ROBERT ON GOOD OLD KRISMUS.

Of course I don't kno how jolly Old Krismus affecks other peepel, but I

do kno how it affecks me, and that is, that I allus feels pertickler

kind to pore ragged littel children, such as we sees in sum of our

back-streets and sitch places, and eweryboddy can therefore understand

without werry much trubble how werry pleased I was at what append the

other day, and how jolly prowd I was at being alloud to have my little

share in it.

I offishyated the other day at a werry werry nice party of about twenty,

at one of our best Tavverns, and they was about as nice and brite and

jowial a set of Gents as I have had the honner of waiting on for sum

time parst. They larfed and they chatted away as I likes to see 'em, cos

I nos from my long experience that them's the sort of Gents as is allus

werry libberal to the pore Waiters. Well, one of the werry britest and

wittyest of 'em all, jest about the time as the sperrits is the highest,

wiz., about a hower after dinner, when the wine is a having its werry

best effect, pulls a paper out of his pocket that was ruled all over,

and had a lot of names on it, and he says, says he, with his werry

britest smile, "We've all had a jolly nice dinner, and plenty of good

honnest fun, and I now want you all to join me in a reel good lark;" and

they all looks at him quite hegerly. Then he says, "If you will every

one of you give me a shilling, I will let you have a chance in my

lottery, where they is all prizes and no blanks, and the prizes will

give as much plezzur and appyness," says he, "as the jolly good dinner

we has all just had."

So they all larfed at the funny idear, and they past the paper round,

and ewery one on 'em sined his name and cashed up a shilling.

"I now garrantees," I think he sed, "that for ewery shilling you have

given me no less than twenty-four pore little children shall have a good

dinner; and so, as there is jest twenty of us, we shall have purwided a

good dinner for no less than fore hunderd and hayty pore little hungry

children!"

I was that estonished at this wunderfull rewelashun that I was struck

dum for a minnet, while the jolly party rapped the table and cried,

"Bravo!" But I soon pulled myself together, and, going up quietly behind

the kind-arted Gent, I says, in a whisper, "Please, Sir, will you kindly

let me be a subscriber?" And he did, and I paid my shilling, and sined

my name, amid the cheers of the cumpny, and then retired, as prowd as a

Alderman. But what a fact for an Hed Waiter to ponder hover! A dinner

for a hapenny! and the dinner as this jolly party had bin a eating cost,

I dessay, quite thirty shillings a head, which I makes out to be, not

being a werry grand skoller, about enuff for some seven hunderd pore

children's dinners! I leaves to stronger heds than mine to calkerlate

how many pore children the bill for the hole twenty wood have paid for;

BROWN says ewer so many thousands; but BROWN does always xagerate so.

ROBERT.

* * * * *

"HER MAJESTY'S OPPOSITION."

AUGUSTUS DRURIOLANUS IMPERATOR, of course, represents "the Government,"

and Messrs. H. J. LESLIE and HARRIS (CHARLES of that ilk) are "Her

Majesty's Opposition," who are to be congratulated on their Pantomime of

_Cinderella_ at Her Majesty's Theatre. Having purchased the book,--which

must be classed among the "good books" of the season,--I can say

decidedly that there is a considerable, though not a material,

difference between the Pantomime _Cinderella_ "as she is wrote" by the

two pretty men "Messrs. RICHARD and HENRY,"--whose surnames, I am

informed, are synonymous with those of a great English theologian and a

still greater English astronomer,--and "the Pantomime _Cinderella_" as

she is now performed at Her Majesty's. "Cut and run" must ever be the

motto of the Playright's and the theatrical Manager's action; but what

astonished me, before I consulted the book, was the omission on the

stage of the striking dramatic climax,--especially striking, because a

clock is involved in it,--of _Cinderella's_ story.

Illustration: Portrait of Cinderella "Palmer quæ meruit." A Minnie-ture.

Could I believe my eyes, when, after a magnificent ball-room scene,

where the colours are grouped with consummate skill and taste, I saw the

handsome prince Miss ROBINA _remplaçante_ of Miss VIOLET CAMERON, lead

to her place in the centre of that glittering throng the _petite et

pétillante Cinderella_ in her Court dress, wearing her little glass

slippers (very little slippers, and very little glass), and then,

nothing happened, except that the next Scene descended, and hid them

from view.

But, Heavens! had the Clock in the Palace Yard stopped? Had its works

got out of order? Had it followed the example of the Dock and Gasmen,

and "struck," by refusing to strike? Ah! "Inventor and Producer," Ah!

Mr. H. J. LESLIE, "Ah!" to everyone who had a hand in this sacrilege;

"Ah!" on behalf of Messrs. RICHARD and HENRY, who could not have yielded

this point except under a strong protest,--please restore this. We would

all of us from eight years old (permitted by home licence to go to

theatres at night during Christmas holidays), and up to over fifty

(compelled to go to look after the others, and delighted to do so)--we

would all of us rather hear the clock strike twelve, see _Cinderella_ in

rags, running for bare life, see the Prince in despair at the flight of

his partner, on whose card his name was down for sixteen more valses and

galops, than witness a black-and-white dance, with fans, pretty in

itself, and set to very pretty Solomonesque music, but meaningless as

regards plot.

Here is the stage-direction--"_At the end of song_"--which should have

been a national song, by Mr. CLEMENT SCOTT, but wasn't--in fact, there

was no song at all, as well as I can remember, though I rather think the

crowd were always more or less singing a chorus,--"_clock strikes_." If

it did, I didn't hear it. If it did, why didn't the characters behave as

sich, and on _Cinderella's_ saying what the authors have written, and

which I am positive I didn't hear,

"What shall I do? the hour has struck at last!

I hope to goodness that that clock's too fast!"

why didn't they execute a "_Hurried Gallop_," and why wasn't the

stage-direction, "_The Ball breaks up_,"--the printer prefers "breakes

up,"--"_in wild confusion_" carried out? No one knows better than this

present scribe what changes are necessitated at the last moment, and

after the book is published. But an alteration which omits the point of

the story is scarcely an improvement. It does not affect me that the

demon _Scroogins_ was reduced comparatively to a dummy, for poor Mr.

SHIEL BARRY was suffering from dreadful hoarseness, and could hardly

speak, much less sing. There were originally too many plums in the

pudding. The knock-about scene by two ARMSTRONGS, in imitation of our

old friends the Two MACS, very ingeniously introduced as _Jeames the

First_ and _Jeames the Second_, Royal Footmen, is immensely funny.

_Cinderella's_ jödelling lullaby is pretty. All the music is bright and

lively, and I fancy that though there are the names of four or five

Composers to the bill, Conductor SOLOMON,--who keeps them all going, and

sticks to his beat with the tenacity of a policeman,--has done the major

part of it, and the minor too. Bravo, Mr. EDWARD SOLOMON! "What's a hat

without a head?" and what's a Norchestra without a NED? Mr. ALFRED

CELLIER is responsible for a charming minuet.

Extraordinary Omission from the Shakspeare Tableaux at Her

Majesty's, when they had the materials at hand--

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 98 January 11, 1890 · 第 11 / 23 题