_WINNIPEG, HUDSON’S BAY COMPANY, LORD SELKIRK._
Early Explorers of the North-West--Du Luth--De la Verendrye--
Mackenzie--Hudson’s Bay Company--Treaty of Utrecht--North-West
Company--Lord Selkirk--War in the North-West--Union of the Rival
Companies--The North-West Annexed to Canada.
Winnipeg, with a population of 30,000 inhabitants, is the creation of
the last decade. Thirteen years back there was little to distinguish
its site from any other spot on the river’s bank. The Red River was
skirted by a single tier of holdings on the shore line, directly
along its banks for a distance of fifty miles, known as the Selkirk
Settlement. At the confluence of the River Assiniboine with the main
stream there stood old Fort Garry, an establishment of the Hudson’s
Bay Company. We have in this old fort the precursor of the city. In
1859 a few buildings, including a hotel, were clustered near it as the
commencement of the future Winnipeg. At an early date in the history of
French Canada a great extent of the country around the western lakes
was explored. Prominent among the many men eminent in these discoveries
was Du Luth, who appears in connection with the North-West as having
been the first to establish a fort on the River Kaministiquia, Lake
Superior, about 1680, on the site of Fort William. It is not to be
supposed that at this date no further explorations were undertaken
westward by the French. Many of the waterways were certainly known, and
to some extent they were followed. But no attempt was made to extend
trade operations beyond Lake Superior; and it was only to a limited
extent that discovery was pushed westward. For some years exploration
was turned towards the south of the territory held by the French, to
guard against the encroachment of the English from New York, which now
commenced to attract more attention.
There is no proof that any change in this respect took place until the
days of De la Verendrye. This remarkable man in 1731 was in charge of
Fort Nepigon, Lake Superior. In that year he started westward across
the height of land, passed through the chain of lakes to the Lake of
the Woods and followed the River Winnipeg to Lake Winnipeg. Proceeding
to the south of the Lake he ascended the Red River and reached the
Assiniboine. I cannot learn that any white man, before him, ever stood
on the site of the present City of Winnipeg.
A series of forts were constructed by him; one where Rainy River flows
into the Lake of the Woods, Fort St. Pierre; one on what is known as
the Northwest Angle, Fort Charles; one where the River Winnipeg flows
into Lake Winnipeg, Fort Maurepas, which name he also gave to the
lake itself; one where the Red River flows into Lake Winnipeg, Fort
Rouge; and one at the junction of the Assiniboine with the Red River,
proximately on the site of the City of Winnipeg, Fort de la Reine.
De la Verendrye, himself, never saw the Rocky Mountains, but the
discovery was made by his two sons in an expedition organized by him
and carried out in accordance with his instructions. They started from
the Fort de la Reine, followed the Assiniboine to the River Souris,
which they traced to one of its sources, thence passing to the Missouri
they followed that stream till they came within sight of the first
range of mountains. It was therefore to the south of Canadian territory
that the peaks were first seen. De la Verendrye had made a series of
northern explorations, reaching the Saskatchewan by Lake Winnipeg,
into which it discharges. He established Fort Bourbon at this point.
He advanced along the river as far as Lake Cumberland, at the entrance
to which he established Fort Poscoyac, which seems to have been the
limit of his travels. He was acquainted with Lake Winnipegoosis and
Lake Manitoba, and established Fort Dauphin at the northern end of the
latter lake. While engaged in organizing a more extended expedition he
died in 1749 at Quebec.
The succeeding ten years of French Canada were passed in the struggle
for national life. The North-West obtained but little attention
except for the purpose of commerce with the Indians. In spite of the
difficulties of carrying it on, it had increased in extent and was
now of considerable importance. With the conquest the trade almost
disappeared, and it was not for some years afterwards that it was
recommenced on the part of the British.
