery, for the making of such is likely to entail

expenditure out of proportion to the buying capacity of smaller nations.

Yet this argument really does not hold good, for inasmuch as in modern

jewellery it is more the design and conception, more the intrinsic

artistic value and the proper choice and handling of the material which

are the main things (and not the quantity of precious stones used), the

cost need by no means be excessive. For day wear, at least, delightful

jewellery is now made entirely from gold and silver, and enamel, and

even bronze, possessing decorative properties immeasurably beyond those

of the far more costly articles produced up to only a few years ago.

Be this as it may, the fructifying effects of these new ideas have, on

the whole, been somewhat slow in making themselves felt within the craft

of the gold and the silver-smith, or, rather, within that branch of it

which embraces articles for personal adornment. Some countries have so

far ignored them altogether; in others they are only just beginning to

take root. In Denmark, for instance, which in other fields of applied

art holds such an honourably prominent position, comparatively little

attention has hitherto been given to jewellery by those distinguished

artists who have for years brought their talent to bear upon other

crafts. But, if I mistake not, a change is beginning to manifest itself

in this respect, and I have very little doubt that the material for an

article on modern Danish jewellery will be vastly augmented within a

span of but a few years, although it is unfortunately a little scanty at

the time of writing.

Bindesböll, whose characteristic style is so easily recognised, has some

good clasps and brooches to his credit. They are distinguished by that

unconventional boldness and freedom which one always hails with unmixed

pleasure wherever one finds them, whether it be on a book-cover, on a

sofa cushion, on a metal vessel, or in some architectural decoration. It

is only very rarely Bindesböll deigns to employ a distinct figure or

motif in his designs, but, in spite of a capriciousness in his lines--a

capriciousness which at times borders upon recklessness--the effect is

almost invariably harmonious and decorative.

Of a totally different stamp is Harald Slott-Möller, to whom is due the

place of honour when dealing with modern Danish jewellery. His designs

are carefully conceived and they almost invariably illustrate a fine

poetic idea or allegory, always happily chosen. They are somewhat

elaborate, both in details and drawing, and in the choice of material,

with regard to which he is rather extravagant than otherwise. His

jewellery is possessed of a distinguished decorative beauty, and

although he is entirely original, both in his choice of motifs and in

his way of dealing with them, it might perhaps not be very difficult to

trace certain English influences in his work. He is himself a skilful

craftsman, whilst some of his designs have been executed at the famous

establishment of Mr. Michelsen, Danish Court jeweller. For one of Mr.

Michelsen's daughters, Slott-Möller designed the exceedingly beautiful

brooch of which we give an illustration (Plate 4). It is made of silver,

which is strongly oxidised, with blue, white, and green enamel. The

stars are set in diamonds, and the pendants at the side are pearls. The

comb with the butterflies on the lyre is the property of another sister,

and is made of tortoise-shell and gold, with enamel, set with pearls,

diamonds, and sapphires. A second comb, likewise made of tortoise-shell,

has for its decorative motif a mermaid, gold, enamel, and coral being

used with no mean skill. In the necklace the myth of Helen is

represented. The central portion is of dark oxidised silver, with flames

and sparks in gold, the walls of burning Troy and the grass are enamel,

and the figure of Helen is carved in ivory. On the side plates men fight

and die, illustrating the inscription, in Greek: "She brought

devastation, she gave fame." Slott-Möller has himself made the whole of

this elaborate and charming necklace. The hand-mirror is made in silver,

with an ivory handle, in the likeness of a candle, round the flame of

which a number of luckless moths flutter; the moths and the ooze from

the candle are oxidised.

Moyens Bollin, who has lately gone in for the making of artistic metal

objects, has also designed several pretty combs, clasps, etc., made in

silver or bronze. In the former material is a clasp, of which we give an

illustration, with flowers in blossom and bud, admirably drawn so as to

fill their allotted space. Another clasp, a butterfly, is in bronze.

Erick Magnussen is a very young artist, who seems to give promise. The

"1901" in the pendant mirror is very deftly drawn, covering its space

evenly and well, as does also the design of the "Fish" clasp

illustrated. The other, with the mermaids, shows that he can also

successfully employ the female form for decorative purposes.

A silver clasp and brooch by Niels Dyrlund are distinguished by a

quaint but well balanced intertwining of lines, the effect produced

being pleasing and decorative, and Einar Nielsen, the talented painter,

Axel Hou, and Georg Jensen have also recently taken to the designing of

clasps and such like objects.

[Illustration]

[Illustration: _Necklace representing the story of Helen of Troy. The

central part in dark oxidised Silver, with flames and sparks in Gold;

the walls of burning Troy and the grass in Enamel; the figure of Helen

is carved in Ivory_

HARALD SLOTT-MÖLLER

PLATE 1]

[Illustration: _A. Belt-Mirror in chased Silver_

ERICK MAGNUSSEN

_B. Silver Hand-Mirror with an Ivory handle. The moths are oxidised_

HARALD SLOTT-MÖLLER

PLATE 2]

[Illustration: FIG. A

FIG. B

_A. "Butterfly" Comb in Tortoiseshell and Gold, with Enamel, and set

with Pearls, Diamonds, and Sapphires_

_B. "Mermaid" Comb in Tortoiseshell and Gold, with Coral and Enamel_

HARALD SLOTT-MÖLLER

PLATE 3]

[Illustration: _Enamelled Brooches in oxidised Silver_

HARALD SLOTT-MÖLLER

PLATE 4]

[Illustration: FIG. A

FIG. B

_A. Silver Clasp_

_B. Enamelled Silver Clasp_

ERICK MAGNUSSEN

PLATE 5]

[Illustration: FIG. A

FIG. B

_A. Twofold Silver Clasp_

MOYENS BOLLIN

_B. Silver Belt-Clasp_

ERICK MAGNUSSEN

PLATE 6]

[Illustration: FIG. A

FIG. B

_A. "Butterfly" Clasp in Bronze_

_B. Silver Clasp_

MOYENS BOLLIN

PLATE 7]

[Illustration: FIG. A

FIG. B

_A. Silver Clasp in three pieces_

MOYENS BOLLIN

_B. Silver Buckles and Brooches_

TH. BINDESBÖLL

PLATE 8]

* * * * *

+----------------------------------------------------------+

| |

| Transcriber's notes: |

| |

| P.1. 'unbiassed' changed to 'unbiased'. |

| P.4.(French) no devil-fish, 'no' changed to 'nor'. |

| P.7. 'themelves' changed to 'themselves'. |

| Plate 43. 'Pendent' changed to 'Pendant'. |

| Corrected various punctuation. |

| |

| '=' around words mean bold as in =French=. |

| '_' around words mean italic as in _French_. |

| |

+----------------------------------------------------------+

End of Project Gutenberg's Modern Design in Jewellery and Fans, by Various

Modern Design in Jewellery and Fans · 第 4 / 4 段