PART I.

Transcriber's notes:

In this transcription, italic text is denoted by _underscores_ and bold

text by =equal signs=. Superscripts are indicated by ^ (e.g. Fig. 509,

_I^a_).

The text contains numerous inconsistencies of hyphenation. A few have

been adjusted where there was clear evidence of a preferred style (e.g.

meso-colic-->mesocolic and meso-duodenum-->mesoduodenum) but most have

been left in their original format.

A few spelling typos have been corrected silently (e.g.

improtant-->important, mecocolon-->mesocolon) and missing letters have

been inserted inside square brackets (e.g. junct[i]on, t[r]ansverse).

Some spelling inconsistencies probably represent contemporarily

acceptable spelling alternatives (e.g. coati/coaiti, mesal/mesial,

praecava/precava, hyaena/hyena).

A small number of punctuation inconsistencies have been corrected

silently by insertion of missing punctuation or deletion of redundant

punctuation.

The abbreviation viz. appears inconsistently in both roman and italic

font.

Illustrations (not displayed in this transcription) were originally

grouped separately from the text. Their captions have been relocated

adjacent to their first mention in the text. Some illustrations

contained features labelled as X, A, B, 1, 2, etc. and when these are

cross referenced in the text they are sometimes inconsistently styled

(upper/lower case, roman/italic).

The numbering system and font styling of the TOC is not consistent

within the TOC nor with the corresponding headings in the text, and some

TOC entries correspond to in-line text rather than to true headings. No

attempt has been made to remedy these inconsistencies. One missing TOC

entry has been inserted.

The index is shown as it originally appeared - with some entries not in

correct alphabetic sequence.

Footnotes are located below the paragraph of reference.

THE ANATOMY

OF THE

HUMAN PERITONEUM

AND

ABDOMINAL CAVITY

CONSIDERED FROM THE STANDPOINT OF DEVELOPMENT

AND COMPARATIVE ANATOMY

BY

GEORGE S. HUNTINGTON, M.A., M.D.

PROFESSOR OF ANATOMY, COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS,

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY,

NEW YORK CITY

ILLUSTRATED WITH 300 FULL-PAGE PLATES CONTAINING

582 FIGURES, MANY IN COLORS

LEA BROTHERS & CO.

PHILADELPHIA AND NEW YORK

1903

Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1903, by

LEA BROTHERS & CO.,

In the Office of the Librarian of Congress. All rights reserved

PREFACE.

In the following pages an attempt has been made to emphasize the value

of Embryology and Comparative Anatomy in elucidating the difficult and

often complicated morphological problems encountered in the study of

human adult anatomy.

Moreover, in addition to the direct advance in the method and scope of

anatomical teaching afforded by these aids, it is further hoped that the

broader interpretation, both of structure and function, obtained by

ontogenetic and phylogenetic comparison, will impart an interest to the

study of adult human morphology, such as the subject, considered solely

in the narrow field of its own limitations, could never arouse.

The book represents part of the course in visceral anatomy as developed

during the past fourteen years at Columbia University. The sections

dealing with the morphology of the vertebrate ileo-colic junction and

with the structural details of the human caecum and appendix are

considered somewhat more fully, as warranted by the extensive material

available. The illustrations are for the greater part taken from

preparations in the Morphological Museum of the University. Wherever

practicable the direct photographic reproduction of the actual

preparation is given. In the case of preparations not suitable for this

purpose, careful drawings have been made which offer in every instance a

faithful and correct interpretation of the conditions presented by the

actual object. A number of the embryonic illustrations are taken from

the standard text-books on the subject, due credit being given to their

source. I desire to express my sincere thanks to Dr. Edward Leaming, of

the Department of Photography and to Mr. M. Petersen, artist of the

Anatomical Department of the University, for their skilful and

thoroughly reliable work in the preparation of the illustrations.

=George S. Huntington.=

=Columbia University=, in the City of New York,

_December, 1902_.

CONTENTS.

PAGE.

INTRODUCTION 17

Development of Vertebrate Ovum 19

Development of Coelom and of Alimentary Canal 21

Development of Cloaca 24

Development and Divisions of the Peritoneum 32

Derivatives of Entodermal Intestinal Canal 34

Divisions of Alimentary Canal 38

PART I. ANATOMY OF THE PERITONEUM AND ABDOMINAL CAVITY 39

COMPARATIVE ANATOMY OF FOREGUT AND STOMACH 42

Morphological Types of Stomach 43

Development of the Intestine 51

I. Intestinal Rotation and Definition of Adult Segments of

the Intestinal Canal 58

Development of Aortal Arterial System 63

II. Demonstration of Intestinal Rotation in the Lower

Mammalia 67

Peritoneal and Visceral Relations in the Infra-colic

Compartment of the Abdominal Cavity in the Adult 74

Part II. ANATOMY OF THE PERITONEUM IN THE SUPRA-COLIC COMPARTMENT

OF THE ABDOMEN 99

1. STOMACH AND DORSAL MESOGASTRIUM 100

_a._ Changes in Position of Stomach 102

_b._ Changes in Direction and Extent of Dorsal Mesogastrium 103

_c._ Development of Spleen and Pancreas in the Dorsal

Mesogastrium and Changes in the Disposition of the Great

Omentum 108

1. Development of Spleen 108

2. Development of Pancreas 111

Development of Pancreas in Lower Vertebrates 115

Comparative Anatomy of Pancreas 116

Pyloric Caeca or Appendices 119

Peritoneal Relations of Pancreas 122

Comparison of Embryonal Stages during the Development of

the Human Dorsal Mesogastrium, Spleen and Pancreas with

the Permanent Adult Condition of the same Structures in

Lower Mammalia 126

1. Spleen, Pancreas and Great Omentum of Cat 127

2. Relation of Great Omentum to Transverse Colon,

Transverse Mesocolon and Third Part of Duodenum 129

2. VENTRAL MESOGASTRIUM AND LIVER 140

I. _A._ Development of Liver 141

_B._ Comparative Anatomy of Liver 144

_C._ Development of Vascular System of Liver 145

Comparative Anatomy of the Hepatic Venous Circulation 154

II. Ventral Mesogastrium 163

Peritoneal Relations of Liver 167

Relation of Hepatic Peritoneum to the "Lesser Sac" 174

Caudal Boundary of Foramen of Winslow 178

Pancreatico-gastric Folds 181

PART III. LARGE AND SMALL INTESTINE, ILEO-COLIC JUNCTION

AND CAECUM 189

I. GENERAL REVIEW OF MORPHOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF THE

VERTEBRATE INTESTINE 190

I. Midgut or Small Intestine 192

Intestinal Folds 193

Divisions of Small Intestine 194

Structure of Small Intestine 194

1. Secretory Apparatus 194

2. Absorbing Apparatus 195

Valvulae Conniventes 196

II. Endgut or Large Intestine 198

II. SERIAL REVIEW OF THE ILEO-COLIC JUNCTION AND CONNECTED

STRUCTURES IN VERTEBRATES 200

I. Fishes 200

II. Amphibia 201

III. Reptilia 201

IV. Birds 203

V. Mammalia 204

Monotremata 204

Marsupalia 204

Edentata 206

Sirenia 208

Cetacea 209

Ungulata 209

Rodentia 211

Carnivora 212

Cheiroptera 212

Insectivora 213

Primates 213

III. PHYLOGENY OF THE TYPES OF ILEO-COLIC JUNCTION AND CAECUM

IN THE VERTEBRATE SERIES 217

1. Symmetrical Form of Ileo-colic Junction; Mid- and End-gut

in Direct Linear Continuity 221

2. Asymmetrical Development of a Single Caecal Pouch, lateral

to the Ileo-colic Junction, Mid- and End-gut Preserving

their Linear Continuity 223

3. Rectangular Ileo-colic Junction, with Direct Linear

Continuity of Caecum and Colon 225

IV. STRUCTURE OF CAECAL APPARATUS AND SPECIALIZED MORPHOLOGICAL

CHARACTERS OF COLON IN RODENTS AND UNGULATES 229

1. Caecum Proper 229

2. Structural Modifications of Proximal Segment of Colon

analogous in their Functional Significance to the Caecal

Apparatus 230

V. CAECAL APPARATUS AND COLON IN HYRAX. 234

PART IV. MORPHOLOGY OF THE HUMAN CAECUM AND VERMIFORM APPENDIX 237

I. Development of the Caecum and Appendix 237

II. Changes in the Position of the Caecum and Appendix during

normal Development, depending upon the Rotation of the

Intestine and the subsequent Descent of the Caecum 239

III. Variations of Adult Caecum and Appendix 244

_A._ Shape of Caecum and Origin of Appendix. Types and

Variations of Adult Caecum and Appendix 245

_B._ Position and Peritoneal Relations of Appendix 250

_C._ Ileo-Caecal Folds and Fossae 260

INTRODUCTION.

In considering the anatomy of the human abdominal cavity and peritoneum

in the following pages the explanation of the adult conditions

encountered is based upon the development of the parts, and the

successive human embryonal stages are illustrated by the examination of

the lower vertebrates presenting permanent adult structural conditions

which appear as merely temporary embryonal stages in the development of

the higher mammalian alimentary tract.

For the sake of clearness and brevity all discussion of the _theories of

peritoneal development_ has been designedly omitted. The assumption of

peritoneal _adhesion_, and consequent obliteration of serous areas,

offers many advantages in considering the adult human abdominal cavity,

especially from the standpoint of comparative anatomy. The same has

consequently been adopted without reference to divergent views and

theories.

In studying the descriptive text and the diagrams the student should

remember that the volume offers in no sense a complete or detailed

account of the development of the abdominal cavity and its contents. The

purpose is not to present the embryology of this portion of the

vertebrate body, but to _utilize_ certain embryological facts in order

to _explain_ the complicated adult conditions encountered. To avoid

confusion, and to bring the salient points into strong relief, the

majority of the diagrams illustrating human embryonal stages are purely

schematic.

Moreover, in order to avoid confusing and unnecessary details it is

often desirable to disregard developmental chronology entirely. Many of

the diagrams combine several successive developmental stages, showing

different degrees of development in different portions of the same

drawing. Again it is frequently necessary, for the sake of brevity and

clearness, to actually depart from known embryological conditions. If,

for example, the stomach and liver are treated as if they were from

their inception abdominal organs, the student of systematic embryology

will recall the fact that this position is only _obtained after_ their

primitive differentiation by growth and migration.

Again the mesenteries are treated here as if they formed definite and

well-defined membranes from the beginning--without reference to the

abdominal organs with which they are associated. We speak of the liver

as growing into and between the layers of the ventral mesogastrium,

because this conception offers the opportunity of more clearly

explaining the adult condition. Actually, however, the membrane

develops, as a new structure, after the first differentiation of liver

and stomach, as these organs descend into the abdominal cavity.

Similar discrepancies between fact and schema are encountered

throughout. Consequently, while the purpose of the volume is to

facilitate the study and comprehension of the _adult_ peritoneal cavity

and its contents, the reader should guard against receiving the

developmental illustration as a correct successive and detailed account

of the _embryology_ of the parts concerned.

In like manner the comparative anatomical facts adduced form in no sense

even approximately a complete serial morphological account of the

vertebrate alimentary tract.

To the student of human anatomy the zoological position of the forms

which help him to understand complicated human structural conditions is

immaterial. He can draw on all the vertebrate classes independently of

their mutual relations. Hence neither ontogeny nor phylogeny are here

introduced, except as aids to the study of adult human anatomy. The

following pages offer neither an embryology nor a comparative anatomy of

the alimentary tract, but an attempt has been made in them to illustrate

the significance of the complicated anatomical details presented by the

adult human abdominal cavity by reference to the simpler antecedent

conditions encountered during the early developmental stages of the

higher forms and permanently in the structure of the lower vertebrates.

While, as just stated, a complete presentation of the development of the

abdominal cavity is not required, yet the student will find it of

advantage to rehearse the main facts of vertebrate embryology, for the

purpose of bringing a clear understanding of the manner in which the

vertebrate body is built up to bear upon the problems which the special

organs and structures of the body-cavity present for his consideration.

This purpose can be accomplished by a very brief and condensed

consideration of the cardinal facts.

The entire vertebrate body is the product of developmental changes

taking place after fertilization in a single primitive CELL, the EGG or

OVUM (Fig. 1).

[Illustration: FIG. 1.--Human ovum, from a mature follicle, a sphere of

about 0.2 mm. diameter. x 25. (Kollmann.)]

In structure the ovum corresponds to other animal cells. On account of

their special significance during development the different component

parts of the egg-cell have received special distinctive names. The

_cell-body_ is known as the _vitellus_ or _yolk_. It is composed of two

substances, the _protoplasm_ or formative yolk and the _deuteroplasm_ or

nutritive yolk, which vary in their relative proportions in the ova of

different animals.

The protoplasm represents the material from which in the course of

development the cells forming the body of the individual are derived,

while the deuteroplasm serves for the nutrition of the ovum during the

earliest stages of development.

The _nucleus_ of the egg-cell is distinguished as the _germinal

vesicle_, and its _nucleolus_ as the _germinal spot_.

The _cell-body_ or _vitellus_ is surrounded by a condensed portion of

the cell contents to which the name of the vitelline membrane has been

applied, which in turn is enclosed by a transparent and elastic cover,

the _zona pellucida_, presenting a radially striated appearance.

The ovum is contained in the cortical portion of the ovary, enclosed in

the _Graafian follicle_, a vesicle 4-8 mm. in diameter, whose fibrous

walls are lined by several layers of epithelial cells, which surround

the ovum, forming the _discus proligerus_.

After impregnation the egg-cell, by a process of repeated division or

cleavage, undergoes _segmentation_, the cell-body being divided

successively into two, four, eight, sixteen, thirty-two, etc., _cells_,

called _blastomeres_ (Figs. 2 and 3). The mass of cells finally

resulting from this process of segmentation forms the ground work of the

future body. A vertebrate ovum in this stage of complete segmentation is

called the _morula_ from its resemblance to a mulberry (Fig. 4).

