VI

The foregoing discussion of Shelley’s psychology, and especially of what

was abnormal in it, would hardly be complete without some reference to

the possibility of his having possessed what may be termed higher

psychic powers. The whole subject is, of course, difficult, and this is

not the place to embark on a long analysis of the general evidence for

the existence of super-normal faculties. But, in view of the

considerable researches that have been of late undertaken in this field,

and of the general results that have been achieved, some mention of this

aspect of Shelley’s genius is not inappropriate. We have noted in his

private life the recurrence of certain ideas of persecution and of

certain hallucinations. These things, like all other mental

aberrations, require, as their necessary condition, some degree of

dissociation of the various components of the mind. Just as the growth

of a tumour indicates a certain autonomy of one portion of the body, so

such phenomena as hallucination, double-personality, mediumistic

trances, hysteria, and obsessions, indicate the autonomy of certain

constituents of the mind or personality. But this capacity for

decentralisation is not merely pathological in its effects; the same

partial suspension of the control normally exercised by the conscious

mind may liberate either the repressed impulses of the hysterical

patient or the latent divinations and intuitions which mark the genius

or the mystic.

The practical difference between the genius and the humble artist is

that the former reaches heights of truth and beauty unattainable by the

latter; heights which seem to require, for their attainment, the

operation of obscure and even occult faculties. Inspiration, divination,

direct intuitive perception of the nature both of things and of

men--these, when they are clarified and crystallised by a competent

artist, constitute genius. But these are the operations of psychic

powers such as reach their fullest development in the state of ecstasy

described by the mystics or in the phenomena of mediumship which, in all

ages, have given rise to the popular belief in spirits. It is difficult

for completely sane and normal men to realise that the familiar

faculties and senses are, in reality, but stereotyped and canalised

outlets for the living personality; that they may hinder the free

expression of the latter, even while they help it along their own lines.

Yet the inner person, or spirit, though it may have created sense-organs

to facilitate its perceptions, can, as the observations of psychiatrists

fully attest, yet perceive without their aid, and may even require, for

its subtlest operations, a temporary suspension of their functions.

“If the doors of perception were cleansed, everything would appear to

man as it is--infinite.

“[Typo for quotes?]For man has closed himself up till he sees all things

through narrow chinks of his cavern.”

These lines of Blake’s express the same thought, which, indeed, is one

common to all the mystics. The vital power which perceives through “this

life’s five windows of the soul,” can also transcend the limitations

which they impose on it; but, to so transcend the senses, it must

usually obliterate them for the time being; and with them go most of the

ordinary conscious factors of personality.

So with Shelley we find, not merely the pathological results of mental

dissociation, nor even only the signs of genius--swift and subtle

intuitions scattered through his works--but also, at times, we see

indications of powers which, for want of a better term, may be called

occult.[23] His poems give indications, stronger than mere hints, that

he constantly verged on a state of ecstasy. His frequent reference to

the ideas of infinity, eternity, and the like; his use of epithets

implying the absence of some defining and limiting attribute; his

reiterated employment of such words as chasm and abysm; and his direct

references to states of ecstatic rapture, mental vertigo, sudden

sinkings, faintings and swoons, all show that he lived on the edge of

that state of ecstasy in which the limits of normal personality are

passed and a region of more extended consciousness is reached. He felt

“the awful shadow of some unseen Power,” not as an abstract

philosophical idea, but as a real presence.

Sudden, thy shadow fell on me;

I shrieked, and clasped my hands in ecstasy.

I do not think that anyone who has studied the writings of some of the

greater mystics will fail to see much that is similar in Shelley’s

poetry; although, on the other hand, it is not likely that Shelley ever

attained the full state of complete ecstasy.

In comparing the lives and records of different mystics we find,

according to Dr. Bucke,[24] a certain substratum of common features,

which seem to be essential characteristics of the mystical disposition.

Before reaching the state of cosmic consciousness, the subject must be

of an earnest, truth-seeking nature; he must perceive the evils of this

life, and suffer acutely in spirit; he must be moved by compassion for

the fate of mankind, and by an ardent yearning after a more spiritual

existence. Usually more passionate than the average man, he yet has to

renounce much of the so-called pleasures of the world, and, in solitude,

to wring from his own heart the meaning and purpose of life.

There is so much in Shelley’s poetry which shows him in these typical

preliminary stages which precede illumination, that I will only refer to

the _Ode to the West Wind_--a poem in which the intensity of passion,

the despair with this life, and the overwhelming yearning for

identification with nature, which are typical of the mystic, find such

poignant expression.

The psychology of the poet Shelley · 第 12 / 16 题