It was hoped that Fox and Pitt might come in together, but their quarrel

was irreconcilable. After some negotiations, therefore, the Duke of

Devonshire was made First Lord of the Treasury, and Pitt First

Secretary of State and real Prime Minister. The measures of the new

Government were in strict accordance with the principles of the party

which Pitt represented. The Hessians were dismissed, a Bill was passed

for increasing the militia, by which 32,000 men were to be called out;

reinforcements were sent to America; the enterprising and warlike

character of the Highlanders was enlisted on the side of order by the

formation of Highland regiments, a step which did more towards the

pacification of the country than any measures of coercion. Pitt also did

what he could to dissociate himself from the conduct of Newcastle with

regard to Admiral Byng. A court martial held upon that officer had been

bound by strict instructions, and had found itself obliged to bring in a

verdict of guilty, though without casting any imputation on the personal

courage of the Admiral. On his accession to power Pitt was courageous

enough, although he rested on the popular favour, to do his best to get

Byng pardoned, and urged on the King that the House of Commons seemed to

wish the sentence to be mitigated. The King is said to have answered in

words that fairly describe Pitt's position, "Sir, you have taught me to

look for the sense of my subjects in another place than the House of

Commons." The sentence was carried out, and Byng was shot on the

quarter-deck of the 'Monarque' at Portsmouth (March 14, 1757). But the

new ministry was of short duration. Pitt found himself unable to stand

up against the dislike of the King, and the want of that Parliamentary

influence which Newcastle's position as head of the Whigs, and his long

course of corruption, had gained him. He was summarily dismissed. The

King tried to get back Newcastle and his subservient ministry (whom he

used to speak of as "Newcastle's footmen"), and, after a period of

intrigue, Pitt had to consent to a compromise, giving his own talents

and popularity, and accepting in exchange the great Parliamentary

support of Newcastle. To this ministry Fox was persuaded to give his

adhesion, and to accept the lucrative post of Paymaster-General. Thus

was formed that strong Government so gloriously known as Pitt's

ministry.

[Sidenote: Secret treaties of Maria Theresa.]

[Sidenote: Europe prepares for war.]

While these ministerial changes had been going on in England, our

dispute with France as to the limits of our American colonies had become

blended with a quarrel of quite a different origin, which was to plunge

Europe into a general war for several years. As early as 1745, before

the signature of the Treaty of Dresden, the Courts of Berlin and Dresden

had entered into some sort of arrangement for curtailing what they

regarded as the undue pre-eminence of Prussia. After that treaty the

Empress Queen seems to have been still more anxious for some similar

plan, and almost immediately after the termination of the War of

Succession, had entered into relations with the Czarina Elizabeth of

Russia; a treaty had been agreed to, to which there were added secret

clauses, providing that any movement on the part of Prussia against

either Russia, Austria, or Poland, should be held wholly to invalidate

the Treaty of Dresden; and in the result of a success of their arms, it

was arranged that Prussia should be divided between the three countries.

These arrangements are sometimes spoken of as the Treaties of Warsaw and

of St. Petersburg. To this treaty the Elector of Saxony, who was also

King of Poland, was a party, though without signing. In 1754, magazines

and armies were prepared in Bohemia and Moravia; the Saxon army was

collected at Pirna; and finally, in 1756, adroit flattery addressed to

Madame de Pampadour, the reigning mistress at the French Court, induced

France to join in the alliance. Louis and his ministry, ignoring the

really vital question which was then at issue with England, reversed the

traditional policy of France, rejected the proffered alliance with

Prussia, and threw the country headlong into a European war, in close

alliance with its old enemy the Austrian House.

[Sidenote: Alliance between England and Prussia.]

In accordance with the traditions of European policy it was England, not

France, who should have appeared as the ally of Austria. But a coldness

had been gradually springing up between the Courts. The Barrier Treaty

of Utrecht, by which the Austrian Netherlands were debarred from the

Indian trade, was a constant cause of uneasiness. The part which England

had taken in mediating the Treaties of Breslau and Dresden, which ceded

Silesia to Prussia, had been mistaken by the Austrian Court; although in

fact both wise and friendly, it had excited deep displeasure. Thus, when

an alliance was mentioned, the terms proposed by Austria were so high

that the English Government had no choice but to refuse them. Under

these circumstances, as Hanover could not be left exposed wholly without

friends, England turned to the opposite party and allied itself with

Prussia.

[Sidenote: Frederick's first campaign.]

[Sidenote: Supported by Pitt.]

[Sidenote: Foreign policy of the various parties in England.]