[Illustration: FIG. 2.--Segmentation of mammalian ovum (bat). (After E.

von Beneden.) Two blastomeres, each with a nucleus, shown in lighter

color. The dark bodies are yolk-granules.]

[Illustration: FIG. 3.--Segmentation of mammalian ovum. Four

blastomeres. (After E. von Beneden.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 4.--Ovum of rabbit, from terminal portion of

oviduct. The zona pellucida appears thickened, and contains many

spermatozoa which failed to penetrate the ovum. (After Bischoff.)]

After segmentation is completed a cavity filled with fluid and

surrounded by the developing cells is gradually formed in the interior

of the mass. This cavity is known as the _segmentation-cavity_. The egg

is now called the _blastula_, _blastosphere_ or _blastodermic vesicle_

and the cellular membrane enclosing the segmentation-cavity forms the

_germinal membrane_ or _blastoderm_ (Figs. 5 and 6). The cells of the

blastoderm become aggregated at one point on the circumference of the

vesicle (dorsal pole of blastosphere) forming, when viewed from above, a

thickened biscuit or disk-shaped opaque area. This is known as the

_germinal area_, or _primitive blastoderm_ or _embryonic shield_ (Figs.

7 and 12).

[Illustration: FIG. 5.--Blastodermic vesicle of rabbit. (After E. von

Beneden.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 6.--Blastodermic vesicle of _Triton taeniatus_.

(Hertwig.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 7.--Embryonic area of rabbit embryo. (Heisler, after

E. von Beneden.) The primitive streak beginning in the

cell-proliferation known as the "node of Hensen."]

[Illustration: FIG. 12.--Oval embryonic area of rabbit's egg, detached

with part of wall of blastodermic vesicle. x 30. (Kollmann.)]

This is the first indication of the coming division of the entire

egg-cell into the _embryo proper_ and the _vitelline_ or _yolk-sac_

(Figs. 8 and 9). The entire future individual develops from the cells of

the germinal area. This area comprises both the embryo proper and the

region immediately surrounding it.

[Illustration: FIG. 8.--Blastodermic vesicle of mammal. (E. von

Beneden.) The layer of cells lining the interior of the vesicle next to

the zona pellucida forms Rauber's "Deckschichte" or prochorion. This is

not the true ectoderm, since it does not participate in the formation of

the embryo, which is entirely derived from the cells of the germinal

area.]

[Illustration: FIG. 9.--Human embryo with yolk-sac, amnion, and

belly-stalk of fifteen to eighteen days. (Heisler, after Coste.)]

The remainder of the ovum, serving temporary purposes of nutrition and

respiration, gradually becomes absorbed and disappears.

[Illustration: FIG. 10.--Embryonal area of sheep, composed of ectoderm

and entoderm. (After Bonnet.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 11.--Blastodermic vesicle of rabbit. Section through

embryonic area at caudal limit of node of Hensen. (Rabl.)]

Transverse sections at right angles to the long axis of the embryonic

area show that the single layer of cells composing the primitive

germinal membrane becomes differentiated first into two (Fig. 10) and

subsequently into three layers of cells (Fig. 11). At the margins of the

germinal area these layers are of course continuous with the rest of

yolk-sac wall. From their position in reference to the center of the

cell the three layers of the blastoderm are described as--

1. The outer, Epiblast or Ectoderm.

2. The middle, Mesoblast or Mesoderm.

3. The inner, Hypoblast or Entoderm.

The central nervous system (brain and spinal cord) is derived from the

ectoderm by the development of a groove in the long axis of the

embryonic area (Figs. 13, 14, 16 and 17), and by the subsequent union in

the dorsal midline of the ridges bounding the groove to form a closed

tube (Fig. 18). (Medullary groove, plates and canal.)

[Illustration: FIG. 13.--Transverse section of embryonic area of ovum of

sheep of fourteen and a half days. (Heisler, after Bonnet.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 14.--Germinal area of rabbit's ovum. (Kollmann.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 15.--Surface-view of area pellucida of an

eighteen-hour chick-embryo. (Balfour.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 16.--Transverse section of human embryo before

development of protovertebrae or chorda dorsalis. (Keibel.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 17.--Transverse section of a sixteen and a half day

sheep embryo. (Heisler, after Bonnet.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 18.--Embryo of bird, at beginning of third day, with

four blastodermic layers, resulting from the division of the mesoderm

into parietal and visceral layers, separated by the coelom cavity.

Transverse section. x 170. (Kollmann.)]

The following changes in the ventral aspect lead to the formation of the

alimentary canal and body-cavity:

The developing embryo at first lies flat on the subjacent yolk-mass, and

subsequently becomes gradually separated more and more from the rest of

the blastoderm by grooves or furrows which develop along the sides and

at the cephalic and caudal extremity of the embryo. The folds resulting

from these furrows indent the yolk more and more as development proceeds

and tend to approach each other at a central point, the future

_umbilicus_.

In the meanwhile changes in the region of the mesoderm have led to

conditions which produce a differentiation of the ventral portion of the

embryo into two tubes or cylinders, the _alimentary_ or _intestinal

canal_ and the _general body-cavity_, the former being included within

the latter.

Early in the course of development a number of spaces appear in the

mesoderm on each side of the axial line of the embryo. These spaces soon

unite to form two large cavities, one on each side. Taken together these

cavities constitute the _coelom_ or _body-cavity_, which becomes

subdivided in the adult mammal into the pleural, pericardial and

abdominal cavities.

As these coelom cavities develop in the mesoderm the cells lining them

become distinctly epithelial. This mesodermic epithelium lining the

coelom is called the _mesothelium_.

The development of the coelom space divides the mesoderm on each side

into an outer leaf, the _somatic_ or _parietal mesoderm_, and an inner

leaf, the _splanchnic_ or _visceral mesoderm_ (Figs. 18 and 19). The

former is closely applied to the ectoderm, forming with it the

_somatopleure_ or _body-wall_. The latter, in close contact with the

entoderm, forms with it the _splanchnopleure_ or wall of the alimentary

canal. In the dorsal median line both somatic and splanchnic mesoderm

become continuous with each other and with the axial mesoderm (Fig. 20).

[Illustration: FIG. 19.--Transverse section of a seventeen and a half

day sheep embryo. (Bonnet.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 20.--Curves of blastodermic layers and division of

mesoderm in amniote embryo. (Kollmann.)]

The folds of the splanchnopleure, indenting the yolk-sac, form a gutter

directly connected with the yolk, the _primitive intestinal groove_ or

_furrow_, whose margins gradually approach each other (Fig. 20). In this

way the primitive alimentary canal becomes separated from the yolk. At

first this separation is ill-defined, and the channel of communication

between the primitive intestine and the yolk is wide (Figs. 13, 16, 17

and 19). The folding of the splanchnopleure completes, at an early

period, the dorsal and lateral walls of the embryonic gut, but

ventrally, toward the yolk, the tube is incomplete and widely open.

By union and coalescence of the splanchnopleural folds, proceeding from

the caudal and cephalic ends towards the center, this primitive wide

channel gradually becomes narrowed down, until the communication between

the yolk-sac and the intestine is reduced to a canal, the

_vitello-intestinal_ or _omphalo-mesenteric duct_. The intestinal gutter

is thus converted into a closed tube except at the point of implantation

of the vitelline duct during the persistence of this structure. In the

meanwhile the somatopleural folds forming the body-walls grow more and

more together from the sides, approaching the vitello-intestinal duct.

Finally touching each other they coalesce to form the ventral body wall,

in the same manner as the splanch[n]opleural folds met and united to

form the alimentary tube.

At the same time the vitello-intestinal duct and the remnant of the

yolk-sac, to which it was attached ("umbilical vesicle"), normally

become obliterated and disappear.

After the intestinal tube and the body cavity have thus become closed

the embryo straightens out and the alimentary canal appears as a nearly

straight cylindrical tube extending from the cephalic to the caudal end

of the embryo. This primitive alimentary tube at first terminates at its

cephalic extremity in a blind pouch, while at the caudal end in the

early stages the intestine is connected with the nerve-tube by a channel

called the _neuro-enteric canal_, forming in the earliest embryos a

communication between the ectoderm lining the bottom of the medullary

groove and the entoderm (Figs. 22 and 26). In man this stage is

encountered very early, in embryos of 2 mm. before the formation of

either heart or provertebrae.

[Illustration: FIG. 22.--Caudal half of human blastoderm measuring 3

mm., with open medullary groove. Dorsal view. x 30. (After Spee.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 26.--Neuro-enteric canal in section of human embryo

of 2 mm. (After Spee.)]

At the point where the canal develops the primitive groove presents a

thickened circumvallate spot, marking the beginning perforation of the

medullary plate from the ectoderm to the entoderm. The canal exists only

for a short period during the earliest stages of embryonal life. It

becomes rapidly closed, the neural and intestinal tubes henceforth

remaining permanently separated from each other.

The embryonal caudal end of the primitive alimentary canal is not the

final adult termination of the tube. When the anal aperture is formed in

a manner to be presently detailed, the opening is situated cephalad of

the portion connected with the nerve-tube by the neuro-enteric canal.

Hence this terminal portion of the early embryonic alimentary canal is

called the "post-anal gut" (Fig. 21).

[Illustration: FIG. 21.--Sagittal section of caudal extremity of cat

embryo of 6 mm. (Tourneux.)]

The post-anal gut and the neuro-enteric canal are better developed in

the embryos of the lower than in those of the higher vertebrates. But in

all vertebrates of the present day both of these structures undergo

regressive changes and finally disappear altogether. They serve to

recall conditions which existed in bygone ages, and, while they have a

long and significant phylogenetic history, they have lost among living

vertebrates all physiological importance.

After closure of the neuro-enteric canal and obliteration of the

post-anal gut the alimentary tube ends, during a short period, both

cephalad and caudad in a blind pouch. Very soon, however, the ectoderm

becomes invaginated at both extremities and finally perforates into the

lumen of the intestine, thus establishing the oral and anal

communications with the exterior. The anal ectodermal invagination

(proctodaeum) (Fig. 21), is smaller than the oral (stomadaeum) (Fig. 27),

but the intestinal tube forms an extensive pouch in the anal region

which descends to meet the ectodermal invagination of the proctodaeum.

The details of the embryonic processes leading to the final

establishment of the adult condition are of great interest on account of

the pathological importance of abnormal or arrested development in these

parts. Failure of the caudal intestinal pouch to establish a

communication with the anal invagination, or failure of development in

either anal invagination or intestinal pouch, leads to the condition

known as atresia ani or imperforate anus, of which there are several

varieties.

[Illustration: FIG. 27.--Median section through head of embryo rabbit of

6 mm. (Mihulkovics.)]

Before the anal opening forms the primitive caudal intestine receives

from above the stalk of the _allantois_, while the Wolffian duct, the

canal of the embryonic excretory apparatus, also opens into it. The

renal bud on the Wolffian duct in Fig. 28 indicates the beginning

development of the permanent kidney (metanephros), and the proximal

portion of the allantoic stalk is destined to form by a spindle-shaped

enlargement the future urinary bladder (Fig. 28). The caudal gut has as

yet no anal opening. Ventrad of the tail end of the embryo the ectoderm

presents at this time a depression (Fig. 21). The ectoderm lining the

bottom of this anal fossa or depression is separated by a little

mesoderm tissue from the entodermal lining of the blind pouch of the

caudal gut. Ectoderm and entoderm in this region with the intervening

mesodermal layer form the _cloacal membrane_ (Fig. 21).

[Illustration: FIG. 28.--Reconstruction of caudal end of human embryo of

11.5 mm. (four and a half weeks), showing pelvic structures. x 40.

(After Keibel.)]

=Development of Cloaca.=--The entodermal pouch or prolongation sent down

from the end-gut to meet the anal invagination enlarges and dilates to

form a short wide piece of the intestinal tube into which open on the

one hand the urinary and sexual ducts of the genito-urinary system,

while it receives on the other the termination of the _end-gut proper_

(Figs. 28 and 29).

[Illustration: FIG. 29.--Reconstruction of caudal end of human embryo of

14 mm. (five weeks). x 20 (After Keibel.)]

This is the permanent condition of the terminal openings of the

alimentary and genito-urinary tracts in the lower vertebrates. It is

found in certain fishes, in all amphibia, reptiles and birds, and occurs

also in one order of mammals, the monotremes. In man and mammals

generally the anal orifice is separated from the genito-urinary opening,

lying dorsad of the same and provided with special sphincters. Only in

the monotremes do the anus and the genito-urinary tract open into a

common cloaca surrounded by a sphincter common to the anal and

genito-urinary openings (sphincter cloacae). In birds, reptiles, amphibia

and many fishes (especially the Plagiostomata) this cloacal formation is

the rule. In many fishes, especially the Teleosts, the anus and the

genito-urinary openings are separate, as in mammals, but their position

is reversed, the anus being ventral, while the genito-urinary opening is

placed dorsally.

[Illustration: FIG. 23.--Genito-urinary tract and cloaca of _Iguana

tuberculata_, female. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1846.)]

Fig. 23 shows the cloaca in a female specimen of _Iguana tuberculata_.

The ventral wall of the cloaca has been divided to the left of the

median line and turned over to the right, carrying with it the cloacal

opening of the bladder. The termination of the alimentary canal opens

into the cloaca from above.

A transverse fold of the mucosa separates this upper compartment of the

cloaca (_coprodaeum_) from a lower space (_urodaeum_) which receives in

its dorsal wall the openings of the two oviducts and immediately above

them--upon two papillae--the openings of the ureters, while the ventral

wall contains the cloacal opening of the bladder.

The right ovary has been removed--to show the abdominal opening of the

right oviduct--by dividing the mesovarian peritoneal fold.

[Illustration: FIG. 24.--Genito-urinary tract and cloaca of the hen,

_Gallus bankiva_. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1208.)]

Fig. 24--taken from a preparation of the hen--shows the typical

arrangement of the female genito-urinary tract and cloaca in the birds.

The terminal portion of the alimentary canal, in entering the cloaca,

forms an expanded upper cloacal compartment for the accumulation of the

excreta, called the _coprodaeum_.

