LONGFELLOW.

The preface of "Outre-Mer," Longfellow's first book, is dated 1833. The

last poem in his last volume is published in 1863. In those thirty years

what wide renown, what literary achievement, what love of friends in

many lands, what abounding success and triumph, what profound sorrow,

mark the poet's career! The young scholar, returning from that European

tour which to the imaginative and educated American is the great

romance, sits down in Bowdoin College in Maine, where he is Professor,

and writes the "Epistle Dedicatory" to the "worthy and gentle reader."

Those two phrases tell the tale. The instinct of genius and literary

power stirring in the heart of the young man naturally takes the quaint,

dainty expression of an experience fed, thus far, only upon good old

books and his own imagination. The frolicking tone of mock humility,

deprecating the intrusion upon the time of a busy world, does not

conceal the conviction that the welcome so airily asked by the tyro will

at last be commanded by the master.

Like the "Sketch-Book" of the other most popular of our authors, Irving,

the "Outre-Mer" of Longfellow is a series of tales, reveries,

descriptions, reminiscences, and character-pieces, suggested by European

travel. But his beat lies in France, Spain, and Italy. It is the romance

of the Continent, and not that of England, which inspires him. It is the

ruddy light upon the vines and the scraps of old _chansons_ which

enliven and decorate his pilgrimage, and through all his literary life

they have not lost their fascination. While Irving sketches "Rural Life

in England," Longfellow paints "The Village of Auteuil"; Irving gives us

"The Boar's Head Tavern," and Longfellow "The Golden Lion Inn" at Rouen;

Irving draws "A Royal Poet," Longfellow discusses "The Trouvères," or

"The Devotional Poetry of Spain." It is delightful to trace the charming

resemblance between the books and the writers, widely different as they

are. There is the same geniality, the same tender pathos, the same

lambent humor, the same delicate observation of details, the same

overpowering instinct of literary art. But Geoffrey Crayon is a

humorist, while the Pilgrim beyond the Sea is a poet. The one looks at

the broad aspects of English life with the shrewd, twinkling eye of a

man of the world; the other haunts the valley of the Loire, the German

street, the Spanish inn, with the kindling fancy of the scholar and

poet. The moral and emotional elements are quite wanting in Irving; they

are characteristic of Longfellow. But the sweetness of soul, the freedom

from cynicism or stinging satire, which is most unusual in American, or

in any humorous or descriptive literature, is remarkable in both. "I

have no wife, nor children, good or bad, to provide for," begins

Geoffrey Crayon, quoting from old Burton. But neither had he an enemy

against whom to defend himself. It was true of Geoffrey Crayon, down to

the soft autumn day on which he died, leaving a people to mourn for him.

It is true of the Pilgrim of Outre-Mer, in all the thirty years since

first he launched forth "into the uncertain current of public favor."

In this earliest book of Longfellow's the notable points are not power

of invention, or vigorous creation, or profound thought, but a

mellowness of observation, instinctively selecting the picturesque and

characteristic details, a copious and rich scholarship, and that

indefinable grace of the imagination which announces genius. The work,

like the "Sketch-Book," was originally issued in parts, and it was

hardly possible for any observer thirty years ago not to see that its

peculiar character revealed a new strain in our literature. Longfellow's

poems as yet were very few, printed in literary journals, and not yet

signalizing his genius. It was the day when Percival Halleck, Sprague,

Dana, Willis, Bryant, were the undisputed lords of the American

Parnassus. But the school reading-books already contained "An April Day"

and "Woods in Winter," and all the verses of the young author had a

recognition in volumes of elegant extracts and commonplace-books. But

the universal popularity of Longfellow was not established until the

publication of "Hyperion" in 1839, followed by "The Voices of the Night"

in the next year. With these two works his name arose to the highest

popularity, both in America and England; and no living author has been

more perpetually reproduced in all forms and with every decoration.

If now we care to explain the eager and affectionate welcome which

always hails his writings, it is easy to see to what general quality

that greeting must be ascribed. As with Walter Scott, or Victor Hugo, or

Béranger, or Dickens, or Addison in the "Spectator," or Washington

Irving, it is a genial humanity. It is a quality, in all these

instances, independent of literary art and of genius, but which is made

known to others, and therefore becomes possible to be recognized, only

through literary forms. The creative imagination, the airy fancy, the

exquisite grace, harmony, and simplicity, the rhetorical brilliancy, the

incisive force, all the intellectual powers and charms of style with

which that feeling may be expressed, are informed and vitalized by the

sympathy itself. But whether a man who writes verses has

genius,--whether he be a poet according to arbitrary canons,--whether

some of his lines resemble the lines of other writers,--and whether he

be original, are questions which may be answered in every way of every

poet in history. Who is a poet but he whom the heart of man permanently

accepts as a singer of its own hopes, emotions, and thoughts? And what

is poetry but that song? If words have a uniform meaning, it is useless

to declare that Pope cannot be a poet, if Lord Byron is, or that Moore

is counterfeit, if Wordsworth be genuine. For the art of poetry is like

all other arts. The casket that Cellini worked is not less genuine and

excellent than the dome of Michel Angelo. Is nobody but Shakspeare a

poet? Is there no music but Beethoven's? Is there no mountain-peak but

Dhawalaghiri? no cataract but Niagara?