Frederick had already entered upon the war. The appearance of hostile

preparations had aroused his suspicions. He demanded a plain answer as

to the intentions of the Empress Queen, and on receiving an evasive

reply, he determined upon striking the first blow, although he knew that

his nation numbered but 5,000,000, while the number of the allies could

not be estimated at less than 90,000,000. He passed rapidly through

Saxony, blockaded the Saxon army in Pirna, and, collecting all his

forces, defeated the Austrians under Marshal Braun at Lowositz (Oct. 1,

1756). After this victory he rendered the relief of the Saxons

impossible, and the whole army surrendered at Pirna. Frederick occupied

Dresden, and there found and published copies of the secret treaties,

which fully justified his conduct. The French had made a false step in

plunging into the continental war. They were already successful in the

Mediterranean; already the overbearing conduct of the English, in laying

a nominal blockade on all the ports of France, had excited the general

indignation of the Continent. The real policy of that country was to

direct all their energies to the colonial and maritime war with England.

It is probable that they thought to wring from George concessions in the

colonies in exchange for the security of Hanover, which lay exactly

between the contending parties. But Pitt at once apprehended the error

they had made, and saw a great opportunity for raising the power of

England. He knew that when France was busied in the endless difficulties

of the European war, England, while subsidizing foreign troops, could

employ her real power in completing her colonial empire. He therefore

braved the charge of inconsistency, and threw himself heart and soul

into the defence of Hanover and the support of Frederick. To understand

how complete his apparent change of views was, and his courage in openly

avowing them, the principles of the party which he had hitherto

represented must be remembered. Though a section of the great Whig

party, they differed in their views both as to foreign and domestic

policy from the main body of the Whigs. To both the power of France was

an object of dread. But,--while the official Whigs desired to check it

by the preservation of the balance of power in Europe, by close

connection with the continental powers, by money subsidies, and by

occasional assistance of troops,--Pitt and his friends thought that, as

England was an island, its natural policy was to depend upon the navy;

that as trade was our proper business, so the navy was our proper

strength; that we did but weaken ourselves by entangling ourselves with

foreign politics; that our army should be entirely defensive, and that

we need have no fear of invasion while we commanded the sea. Thus while

one party upheld the necessity of subsidies and a considerable standing

army, the other wished for no subsidies, a strong militia, and a

powerful navy. The differences were not less in their respective views

of home policy. The main body of the Whigs were desirous of retaining

quite unchanged the Constitution as settled by the Revolution, and held

that power must be secured by parliamentary influence and the

distribution of patronage. In Pitt's more liberal view, parliamentary

influence should have been unnecessary--a Government pleasing to the

people, which a good Government would naturally be, would want no other

support. Pitt's alliance with Newcastle and his acceptance of his

parliamentary influence was as entirely opposed to this view as his

maintenance of subsidies to the European powers was to all appearance

opposed to his former views of foreign politics. But circumstances had

arisen which to his mind entirely altered the position of England, and

he frankly declared that it was for the sake of England that Hanover was

threatened, and that he would win America for them in Germany.

[Sidenote: Disasters of the year 1757.]

The object Pitt set before him in his new ministry was to raise the

national spirit. For this purpose he threw himself with all his

vehemence into the war, and his energy became visible in every

department. He at once assumed the whole conduct of foreign affairs,

leaving to Newcastle the jobbery he so much liked; it is even said that

the Admiralty had orders to sign his despatches and instructions without

reading them. But he was met with difficulties arising from the bad

Government and the bad appointments which he found on entering office.

It was thus, with wholly inefficient generals, that he set to work to do

what he could in the year 1757. True to his general view of employing

England chiefly on the sea, it was to expeditions to the French coast

that he at first looked for success. Before he was well seated in the

ministry such an expedition had been despatched against Rochefort under

Admiral Hawke and General Mordaunt. The fleet acted well enough, but

Mordaunt and his soldiers brought the expedition to ruin, though Wolfe

volunteered to capture the town if he might be intrusted with 500 men.

In America the same want of success met the English. Lord Loudon was

there commanding in chief, a man who was incessantly busy and never did

anything; he was graphically described by Franklin as resembling a St.