It is separated by a prominent mucous fold from the central compartment,

or _urodaeum_ which receives the terminations of the two ureters and of

the single (left) oviduct. A second fold forms the distal limit of the

urodaeum and separates it from the lowest cloacal compartment, the

_proctodaeum_.

[Illustration: FIG. 25.--Genito-urinary tract and cloaca of _Platypus

anatinus_, duck-billed platypus. (Columbia University Museum, No.

1802.)]

Fig. 25 shows the male genito-urinary tract and the cloaca in the

monotreme, _Platypus anatinus_. The cloaca is a spacious sac formed by

the confluence of the rectum and the genito-urinary sinus.

The penis, consisting of two large cavernous bodies, is contained in a

fibrous sac which arises from the junction of the genito-urinary sinus

and the cloaca, and is continued into the ventral wall of the cloaca

near its termination by an opening through which the penis can pass into

the cloaca and beyond the external cloacal aperture.

The semen enters the penis at its root through a narrow opening situated

close to the junction of genito-urinary sinus and cloaca.

For a short period, therefore, the human embryo and the embryos of the

higher mammalia present conditions which correspond to the permanent

structure of the parts in these lower vertebrates. In human embryos of

11.5 mm. cervico-coccygeal measure (32-33 days) (Fig. 28), the cloaca

appears as a short sac continuous dorsad with the intestine, ventrad

with the rudiment of the urinary bladder. The larger portion of the

caudal gut (postanal gut) has disappeared, having been reduced to a thin

epithelial strand which gradually becomes entirely absorbed. Only the

proximal portion of the end-gut is used for the development of the

cloaca, which, however, at first has no external opening (Fig. 28).

The tail end of the embryo becomes more extended and between it and the

umbilical cord an interval appears in which the genital protuberance

develops. Behind this point the ventral cloacal wall is formed by the

cloacal membrane.

A considerable interval also develops between the points of entrance

into the cloaca of the intestine proper and of the allantoic stalk

(urinary bladder). The growth of the mesoderm pushes the intestine

against the sacral vertebrae, while the stalk of the allantois with the

rudimentary urinary bladder is forced against the ventral abdominal

wall. These changes prepare the way for the first appearance of the

_genito-urinary sinus_. The neck of the embryonic bladder elongates and

receives the ducts of the urinary and genital glands (Fig. 29). In

embryos of 14 mm. cervico-coccygeal measure (36-37 days) (Figs. 29 and

30), the genito-urinary sinus perforates the cloacal membrane on the

ventral aspect of the genital protuberance, forming the _uro-genital

cleft_. The rectum remains closed for a few days longer. The perforation

is preceded by the formation of a transverse ectodermal reduplication,

producing a depression called the _transverse anal fissure_. This

depression increases in depth until a distinct anal invagination

results, known as the _proctodaeum_, which grows as a funnel-shaped fossa

toward the blind termination of the endgut. In embryos of 25 mm.

cervico-coccygeal measure (81/2-9 weeks) the intestine still ends in a

blind pouch. The anus is, therefore, independent of the end-gut in its

development. It is derived from the ectoderm and its production is

analogous to the formation of the oral cavity by means of the ectodermal

invagination called the _stomadaeum_.

[Illustration: FIG. 30.--Human female foetus, 3.4 cm. long,

vertex-coccygeal measure. The external perineal folds separate the anal

invagination from the uro-genital opening. (Kollmann.)]

Finally the cloaca is converted into a ventral tube from which part of

the urinary bladder, the urethra and genito-urinary sinus develop, and a

dorsal tube from which the _rectum_ is derived. This double disposition

of the cloaca is accomplished by gradual changes in the entoderm and

mesoderm. The entoderm proliferates until a partition is formed which

separates the two divisions of the cloacal tube from each other, and the

mesoderm likewise increases, surrounding the newly formed entodermal

tubes with tissue from which the muscles, connective tissue and blood

vessels of the parts are derived (Figs. 28 and 29).

This partition, the _septum uro-rectale_, develops symmetrically on each

side, appearing first as paired folds on the right and left sides called

the _internal perineal folds_ (Figs. 28 and 29). When these folds have

reached the cloacal membrane they complete the separation of the cloaca

into two adjacent canals. Each of these canals is still closed caudad by

its respective portion of the cloacal membrane, now divided into an

_anal_ and _uro-genital_ segment. These two portions of the original

cloacal membrane become perforated separately, the uro-genital before

the anal. Hence the external opening of the uro-genital sinus is the

first to appear, to be followed by the anal perforation. The internal

perineal folds are supplemented by the formation of similar external

folds, ridges of mesoderm tissue which surround the anal orifice in the

form of a low wall and thus deepen the anal ectodermal invagination into

the fossa of the proctodaeum.

These developmental stages in the formation of the end-gut are of

importance because they offer the explanation of the pathological

conditions which result from an arrest of development and from the

failure of either the uro-genital or anal opening to form in the usual

manner. These malformations must date back to an early stage, and

probably have their inception in disturbances occurring in the normal

development between the 15th and 23d day (embryos of 3-6 mm.). Perhaps

in some cases of atresia there may be a secondary obliteration of a

previously formed opening. In Fig. 31 the proctodaeum persists but the

perforation of the anal membrane into the end-gut has not occurred. The

ectoderm of the anal fossa and the intestinal entoderm remain separated

by a transverse mesodermal partition. Different degrees of this

malformation are observed. The layer separating the skin from the blind

end of the rectum may be so thin that the meconium contained in the

latter can be felt through it. On the other hand the rectum may

terminate high up in a blind pouch, which is separated from the skin by

a distance of several centimeters.

[Illustration: FIG. 31.--Section of pelvis of human foetus, showing

atresia recti. (Esmarch.)]

We may now briefly consider the genetic, histological and mechanical

conditions which the above-outlined course of development imposes on the

alimentary tract.

The ectoderm forms the superficial covering of the embryo and in the

dorsal axial line develops the medullary groove which subsequently

becomes converted into the cerebro-spinal axis by closure of the

medullary plates and inclusion of the neural tube within the surrounding

mesoblast (Fig. 18). The entoderm forms the epithelial lining of the

interior of the alimentary canal and its appendages and derivatives

(Fig. 19). The mesoderm furnishes the skeletal, muscular and vascular

systems. At first single, like the two remaining layers of the

blastoderm, the mesoderm splits early on each side of the chorda

dorsalis into two layers, including between them spaces which after

coalescence form the _primitive pleuro-peritoneal_ or _body-cavity_

(Fig. 20). One of these mesodermal layers bounding this space becomes

closely connected with the ectoderm, forming the _somatopleure_ or body

wall, while the other joins the entoderm to complete the wall of the

alimentary canal, forming the _splanchnopleure_. In the course of

further development the edges of these two layers approach each other

ventrally in the median line and finally fuse.

The products of this fusion are two epithelial tubes, one included

within the other, with walls reinforced by tissue derived from the two

layers of the mesoderm. The internal or entodermal tube is of much

smaller diameter than the outer or ectodermal tube, but much longer. The

walls of the two tubes are placed in contact with each other by their

mesodermal elements dorsally in the axial line, but elsewhere are

separated from each other by the body-cavity (except in the region of

the ventral mesogastrium).

The splanchnopleure is not so wide as the somatopleure. As it closes in

the ventral median line it includes the deepest or entodermal layer. It

now forms a tube whose walls are composed superficially of mesoderm

(splanchnopleure) while the lumen is lined by epithelium derived from

the entoderm. This tube is the _primitive enteric_ or _alimentary

canal_. The somatopleuric layers bounding the body cavity take a wider

sweep and after they have united ventrally in the median line they

embrace a much more extensive space, the _primitive body cavity_ or

_coelom_. The walls of this space are largely made up of the skeletal and

muscular elements developed from the mesoderm of the somatopleure,

covered superficially by the common ectodermal investment of the body.

It will be seen that the enteric tube thus becomes included within the

wider and more capacious coelom cavity.

Both the somatic and the splanchnic leaf of the mesoderm consist at

first solely of a layer of flattened epithelial cells, the mesothelium.

But very early this tissue is increased to form a massive layer by

direct development from the mesothelium. The new mesodermal cells thus

produced constitute the _mesenchyma_, which includes the whole of the

mesoderm of the embryo except the mesothelial lining of the coelom. The

cells of the mesenchyma, connected with each other and with the

mesothelial cells by protoplasmic processes, are not as close together

as in an epithelium and do not form a continuous membrane. By migration

and multiplication a large mass of mesodermal tissue is produced which

fills the entire space between the mesothelium and the primary germ

layers. The mesenchymal tissue between the mesothelium and the ectoderm

forms the mass of the skeletal, muscular and vascular systems. The

mesenchymal tissue between the mesothelium and the entoderm forms an

important constituent of the alimentary canal and of its appendages. The

entoderm furnishes the internal epithelial lining of the tube upon which

the performance of the specific physiological function of the entire

apparatus depends. This epithelial tube is covered from without by the

splanchnic mesoderm. The mesodermal elements thus added to the enteric

entodermal tube consist of connective tissue and muscular fibers. The

latter, arranged in the form of circular and longitudinal layers,

control the contractility of the tube and regulate the propulsion of the

contents. The connective tissue of the splanchnic mesoderm appears as an

intermediate layer uniting the epithelial lining and the muscular walls.

Situated thus between the mucous and muscular coats of the intestine

this layer is known as the _submucosa_. It contains, imbedded in its

tissue, the glandular elements of the intestine derived from the

entodermal epithelium, and the blood vessels, lymphatics and nerves. The

second chief function of the splanchnic and somatic mesoderm is the

production of the serous membrane investing the body cavity and its

contents from the mesothelium lining the primitive coelom. This

mesothelial tissue, differentiated as a layer of flattened cells, lines

the interior of the body cavity and covers the superficial aspect of the

enteric tube. By subsequent partition of the common coelom the great

serous membranes of the adult, the pleurae, pericardium and peritoneum,

are developed from it.

The entodermal enteric tube is, as already stated, closely attached at

an early period along its dorsal surface to the axial rod of mesoderm

containing the chorda dorsalis immediately ventrad of the neural canal.

In the earliest stages, just after the splanchnopleure and somatopleure

have closed to complete the alimentary tube and body cavity, the remnant

of these layers extends between the ventral abdominal wall and the

ventral surface of the intestine forming a partition which divides the

body into a right and left half. (Fig. 32, _A._) For the most part this

primitive connection between the ventral abdominal wall and the

intestinal tube is lost very early. The stomach, however, is always

connected by a ventral mesogastrium, from which the lesser omentum is

derived, to the ventral body wall. The disappearance of the ventral

mesentery caudad of this point establishes the condition indicated in

Fig. 32, _B._ The entodermal tube and the surrounding splanchnic

mesoderm forming the intestinal canal is attached along its dorsal

surface to the axial mesoderm of the dorsal mid-line. The primitive

mesothelial peritoneum is reflected along this line from the internal

surface of the body wall upon the ventral and lateral surfaces of the

intestine. The coelom of one side communicates ventrad of the intestine

with the coelom of the opposite side. Hence by the disappearance of the

ventral mesentery caudad of the stomach the paired body-cavities have

become fused into a single abdominal cavity--while cephalad the original

division into right and left halves is maintained by the portion of the

ventral mesentery which attaches the stomach to the ventral abdominal

wall. The mesodermal tissue which at this time attaches the alimentary

tube along its entire extent to the dorsal wall of the coelom carries the

primitive embryonic arterial vessel, the aorta. This vessel supplies a

series of small branches to the intestine, which reach the same by

passing ventrad imbedded in the mesoderm connecting the tube to the

dorsal body wall.

[Illustration: FIG. 32.--Schematic diagrams, illustrating the vertebral

mesentery. _A._ earlier; _B._ later condition. (Minot.)]

With the further development of the alimentary canal a gradual

elongation of this connecting band of mesoderm and of the contained

vessels is observed, the tube itself gradually receding from the

vertebral axis. The early broad attachment is replaced by a narrower

stalk into which the mesoderm is drawn out. With this narrowing in the

transverse and elongation in the sagittal direction the connecting

tissue assumes the character of a thin membrane with two free serous

surfaces, including the intestinal vessels imbedded between them.

Coincident with this elongation of the enteric attachment and its

narrowing in the transverse direction the primitive intestine becomes

more completely invested by the serous lining membrane of the coelom

cavity. In this stage we can speak of the double-layered membrane

attaching the tube to the dorsal body wall and carrying the intestinal

blood-vessels as the primitive dorsal mesentery. The intestinal canal

itself is invested by serous membrane except along a narrow strip of its

dorsal border where the mesentery is attached and where the vessels

reach the intestine. We can now distinguish the serous lining membrane

of the abdominal cavity, derived from the mesothelium of the splanchnic

and somatic mesoderm as the _peritoneum_. The membrane presents the

following topographical subdivisions:

1. _Parietal Peritoneum_, lining the inner surface of the abdominal

walls.

2. _Visceral Peritoneum_, investing the external surface of the

intestine and its derivatives.

3. _Mesenteric Peritoneum_, connecting these two, carrying the

intestinal blood vessels and lymphatics and acting as a suspensory

support to the alimentary canal.

The dorsal mesentery in fishes, amphibia and reptiles contains smooth

muscular fibers derived from the mesoderm. These bands of smooth muscle

fibers are also encountered, though less well developed, in the

mesentery of birds and mammals. The so-called "suspensory muscle of the

duodenum" belongs to this category. It consists of a few strands of

unstriped muscular and fibrous tissue which passes from the praeaortal

tissue around the origin of the superior mesenteric artery and coeliac

axis to the duodeno-jejunal angle. Fasciculi from this band may

penetrate into the root of the mesentery (Gegenbaur).

Similar muscular fasciculi have been observed in the peritoneal folds of

the ileo-caecal junction (Luschka) and in the mesorectum--forming in the

latter situation the recto-coccygeal muscles of Treitz, and in the

female the recto-uterine muscles.