The celebrated Sir Alexander Mackenzie, the first white man who by land
reached the Pacific Ocean in Northern latitudes, has left some valuable
information concerning the trade of this period. We learn from him that
the military posts established by the French at the confluence of the
lakes had strongly in view the control of the traffic in furs. During
French rule, trade had been conducted under admirable regulations. He
himself tells us that a number of able and respectable men, retired
from the army, had carried on their operations under license with
great order and regularity. At the same time, the trade itself was
fettered by many unwise restrictions. Nevertheless it was taken to
immense distances, and “it was a matter of surprise,” he adds, “that no
exertions were made from Hudson’s Bay to obtain even a share of the
trade,” which, according to the charter of that company, belonged to it.
The Hudson’s Bay Company at this date had been nearly a century in
existence. Hudson’s last voyage to Hudson’s Bay was in 1610. In
1612 Button sailed and discovered Port Nelson, York Factory. It was
not, however, until 1669 that any settlement was made, when Captain
Zachariah Gillam, a New England captain, established himself at the
discharge of the Nemisco and constructed a stone fort, calling it Fort
Charles, the present Fort Rupert. It was after this step, on the 2nd of
May, 1670, that the charter was given to the Hudson’s Bay Company, a
result no little owing to the influence of Prince Rupert.
The first operations of the company were marked by great energy,
and their trade rapidly increased. In the first fifteen years five
factories were in operation: Rupert, to the east of James’ Bay, at the
discharge of the River Nemisco; Hayes, at the south-western corner and
at the mouth of the Moose River; Albany, on the west, some twenty miles
north of Moose River; York Factory, on the Nelson River; and Churchill,
north of York, the most northerly settlement on the west coast.
From 1686 to the Treaty of Utrecht there were a series of attempts
on the part of French Canada to dispossess the company. No doubt the
French authorities held that their supremacy was dangerously threatened
by the establishment of flourishing settlements to the north,
identical in nationality with the Bostonnais of Massachusetts and the
English of New York. The Treaty of Ryswick itself, in 1695, even became
the cause of difficulty, from the vagueness of its provisions, and it
was not until the Treaty of Utrecht, in 1713, that the French claims
were entirely abandoned. The English Government had determined to
retain Nova Scotia, the fisheries of Newfoundland and what was called
the Hudson’s Bay Territory, and on that basis peace was made.
For the next half century there was no clashing of interests between
the Hudson’s Bay Company and the French of Canada, owing to the
operations of the latter being extended in a limited degree north
of Lake Superior. After the conquest, for some years, the trade was
thrown entirely into the Company’s hands. Indians even went to York
Factory to barter their furs. During this period the profits must have
been immense. It was only by degrees that the English traders from
Canada penetrated into the country. They found the Indian unfriendly.
The French had instilled into his mind a jealousy of the English
speaking race, having represented it as the ally of the Iroquois, the
long-standing enemy of the Lake Superior Indians. A rooted distrust
had thus grown up which long remained. About 1766 trade somewhat
recommenced, assisted by Montreal enterprise. Michillimackinac was for
a long time the base of such operations, and few traders penetrated
further than the Kaministiquia. Thomas Curry was the first to pass
beyond this limit. He reached Fort Bourbon, where Cedar Lake discharges
into Lake Winnipeg, whence he brought away so fine a cargo of furs that
he was satisfied never again to return to the Indian country.
By this time the Hudson’s Bay Company had pushed on their posts
to Sturgeon Lake, and now commenced that antagonism between those
representing the interests centered at Montreal and the members of the
company, which for half a century caused difficulty, embarrassment,
loss and finally bloodshed.
One of the charges made against the Montreal traders of those days was
that they were the first to introduce rum into the North-West, to the
ruin of the Indians.
A name of that period, preserved in the records of the law, still
survives: Peter Pond, who was tried for the murder of one of his
partners. He escaped by the Court determining that they had no
jurisdiction in the territory. Pond was a man of much energy. Following
in the steps of Frobisher, he traded north of Lake Winnipeg to the
tributaries of the Churchill, and to the Westward as far as the
Arthabaska and Elk Rivers. His purpose was to intercept the furs _en
route_ to Fort Churchill, on Hudson’s Bay. The trade, in the meantime,
received a severe blow from the conduct of some traders at Eagle
Hills. A dose of laudanum was given to an Indian, and caused his death.