Thirty years ago almost every critic in England exploded with laughter

over the poetry of Tennyson. Yet his poetry has exactly the same

characteristics now that it had then; and Tennyson has gone up to his

place among English poets. It is not "Blackwood," nor any quarterly

review or monthly magazine, (except, of course, the "North American" and

the "Atlantic,") which can decree or deny fame. While the critics are

busily proving that an author is a plagiarist or a pretender, the world

is crowning him,--as the first ocean-steamer from England brought Dr.

Lardner's essay to prove that steamers could not cross the ocean.

Literary criticism, indeed, is a lost art, if it ever were an art. For

there are no permanent acknowledged canons of literary excellence; and

if there were any, there are none who can apply them. What critic shall

decide if the song of a new singer be poetry, or the bard himself a

poet? Consequently, modern criticism wisely contents itself with

pointing out errors of fact or of inference, or the difference between

the critic's and the author's philosophic or æsthetic view, and bitterly

assaults or foolishly praises him. When Horace Binney Wallace, one of

the most accomplished and subtile-minded of our writers, says of General

Morris that he is "a great poet," and that "he who can understand Mr.

Emerson may value Mr. Bancroft," we can feel only the more profoundly

persuaded that fame is not the judgment of individuals, but of the mass

of men, and that he whose song men love to hear is a poet.

But while the magnetism of Longfellow's touch lies in the broad humanity

of his sympathy, which leads him neither to mysticism nor cynicism, and

which commends his poetry to the universal heart, his artistic sense is

so exquisite that each of his poems is a valuable literary study. In

this he has now reached a perfection quite unrivalled among living

poets, except sometimes by Tennyson. His literary career has been

contemporary with the sensational school, but he has been entirely

untainted by it, and in the present volume, "Tales of a Wayside Inn,"

his style has a tranquil lucidity which recalls Chaucer. The literary

style of an intellectually introverted age or author will always be

somewhat obscure, however gorgeous; but Longfellow's mind takes a

simple, child-like hold of life, and his style never betrays the

inadequate effort to describe thoughts or emotions that are but vaguely

perceived, which is the characteristic of the best sensational writing.

Indeed, there is little poetry by the eminent contemporary masters which

is so ripe and racy as his. He does not make rhetoric stand for passion,

nor vagueness for profundity; nor, on the other hand, is he such a

voluntary and malicious "Bohemian" as to conceive that either in life or

letters a man is released from the plain rules of morality. Indeed, he

used to be accused of preaching in his poetry by gentle critics who held

that Elysium was to be found in an oyster-cellar, and that intemperance

was the royal prerogative of genius.

His literary scholarship, also, his delightful familiarity with the pure

literature of all languages and times, must rank Longfellow among the

learned poets. Yet he wears this various knowledge like a shining suit

of chain-mail, to adorn and strengthen his gait, like Milton, instead of

tripping and clumsily stumbling in it, as Ben Jonson sometimes did. He

whips out an exquisitely pointed allusion that flashes like a Damascus

rapier and strikes nimbly home, or he recounts some weird tradition, or

enriches his line with some gorgeous illustration from hidden stores, or

merely unrolls, as Milton loved to do, the vast perspective of romantic

association by recounting in measured order names which themselves make

music in the mind,--names not musical only, but fragrant:--

"Sabean odors from the spicy shore

Of Araby the blest."

In the prelude to the "Wayside Inn," with how consummate a skill the

poet graces his modern line with the shadowy charm of ancient verse, by

the mere mention of the names!

"The chronicles of Charlemagne,

Of Merlin and the Mort d'Arthure,

Mingled together in his brain

With talcs of Flores and Blanchefleur,

Sir Launcelot, Sir Morgadour,

Sir Guy, Sir Bevis, Sir Gawain."