In its earlier stages the primitive common mesentery forms a membrane

which carries the intestinal blood vessels between its two layers,

surrounds the embryonic alimentary canal and attaches the same to the

ventral aspect of the chorda dorsalis and aorta. This is the permanent

condition in many of the lower vertebrates in which the intestinal tube

is suspended by a simple dorsal mesentery, a condition which is repeated

by the embryos of man and the higher vertebrates. From this primitive

common mesentery are derived, by further development, displacement and

adhesion, all the other mesenteries, omenta and peritoneal folds of the

adult. The character and degree of these subsequent changes is

determined by the increase in length and change in position of the

intestine and the growth of large organs, like liver, spleen and

pancreas. Many portions of the intestinal canal, at first suspended by

the mesentery and freely movable within the abdominal cavity, become

later, by secondary adhesion, firmly connected with adjacent portions of

the tube or with the abdominal parietes.

In certain of the lower vertebrates (fishes) large sections of the

intestine lie entirely free within the abdomen, their only connection

with the parietes being afforded by the blood vessels. This condition

depends upon _absorption_ of the original mesentery. A similar process,

though much more circumscribed, is observed in the omenta of many

mammals, which appear perforated at several points.

=Derivatives of the Entodermal Intestinal Tube.=--The entodermal

epithelium is physiologically the characteristic element of the

alimentary canal. Besides lining the entire internal surface of the tube

it gives rise by budding and protrusion from the intestinal canal to a

series of organs which from the mode of their development must be

regarded as diverticular or derivatives of the alimentary canal (Figs.

33, 34, and 35). These organs, proceeding in order cephalo-caudad, are

the following:

The salivary glands.

Thymus and thyroid.

The lungs.

Pancreas.

Liver.

[Illustration: FIG. 33.--Schema of alimentary canal and accessory

organs, derived from same. (After Bonnet.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 34.--Reconstruction of alimentary canal of human

embryo of 4.2 mm. x 24. (After His.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 35.--Reconstruction of alimentary canal of human

embryo of 7 mm. (twenty-eight days). x 12. (After His.)]

The epithelium of all these structures is derived from the primitive

entoderm of the intestinal tube, except the epithelium of the salivary

glands, which, being derived from the stomadaeal invagination, is

ectodermal in character. We have previously noted the general history

and appearance of the yolk-sac and its connection by means of the

vitello-intestinal duct with the intestine. In contradistinction to the

adult organs just noted the yolk-sac or umbilical vesicle is merely a

temporary embryonal appendage to the alimentary canal. It also differs

from them in the fact that it is not an extension or budding from the

completed intestinal tube, like the liver and pancreas, but indicates,

by the implantation of the duct (Fig. 21), the last point at which

closure of the intestinal canal takes place, when after obliteration of

the duct the separation of the intestine from the yolk-sac is completed.

The segment of the primitive alimentary canal cephalad of the attachment

of the vitello-intestinal duct gives rise to the pharynx, oesophagus,

stomach, proximal portion of small intestine proper and its derivatives,

the liver and pancreas.

The portion situated caudad of the duct produces the rest of the small

and all of the large intestine (Figs. 33 and 35). At times in man and

other mammals (cat) the vitello-intestinal duct does not become

absorbed, but persists and continues to develop as a part of the small

intestine, forming the blind pouch or appendage known as _Meckel's

diverticulum_ (Figs. 37 and 38). This diverticulum may vary in length

from 1.5 to 15 cm. It either projects freely into the abdominal cavity

as a pouch arising from the convex border of the small intestine

opposite to the mesenteric attachment, or else it reaches the abdominal

wall at the umbilicus and is attached to the same. In a few instances it

has not terminated in a blind pouch, but has remained open at the

umbilicus, in which case the aperture discharges intestinal contents.

Sometimes the process of obliteration which normally leads to the

absorption of the vitello-intestinal duct extends to the adjoining

segment of the small intestine, resulting in obliteration of the

intestinal lumen and consequent obstruction at this point.

[Illustration: FIG. 36.--Reconstruction of alimentary canal of human

embryo of thirty-five days (13.8 mm.). x 8. (After His.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 37.--Human adult ileum with Meckel's diverticulum.

Ileo-diverticular serous fold and persistent omphalo-mesenteric artery.

(Columbia University Museum, No. 1803.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 38.--Human adult ileum, with Meckel's diverticulum.

(Columbia University Museum, No. 745.)]

The intestinal opening of the diverticulum is situated at a varying

distance above the ileo-colic junction, ranging from 27.5 cm. to 290

cm., with an average of 107 cm.

While the obliteration and complete absorption of the duct is normal in

nearly all vertebrates, a remnant persists in some birds, in which a

short caecal pouch (_diverticulum caecum vitelli_) is found at about the

middle of the small intestine. A portion of the vitello-intestinal duct

thus persists throughout life in some wading and swimming birds. Figs.

39 and 40 show this condition in the small intestine of _Urinator lumme_

and _imber_, the red-throated loon and the great northern diver. In

other birds, however, such as birds of prey, song birds, etc., the duct

is absorbed and disappears completely.

[Illustration: FIG. 39.--Small intestine of the red-throated loon,

_Urinator lumme_, showing persistent caecal pouch, the remnant of the

vitelline duct. (Columbia University Museum, No. 997.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 40.--Small intestine of great northern diver,

_Urinator imber_, with caecal pouch, the remnant of the vitelline duct.

(Columbia University Museum, No. 77, 1578.)]

In order to complete the embryological history of the alimentary canal

it is necessary to take brief account of another structure derived from

it, namely the _allantois_. Its significance to the adult organism is

seen in connection with the genito-urinary tract, the urinary bladder

being formed by its persistent portion. In the embryo, however, it has

important nutritive and respiratory functions. In the embryos of the

higher vertebrates nutrition depends only in the earliest stages upon

the yolk-sac of the ovum, over which a vascular network extends.

Very soon the caudal portion of the primitive intestine develops a

vascular sac-like outgrowth (Figs. 21 and 41). This pouch forms the

_allantois_. It is intimately connected with embryonal respiration, and

probably also forms a reservoir which receives the secretion of the

primitive kidney. This foreshadows the final destiny of the proximal

intra-abdominal portion of the allantoic sac which persists and is

converted into the urinary bladder of the adult.

[Illustration: FIG. 41.--Diagram illustrating the later stages in the

formation of the mammalian foetal membranes. (Heisler, modified from

Roule.)]

The allantois is present in Amphibia but is very small. In Amniota[1] it

is large and grows around the embryo. In those of the higher vertebrates

which are developed within an egg (reptiles, birds and monotremes) the

sac of the allantois comes to lie beneath the egg-shell and acts as a

respiratory organ. In the higher mammalia, developed within the uterus,

the allantois becomes attached by vascular villi to the uterine wall and

establishes a vascular connection between the foetal and maternal blood

vessels. In this way the _allantoic placenta_ is formed (Fig. 41). The

placenta, as just stated, is absent in the monotremes and is only

slightly developed in marsupials, in which animals the foetus develops to

maturity in the marsupial pouch after leaving the uterus. These animals

are therefore distinguished as _Aplacentalia_ from the remaining higher

mammals in which the allantoic placenta develops and which are hence

called the _Placentalia_.

[1] In the embryos of reptiles, birds and mammals folds of the

somatopleure arise externally to the constricting furrows by means of

which the embryo is gradually separated from the yolk-sac, with the

resulting formation of the intestinal and abdominal walls. These folds,

situated at the head, tail and on the sides, grow upwards and finally

meet and unite to form a membranous sac called the _amnion_. Hence these

higher vertebrates (reptiles, birds and mammals) are called _Amniota_,

in contradistinction to fishes and amphibia who have no amnion and are

hence known as _Anamnia_.

=Summary.=--To recapitulate, therefore, the intestinal tube gives origin

to two kinds of appendages or derivatives:

1. Organs of the adult body, derived by budding from the alimentary

entodermal epithelium, in the form of pouch-like diverticula which

follow the glandular type of development and become secondarily

associated with mesodermal elements. These organs are again of two

kinds:

(_a_) _Organs which retain their original connection with the lumen of

the digestive canal:_

The salivary glands,}

The liver, } Connected by their ducts with the digestive

The pancreas, } canal.

The lungs, }

which open by means of the trachea and the laryngeal aperture into the

pharyngeal cavum.

(_b_) _Organs which lose their primitive connection with the alimentary

canal._

Thymus and Thyroid Gland.

2. Embryonic appendages of the alimentary tract.

(_a_) The vitello-intestinal or omphalo-mesenteric duct and the yolk-sac

or umbilical vesicle. This structure does not form as an extension from

the intestinal tube after the same has been closed by coalescence of the

splanchnopleure in the ventral mid-line, but is the result of the

folding in of the layers of the embryonic germinal area, by means of

which the body-rudiment is constricted off from the yolk-sac. The

reduced channel of communication forms the vitello-intestinal duct. In

the vast majority of vertebrates this disappears completely by

absorption in the course of further development. It may persist in part

abnormally as Meckel's diverticulum. In a few birds its proximal portion

remains normally as a small blind pouch attached to the free border of

the small intestine.

(_b_) The allantois. This is a hollow outgrowth from the embryonic

intestinal canal of the higher vertebrates, performing important

functions in connection with the early nutrition of the embryo. In the

course of subsequent development its proximal portion, situated within

the abdominal cavity, becomes converted into the urinary bladder. In

mammals it loses its original connection with the intestinal canal and

is assigned entirely to the genito-urinary tract. In some of the lower

vertebrates, amphibia and reptiles it retains its connection with the

ventral wall of the cloaca throughout life. (See Fig. 42, genito-urinary

tract of _Iguana tuberculata_.)

[Illustration: FIG. 42.--Genito-urinary tract and cloaca of _Iguana

tuberculata_, female. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1846.)]

After the intestinal canal has become separated from the yolk-sac it

forms at first a straight tube, running cephalo-caudad beneath the

chorda dorsalis. In most forms, however, the intestine grows much more

rapidly in length than the body-cavity of the embryo in which it is

contained. Hence the intestine is forced to form coils or convolutions.

The entire alimentary canal, from the mouth to the anus, can be

separated into the following divisions and subdivisions:

=I. Foregut=, including

1. The oral cavity.

2. The pharynx.

3. The oesophagus.

4. The stomach.

=II. Midgut=, closely associated at its beginning with the liver and

pancreas.

It extends between the pyloric extremity of the stomach and the

beginning of the last segment, the endgut, frequently separated from

both by ring-like aggregations of the circular muscular fibers and

corresponding projections of the mucous membrane (pyloric and ileo-colic

valves).

The midgut is usually the longest portion of the intestinal tube.

=III. Endgut=, the last segment of the intestinal canal, courses through

the pelvic portion of the body cavity. From this short end-piece are

developed: (1) The colon, sigmoid flexure and rectum; (2) the cloaca

with the uro-genital sinus and the duct of the allantois.

PART I.

ANATOMY OF THE PERITONEUM AND ABDOMINAL CAVITY.

For the purpose of studying the adult human peritoneum it is in the

first place absolutely necessary to obtain a correct appreciation of the

disposition of the chief viscera within the abdominal cavity and of

their mutual relations. In the second place the visceral vascular supply

of the abdomen must be carefully considered in order to correctly

appreciate certain important relations of the peritoneal membrane.

A review of the visceral contents of the abdomen shows that we have to

deal chiefly with the divisions of the alimentary tract below the

oesophagus and the structures directly derived from the same, as liver

and pancreas, or associated topographically with the alimentary canal,

as the spleen. Portions of the urinary and reproductive systems situated

within the abdominal and pelvic cavities will also require

consideration.

The digestive apparatus as a whole presents, in the first place, a

segment designed to convey the food to the stomach, the

oesophagus--supplemented in mammalia by the special apparatus of the

mouth and pharynx, in which the food is mechanically prepared for

digestion by chewing and mixed with the secretion of the salivary

glands.

The _digestive apparatus proper_, succeeding to the oesophagus, is

usually divisible into two sections differing in function and structure.

1. The STOMACH, a short sac-like dilatation, in which chiefly

nitrogenous material is digested.

2. The SMALL INTESTINE, a long and usually much convoluted narrow tube,

chiefly devoted to the digestion of starches, fats and sugars, and to

the absorption of the digested matters.

In some of the lower vertebrates, as the _Cyclostomata_ (Fig. 43),

_Esox_, _Belone_, etc., among fishes (Fig. 48), _Necturus_ and _Proteus_

among amphibians (Figs. 50 and 51), the separation of the digestive

portion of the alimentary tract into stomach and small intestine is not

clearly defined (vide infra, p. 43).

[Illustration: FIG. 43.--Entire alimentary canal of the lamprey,

_Petromyzon marinus_, below the pericardium. (Columbia University

Museum, No. 1575.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 48.--Alimentary canal of _Belone_, pickerel.

(Nuhn.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 50.--_Necturus maculatus_, mud-puppy. Alimentary

canal and appendages. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1454.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 51.--Alimentary canal of _Proteus anguineus_.

(Nuhn.)]

A distinct digestive segment may even be entirely wanting, owing to its

failure to differentiate from the oesophagus on the one hand and from the

endgut on the other. In such forms the entire digestive canal appears as

a tube of uniform caliber extending from mouth to anus. It is necessary

to begin with these simple structural conditions in order to obtain a

clear conception of the disposition of the viscera in the adult human

abdomen. Such simple arrangement of the alimentary tract is found in the

embryo of man and of the higher vertebrates, and similar rudimentary

types are encountered, as the permanent condition, in some of the lower

forms. These latter are especially valuable for purposes of study,

because they afford an opportunity of examining directly, as macroscopic

objects, structural conditions which are found only as temporary

embryonal stages during the development of the higher mammalia (Fig.

43).

In the early stages the alimentary tract of the mammalian embryo

consists of a straight tube of nearly uniform caliber (Fig. 44, _A_),

extending from the pharynx to the cloaca, along the median line in the

dorsal region of the body cavity, connected with the ventral aspect of

the axial mesoderm by a membranous fold forming the primitive common

dorsal mesentery. Subsequently differentiation of this simple tube into

successive segments takes place, marked by differences in shape and

caliber and in histological structure.