In the turmoil which ensued several lives were lost, and the commerce
with the Indians became much impeded.
To remedy the depressed condition of the trade and to avoid further
complications, the North-West Company was formed in 1783. A rival
company was started, of which the celebrated Mackenzie was a member.
The two were, however, united in 1787.
At this date the North-West Company arrogated to itself full control
over the country. No operations of any kind except under their
authority were permitted. The company was supreme. The private trader
was driven from the field, and it would seem that these extreme
measures could be carried out with impunity. They were the days of the
North-West Company’s affluence and power. Influences even without its
ranks came within their control, to make the organization irresistible.
Peculiarly it was a Canadian enterprise, and as such commanded
sympathy against competition from without. We can scarcely, at this
day, understand the extent of its power. In our commercial world, as
we find it, there are many wealthy corporations possessing social and
political control. The avenues to wealth and distinction are numerous,
branching out from many centres. It may be asserted that formerly the
North-West was looked upon as the one field which promised prizes in
life’s lottery to the youth of the country. The leading magnates, who
had large incomes, indulged in princely hospitality, the memory of
which has not wholly died away, and it may be conceived how, at that
date, with a small population, with a limited field for enterprise,
with little general wealth, the power of the company was everywhere
recognized.
I have now arrived at the period when I have to record the settlement
of Red River, the forerunner of the City of Winnipeg: indeed, the first
step taken towards making the prairies the abode of civilized life. The
task is not easy. The ashes of the fires of that day are yet warm under
our feet. The sons and grandsons of the men whose names are identified
with the leading events are among those who we meet daily. The story
has often been told; nevertheless it is only imperfectly known. The
principal actor in these events was Lord Selkirk. As his character is
studied it must be conceded that few men have been marked by a higher
sense of life and duty. A man of remarkable ability, his character was
one of rare disinterestedness and chivalry, and I cannot but think his
name will so live in our history.
As early as 1802 Lord Selkirk entered into correspondence with the
English Government on the advisability of promoting emigration from
the Highlands and Ireland to Rupert’s Land. The following year he
arranged to carry a body of Highlanders to Prince Edward Island. We
next hear of him in Canada and the United States, where he passed two
years examining into the means available to carry out his purpose.
During 1804 he entered into correspondence with General Hunter,
then Governor of Upper Canada, now Ontario, with regard to making
settlements in that Province. Those were not the days when questions
such as these received much attention, nor were they even understood.
The value of population to develop the resources of a country had
generally to be better known before correct views could prevail as to
the value of unsettled land, and the negotiations failed owing to the
excessive price demanded for it.
As Canada did not offer the field sought, Lord Selkirk turned to the
Hudson’s Bay Company as the means by which his theories of colonization
could be carried out. He and his friends took their measures
accordingly. He purchased stock in the company, and thus obtained a
commanding influence and the recognition necessary for the prosecution
of the undertaking. This event took place in 1811.
From the commencement the North-West Company vigorously opposed his
project. They looked upon Lord Selkirk as a visionary, and his scheme
alike impracticable and undesirable. They might not be unwilling to
divide the hunting ground of a continent with their rivals, but they
did not recognise that the prairies of the west were available for
support of human life. They regarded the country as a wilderness,
to be reserved for the fur-bearing animals alone. Hitherto their
profits had been excessive and secure, and any change threatening the
discontinuance or reduction of the advantages which they possessed had
to be avoided.
Evidently such a scheme as that of Lord Selkirk’s was the first step
towards the destruction of their trade and the diminution of their
profits. The same year some ninety persons, mostly Highland cotters
from Sutherlandshire, with a few additions from the West of Ireland,
reached Hudson’s Bay. They wintered there, and in 1812 travelled to
Red River, a proceeding in itself memorable, as from it dates the
settlement of the North-West. A further number was added in 1813. The
two winters 1812-1813, till the spring of 1814, were passed at Pembina,
at Fort Daer. The Governor was Captain Miles Macdonnell, formerly of
the Queen’s Rangers. In 1814 further settlers arrived under Mr. A.
