SECTION II.

THE AMERICAN COLONIZATION SOCIETY APOLOGISES FOR SLAVERY AND

SLAVEHOLDERS.

My charges against the American Colonization Society acquire breadth and

solemnity as I progress in my task. I have fairly and abundantly

sustained my first,--_that the Society is not the enemy of the

slave-system_; and I now proceed to prove my second,--_that it

apologises for slavery and slaveholders_.

'There is a golden mean, which all who would pursue the solid

interest and reputation of their country may discern at the very

heart of their confederation, and will both advocate and

enforce--a principle, of justice, conciliation and humanity--a

principle, sir, which is not inconsistent with itself, and yet

can sigh over the degradation of the slave, _defend the wisdom

and prudence of the South against the charge of studied and

pertinacious cruelty_,' &c.--[Address of Robert F. Stockton,

Esq. at the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Parent Society.]

'It is a fact, given us on the most unquestionable authority,

that there are now in the southern States of our union,

hundreds, and even thousands of proprietors, who would gladly

give liberty to their slaves, but are deterred by the

apprehension of doing injury to their country, and perhaps to

the slaves themselves.'--[Discourse by the Rev. Dr.

Dana.--African Repository, vol. i. p. 145.]

'Guarding that system, the existence of which, though

_unfortunate_, THEY DEEM NECESSARY.'--[African Repository, vol.

i. p. 227.]

'We all know from a variety of considerations which it is

unnecessary to name, and in consequence of the policy which is

obliged to be pursued in the southern States, that it is

extremely difficult to free a slave, and hence the enactment of

those laws _which a fatal necessity seems to demand_.'--[African

Repository, vol. ii. p. 12.]

'They are convinced, that there are now hundreds of masters who

are so only from _necessity_.'--[Memorial of the Society to the

several States.--A. R. vol. ii. p. 60.]

'_I do not condemn_, let me be understood, _their detention in

bondage_ under the circumstances which are yet existing.'--['The

Colonization Society Vindicated.'--Idem, vol. iii. p. 201.]

'A third point in which the first promoters of this object were

united, is, that few individual slaveholders can, in the present

state of things, emancipate their slaves if they would. There is

a certain relation between the proprietor of slaves and the

beings thus thrown upon him, which is far more complicated, and

far less easily dissolved, than a mind unacquainted with the

subject is ready to imagine. The relation is one which, where it

exists, grows out of the very structure of society, and for the

existence of which, the master is ordinarily as little

accountable as the slave.'

'He [the planter] looks around him and sees that the condition

of the great mass of emancipated Africans is one _in comparison

with which the condition of his slaves is enviable_;--and he is

convinced that if he withdraws from his slaves his authority,

his support, his protection, and leaves them to shift for

themselves, he turns them out to be vagabonds, and paupers, and

felons, and to find in the work-house and the penitentiary, the

home which they ought to have retained on his paternal

acres.--Hundreds of humane and Christian slaveholders retain

their fellow-men in bondage, because _they are convinced that

they can do no better_.'--[Address of the Managers of the

Colonization Society of Connecticut.--Af. Rep. vol. iv. pp. 119,

120.]

'I AM NOT COMPLAINING OF THE OWNERS OF SLAVES; they cannot get

rid of them.--_I do not doubt that masters treat their slaves

with kindness_, nor that the slaves are happier than they could

be if set free in this country.'--[Address delivered before the

Hampden Col. Soc., July 4th, 1828, by Wm. B. O. Peabody, Esq.]

'_Policy_, and even _the voice of humanity_ forbade the progress

of manumission; and the _salutary hand of law_ came forward to

co-operate with our convictions, and to arrest the flow of our

feelings, and the ardor of our desires.'--[Review of the Report

of the Committee of Foreign Relations.--Af. Rep. vol. iv. p.

268.]