George and the dragon on the sign of an inn, always mounted on a

galloping horse, but never advancing a step. Under such leadership the

attack on Louisburg failed. Worse than this was the disaster which

attended our troops in Germany. The Duke of Cumberland, bold and

active, but no general, allowed himself to be outmanœuvred by

Marshal D'Estrées, suffered the French to cross the Weser unopposed, was

beaten at Hastenbach, and while attempting to cover the fortress of

Stade, was surrounded by the French and compelled to sign the Convention

of Klosterseven, by which it was agreed that his army should be entirely

broken up, the auxiliaries sent to their homes, and the Hanoverian

troops go into cantonments. To complete the misery of the situation,

Frederick had himself suffered a disastrous defeat at Kolin, in Bohemia,

while covering the siege of Prague. The extraordinary campaign which

saved Prussia does not belong to our history; it is enough to

understand, that with extreme rapidity he threw himself towards the

western extremity of his widespread dominions, and filled the gap which

Cumberland had left open. The great victory of Rosbach, in the

neighbourhood of the Saale, over the French and Imperialists, rendered

that flank secure for the present. Suddenly darting back again into

Silesia, where his affairs had not been going prosperously in his

absence, he completely defeated the Austrians at the battle of Lissa,

north of the river Schneidwitz, and thus rendered that flank secure

also.

This year, so disastrous in Europe, had been marked by the signal

success of our arms in India, whither Clive, who had come home after his

brilliant successes in the Carnatic, had again returned as Governor of

Fort St. David. He had been summoned to Bengal to revenge the horrors of

the Black Hole of Calcutta, and had there laid the foundation of the

English power by the brilliant victory of Plassy.[8]

[Sidenote: Change of generals. 1758.]

[Sidenote: Success in America.]

The disasters which had met the English arms in all directions moved the

anger of Pitt, and he determined on a thorough change of generals. In

the place of Cumberland, who had shown his inefficiency in the last

campaign, Ferdinand of Brunswick, a worthy disciple of Frederick's, was

appointed to command the army of Hanover; and as the Convention of

Klosterseven was repudiated by the English, he found the defeated army

at Stade ready to receive him. Loudon gave place to Amherst and Wolfe.

It was in America that the English troops were chiefly employed. The

mouth of the St. Lawrence was guarded by Cape Breton Island and

Louisburg. At New York the Hudson falls into the sea, and from its mouth

there runs northward, nearly into the valley of the St. Lawrence, a

valley and chain of lakes, of which the first is Lake Champlain. The

fortress which holds the road is Ticonderoga. On the Ohio, as already

mentioned, was Fort Duquesne, where Fort Pittsburg now is. The French

possessions were to be attacked by each of these three points. Amherst

and Wolfe, with a fleet under Boscawen, were to capture Louisburg.

Abercrombie was to push up the Hudson and take Ticonderoga, while to

Forbes was intrusted the capture of Fort Duquesne. Working hand in hand,

without jealousy, Amherst and Boscawen succeeded at once in capturing

Louisburg, which had last year been supposed unassailable. Fort Duquesne

was also taken. Ticonderoga, strong from its situation in the midst of

water and marshes, resisted all efforts, but the line of junction

between Canada and the Mississippi was effectually cut.

[Sidenote: Victory of Creveld. June 23, 1758.]

[Sidenote: Expeditions to Cherbourg and St. Malo.]

[Sidenote: Campaign of Frederick.]

In Europe the same energy was visible. The army of Ferdinand was

reinforced by a considerable number of English troops. Prince Ferdinand

was opposed by the Count of Clermont, an unusually incapable general,

who had in fact never before seen troops in the field. He succeeded in

clearing Hanover and driving the French behind the Rhine at Creveld. He

there defeated them with a loss of some 6000 men, but found himself

unable to retain his advanced position, and recrossed the river. Pitt

had often asserted that, much as he wished to uphold the cause of

Frederick, nothing would induce him to send British blood to "the Elbe,

to be lost in that ocean of gore." But this successful campaign induced

him to change his view, and a considerable body of troops, about 12,000

in number, under the Duke of Marlborough and Lord George Sackville, were

sent to join Prince Ferdinand. These same officers had just been

employed in executing one of those joint military and naval expeditions

which Pitt seems at first to have thought the proper means by which

England should assist in a continental war. Like all such isolated

expeditions, it was of little value. St. Malo, against which it was

directed, was found too strong to be taken, but a large quantity of

shipping and naval stores was destroyed. The fleet also approached

Cherbourg, but although the troops were actually in their boats ready to

land, they were ordered to re-embark, and the fleet came home. Another

somewhat similar expedition was sent out later in the year. In July

General Bligh and Commodore Howe took and destroyed Cherbourg, but on

attempting a similar assault on St. Malo, they found it too strong for

them. The army had been landed in the Bay of St. Cast, and, while

engaged in re-embarkation, it was attacked by some French troops which

had been hastily collected, and severely handled. In spite of this

slight check it was plain that the tide of victory had changed. The

campaign of King Frederick had been marked by chequered fortune. He had

found the siege of Olmutz, in Moravia, beyond his strength, but upon the

east of his dominions had won a great victory over the Russians, under

General Fermor, at Zörndorf (August 25); and though he suffered a heavy

defeat by a night surprise at Hofkirchen, he managed his retreat so

ably, that before the end of the year he had rid Saxony of the Austrians

and again secured Silesia.