Macdonald, having passed the winter at Fort Churchill. Towards the end
of the year the number amounted to two hundred.
It was in this year that the Governor issued the proclamation so much
criticized and censured, and it has been brought forward as sufficient
in itself to justify the inimical proceedings subsequently taken
against the settlement. It is difficult to recognize that it was
not warranted by the circumstances, and, considering the interests
entrusted to the Governor, that it was not one which he had a perfect
right to issue when he did so, in no way to the injury of others. He
directed that no provisions should be exported from the country, as
such stores were required for the arrivals expected, that money would
be paid for all produce, and that those not observing these regulations
would be arrested. The Governor must have known and felt the
difficulties under which he was placed. The North-West Company, both in
London and on this continent, had shown the strongest opposition to the
settlement. Independently of the nature of the difficulties incident to
the situation, there was this enmity to be met; an enmity known to be
powerful and not over scrupulous. It is true that it had not taken the
armed and open attitude which it ultimately assumed, but the ruin of
the settlement had long been resolved upon.
A council of the officers of the North-West Company was held at Fort
William in 1814, and it is in evidence that it was here that plans
were formed to induce the settlers to abandon their homesteads and
prejudice the Indians against them--every employé of the company was
already their foe--and to buy up all the provisions so that scarcity
should result and ruin to the settlement follow. It was in anticipation
of such a scheme that the Governor’s proclamation was issued. He had
obtained information that such a policy would be followed, and he
endeavoured, on his side, to meet it as best he could.
The Selkirk settlers had constructed a new fort, Fort Douglas. Its site
lies within the present City of Winnipeg, not far from Fort Gibraltar,
the property of the North-West Company. It was in 1814 that Duncan
Cameron came to the Red River in charge of the latter. His special
mission was to influence the settlers to abandon their homes. Cameron
is represented to have been a man of address and plausibility, and he
so well executed the duty assigned him of making those who listened to
him discontented that about three-fourths of the number left the Red
River for Upper Canada. Their descendants are yet to be found in the
Counties of Elgin, Middlesex and Simcoe, in Ontario.
It will scarcely be believed that a notice was served on those
who remained, signed by four partizans of the North-West Company,
sternly requiring them to leave the settlement. It had to be entirely
abandoned. The better to show their power, in the temporary absence of
the Governor, they removed the cannon, implements and other property
from Fort Douglas. The proceeding was doubtless calculated to show the
strength of the North-West Company, side by side with the impotent
character of Lord Selkirk’s protection. There was no course open but
compliance. The exiles took canoes and paddled down the Red River to
Lake Winnipeg, and reached Norway House, to the north of the lake.
They had not been long here when they were met by Collin Robertson and
some twenty employés passing up Jack River on their way to join the
settlement. Robertson was a man of determination, and saw that there
was no good reason why the enterprise should be abandoned, and that
such an outrage, with one of Selkirk’s character, would only call for
renewed effort. He induced the settlers to return. They found their
houses burned and their property destroyed. This occurred in August,
but in October an additional number came, and the settlement had
regained more assured strength. We have now arrived at 1816.
In the half century which had elapsed since the conquest that which
may almost be called a new race of men had sprung up: the children of
the French _voyageurs_ of the North-West Company, who had married or
lived with Indian women in the neighbourhood of the several forts.
They obtained the name of “Bois-Brulés.” They were powerful in frame,
disinclined to restraint, attached to a wandering life and unsettled
habits, mostly without education. They were easily accessible to those
who knew how to appeal to their prejudices. They had courage, and
under able leaders became a formidable foe. Their sympathies were
difficult to determine. Perhaps the leading feature of their character
was jealousy of their individual rights. In subsequent years their
self-assertion took so threatening a form that the presence of Imperial
troops more than once became necessary. Early in June, 1816, a party
of them gathered at Portage-la-Prairie, on the Assiniboine. They had
but one object in view. It was, in a sentence, to retain the country
for themselves, and to drive out all whom they had learned to look upon
as intruders. There is everything to show that they were perfectly
organized. They were armed, it is said that they were painted and
disguised, and every precaution taken to make their movements appear an
act of the genuine Red man. The evidence, accessible to those who will
examine it, shows that the Indians were in no way mixed up with the
expedition. It was confined to the men whose sympathies were with the
North-West Company. Their operations commenced by seizing some boats
and furs at Portage-la-Prairie, belonging to the Hudson’s Bay Company,
and advancing to Fort Douglas, at Red River.