'When an owner of slaves tells me that he will freely relinquish

his slaves, or even that he will relinquish one-half of their

value, _on condition that he be compensated for the other half_,

and provision be made for their transportation, I feel that he

has made a generous proposal, and _I cannot charge him with all

the guilt of slavery_, though he may continue to be a

slaveholder.'--[Af. Rep. vol. v. p. 63.]

'Even slavery must be viewed as a great national calamity; a

public evil entailed upon us by untoward circumstances, _and

perpetuated for the want of appropriate remedies_.'--[Idem, vol.

v. p. 89.]

'Slavery is an evil which is entailed upon the present

generation of slaveholders, which they must suffer, _whether

they will or not_.'--[Idem, p. 179.]

'Our brethren of the South, have the same sympathies, the same

moral sentiments, the same love of liberty as ourselves. By them

as by us, slavery is felt to be an evil, a hindrance to our

prosperity, and a blot upon our character. But it was in being

when they were born, and has been forced upon them by a previous

generation.'--[Address of Rev. Dr. Nott.--Idem, p. 277.]

'With a writer in the Southern Review we say, "the situation of

the people of these States was not of their choosing. When they

came to the inheritance, it was subject to this mighty

incumbrance, and it would be criminal in them to rain or waste

the estate, to get rid of the burden at once." With this writer

we add also, in the language of Captain Hall, that the

"slaveholders ought not (immediately) to disentangle themselves

from the obligations which have devolved upon them, as the

masters of slaves." We believe that a master _may_ sustain his

relation to the slave, with as little criminality as the slave

sustains his relation to the master.' * * * 'Slavery, in its

mildest form, is an evil of the darkest character. Cruel and

unnatural in its origin, no plea can be urged in justification

of its continuance but the plea of _necessity_.'--[Af. Rep. vol.

v. pp. 329, 334.]

'How much more consistent and powerful would be our example, but

for that population within our limits, whose condition

(_necessary_ condition, I will not deny) is so much at war with

our institutions, and with that memorable national

Declaration--"that all men are created equal."'--[Fourteenth

Ann. Report.]

'_It_ [the Society] _condemns no man because he is a

slaveholder._' * * * 'They [abolitionists] confound the

_misfortunes_ of one generation with the crimes of another, and

would sacrifice both individual and public good to an

_unsubstantial theory of the rights of man_.'--[A. R. vol. vii.

pp. 200, 202.]

'Many thousand individuals in our native State, you well know,

Mr President, are restrained, said Mr Mercer, from manumitting

their slaves, as you and I are, by the melancholy conviction,

that they cannot yield to the suggestions of humanity, without

manifest injury to their country.' * * * 'The laws of Virginia

now discourage, and very wisely, perhaps, the emancipation of

slaves.'--[Speech of Mr Mercer.--First Annual Report.]

'We are ready even to grant, for our present purpose, that, so

far as mere animal existence is concerned, the slaves have no

reason to complain, and the friends of humanity have no reason

to complain for them.' * * * 'There are men in the southern

states, who long to do something effectual for the benefit of

their slaves, and would gladly emancipate them, did not

_prudence_ and _compassion_ alike forbid such a

measure.'--[Review of the Reports of the Society, from the

Christian Spectator.--Seventh Annual Report.]

'Such unhappily is the case; but there is a _necessity_ for it,

[for oppressive laws,] and so long as they remain amongst us

will that necessity continue.'--[Ninth Annual Report.]

'I MAY BE PERMITTED TO DECLARE THAT I WOULD BE A SLAVEHOLDER

TO-DAY WITHOUT SCRUPLE.'--[Fourteenth Annual Report.]

'For the existence of slavery in the United States, those, and

those only, are accountable who bore a part in originating such

a constitution of society. The bible contains no explicit

prohibition of slavery. There is neither chapter nor verse of

holy writ, which lends any countenance to the fulminating spirit

of universal emancipation, of which some exhibitions may be seen

in some of the newspapers.' * * * 'The embarrassment which many

a philanthropic proprietor has felt in relation to his slaves,

has been but little known at the north, and has had but little

sympathy. He finds himself the lord of perhaps a hundred human

beings; and is anxious to do them all the good in his power. He

would emancipate them; but if he does, their prospect of

happiness can hardly be said to be improved by the change. Some

half a dozen, perhaps, in the hundred, become industrious and

useful members of society; and the rest are mere vagabonds,

idle, wicked, and miserable.'