[Illustration: FIG. 44.--Schematic diagram representing three stages in

the differentiation of the mammalian digestive tract: A. Early

undifferentiated stage, in which the entire canal appears as a tube of

uniform calibre. B. Spindle-shaped gastric dilatation. C. Typical

mammalian gastric dilatation.]

[Illustration: FIG. 45.--Reconstruction of human embryo. 1, 2, 3, 4,

Gill-pouches. (After Fol.)]

The first indication of the future stomach appears early, in human

embryos of from 5-6 days (Figs. 44, _B_, and 45; for later embryonal

stomach forms compare also Figs. 33, 35 and 36), as a small

spindle-shaped dilatation of a portion of the primitive entodermal tube,

placed in the median plane, dorsad of the embryonic outgrowth of the

liver, between it and the oesophagus. The appearance of this

dilatation marks the separation of the proximal cephalic part (pharynx

and oesophagus) from the distal caudal (intestinal) portion of the

primitive alimentary canal.

Further growth of the stomach takes place chiefly along the dorsal

margin of the dilatation, rendering the same more convex. The ventral

border develops to a less degree and in the course of further and more

complete differentiation the dorsal margin of the future stomach assumes

even at this period the character of the greater curvature, while the

opposite ventral margin, the future lesser curvature, following the

dilatation of the tube dorsad, becomes in turn concave (Fig. 44, _C_).

The early spindle-shaped dilatation has therefore assumed the general

shape of the adult organ. This differentiation of greater and lesser

curvature begins to appear in embryos of 5 mm. (Fig. 46) and is very

well marked in embryos of 12.5 mm., Fig. 36, of an embryo of five weeks,

indicates the adult form of the stomach clearly.

[Illustration: FIG. 46.--Alimentary canal of human embryo of 5 mm. x 15.

(Reconstruction after His.)]

It will, however, be noted that the oesophageal entrance is still at the

cephalic extremity of the rudimentary stomach, while the pyloric

transition to the intestine occupies the distal caudal point, under

cover of the liver, and turns with a slight bend dorsad and to the right

to pass into the duodenum. The future greater curvature is directed

dorsad and a little to the left toward the vertebral column, while the

concave lesser curvature is turned ventrad and a little to the right

toward the ventral abdominal wall. At this time there is but little

indication of the subsequent extension of the organ to the left of the

oesophageal entrance to form the great cul-de-sac or fundus of the adult

stomach.

In this stage of its development the stomach therefore presents ventral

and dorsal borders, and right and left surfaces, while the continuity of

its lumen with the adjacent segments of the alimentary canal appears as

a proximal or cephalic oesophageal and a distal or caudal intestinal

opening.

COMPARATIVE ANATOMY OF FOREGUT AND STOMACH.

A serial review of this portion of the alimentary tract in vertebrates

forms one of the most interesting and instructive chapters in

comparative anatomy.

Not only is every embryonal stage in the development of the higher

mammalia represented permanently in the adult structure of some of the

lower types, but the far-reaching influence of function and of the

physiological demands on the structure of this portion of the digestive

tract is strikingly illustrated by the numerous and marked modifications

which are encountered.

The foregut, strictly speaking, is in mammals separated from the oral

cavity by the musculo-membranous fold of the soft palate and uvula. In

all other vertebrates except the crocodile, the oral cavity and foregut

pass into each other without sharp demarcation (Fig. 47). In some of the

lower vertebrates the alimentary canal never advances beyond the

condition of a simple straight tube of nearly uniform caliber. There is

no gastric dilatation and hence no differentiation of a stomach properly

speaking. Such for example is the case in some teleost fishes, as the

pickerel (Fig. 48). In these forms we have to deal with the persistence

of the early embryonic pregastric stage of the higher types, before the

simple alimentary tube is differentiated by the appearance of the

distinct gastric dilatation.

[Illustration: FIG. 47.--_Gallus canis_, dog-shark, male. Genito-urinary

tract and cloaca _in situ_. The foregut has been divided just caudad of

the communication with the oral cavity. (Columbia University Museum, No.

1694.)]

In the _Cyclostomata_ (Fig. 43) the intestinal canal passes through the

body in a perfectly straight line and the three segments (mid-, fore-

and hindgut) are not clearly differentiated.

In the _Ammocoetes_ the foregut begins behind the wide branchial basket,

dorsad of the heart, with a narrow entrance, which is succeeded by a

dilated segment. The entrance of the hepatic duct separates fore- and

midgut.

In _Amphioxus_ the branchial pouch passes with a slight constriction

directly into the gut which extends through the body-cavity in a

straight line.

The narrow segment is usually regarded as the "oesophagus." This is

followed by a slightly dilated segment, the "stomach," into which a

blind pouch enters. This caecal pouch is usually considered as a

_hepatic_ diverticulum (Fig. 49).

[Illustration: FIG. 49.--_Amphioxus_, dissected from the ventral side.

The relatively enormous pharynx occupies more than half the length of

the body. The walls are separated by the gill-clefts, and the parallel

gill-bars abut at the midventral line on the _endostyle_. (Willey, after

Rathke.)]

But even in these rudimentary forms the point where the liver develops

from the entodermal intestinal tube marks the separation of fore- and

midgut. The stomach, when it develops, is situated cephalad of the

entrance of the hepatic duct into the intestine. The section cephalad of

the duct opening may be very short, and the food digested further on in

the intestinal tube. Consequently a function which in these lower

vertebrates is assigned to the midgut becomes transferred in the higher

forms to a specialized segment of the foregut, situated cephalad of the

hepato-enteric duct. This segment is the

STOMACH.

The distribution of the vagus nerve finds its explanation in this

derivation of the stomach. The primitive foregut is formed by the

passage between the branchial cavity and the midgut, and is within the

area supplied by the vagus. Hence when the stomach develops from the

foregut, as a specialized segment of the same, it is supplied by vagus

branches. The vertebrate stomach varies greatly in size and shape.

The type-form is presented by a longitudinal spindle-shaped dilatation

of the foregut, which retains its foetal vertical position in the long

axis of the body. An example of this form, which is encountered among

fishes and amphibia, is presented by the alimentary tube of _Proteus

anguineus_ and _Necturus maculatus_ (Figs. 50 and 51). Since this

condition is common to all vertebrates in the earliest foetal period it

can be designated as the foetal or primitive stomach form. All others

appear as secondary derivatives from this typical early condition.

The influences which bring about such derivations and modifications may

be enumerated as follows:

1. The habitual amount of food required by the animal.

2. The volume and digestible character of the food.

3. The size and shape of the abdominal cavity in which the stomach is

contained.

4. Structural modifications designed to increase the action of the

gastric juice on the food contained in the stomach.

5. The assumption, on part of the stomach, of functions which are

usually relegated to other organs.

Most of the individual stomach forms encountered among vertebrates owe

their production to several of these influences acting in conjunction.

We may group the main types as follows:

=1. Stomach Forms Depending on the Influence exerted by the Habitual

Amount of Food required by the Animal.=--The greater the activity of

tissue changes is, the greater will be the amount of food required and

the more pronounced will be the gastric dilatation of the alimentary

canal. Hence in the higher vertebrates generally the stomach appears as

a large and more sac-like dilatation than in lower forms, such as fishes

and amphibia and some reptilia, in which the stomach is usually smaller

and foetal in shape, forming a slight longitudinal dilatation situated in

the long axis of the body. An example is seen in the stomach of _Coluber

natrix_ (Fig. 52). Frequently this slight dilatation is scarcely

differentiated from the oesophagus at the cephalic and from the small

intestine at the caudal end. Many batrachians and perennibranchiates

possess this form among the amphibia. It is also encountered in the

pickerels, the _Cyprini_, and in _Labrus_ among fishes, and in some

saurians and ophidia among reptiles. It constitutes a slight advance in

development over the earliest stage represented, as we have seen, by the

nearly uniform and undifferentiated alimentary tube of amphioxus and the

cyclostomata.

[Illustration: FIG. 52.--Alimentary canal of _Coluber natrix_. (Nuhn.)]

This transition of the foetal form to the more advanced secondary types

of the stomach is marked by the development of two important structural

features:

(_a_) The separation in the interior of the canal of the stomach from

the intestine by the appearance of a ring-shaped valve, the _pyloric

valve_. This is produced by an aggregation of the circular muscular

fibers of the intestine at this point, and causes a projection of the

mucous membrane into the lumen of the canal. It begins to appear in the

fishes (pickerel, sturgeon, etc.), is found in most amphibia and is

regularly present in the stomach of the higher vertebrates. (Figs. 54

and 55.) A good example of the ring-shaped plate of the pylorus with

central circular opening produced by the aggregation of the circular

muscular fibers is afforded by the view of the interior of the

cormorant's stomach given in Fig. 69. The opposite or oesophageal

extremity of the stomach is less well differentiated from the afferent

tube of the oesophagus.

[Illustration: FIG. 54.--Human adult. Pyloro-duodenal junction and

pyloric valve in section. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1842.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 55.--Series of sections showing human pyloric valve

and gastro-duodenal junction:

1. Stomach of foetus at term in section.

2. Adult pyloric valve, gastric surface.

3. Adult pyloric valve and gastro-duodenal junction in section.

4. Foetal gastro-duodenal junction in section. Entrance of biliary and

pancreatic ducts on summit of papilla of duodenum. (Columbia University

Museum, No. 1851.)]

There is no aggregation of muscular circular fibers in this situation

and no valve. Superficially the external longitudinal muscular fibers of

the oesophagus pass continuously and without demarcation into the

superficial gastric muscular layer. The separation between oesophagus and

stomach is, however, marked on the mucous surface by a well-defined line

along which the flat, smooth and glistening oesophageal tesselated

epithelium passes into the granular cuboidal epithelium of the gastric

mucous membrane. The oesophageo-gastric junction in the adult human

subject is shown in Fig. 53.

[Illustration: FIG. 53.--Human adult. Mucous surface of

oesophageo-gastric junction. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1842.)]

(_b_) The pyloric end of the stomach makes an angular bend, while the

rest of the organ remains in the original vertical position in the long

axis of the body. An example of this condition is presented by the

stomach of _Scincus ocellatus_ (Fig. 56; cf. also Fig. 202).

[Illustration: FIG. 56.--Alimentary canal of _Scincus ocellatus_.

Pyloric extremity of the slightly marked gastric dilatation presents an

angular bend. (Nuhn.)]

The purpose of both of these provisions is to retain the gastric

contents for a longer time within the stomach. Hence this form is

encountered especially in those fishes and amphibians in which the

nutritive demands require a more complete digestion of the food taken.

This is the case, for example, in _Gobius_ (Fig. 57), the plagiostomata

(Fig. 58), and many saurians. The same transitory stomach form is even

found in some mammals, as the seals. Fig. 59 shows the stomach in _Phoca

vitulina_, the harbor seal. With the further increase in the demand for

complete digestion of the food the entire stomach assumes a transverse

position to the long axis of the body. This may occur while the stomach

still retains its primitive tubular form, as in most chelonians (Fig.

60). In others the change in position occurs after the gastric

dilatation has assumed the sac-like form, as in many land-turtles,

crocodiles, some batrachians and all higher vertebrates (Figs. 61 and

62). This transverse position, at right angles to the long axis of the

body, forms the starting point for the derivation of all secondary types

of stomach.

[Illustration: FIG. 57.--Alimentary canal of _Gobius niger_. (Nuhn.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 58.--Alimentary canal of shark. (Nuhn.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 59.--Stomach of _Phoca vitulina_, harbor seal.

(Columbia University Museum, No. 600.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 60.--Stomach of _Pseudemys elegans_, pond turtle.

(Columbia University Museum, No. 1710.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 61.--Stomach of _Chelydra serpentina_, snapping

turtle. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1852.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 62.--Same in section.]

=2. Stomach Forms Depending on the Influence Exerted by the Volume and

Digestible Character of the Foods.=--Vegetable substances usually have a

large volume in proportion to the amount of nutritive material which

they contain. Meat, on the other hand, contains considerable nutriment

in a comparatively small bulk. Hence carnivora (Fig. 63) usually have a

smaller stomach than herbivora (Fig. 64).

[Illustration: FIG. 63.--Stomach of _Lutra vulgaris_, otter. (Nuhn.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 64.--Stomach of _Equus caballus_, horse. (Nuhn.)]

=3. Stomach Forms Influenced by Size and Shape of the Abdominal Cavity

in which they are Contained.=--In animals whose bodies are long and

slender, as in snakes (Fig. 52), most saurians (Fig. 56), many tailed

batrachians and perennibranchiates (Figs. 50 and 51), many teleosts

(Fig. 48), the stomach is likewise usually long and slender in shape,

unless special modifying conditions exist. When on the other hand the

body is broad and short, as in Lophius (Fig. 65), Pipa (Fig. 66), and

most higher vertebrates, the stomach is also broader and more sac-like.

[Illustration: FIG. 65.--Stomach of _Lophius piscatorius_, angler.

(Nuhn.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 66.--Stomach of _Pipa verucosa_. (Nuhn.)]

=4. Stomach Forms Depending on Structural Modifications Designed to

Increase the Action of the Gastric Juice on the Food.=--This purpose is

accomplished:

(_a_) By increasing the source of supply of the gastric juice.

(_b_) By increasing the length of time during which the food remains in

the stomach.

(_a_) The source of supply of the gastric juice is increased by adding

to the usual gastric glands of the stomach a special accessory glandular

compartment, either placed at the cardia, where the oesophagus enters, as

in _Myoxus_ or _Castor_ (Fig. 67) or attached to the body of the stomach

to the left of the cardia, as in the manatee (Fig. 68). The first

arrangement is similar to the universal position of the glandular

stomach of birds (Fig. 69). In birds, however, the glandular

proventriculus is the _only_ source of the gastric juice, while in the

above-mentioned mammalia (myoxus and beaver) the accessory glandular

stomach is merely an addition to the supply derived from the usual

gastric glands situated in the body of the organ.