At the fort itself the intrigues and intentions of those hostile to
the settlement were known, and in some undefined way it was felt that
danger was near. What form it would take, or whence it would come,
none could say, but a watch was kept night and day. It would appear
that the attack came earlier than was looked for. On the evening of
the 17th June the alarm was given of the approach of the Bois-Brulés.
Semple was the Governor. He was a man of courage and had served. He
did what little he could with the resources which at that hour were
available. He collected a few men and started onwards to meet the
advancing party. Seeing the numbers increase, he sent for a cannon and
more force, and in the meantime continued to advance. As the opposing
parties approached, each leader asked the other what he wanted. It is
stated that one of the Governor’s party fired a shot in the air, on
which a shot from the Bois-Brulés brought down Mr. Holte, who held
the rank of lieutenant in the settlement. The firing became general.
Governor Semple was killed and his men fell around him. Twenty-two
in all were shot. There is no report of a death on the side of the
Bois-Brulés. No further resistance was attempted, and Fort Douglas was
given over to the North-Westers. The settlers were compelled to take
to their canoes and find a refuge where they could. The settlement was
again entirely broken up.
Such was the celebrated affair of Seven Oaks on the 17th June, 1816,
yet sung in the songs of the Bois-Brulés and chanted as the hymn of
victory.
Lord Selkirk had heard the story of the attack of the preceding
year, and at once hurried to Canada. He passed the winter of 1815
in Montreal, the season being too late for him to go west. Governor
Semple was held to be in all respects competent, and Lord Selkirk had
given him his full confidence; so it was thought that until his own
arrival no further difficulty would be experienced. He was, however,
convinced that the attacks had not ceased, and that if the settlement
had to be defended a force sufficient to meet such outrages had to
be found. The deMeuron and Watteville regiments were on the eve of
being disbanded, and Lord Selkirk obtained from their ranks the men
he required to recruit the colony. These regiments were two of the
foreign legion raised during the Peninsula war; they had been ordered
to Canada in 1812. At the peace after Waterloo their disbandment was
resolved on. They left the British service with the highest reputation
for discipline and conduct. Early in June, 1816, the expedition started
from Montreal with four officers and eighty men of the deMeuron corps.
At Kingston the number was increased by seventy of the Watteville
regiment. It proceeded up to Drummond’s Island on Lake Huron to receive
a sergeant and six men of the Imperial army, who were to be present at
Red River as a proof of the countenance given to the settlement by the
home authorities.
Selkirk joined the expedition at Sault St. Mary His purpose was to
have proceeded to Duluth, Fond du Lac, and to have crossed overland to
Red River. They had not advanced far when they met Miles Macdonnell
bringing down the news of the second destruction of the colony and of
the violent death of the Governor and twenty-one of his people. Selkirk
at once started for Fort William to meet the foe on his own ground.
They arrived on the 12th August and encamped on the Point deMeuron,
some five miles from the mouth of the Kaministiquia, a name it still
retains, and which the reader may remember I alluded to when visiting
that locality. A demand was at once made on the fort for the parties
captured, who had been brought there as prisoners. The North-West
people denied the fact of the arrest, and sent them to Point deMeuron.
Lord Selkirk had now before him the evidence of such of his people who
had suffered at Seven Oaks to confirm the opinion that the trouble
had been caused by the North-West Company. Fort William was unable to
resist him. He arrested McGillivray, McKenzie and others of the Company
who were then present, by warrant. They were allowed to remain for a
time at Fort William, but as it was evident a rescue was intended, he
sent them down as prisoners to York, now Toronto, under an escort.
Selkirk wintered on the Kaministiquia and collected provisions. On the
1st May, 1817, he started for Red River, and arrived there the last
week in June, passing over the distance in seven or eight weeks, which
recently I travelled by rail in twenty-four hours. The settlement was
again established.