--[Review on African Colonization.--Vide the Christian Spectator

for September, 1830, in which the reader will find an elaborate

apology for the system of slavery, and this, too, by a

clergyman!]

'The existence of slavery among us, though not at all to be

objected to our southern brethren as a _fault_, is yet a blot on

our national character, and a mighty drawback from our national

strength.'--[Second Annual Report of the N. Y. State Col. Soc.]

'Entertaining these views of this fearful subject, why should

our opponents endeavor to prejudice our cause with our southern

friends? And we are the more anxious on this point, for we

sincerely entertain exalted notions of their sense of right, of

their manliness and independence of feeling--of their dignity of

deportment--of their honorable and chivalric turn of thought,

which spurns a mean act as death. And if I was allowed to

indulge a personal feeling, I would say that there is something

to my mind in the candor, hospitality and intelligence of the

South, which charms and captives, which wins its way to the

heart and gives assurance of all that is upright, honorable, and

humane. There is no people that treat their slaves with so

little cruelty and with so much kindness. There is nothing in

the condition of slavery more congenial with the feelings of the

South than with the feelings of the North. Philanthropy and

benevolence flourish with as much vigor with them as with

us--their hearts are as warm as ours--they feel for the

distresses of others with as much acuteness as we do--their ears

are as open to the calls of charity as ours--they as deeply

regret as we do the existence of slavery--and oh! how their

hearts would thrill with delight, if the mighty incubus could be

removed without injury or destruction to every thing around

them.'--[Speech of James S. Green, Esq. on the same occasion.]

'Many of the best citizens of our land are holders of slaves,

and hold them IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF

HUMANITY AND JUSTICE.'--[Rev. Thomas T. Skillman, editor of the

Western Luminary, an ardent supporter of the Col. Soc.]

'It is a very common impression that a principal evil of the

condition of the southern blacks, is the severity of their

treatment. THIS IS AN ERROR. It is almost every where

disreputable to treat slaves with severity; and though there are

indeed exceptions, yet in most cases in the South, even tyranny

itself could not long withstand the reproaches of public

opinion. A STILL GREATER AND MORE DANGEROUS EVIL, IS THE VERY

REVERSE. It is _indulgence_; not only in such things as are

proper and innocent, but in indolent habits and vicious

propensities.'

--[From an address prepared for the use of those who advocate

the cause of the African Education Society at Washington--a

Society which educates none but those who consent to remove to

Liberia.]

'How should a benevolent Virginian, in view of the fact, that

out of thirty-seven thousand free people of color in his State,

only two hundred were proprietors of land, how should he be in

favor of general emancipation? But, show him, that if he will

emancipate his slaves, there is a way in which he can without

doubt improve their condition, while he rids himself of a

grievous burden, and he will promptly obey the demands of

justice--he will then feel that his generous wishes can with

certainty be fulfilled. While he knows that scarcely any thing

is done to meliorate the condition of those now free, and

reflects on the many obstacles in the way of doing it in this

land, he feels bound by a regard to what he owes himself--his

children--his country, and even his slaves themselves, not to

emancipate them. For he is sure, that, by emancipation, he will

only add to the wretchedness of the one, and at the same time

put at imminent hazard the dearest interests of the other. Thus

he is forced to refrain from manumission, and not only so, but

against all his benevolent inclinations, he is forced to

co-operate with his fellow-citizens in sustaining the present

system of slavery. He would most cheerfully follow the impulse

of his noblest feelings--he would remove the curse which the

short-sighted policy of his fathers entailed upon him; but he

cannot disregard the first law of nature; especially not, when,

were he to do it, he would render the _curse_ still more

calamitous in its consequences.'--[An advocate of the

Colonization Society in the Middletown (Connecticut) Gazette.]