[Sidenote: Victories of the year 1759.]

The success which had marked the course of the British arms in all parts

of the world continued to attend them, and this year (1759) is one of

the most glorious in our military annals. Horace Walpole remarks, that

"it was necessary to ask every morning what new victory there was for

fear of missing one." In January came the news of the capture of Goree

in Africa, in June the news of the capture of Guadaloupe, in August of

the victory of Minden, in September of Lagos, in October of Quebec, and

in November of Quiberon. The contrast between the England of 1757,

crouching in fear within its own limits and crying for help to Hanover

and Hesse, and the England of 1759 is indeed striking. There was again a

threatened descent of the French upon England, but there was now no

craven fear of such an event. Pitt had raised the temper of the people.

The threat was regarded not only with indifference, but as a means of

acquiring further triumph. England could well defend itself. The militia

was called out and mobilized; the fleet was so large and in such order

that it could efficiently watch all the French ports. Boats for the

expedition were building at Havre; Rodney anchored in the harbour and

bombarded it for fifty hours, destroying most of the boats; Boscawen was

watching De la Clue at Toulon; Hawke was watching Conflans at Brest.

Thurot, in Dunkirk, was also blockaded. This arrangement of fleets

produced in the course of the year two great naval victories.

[Sidenote: Naval victories of Lagos and Quiberon.]

The French desired to connect their scattered squadrons. For this

purpose De la Clue attempted to come out of Toulon and to join the

fleets in the north of France. As he passed round Spain, Boscawen, whose

duty it had been to watch him, fell upon his fleet off Lagos. Three of

his ships were taken and two destroyed, while eight vessels, which had

been separated from him, were lost as they came through the straits; so

that, with the exception of two ships, the whole of his squadron was

annihilated. This was in September. In the following month a still

greater success met the English navy. Sir Edward Hawke attacked the

Brest fleet under Conflans off the point of Quiberon. He had been driven

from his watch by stress of weather, and Conflans had taken the

opportunity to come out of harbour, hoping to destroy a detached

squadron which was off the coast. But Hawke's return was too quick for

him. He made a junction with the detached squadron, and thus, superior

in force to the French, drove them back towards the coast. The French

withdrew among the rocky islets near the mouth of the Vilaine. It was

blowing a gale, and the rocky coast was full of danger. But Hawke

replied to the representations of his pilot by giving him peremptory

orders, that whatever the risk might be, he was to lay his ship

alongside of the French admiral's. "You have done your duty in showing

me the danger, now you are to obey my orders and lay me alongside the

Soleil Royal." The victory was complete: two French ships struck, four

were sunk, and the rest, all damaged, ran for shelter to the Vilaine.

This blow, together with the complete destruction of Thurot's squadron,

which had come out of Dunkirk and made a landing in Ireland, completed

the practical annihilation of the French fleet. The total loss up to

this time of the French navy was sixty-four ships, without counting

Thurot's squadron. During the same time the English had lost but nine.

[Sidenote: Capture of Quebec.]

But the great victory of the year was the capture of Quebec. To secure

Canada was one of Pitt's chief objects. Louisburg and Duquesne had

already fallen, and the country itself was thus open to his attack. The

French army was under the command of an excellent general, the Marquis

de Montcalm, who had his headquarters at Quebec. General Amherst was the

English commander-in-chief, but subordinates of more than usual vigour

were necessary for him, and Pitt, who had kept his eye on Wolfe since

the attack on Rochefort, and had seen his energy at the siege of

Louisburg, disregarding all claims of seniority, intrusted to him the

attack on Quebec. This was originally to be a combined movement. Amherst

was to march up by Lakes Champlain and George, take Ticonderoga and

Crown Point, where Abercrombie had failed last year, and thus reach the

St. Lawrence. Generals Prideaux and Johnson were to take Fort Niagara,

and then, passing down Lake Ontario into the St. Lawrence, to join in

the attack on Quebec, securing Montreal on the way. Though both these

latter expeditions were successful, the difficulties met with rendered

them so slow that the combination failed. The plan was Pitt's own, and

was probably too extensive; it may be doubted whether he had sufficient

knowledge of what it is possible for an army to do. Wolfe, with 8000

men, embarked in the squadron of Admiral Saunders, and reached the Isle

of Orleans in the St. Lawrence river on the 13th of June. The expedition

experienced no disasters in the way, having fortunately captured a

vessel with some excellent charts of the river.

A History of England, Period III. Constitutional Monarchy · 第 25 / 78 段