Like all men who take a prominent part in life’s drama, Lord Selkirk
has his admirers and defamers. There are those who can see in his
conduct only the most self-interested motives and an example of
arbitrary, tyrannical self-assertion. He lived in an age when his
unselfish views were rare. To-day we can better understand that his
object in urging emigration as a scheme to aid the poor and struggling
masses of an overcrowded country, sprang from philanthropy and a desire
to relieve suffering humanity. His personal comforts and benefits lay
in the opposite direction to the course he pursued. A calculation
of the chances could promise only misconception of his motives and
personal annoyance. He lived half a century before his time. Of late
years his theories have been accepted as admitted truths. Every
facility has been established to carry them out. The shores of this
Continent yearly bear witness in the number of immigrants who arrive,
that it is the policy of all wise governments to aid the less fortunate
of a people to seek a home on the unoccupied lands which are open to
them. Such was Selkirk’s view. Moreover, he desired to keep up the
national prestige. His aim was to transplant those who were willing
to struggle to better their future to a land of promise beyond the
seas, where they were required to adapt themselves to no new political
existence; where they changed, it is true, the scene of their lives,
but still remained subjects of the mother land whence they had sprung.
In 1821 the Hudson’s Bay Company and the North-West Company united
their fortunes, and have since continued under the name of the Hudson’s
Bay Company.
Here I shall leave the subject. The events which grew out of the
proceedings above described are too near the present day to suggest
that any comment should be made upon them in the circumstances under
which I write. For the next half century the colony passed through many
difficulties. It had no assistance in the shape of emigration. The
Bois-Brulés often caused trouble. After Lord Selkirk’s death, which
took place in Paris in 1820, the wants of the settlers were cared for
by his relatives. In 1835 they gave up all control to the Hudson’s Bay
Company.
The events following the transfer of the Hudson’s Bay Company’s
territory to the Government of Canada in 1870 are fresh in remembrance,
and the period has not arrived to state them dispassionately. In the
meantime Winnipeg has grown up to be a lively, bustling city, full of
business and enterprise. One danger, however, threatens Winnipeg, that
of floods; and I allude to it in the hope of directing the attention
of those of her citizens who have influence, that some consideration
be given to the subject, so that all possible precautions be taken to
reduce the risk of danger and loss. I believe it is one of the painful
experiences of humanity that where a flood has once been, there is
always a probability that it may repeat itself. During the early days
of the Pacific Railway this question was earnestly considered. The
levels of the recorded floods of 1826, 1852 and of 1861, from which
the Selkirk settlements suffered so much, showed that there was danger
to be apprehended, and that it would be advisable to bridge the Red
River at a point where traffic would run no risk of being impeded. The
town plot of Selkirk, about twenty miles nearer Lake Winnipeg, was the
point recommended. I have no desire to be an alarmist and to reproduce
the accounts of these floods, written by Archbishop Taché, the Bishop
of Rupert’s Land, and by Mr. Alexander Ross. It is not to be said that
these gentlemen were interested witnesses desirous of injuring the
country in which they lived.
No one can more firmly hope than myself that no such flood may ever
again happen. We have, however, before us the experience of this winter
in the central United States, and the people of Winnipeg themselves
have had several premonitory warnings within the past few years. Should
there be a repetition of what has previously happened, damage so
extensive must arise that it cannot be contemplated without dread. All
but the original landowners and the speculators who have been enriched
by their operations in lots will be serious sufferers, and none more
than the population of Winnipeg will deplore that the city has been
built within the known limits of a periodic overflow.
The time has passed for the consideration where a better location might
have been obtained for the establishment of a centre of the importance
which Winnipeg promises to attain. But it is necessary to endeavour to
find a solution to the complicated engineering problem by which future
disastrous consequences may be avoided. The responsibility is now
thrown upon the Municipal Corporation, and it is their duty to care for
the safety of the city, so that there will be the least cause to lament
that it has not been founded on a site above all risk of injury from
floods.