'Slavery is indeed a curse; and bitter is the lot of him who is

born with slaves on his hands. And now, instead of denouncing as

inhuman and unmerciful monsters and tyrants, those who are thus

_unfortunate_, I say, let the commiseration and pity of every

good citizen and christian in the land be excited, and let

fervent prayers be offered in their behalf, and that God would

direct the whole American mind to the adoption of the most

effectual measures for the accomplishment of the total abolition

of slavery.'--[New-Haven Religious Intelligencer for July 16,

1831.]

'Special reference will also be had to the condition and wishes

of the slave States. In most of them it is a prevailing

sentiment, that it is not safe to furnish slaves with the means

of instruction. Much as we lament the reasons for this

sentiment, and the _apparent necessity_ of keeping a single

fellow creature in ignorance, we willingly leave to others the

consideration and the remedy of this evil, in view of the

overwhelming magnitude of the remaining objects before

us.'--[Address of the Board of Managers of the African Education

Society of the United States.]

'And when we [of New-England] did emancipate our slaves, we were

driven to the measure by the force of example; and we did not do

it until it was found quite convenient; and then what provision

was made for the poor blacks? Let our State Prison records

answer the question. Our Southern brethren have been _more

kind_: they will not emancipate them until they send them where

they can enjoy _liberty_, more than in name. As a Northern man I

feel it my duty, and I take pleasure in giving the _meed of

praise_ to my Southern brethren.'--[Speech of Rev. Mr Gallaudet,

at a colonization meeting in New-York city.]

'The slave works for his master, who feeds and clothes him,

defends him from harm, and takes care of him when he is sick.

The free colored man works for himself, and has nobody to take

care of him but himself.'

--[From a little colonization work, published in Baltimore in

1828, 'for the use of the African Schools in the United

States'!! entitled 'A Voice from Africa.']

'The slaveholder will tell you, that he did not take liberty

from the African--he was a slave when he found him, and he is no

more than a slave yet. The man who owns one hundred acres of

land more than he can cultivate himself, is as much a

slaveholder as he who owns a slave.'--[An advocate of

colonization in the Richmond (Indiana) Palladium for Oct. 1,

1831.]

'I DO NOT MEAN TO SPEAK OF SLAVERY AS A SYSTEM OF CRUELTY AND OF

SUFFERING. On this point I am free to say, from personal

observation and occasional residences for some years at the

South, there has been much misapprehension among our

fellow-citizens of the North. And I rejoice to add, that _the

condition of the slaves generally is such as the friends of

humanity have no reason to complain of_.'--[Oration delivered at

Newark, N. J. July 4th, 1831, by Gabriel P. Disosway, Esq.]

'Slavery, it is true, is an evil--a national evil. Every

laudable effort to exterminate it should be encouraged. And we

presume that nine-tenths of the slaveholders themselves, would

rejoice at the event, could it be accomplished, of the entire

freedom from the country of every person of color, and would

willingly relinquish every slave in their possession. But the

slaves _are_ in their possession--they are entailed upon them by

their ancestors. And can they set them free, and still suffer

them to remain in the country? Would this be policy? Would it be

safe? No. When they can be transported to the soil from whence

they were derived--by the aid of the Colonization Society, by

Government, by individuals, or by any other means--then let them

be emancipated, and not before.'--[Lowell (Mass.) Telegraph.]

It is a self-evident proposition, that just so far as you alleviate the

pressure of guilt upon the consciences of evil doers, you weaken the

power of motive to repent, and encourage them to sin with impunity. To

descant upon the wrongs of the slave-system, and yet exonerate the

supporters of it from reprehension, is to deal in absurdities: we might

preach in this manner until the crack of doom, and never gain a convert.

Paradoxes may amuse, but they never convince the mind.