[Illustration: FIG. 67.--Stomach of _Castor fiber_, beaver. (Nuhn.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 68.--Stomach of _Manatus americanus_, manatee.

(Nuhn.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 69.--Stomach of _Phalacrocorax dilophus_,

double-crested cormorant; section. (Columbia University Museum, No.

67/1804.)]

(_b_) The increase of the length of time during which the food remains

in the stomach subject to the action of the gastric juice can be

accomplished in one of several ways.

1. The stomach, while it retains its general tubular form increases

considerably in length and assumes the shape and structure found in the

human large intestine. It is partially subdivided by folds projecting

into the interior and separating compartments resembling the colic cells

of the human large intestine. The time required for the passage of food

through the stomach is thus increased and the action of the gastric

juice is prolonged and rendered more intense.

Such modifications of the structure of the stomach are encountered in

_Semnopithecus_ among the monkeys and in the kangaroo, among marsupials

(Figs. 70 and 71).

[Illustration: FIG. 70.--Stomach of _Halmaturus derbyanus_, rock

kangaroo. (Columbia University Museum, No. 582.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 71.--Stomach of _Semnopithecus entellus_, entellus

monkey. (Columbia University Museum, No. 62/1805.)]

2. The same purpose is accomplished by the development of diverticula

from the stomach, in which the food is retained and acted on by the

gastric juice for longer periods.

The herbivora, omnivora and such carnivora as live on animal food

difficult of digestion furnish examples of this type of stomach. The

same is also found in most teleosts. In the latter the caecal gastric

pouch lies in the long axis of the body, opposite the entrance of the

oesophagus. A marked example of this arrangement is seen in the stomach

of the eel, _Anguilla anguilla_ (Fig. 72).

[Illustration: FIG. 72.--Alimentary canal of _Anguilla anguilla_, eel.

(Columbia University Museum, No. 1271.)]

In other forms, and in the mammalia especially, the blind pouch is

developed from the portion of the stomach lying to the left of the

oesophageal entrance at the cardia, and is hence placed transversely to

the long axis of the body.

This difference in the position of the cul-de-sac is explained by the

small transverse measure of the body in teleosts, while the greater

amount of available space in the abdominal cavity of mammalia permits

of the transverse position of the entire stomach and of the development

of the diverticulum from its left extremity.

Most mammals have only a single pouch, whose size varies with the

digestibility of the food habitually taken. It is greater in herbivora

(Figs. 64 and 73) than in omnivora and carnivora (Figs. 74 and 75). In

some of the latter, as _Lutra_ (Fig. 63), the cul-de-sac is almost

wanting.

[Illustration: FIG. 73.--Stomach of _Lepus cuniculus_, rabbit. (Nuhn.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 74.--Stomach of _Nasua rufa_, coati. (Nuhn.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 75.--Stomach of _Felis leo_, lion. (Nuhn.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 76.--Stomach of _Erethizon dorsatus_, American

porcupine. (Columbia University Museum, No. 358.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 77.--Stomach of _Cercopithecus cephus_, moustache

monkey. (Columbia University Museum, No. 158.)]

In some forms, as the pig, the left extremity of the stomach carries a

caecal appendix with a spiral valve in the interior separating its lumen

from the general gastric cavity (Fig. 78). Others have two such caecal

appendices added to the left end of the stomach (Peccary, Fig. 79).

These caecal pouches may arise from the _body_ of the stomach, instead of

from the left extremity. An example of this condition is furnished by

the American manatee (Fig. 68).

[Illustration: FIG. 78.--Stomach of _Sus scrofa_, pig. The fundus of the

stomach carries a caecal appendage separated in the interior by a spiral

fold of the mucous membrane from the gastric cavity.]

[Illustration: FIG. 79.--Stomach of _Dicotyles torquatus_, peccary. The

fundus is a capacious pouch prolonged ventrally and dorsally into two

caecal appendages resembling the single appendage of the pig's stomach.

(Columbia University Museum, No. 1806.)]

=5. Variations in the Form of the Stomach Depending upon the Assumption

by the Stomach of Special Functions, which are Usually Relegated to

other Organs.=--These functions are the following:

(_a_) Storage of food in special receptacles or compartments for

subsequent use.

(_b_) Mastication of the food is in some animals accomplished only

partly or not at all in the mouth, and is then performed in the stomach.

A portion of the stomach is thus converted into an apparatus for

mastication.

(_c_) The provisions for these two accessory functions may be combined

in the same stomach.

(_a_) Many of the higher vertebrates possess in connection with the

alimentary tract additional reservoirs for the storage of food until

used. Such reservoirs are found in mammals and birds connected with the

oral cavity, as cheek-pouches, or with the oesophagus, such as the crop

of the birds (Fig. 88). Fig. 80 shows the development of the

cheek-pouches in one of the primates, _Macacus nemestrinus_.

[Illustration: FIG. 80.--_Macacus nemestrinus_, pig-tail macaque monkey;

cheek-pouches. (From a fresh dissection.)]

In many mammals reservoirs of similar import are added

directly to the stomach and form an integral part of

the organ. Examples are furnished by the compound stomachs of many

rodents, ruminants, cetaceans and herbivorous edentates. The peculiar

appearance of these stomachs is explained if the additional reservoirs

are in imagination removed and the digestive stomach proper restored so

to speak to the type-form. The proximal or cardiac portion of the

stomach in many rodents is devoid of gastric glands and must be

interpreted as a storage chamber for food (Fig. 81). The same

significance attaches to the corresponding portion of the manatee's

stomach (Fig. 68).

[Illustration: FIG. 81.--Stomach of _Cricetus vulgaris_, hamster.

(Nuhn.)]

Similar contrivances are found in the ruminant stomach. The first

and second divisions (rumen and reticulum) are nothing but sac-like

gastric reservoirs or pouches, in which the food is collected, to be

subsequently returned to the mouth for mastication. When swallowed for

the second time the bolus is carried, by the closure of the so-called

oesophageal gutter, past the first and second stomach into the digestive

apparatus proper (the abomasum) (Figs. 82 and 83). Many ruminants

(_e. g._, _Moschus_) only have these three compartments. Most, however,

have four, the leaf stomach or psalterium being intercalated between

the retinaculum and the abomasum. The psalterium contains no digestive

glands. It may possibly serve for the absorption of the liquid portions

of the foods.

[Illustration: FIG. 82.--Stomach of _Ovis aries_, sheep. (Columbia

University Museum, No. 1807.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 83.--Scheme of ruminant compound stomach. (Nuhn.)]

The rumen or first stomach of the camels and llamas is provided with

so-called "water-cells," for the storage of water. These cells are

diverticula lined by a continuation of the gastric mucous membrane. The

entrance into these compartments can be closed by a sphincter muscle

after they are filled with water (Fig. 84).

[Illustration: FIG. 84.--Mucous membrane of stomach of _Camelus

dromedarius_, dromedary, showing water-cells. (Columbia University

Museum, No. 1123.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 85.--Stomach of _Phocaena_, porpoise. (Nuhn.)]

The three stomachs of the cetaceans are similar to those of the

ruminants (Fig. 85). The first is a crop-like reservoir for the

reception of the food when swallowed. The mucous membrane is entirely

devoid of digestive glands. In the dolphins the mucous membrane is

provided with a hard horny covering, which serves to break up the food

mechanically by trituration. The second stomach and the gut-like pyloric

prolongation constituting the third stomach contain gastric glands and

are hence digestive in function.

(_b_) Stomach forms, in which a portion of the organ is converted into

an apparatus for mastication, are seen especially in birds, in which

animals, on account of the absence of teeth, mastication cannot be

performed in the mouth.

The stomach of the bird is usually composed of two segments, one placed

vertically above the other.

The first appears like an elongated dilatation of the oesophagus, forming

the _Proventriculus_ or glandular stomach.

The second is larger, round in shape, with very strong and thick

muscular walls (Figs. 86 and 87).

[Illustration: FIG. 86.--Stomach of _Urinator imber_, red-throated loon.

(Columbia University Museum, No. 1808.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 87.--Scheme of stomach of granivorous bird. (Nuhn.)]

The proventriculus furnishes the gastric juice exclusively.

The second or muscular stomach, devoid of gastric glands, functions

merely as a masticating apparatus for the mechanical division of the

food. The thick muscular walls of this compartment may measure several

inches in diameter and carry on the opposed mucous surfaces lining the

cavity a hard horny plate with corrugated and roughened surface (Fig.

88). These hard plates are designed to crush the food between them, as

between two mill stones. The muscle stomach is best developed in

herbivorous birds, while both the muscular wall and the horny plate are

much weaker and thinner in carnivore wading and swimming birds (Fig.

89).

[Illustration: FIG. 88.--OEsophagus and stomach of _Gallus bankiva_, hen.

(Columbia University Museum, No. 1809.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 89.--Stomach of _Botaurus lentiginosus_, bittern.

(Columbia University Museum, No. 23/1810.)]

In birds of prey, especially in the owls, the stomach walls are scarcely

more massive than in other animals, and the mucous membrane is soft and

devoid of a horny covering. The glandular and masticatory stomachs are

less sharply divided from each other in these forms, and the entire

organ conforms more to the general vertebrate type (Fig. 90).

[Illustration: FIG. 90.--Stomach of owl sp. (Nuhn.)]

In some birds (herons, storks, etc.) a small rounded third stomach, the

so-called pyloric stomach, is placed between the muscle stomach and the

pylorus (Fig. 91). It contains no gastric glands, and possibly may

function as an additional absorbing chamber.

[Illustration: FIG. 91.--Stomach of _Ardea cinerea_, heron. (Nuhn.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 92.--Stomach of crocodile. (Nuhn.)]

Among reptiles the stomach of the crocodile resembles the organ in birds

(Fig. 92). It is flat and rounded in shape, the muscle wall carries a

tendinous plate, and there is a pyloric stomach. There is, however, no

glandular stomach or proventriculus, as in birds, and the mucous

membrane is not covered by a horny plate, but is soft and contains the

peptic glands. Figs. 93 and 94 show the stomach of _Alligator

mississippiensis_, in the ventral view and in section.

[Illustration: FIG. 93.--Stomach of _Alligator mississippiensis_.

(Columbia University Museum, No. 1811.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 94.--Same in section. Thin-walled cardiac segment

continues into cavity of pyloric ventriculus.]

[Illustration: FIG. 95.--Stomach of _Bradypustridactylus_, three-toed

sloth. I. First stomach, devoid of gastric glands, corresponding to

rumen of ruminants.

II. Second stomach, the homologue of the ruminant reticulum.

III. Digestive stomach proper, provided with gastric glands connected by

a gutter with the oesophagus.

IV. Muscular stomach, the walls formed by a thick muscular plate and

provided on the mucous surface with a dense corneous covering for

purposes of trituration.]

(_c_) The combination of the two accessory functions just described in

the same stomach is found in the three-toed sloth (Fig. 95).

There are here two large reservoirs, which correspond to the rumen and

retinaculum of the ruminants, and a digestive compartment containing

gastric glands, which corresponds to the ruminant abomasum, and is

connected by an oesophageal gutter directly with the oesophagus. At the

pyloric extremity the muscle wall is greatly increased and the mucous

membrane of this portion carries a thick horny covering, forming a

masticatory stomach greatly resembling the corresponding structure in

the bird. Its function is evidently to complete the mechanical division

of the food which has only been partly masticated in the mouth.

The same significance is probably to be attached to the thickened

muscular walls which the pyloric segment of the stomach in _Tamandua

bivittata_, another edentate, presents (Fig. 96), in strong contrast

with the thinner walled cardiac segment and fundus.

[Illustration: FIG. 96.--Stomach of _Tamandua bivittata_, collared

ant-eater, (Columbia University Museum, No. 68/1485.)]

INTESTINE.

Continuing our consideration of the development of the alimentary canal

we find that changes from the simple primitive straight tube below the

stomach depend upon two factors:

1. The increase in the length of the intestinal tube, which exceeds

relatively the increase in the length of the body cavity in which it is

contained.

2. The differentiation into small and large intestine, the development

of the caecum and ileo-caecal junction, and the development of the

accessory digestive glands, liver and pancreas, by budding from the

proximal portion of the primitive entodermal intestinal tube.

1. In embryos up to 5 mm. cervico-coccygeal measure (Fig. 97) the

intestinal tube follows the body curve without deviation. Subsequently

the elongation of the intestine causes a small bend, with the convexity

directed ventrad, to appear in the umbilical region. This bend gradually

increases until the gut forms a single long loop, beginning a short

distance below the pylorus and directed ventro-caudad. The apex of the

loop, to which the vitello-intestinal duct is attached (Fig. 98) (cf. p.

34) projects beyond the abdominal cavity into the hollow of the

umbilical cord, constituting the so-called "umbilical or embryonal

intestinal hernia." This entrance of the apex of the intestinal

umbilical loop into the umbilical cord begins in embryos of about 10 mm.

During the succeeding weeks--up to the tenth--the segment of the

intestine thus lodged within the hollow of the umbilical cord increases.

After this period the intestinal coils are gradually withdrawn within

the abdomen. The explanation of this temporary extrusion of the

intestine into the umbilical cord is probably to be found in the strain

produced by the yolk-sac which is attached by the vitello-intestinal

duct to the apex of the umbilical loop. As we have seen (p. 35) the site

of the original apex of the loop may still be indicated in the adult by

the persistence of a portion of the vitello-intestinal duct as a

"Meckel's diverticulum."

[Illustration: FIG. 97.--Alimentary canal of human embryo of 5 mm. x 15.

(Reconstruction after His.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 98.--Schema of human embryonic intestinal canal,

with intestinal umbilical loop, but before differentiation of the large

and small intestine.]

In its simplest primitive condition the loop presents a proximal,

descending or efferent limb, an apex, and an ascending, returning or

afferent limb (Fig. 98). In the human embryo these segments of the loop

furnish the jejuno-ileum and portions of the large intestine, in a

manner to be subsequently detailed.