A most felicitous illustration of this trait is in "The Evening Star,"

an earlier poem. Chrysaor, in the old mythology, sprang from the blood

of Medusa, armed with a golden sword, and married Callirrhoë, one of the

Oceanides. The poet, looking at evening upon the sea, muses upon the

long-drawn, quivering reflection of the evening star, and sings. How the

verses oscillate like the swaying calm of the sea, while the image

inevitably floats into the scholar's imagination:--

"Just above yon sandy bar,

As the day grows fainter and dimmer,

Lonely and lovely a single star

Lights the air with a dusky glimmer.

"Into the ocean faint and far

Falls the trail of its golden splendor,

And the gleam of that single star

Is ever refulgent, soft, and tender.

"Chrysaor rising out of the sea

Showed tints glorious and thus emulous,

Leaving the arms of Callirrhoë,

Forever tender, soft, and tremulous.

"Thus o'er the ocean faint and far

Trailed the gleam of his falchion brightly:

Is it a god, or is it a star,

That, entranced, I gaze on nightly?"

The blending of the poetical faculty and scholarly taste is seen, also,

in his translations; and would not a translation of Dante's great poem

be the crowning work of Longfellow's literary life?

But while we chat along the road, and pause to repeat these simple and

musical poems, each so elegant, so finished, as the monk finished his

ivory crucifix, or the lapidary his choicest gem, we have reached the

Wayside Inn. It is the title of Longfellow's new volume, "Tales of a

Wayside Inn." They are New-England "Canterbury Tales." Those of old

London town were told at the Tabard at Southwark; these at the Red Horse

in Sudbury town. And although it is but the form of the poem, peculiar

neither to Chaucer nor to Longfellow, which recalls the earlier work,

yet they have a further likeness in the sources of some of the tales,

and in the limpid blitheness of the style and the pure objectivity of

the poems.

The melodious, picturesque simplicity of the opening, in which the place

and the persons are introduced, is inexpressibly graceful and

masterly:--

"One autumn night in Sudbury town,

Across the meadows bare and brown,

The windows of the wayside inn

Gleamed red with fire-light through the leaves

Of woodbine hanging from the eaves,

Their crimson curtains rent and thin.

As ancient is this hostelry

As any in the land may be,

Built in the old colonial day,

When men lived in a grander way,

With ampler hospitality:

A kind of old Hobgoblin Hall,

Now somewhat fallen to decay,

With weather-stains upon the wall,

And stairways worn, and crazy doors,

And creaking and uneven floors,

And chimneys huge, and tiled, and tall."

The autumn wind moans without, and dashes in gusts against the windows;

but there is a pleasant murmur from the parlor, with the music of a

violin. In this comfortable tavern-parlor, ruddy with the fire-light, a

rapt musician stands erect before the chimney and bends his ear to his

instrument,--

"And seemed to listen, till he caught

Confessions of its secret thought,"

--a figure and a picture, as he is afterward painted,--

"Fair-haired, blue-eyed, his aspect blithe,

His figure tall and straight and lithe,"--

which recall the Norwegian magician, Ole Bull. He plays to the listening

group of friends. Of these there is the landlord,--a youth of quiet

ways, "a student of old books and days,"--a young Sicilian,--"a Spanish

Jew from Alieant,"--

"A theologian, from the school

Of Cambridge on the Charles,"--

then a poet, whose portrait, exquisitely sketched and meant for quite

another, will yet be prized by the reader, as the spectator prizes, in

the Uffizi at Florence, the portraits of the painters by themselves:--

"A poet, too, was there, whose verse

Was tender, musical, and terse:

The inspiration, the delight,

The gleam, the glory, the swift flight

Of thoughts so sudden that they seem

The revelations of a dream,

All these were his: but with them came

No envy of another's fame;

He did not find his sleep less sweet

For music in some neighboring street,

Nor rustling hear in every breeze

The laurels of Miltiades.

Honor and blessings on his head

While living, good report when dead,

Who, not too eager for renown,

Accepts, but does not clutch, the crown."

The musician completes the group.

When he stops playing, they call upon the landlord for his tale, which

he, "although a bashful man," begins. It is "Paul Revere's Ride,"

already known to many readers as a ballad of the famous incident in the

Revolution which has, in American hearts, immortalized a name which this

war has but the more closely endeared to them. It is one of the most

stirring, ringing, and graphic ballads in the language,--a proper

pendant to Browning's "How they brought the good news from Ghent to

Aix."

The poet, listening with eager delight, seizes the sword of the

landlord's ancestor which was drawn at Concord fight, and tells him that

his grandfather was a grander shape than any old Sir William,

"Clinking about in foreign lands,

With iron gauntlets on his hands,

And on his head an iron pot."

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 12, No. 74, December, 1863 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 22 / 31 题