Now, I defy the most ingenious advocates of perpetual slavery to produce

stronger arguments in its favor than are given in the foregoing

extracts. What better plea could they make? what higher justification

could they need? Nay, these apologies of colonizationists represent

oppression not merely as innocent, but even commendable--as a system of

benevolence, upheld by philanthropists and sages!

'I do not condemn the detention of the slaves in bondage under the

circumstances which are yet existing,' says an advocate; by which

consolatory avowal we are taught that the criminality of man-stealing

depends upon _circumstances_, and not upon the fact that it is a daring

violation of the rights of man and the laws of God.

'The planter sees that the condition of the great mass of emancipated

Africans is one, in comparison with which the condition of his slaves is

_enviable_,' assert the Board of Managers!--a concession which

transforms robbery into generosity, cruelty into mercy, and leads the

slaveholder to believe that, instead of deserving censure, his conduct

is really meritorious!--a concession which is at war with common sense,

and contrary to truth.

'I am not complaining of the owners of slaves--I do not doubt that the

slaves are happier than they could be if set free in this country,'

declares an apologist, even in Massachusetts! Stripes and servitude

would doubtless soon alter his opinion. With him, to sell human beings

at public auction, and to separate husbands and wives, and children and

parents, is not a subject of complaint! and to be a slave, to be fed

upon a peck of corn per week, unable to possess property, liable to be

torn from the partner of his bosom and children at a moment's warning

mal-treated worse than a brute, &c. &c. &c. is more desirable than to be

a free man, able to acquire wealth, unrestricted in his movements, from

whom none may wrest his wife or children, and who can find redress for

any outrage upon his person or property!

'Policy, and even _humanity_,' cries another, 'forbid the progress of

manumission'! Indeed! But is it right to hold our fellow creatures as

chattels, and to perpetuate their ignorance and servitude? O no! this is

_wrong_, but it would be a greater wrong to emancipate them! Is this

folly or villany? To oppress our brother is wrong, but to cease from

oppressing him would not be right!

'I would be a slaveholder to-day without scruple,' says another

advocate.

'Many owners of slaves,' another declares, 'hold them in strict

accordance with the principles of humanity and justice'!!! Yes, to

deprive men of their inalienable rights is to do unto them as we would

have them do unto us!

Finally, another boldly declares that the slaves are treated _too

indulgently_!--The laws which regard them as beasts, but punish them for

the commission of crime as severely as if they possessed the knowledge

of angels, he must suppose are too lenient. Their allowance of corn is

too liberal; they ought not to wear any raiment; to sleep in their

wretched huts is calculated to make them effeminate--the open field is a

more suitable place for cattle; no religious instruction should be

granted even orally to them! The slaves, as a body, too kindly treated!

The Lord have compassion upon any of their number who shall come under

the control of him who holds this opinion!

Sentiments, like these, act upon the consciences of slave owners like

opiates upon the body, lulling them into a slumber as profound and fatal

as death. It were almost as hopeless a task to attempt to arouse, alarm

and animate them, so long as they repose under the stupefying effects of

this poison, as to raise the dead. This must not be. Slaveholders are

the enemies of God and man; their garments are red with the blood of

souls; their guilt is aggravated beyond the power of language to

describe; and they must be made to see and realise their awful

condition. Truth must send its arrows into their consciences, and Terror

rouse them to exertion, and Conviction bring them upon their knees, and

Repentance propitiate the anger of Heaven, or they perish by the sword.

The slaves must be free; and He who is no respecter of person is now

holding out to us this alternative--either to wait until they burst

their chains and wade through a river of blood to freedom, or to

liberate them willingly ourselves. Can we hesitate in our choice? Be

this our only reply to those who apologise for the oppressors, and fix

the standard of policy higher than that of duty: 'Wo unto them that call

evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for

darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Wo unto them

that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight! which

justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the

righteous from him!'

Thoughts on African Colonization · 第 2 / 11 章