This stage in the development of the higher vertebrate intestine is well

illustrated by the alimentary tract of the mud-puppy, _Necturus

maculatus_, shown in Fig. 99, which represents the entire situs viscerum

of an adult female animal.

[Illustration: FIG. 99.--Viscera of _Necturus maculatus_, mud-puppy, _in

situ_. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1175.)]

The stomach is tubular, not distinctly differentiated from the

oesophagus, placed vertically in the long axis of the body. The pyloric

end is marked by a constriction separating stomach from midgut and

immediately beyond this point the pancreas is applied to the intestine.

The rest of the intestinal canal forms a simple loop, the descending

limb presenting one or two primitive convolutions. There is no marked

differentiation between large and small intestine, the canal possessing

a nearly uniform caliber from pylorus to cloaca.

2. The differentiation of the small from the large intestine, marked by

the appearance of the caecal bud or protrusion (Fig. 100), takes place in

the ascending segment of the umbilical loop a short distance from the

apex. In the human embryo the caecal bud appears in the 6th week as a

plainly marked protuberance, which grows very slowly in length and

circumference. It shows very early an unequal rate of development; the

terminal piece, not keeping pace in growth with the proximal portion, is

converted into the vermiform appendix, while the proximal segment

develops into the caecum proper. The increase in the length of the loop,

which begins to be marked in the 7th week, is not uniform. The apex is

the first portion to present the evidences of this growth. Subsequently

the descending limb grows in length very rapidly and is early thrown

into numerous coils of the future mobile portion of the small intestine

(jejuno-ileum). Even before the withdrawal of the apex of the loop

within the abdominal cavity a prominent coil of these convolutions is

found protruding in the umbilical region (Fig. 544). The ascending limb

of the loop from which a portion of the large intestine is developed,

grows comparatively slowly at this time.

[Illustration: FIG. 100.--Schema of human embryonic intestinal canal

after differentiation of the large and small intestine.]

The future portions of the human adult alimentary tract below the

stomach may be referred, in reference to their derivation, to this

primitive condition of the tube as follows:

1. The segment of small intestine situated between the pylorus and the

beginning or point of departure of the proximal or descending limb of

the umbilical loop, develops into the _duodenum_. This portion of the

small intestine is indicated early in embryos of 2.15 mm. (Fig. 101),

by the origin of the hepatic duct from the intestinal tube. Somewhat

later, in embryos of 4.10-5 mm. length, (Fig. 102) it becomes

additionally marked by the origin of the pancreatic diverticulum. The

duodenum, at first straight, now begins to curve, forming a short

_duodenal loop_ or _bend_. In embryos of 6 weeks the duodenum forms a

simple loop placed transversely below the pyloric extremity of the

stomach (Figs. 103 and 104).

[Illustration: FIG. 101.--Human embryo of 2.15 mm., twelve days old.

Seessel's sac is the cephalic blind termination of the embryonic

foregut before the communication with the ectodermal invagination of

the stomadaeum has been formed. (Reconstruction after His.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 102.--Representation of alimentary canal and

appendages of human embryo of 4.1 mm.; isolated. x 15. (Kollmann, after

His.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 103.--Alimentary canal and appendages of human

embryo of 12.5 mm. x 12. (Kollmann, after His.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 104.--A. Schematic representation of alimentary

canal, with umbilical loop and mesenteric attachments in human embryo of

about six weeks. B and C, stages in the intestinal rotation.]

2. The descending limb, the apex and a small part of the ascending limb

of the umbilical loop form the jejuno-ileum.

3. The remainder of the ascending limb forms the caecum and appendix, the

ascending and transverse colon.

4. The distal straight portion of the primitive tube forms the terminal

portion of the transverse colon (the splenic flexure), the descending

colon, sigmoid flexure and rectum.

The primitive condition of the embryonal mammalian alimentary tract,

after differentiation of the large intestine is well illustrated by some

of the lower vertebrates in which development never proceeds beyond this

stage. Fig. 112 shows the entire alimentary canal of a teleost fish, the

conger eel (_Echelus conger_) isolated.

[Illustration: FIG. 112.--Alimentary canal, isolated and in section, of

_Echelus conger_, the conger eel. (Columbia University Museum, No.

1812.)]

The preparation forms a good illustration of the embryonal stage of the

higher vertebrates in which development has not proceeded beyond the

formation of the simple umbilical loop, about corresponding to the

schematic Fig. 98. The stomach is differentiated both by its caliber and

by the formation of a pyloric ring valve.

The midgut forms a simple loop with a descending and ascending limb

closely bound together by mesenteric attachment. Different from the

course of development followed in the human embryo is the situation of

the ileo-colic junction. The same appears in the terminal straight

segment of the canal--corresponding to the human descending colon--while

in the human embryo the differentiation of small and large intestine

takes place in the course of the ascending limb of the loop. This

condition depends upon the relatively much shorter extent of the

teleost endgut compared with the human large intestine. Other examples

are afforded by the alimentary tract of some of the Amphibia and

Reptilia. Fig. 105 shows the alimentary canal of _Rana catesbiana_, the

common bull frog. The stomach, fairly well differentiated, is succeeded

by the small intestine of considerable length and uniform caliber. The

proximal portion of the small intestine is characterized as duodenum by

its connection with liver and pancreas. In the remaining portion of the

intestinal canal it is not difficult to recognize the elements of the

umbilical loop of the higher mammalian embryo. The larger mass of the

jejuno-ileal coils is developed from the descending limb of the loop; a

smaller number of convolutions belong to the returning or ascending

limb, which also includes the ileo-colic junction. The very short large

intestine of the frog passes straight down to enter the cloaca. Another

example, in which the early embryonal stages of the higher mammalia are

illustrated by the permanent structure of one of the lower vertebrates,

is given in Fig. 106, which shows the alimentary tract of a chelonian,

_Pseudemys elegans_, the pond turtle. The bilobed liver fits over the

well-differentiated stomach in the manner of a saddle. The stomach

itself, as in chelonians generally, has a markedly transverse position

and passes under cover of the right lobe of the liver into the duodenum.

The coils of small intestine form a prominent mass, which, however, when

unravelled as shown in the figure, permits us to recognize its identity

with the mammalian embryonic umbilical loop. The well-marked ileo-colic

junction is situated at the termination of the returning limb of the

loop, close to the beginning of the descending limb. This close

approximation of the duodenum and colon (duodeno-colic isthmus) forms

one of the most important factors in the further development of the

mammalian intestinal canal and will again be referred to below.

[Illustration: FIG. 105.--_Rana catesbiana_, bull-frog. Alimentary canal

and appendages. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1454.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 106.--_Pseudemys elegans_, pond turtle. Alimentary

canal. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1437.)]

From the ileo-colic junction the large intestine of the turtle continues

caudad to the cloaca in a nearly straight line. The same primitive

condition of the intestinal canal may be observed in some members of

man's own class, the mammalia--as in certain edentates. Figs. 107 and

108 show the entire abdominal portion of the alimentary tract in

_Tamandua bivittata_, the little ant-eater of Brazil. The stomach is

turned cephalad and the great omentum elevated. The intestines are

turned over to the right side.

[Illustration: FIG. 107.--Abdominal viscera of _Tamandua bivittata_, the

little ant-eater, seen from the left, with the intestines turned to the

right. (From a fresh dissection.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 108.--The same view, from another specimen. Figures

107 and 108 should be studied and compared together, as each supplements

the other.]

It will be observed that in spite of the numerous coils of the small

intestine the general arrangement of the alimentary canal corresponds to

the primitive scheme shown in Fig. 98. The entire intestinal canal is

attached by a continuous vertical mesentery to the dorsal median line of

the abdominal cavity ventrad of the vertebral column and aorta. The

growth in length of the small intestine has necessitated a corresponding

lengthening of the attached border of the mesentery--consequently the

membrane presents a pleated or crenated appearance. The caecum is well

developed, the ileo-caecal junction being situated within the returning

limb of the loop, a little distance from the apex.

In Figs. 109 and 110, taken from the same specimens, the entire mass of

the small intestines has been turned to the left so as to exhibit the

right leaf of the common dorsal mesentery and the mesoduodenum, the

latter containing the head of the pancreas. It will be noted that the

mesentery, expanding beyond the duodeno-colic isthmus, is common to the

small and to the proximal portion of the large intestine, _i. e._, to

those segments of the alimentary canal which are developed from the two

limbs of the umbilical loop. Figs. 107-110 should be studied and

compared together, as each supplements the others.

[Illustration: FIG. 109.--Abdominal viscera of _Tamandua bivittata_, the

little ant-eater, seen from the right, with the intestines turned to the

left. (From a fresh dissection.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 110.--The same view, from another specimen.]

It will be observed, in reference to the change from the primitive loop

to the subsequent increase in the length of the tube and the resulting

arrangement of the mesentery, that three successive stages are to be

considered, represented schematically in Fig. 111. In the earliest stage

(Fig. 111, I.) the two segments of the loop are of equal length,

parallel to one another, the distance between the beginning and

termination of the loop (1-2) being maintained throughout its

extent. Hence the mesentery is of equal width in all its parts within

the loop, only drawn out, _i. e._, away from the vertebral column, in

accordance with the length of the loop. In the next stage (Fig. 111,

II.) the increase in the length of the intestine is accompanied by a

corresponding widening of the mesentery. The points 1 and 2 are still

approximately the same distance apart as in the earlier stage, but the

increase in the length of the tube between these points forces the two

limbs of the loop to abandon their early parallel course, and to form

curved lines with the concavity turned toward the mesenteric attachment.

In this condition the mesentery consequently forms a widely expanded

membrane framed by the intestine and narrowing between the points 1 and

2 to a neck or isthmus which effects the transition between the expanded

segment surrounded by the intestine and the rest of the dorsal primitive

mesentery. Finally in the stage represented in Fig. 111, III., the

increase in the length of the small intestine has reached a point where

a single curve is no longer sufficient for the accommodation of the

growth. Consequently the tube now appears coiled and convoluted, and the

mesentery, as it is attached to the gut, of necessity follows all the

twists and appears fluted or pleated in its distal attached portion.

[Illustration: FIG. 111.--Schematic representation of the development of

the mesentery of the umbilical loop.]

If we now carefully examine the conditions presented by the intestine

and mesentery in a form like _Tamandua_ (Figs. 107 and 108) we will find

that they correspond to the developmental facts thus far considered. The

termination of the duodenum (1) and the bend in the colon (2) mark the

two points at which in the primitive schema (Fig. 111, I.) the umbilical

loop begins and terminates. The proximal of these two points (1)

corresponds to the termination of the duodenum, which segment extends

from here cephalad to the pyloric extremity of the stomach. The distal

point (2) is placed on the colon where the returning limb of the loop

resumes the original median vertical course of the large intestine.

These two points mark the neck of the loop, which we can describe as the

_duodeno-colic neck_ or _isthmus_.

The same condition is well shown in the intestinal canal of the snapping

turtle (Fig. 113). The duodenum and colon approach each other very

closely at the isthmus and between these points the convolutions of the

intestine extend in a wide circle. We will find this approximation of

duodenum and colon a feature which persists throughout all the later

developmental stages of the higher vertebrates and has an important

bearing on the final arrangement of the intestinal canal in the human

adult.

[Illustration: FIG. 113.--_Chelydra serpentina_, snapping turtle;

intestinal canal, pancreas, and spleen, isolated. (Columbia University

Museum, No. 1369)]

=Further Changes in the Development of the Human Alimentary Canal.

Rotation of the Intestine. Formation of the Segments of the Colon. Final

Permanent Relations of the Segments of the Intestinal Tube.=--The next

important stage leading up to the final adult disposition of the

intestine in man and the higher mammals is the _rotation_ of the

portions developed from the two limbs of the primitive loop around an

oblique axis drawn from the duodeno-colic isthmus to the apex of the

loop. The portion of the large intestine, developed from the ascending

limb of the loop, moves in the third month to the middle line, coming

into contact with the ventral abdominal wall. From here the large

intestine passes, ventrad of the jejuno-ileal coils, toward the cephalic

end of the abdominal cavity and lies transversely along the greater

curvature of the stomach. The growing coils of the small intestine crowd

the colon more and more cephalad. In the fourth month the caecum turns to

the right, coming into contact with the caudal surface of the liver,

ventrad of the duodenum, and subsequently reaches the ventral surface of

the right kidney. As the result of this rotation the ileo-colic

junction, caecum and succeeding portion of the colon are carried from the

original position in the distal and left part of the abdomen cephalad

and to the right across the proximal (duodenal) portion of the small

intestine, while the coils of the jejuno-ileum, developed from the

descending limb and apex of the loop, are turned in the opposite

direction, caudad and to the left underneath the preceding (Figs. 114

and 115). This change in the relative position of the parts of the

intestinal tract and the resulting altered bearing of the colon to the

duodenum will be best appreciated by considering in the first place the

effect of the change on the arrangement of the primitive mesentery and

the intestinal vessels, and secondly by repeating actually the rotation

in the intestinal tract of a mammal (cat) in which the adult arrangement

of the intestine and peritoneum permits us to perform the manipulations

and note the result.

[Illustration: FIG. 114_A_.--Intestinal canal in stage of umbilical

loop--before rotation.]

[Illustration: FIG. 114_B_.--First stage in rotation, colon crossing

duodenum.]

[Illustration: FIG. 115_A_.--Second stage in rotation--rotation of small

intestine.]

[Illustration: FIG. 115_B_.--Schema of intestinal canal after complete

rotation and descent of caecum.]

=I. Effect of Rotation on the Disposition of the Primitive Mesentery and

on the Relative Position of Duodenum and Colon, and Consequent

Arrangement of the Intestinal Blood Vessels.=--It will be appreciated

that in Fig. 111, representing a profile view of the original

arrangement, or in Figs. 107 and 108, showing the intestinal canal of

_Tamandua_, the left layer of the primitive mesentery is turned toward

the observer. The membrane is seen to pass from the ventral aspect of

the vertebral column and aorta, through the narrow neck of the

duodeno-colic isthmus, to expand in the manner already indicated toward

its intestinal attachment. In the rotation of the intestine the twist

takes place at the duodeno-colic neck, carrying, as already stated, the

large intestine cephalad and to the right, while the jejuno-ileum is

turned in the opposite direction caudad and to the left. During this

rotation the duodeno-jejunal angle (Figs. 114, _B_ and 115, _A_) passes

to the left underneath the proximal segment of the colon, which now lies

ventrad and to the right of the duodenal portion of the small intestine.

The mesenteric peritoneum, occupying the bight of the umbilical loop,

will, after the rotation, in the left profile view shown in Fig. 104,

_A_ and _B_, turn its original right leaf toward the beholder, _i. e._,

toward the left, while the original left leaf is turned toward the

right.

Observation of the difference in the position of the ileo-colic junction

will still further accentuate the change in the relative position of the

parts which has been effected by the rotation. In the primitive

condition shown in Fig. 104, _A_, the ileum enters the large intestine

from right to left, and the concavity of the caecal bud turns its

crescentic margin ventrad and to the right.

After rotation is accomplished (Fig. 104, _B_ and _C_, and Fig. 115) the

ileo-colic entrance takes place in the opposite direction, from left to

right and the caecum turns its concave margin caudad and to the left.

Figs. 116 and 117 show the intestinal tract of _Tamandua bivittata_

arranged so as to correspond to the human embryonic condition after

rotation. The caecum has been brought up and to the right across the

proximal duodenal portion of the small intestine, while the jejuno-ileal

coils have been turned down and to the left. The rotation has been

accomplished by a twist at the duodeno-colic isthmus, and the original

right leaf of the mesentery has become the left and _vice versa_.

Comparison with Figs. 107 and 108, representing the condition before

rotation in the same animal, will indicate the changes which have been

accomplished by imitating the course of development followed in the

higher mammals.

[Illustration: FIG. 116.--Abdominal viscera of _Tamandua bivittata_,

with the intestine rotated to correspond to the development in the human

subject. (From a fresh dissection.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 117.--The same view as Fig. 116, from another

specimen.]

Failure of rotation and arrest of development at the primitive stage,

with consequent persistent embryonic condition of the mesentery, occurs

occasionally in man. Such cases have been reported by W. J. Walsham, in

St. Barthol. Hosp. Rep., London, Vol. 16. The following four instances

of this condition, taken from the Columbia University museum, will

illustrate the disposition of the abdominal contents.

Fig. 118 shows the arrangement of the abdominal viscera in an adult

female body. Beginning at the pyloric extremity of the stomach the

entire course of the duodenum can be overlooked and its continuation

into the jejuno-ileal division traced. The small intestines occupy the

ventral and right part of the cavity. The ileo-colic junction is placed

in the lower left-hand corner of the abdomen and the small intestine

enters the large from right to left, the ascending colon is situated to

the left of the median line and at its point of transition into the

segment representing the transverse colon is connected by several

adhesions with the ventral surface of the duodenum. The transverse

colon, folded into several coils bound together by adhesion, occupies

the upper left portion of the abdomen.

[Illustration: FIG. 118.--Abdominal viscera of adult human female, in a

case of arrested rotation of the intestines. (Columbia University

Museum, Study Collection.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 119.--The same preparation with the intestinal coils

displaced upward and to the left.]

Fig. 119, taken from the same specimen, shows the entire mass of

intestines lifted up and turned to the left, exposing the background of

the abdominal cavity lined by parietal peritoneum. The duodenum is still

entirely free and non-adherent to the parietal peritoneum. The

continuity of the mesoduodenum with the jejuno-ileal mesentery is well

shown. The primitive right leaf of the mesentery is turned to the

observer. This layer after completed rotation would form the left layer

of the adult mesentery of the jejuno-ileum.

Fig. 120 illustrates another instance of the same condition in the

adult. In this case the duodenum was coiled twice upon itself and

adherent to the prerenal parietal peritoneum.

[Illustration: FIG. 120.--Abdominal viscera of adult human male;

non-rotation of intestine. (Columbia University Museum, Study

Collection.)]

Fig. 121, presenting the same adhesion of the duodenum, illustrates very

perfectly the persistence of the narrow duodeno-colic isthmus in cases

of non-rotation, as well as the development of the different segments of

the adult tract from the limbs of the embryonal umbilical intestinal

loop.

[Illustration: FIG. 121.--Abdominal viscera of adult human male;

non-rotation of intestine. (Columbia University Museum, Study

Collection.)]

It will be observed that beyond the duodeno-colic isthmus the coils of

the jejuno-ileum have resulted from the increase in length of the

descending limb, the apex and the proximal part of the ascending or

recurrent limb, carrying the ileo-colic junction and caecum. The

remainder of the ascending limb, terminating in the embryonic condition

at the splenic flexure by passing into the descending colon, has in the

course of further development in this individual produced a straight

segment--the misplaced ascending colon--and a convoluted and bent

representative of the normal transverse colon.

The same disposition of the large intestine may be noted in the other

preparations.

Fig. 122 shows an instance of non-rotation observed in the human infant

at two years of age.

[Illustration: FIG. 122.--Abdominal viscera of child, two years old;

non-rotation of intestine. (Columbia University Museum, Study

Collection.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 123.--Human foetus at term; abdominal viscera,

hardened _in situ_; non-rotation of caecum. (Columbia University Museum,

No. 1813.)]

Fig. 123, taken from a foetus at term, shows the result of failure to

completely rotate in the region of the caecum and ileo-colic junction.

The rest of the large intestine has rotated as usual and assumed the

normal position. The terminal ileum, however, passes behind the caecum

and enters the large intestine on its right side; the caecum is turned

upwards and to the right and the appendix lies ventrad of the beginning

of the ascending colon. In order to produce the normal arrangement,

shown in Fig. 124, taken from another foetus at term, it would be

necessary to turn the caecum and ileo-colic junction in Fig. 123 through

half a circle. The caecum would then turn upwards and to the left, the

ileum entering the large intestine from left to right, and the appendix

would be placed behind the caecum and ileo-colic junction. Figs. 125 and

126 show the normal and abnormal arrangement presented by these two

preparations diagrammatically. The instances in which in the adult the

ileo-colic entrance is placed on the right side of the large intestine

and in which the appendix is situated laterad of the ascending colon

unquestionably find their explanation in the failure of the intestine to

completely rotate at the ileo-colic junction.

[Illustration: FIG. 124.--Human foetus at term; abdominal viscera,

hardened _in situ_; normal position of completely rotated caecum and

appendix. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1814.)]

[Illustration: FIG. 125.--Just before final rotation of caecum and

terminal ileum. Concavity of caecum directed cephalad and to right.

Terminal ileum enters colon from right to left.]

[Illustration: FIG. 126.--Rotation completed. Concavity of caecum turns

caudad and to left. Terminal ileum enters colon from left to right.]

[Illustration: FIGS. 125, 126.--Schematic representation of final stages

in rotation of caecum and large intestine.]

The resulting conditions are shown in Figs. 127 and 128, taken from

adult human subjects in which the final stage of rotation of the large

intestine has not taken place.

[Illustration: FIG. 127.--Adult human subject with non-rotated caecum.

The terminal ileum turns caudad from right to left to enter right side

of colon.]

[Illustration: FIG. 128.--Adult human subject with non-rotated caecum,

the ileum entering large intestine from the right and behind, and the

appendix placed to the right of the ascending colon. (From a fresh

dissection.)]

In Fig. 127 the terminal ileum is sharply bent on itself and adherent to

the prerenal parietal peritoneum. It passes from right to left and

downwards to enter the right posterior circumference of the large

intestine. The caecum is turned cephalad and the appendix is in contact

with the right lobe of the liver. The caecum passes with a sharp bend

into the obliquely directed ascending colon.

In Fig. 128 the ileum enters the colon from the right and below. The

apex of the caecum is turned cephalad and to the right and the appendix

extends beneath peritoneal adhesions along the lateral border of the

proximal segment of the colon.

In the next place it is desirable to clearly understand the vascular

supply of the intestine before and after rotation and the final relation

of the superior mesenteric artery to the transverse portion of the

duodenum.

Development of Aortal Arterial System.

The thoracic and abdominal aortae are at first double, the first aortic

arches continuing as so-called "primitive aortae" ventrad of the

vertebral column to the caudal end of the body.

The cephalic portions of the two vessels unite in the chick on the third

day and from this point fusion into a single vessel proceeds slowly

caudad.

In the rabbit the fusion of the primitive aortae begins on the ninth day

in the region of the lung-buds and progresses from here caudad until by

the sixteenth day a single aorta is formed (Fig. 129).

[Illustration: FIG. 129.--Diagrams illustrating the arrangement of the

primitive heart and aortic arches. (After Heisler, modified from Allen

Thompson.)]

That the entire descending aorta in man results from the fusion of two

vessels is shown by the rare cases in which the aorta is divided

throughout its entire length by a septum.

The arteries of the allantois are originally the terminations of the

primitive aortae. After fusion of the primitive aortae to form the

abdominal aorta the allantoic arteries, now passing as the umbilical

arteries to the placenta, appear as the branches of bifurcation of the

abdominal aorta, in the same way as the common iliacs do in the adult.

They furnish branches, which at first are very small, to the budding

posterior extremities and the pelvic viscera. In time these rudiments of

the future external and internal iliac arteries become larger, but as

the umbilical arteries continue to develop throughout the entire

intra-uterine period they appear even in the foetus at term as end

branches of the aorta, a condition which is only changed after birth by

the obliteration of the umbilical arteries and their conversion into the

lateral ligaments of the bladder, while the iliac vessels now appear as

the terminal aortic branches. The statement that the umbilical arteries

appear as the terminal branches of the embryonal aorta requires to be

modified in the following respect:

When the allantois develops its arteries are in fact end-branches of the

two primitive aortae. After their fusion and after the formation of the

single aorta this vessel is continued beyond the umbilical arteries as

a small trunk, the caudal artery or rudiment of the adult sacralis

media. Consequently the umbilical arteries are really lateral branches

of a median vessel, viz., aorta abdominalis and arteria sacralis media.

But as the umbilical vessels are very large and the caudal aorta very

small, the former, even under these conditions, appear as the real

terminal branches of the abdominal aorta.

The arteries supplying the yolk-sac and subsequently the intestinal

canal are the vitelline or omphalo-mesenteric. At first they are

branches derived from the two primitive aortae, and after the fusion of

these vessels they arise from the resulting single abdominal aorta. The

omphalo-mesenteric arteries are at first multiple and later are reduced

to two. When the primitive intestine loses its original close contact

with the vertebral column and the common dorsal mesentery develops, the

two omphalo-mesenteric arteries unite to form a single vessel, running

between the layers of the mesentery. After a short course this artery

divides again into two branches, passing one on each side, around the

intestinal tube, which has in the meanwhile become closed. Ventrad of

the intestine these branches reunite so that the gut is surrounded by a

vascular circle. The left half of this loop becomes obliterated and the

trunk of the omphalo-mesenteric artery now passes on the right side of

the intestine to the umbilicus. The peripheral segment of the

omphalo-mesenteric artery disappears with the cessation of the vitelline

circulation. The proximal portion, situated between the layers of the

mesentery, gives numerous anastomosing branches to the intestine and is

converted into the main trunk of the superior mesenteric artery.

The derivation of the superior mesenteric as the fully developed

proximal segment of the embryonic omphalo-mesenteric artery passing to

the yolk-sac is responsible for the rare anomaly in the adult of a

branch of the superior mesenteric artery continuing beyond the intestine

to the umbilicus. I have encountered one instance of this persistence of

the intra-abdominal portion of the omphalo-mesenteric artery in a male

subject 54 years of age. A connective strand, containing a

small artery derived from the superior mesenteric vessels, extended

between the right layer of the mesentery, some distance from its

attached border, and the ventral abdominal wall at the umbilicus. The

vessel which was pervious throughout, was the size of one of the digital

arteries.

Hyrtl has observed the same variation. An example of partial persistence

of the omphalo-mesenteric artery in the adult is well seen in the case

of Meckel's diverticulum shown in Fig. 37, where the arterial vessel

continued upon the diverticulum represents the embryonic

omphalo-mesenteric artery.

The remaining intestinal arteries are at first more numerous and paired.

In man and most mammals they are early reduced in number, passing from

the abdominal aorta to the dorsal or attached border of the intestine,

between the two peritoneal layers of the primitive dorsal mesentery

(Fig. 104). The arterial blood supply of the intestinal canal then

presents three general divisions:

1. Vessels pass from the proximal part of the abdominal aorta to the

stomach and pyloric portion of the duodenum. This set of vessels forms

the rudiment of the future coeliac axis. With the development of the

liver and pancreas by budding from the duodenum, and with the appearance

of the spleen in the mesoderm of the dorsal mesentery, branches

corresponding to these organs (hepatic and splenic arteries) are added

to the gastric and duodenal vessels and the adult arrangement of the

coeliac axis is thus obtained (Figs. 130, 131, 132 and 133).

[Illustration: FIG. 130.--Diagrammatic representation of the arteries

proceeding to the alimentary canal and appendages prior to rotation of

intestine (stage of simple umbilical loop).]

[Illustration: FIG. 131.--Diagrammatic representation of the arteries of

the alimentary canal in the first stage of intestinal rotation, showing

relation of superior mesenteric artery to the transverse portion of the

duodenum.]

[Illustration: FIG. 132.--Arteries of alimentary canal in the later

stages of intestinal rotation.]

[Illustration: FIG. 133.--Final arrangement of arteries of alimentary

canal after completed rotation of the intestines.]

These vessels have an important bearing on the formation of the adult

peritoneal cavity in the retro-gastric space, and will be considered in

detail below with that portion of the subject.

2. The next vessel in order derived from the aorta and supplying the

duodenum, pancreas, the small and a part of the large intestine is the

above-mentioned superior mesenteric artery, which arises from the aorta

a short distance caudad of the coeliac axis (Figs. 130, 131, 132 and

133).

The Anatomy of the Human Peritoneum and Abdominal Cavity Considered from the Standpoint of Development and Comparative Anatomy · 第 1 / 8 章