The Whig Junto was even more angry than the ministers themselves at this

conduct. They suspected Harley's design, and determined to drive him

from the ministry. Both parties felt that the crisis had arrived. One

or other of them must become predominant. They both determined to make

their power felt, and by a strange manœuvre the extremes of both

sides joined to attack the ministry. The chief points of attack were the

naval administration,--which, as it implicated her husband, was always a

tender point with the Queen,--and the determination of Marlborough to

pursue the course William had marked out, and to carry on the war

chiefly in Flanders. It was in this session of Parliament, which began

on October 23, 1707, that the joint assault upon the Government was

made. The maladministration of the navy was the chief topic, but the

Tories also introduced a motion in the House of Lords, recommending a

change of the seat of war from Flanders to Spain, where the battle of

Almanza had lately proved disastrous to the allied armies. Marlborough

pointed out in vain that this would produce an immediate peace with the

Dutch, who would feel their country open to invasion from France; and

although the Whigs, pledged as they were to support the policy of

William, could not join in such a motion, Somers drew up a declaration,

embodying both the disapprobation felt for the management of the fleet,

and as much of the Tory feeling in favour of a change in the seat of war

as was possible for his party to accept. The declaration stated that "it

is the opinion of this Committee that no peace can be honourable or safe

to her Majesty or her allies, if Spain and the West Indies be suffered

to continue in the power of the house of Bourbon." But the manœuvre

of the Whigs in joining in the assault against Government had been

successful; it was not necessary to press the hostile resolution.

Godolphin had been thoroughly frightened, and recognized the necessity

of breaking up the unnatural friendship and of allying himself with one

or other of the great parties. With the war still continuing he could

not but choose the Whigs. At once entering into negotiations with the

chief of that party, he induced Somers, as President of the Committee

charged with the duty of throwing the late resolutions into the form of

an address, to change the resolutions, by a slight alteration in the

words, from an attack upon Government into a pledge for the continuation

of the war till the French had been entirely broken. The suggested

resolutions mentioned the West Indies, reflecting on the comparative

weakness of our naval efforts, and Spain, implying a change of the scene

of war. The introduction of the words "or any other part of the Spanish

monarchy," entirely destroyed these hostile allusions. The Whigs had

shown their power, it was no longer possible to refuse them their

reward. It became necessary to break with Harley and the moderate

Tories. The discovery that a man of the name of Gregg, a clerk in

Harley's office, was in treasonable correspondence with France, threw

some suspicions on his master's fidelity, and Marlborough and Godolphin

agreed on Harley's dismissal. The Queen was more difficult to move. It

required a threat of resignation on the part of the ministers to induce

her to give up one who, as she believed, thought entirely with her on

Church matters, but she was not yet free from the influence of the

Churchills, and she yielded. With him retired St. John, Harcourt, and

Mansell, whose places were taken by Boyle, a zealous Whig, as Secretary

of State, John Smith as Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Robert Walpole

as Secretary of War. Marlborough and Godolphin had apparently triumphed

by means of the Whigs, but their victory was won at the price of the

Queen's favour and of submission to the dictation of the Whig party, who

at once set to work to secure office for themselves; nor were they

scrupulous in the means they used, the threat that they would turn their

assault on the naval administration directly and by name upon her

husband, then on his deathbed, induced the Queen to remove Pembroke and

give the Presidency of the Council to Somers. Sunderland, though himself

a minister, intrigued with the Scotch Jacobites to throw out the

ministerial candidates at the election of Peers held in accordance with

the Union. To all this the General and Treasurer had to submit. The

administration was completed upon a Whig basis, when Orford was forced

upon the Queen as head of the Admiralty.

[Sidenote: Insecurity of Marlborough's position.]

Marlborough was fully alive to the insecurity of his position. It is

often attributed, though perhaps without sufficient reason, to the

desire to keep up his personal ascendancy, that he refused the terms

offered by Louis; and in the following year the disastrous victory of

Malplaquet has also been considered a political battle. A truer view of

the case seems to be that, afraid of taking any decided steps, he chose

to occupy merely the position of an agent of Government, and obey even

against his own convictions the dictation of the Whig party. At the same

time, he made two desperate efforts to obtain a position independent of

home politics--he applied to the Archduke Charles for the office of

Governor of the Low Countries, which would have produced about £60,000 a

year, and he also demanded from Queen Anne the position of Captain

General for life. In both cases his efforts failed. As far as England

was concerned, he probably owed his disappointment chiefly to the

conduct of his wife. Finding herself supplanted by Mrs. Masham, she

lost all command of her temper, and perpetually outraged the feelings of

the Queen by her violent complaints.

[Sidenote: Fall of the Whigs. 1710.]

[Sidenote: Dr. Sacheverell.]

[Sidenote: Dismissal of Sunderland and Godolphin. Aug. 8.]

[Sidenote: Harley's Tory ministry. Nov.]

The triumph of the Whigs, which had seemed so complete, was of very

short duration. Their fall was caused by a fault which had been too

prevalent among them since the Revolution--whenever they had the upper

hand, they became dictatorial and overbearing. Already they had made

themselves distasteful to the Queen by the eagerness with which they had

forced themselves into power, and an unnecessary exhibition of that

power rendered them distasteful to the people. A certain Dr. Henry

Sacheverell, a strong upholder of the doctrine of non-resistance, had

preached two sermons, one at the Assizes of Derby, one before the mayor

and aldermen at St. Paul's. The mayor, who sympathized with his views,

suggested that he should print the sermons, and though the common

council, when consulted, declined to authorize this step, the preacher

acted on the mayor's suggestion and published both. They became a sort

of political manifesto, which was largely circulated through the

country. The Whigs were naturally angry at this semi-official production

of doctrines subversive of all the principles of the Revolution. They

determined to take notice of the sermons, and, foolishly disregarding

the advice of Somers, they proceeded by the extraordinary method of

impeachment instead of the common process of law. This naturally raised

the foolish utterances of a clergyman to the dignity of a party

question; and when they further insisted upon a ceremonious hearing in

Westminster Hall, the trial became the fashionable topic of the day. The

excitement throughout England was very great. All other public business

came to a standstill, and when the Lords, though they found Sacheverell

guilty, took a very moderate view of his guilt, and punished him only

with three years' suspension, the verdict was regarded as a virtual

acquittal, and celebrated as a party triumph. The exhibition of feeling

called forth by this trial proved both to the Queen and to her secret

advisers how great a hold the Tory party had upon the country.

Encouraged by Harley, who loved an underhand intrigue, and by his

creature Mrs. Masham, she proceeded to act upon her new-found knowledge,

and it became evident how formidable the power of the Crown still was.

Without consulting Godolphin, she made the Duke of Shrewsbury Lord

Chamberlain. Godolphin, instead of resigning at this marked act of

distrust, put up with the affront. Still further emboldened by this

weakness, the Queen dismissed Lord Sunderland, whom she had always

disliked, and followed up the blow by the dismissal of Godolphin

himself. The office of Lord Treasurer was for the time kept in abeyance,

but Harley was made Chancellor of the Exchequer, and was virtually Prime

Minister. For a little while Harley attempted negotiations with the

Whigs, who still retained office, but finding them impracticable, he

determined to rest upon the Tories only, induced the Queen to dissolve

Parliament, and formed an entirely Tory ministry, the most important

members of which were Harcourt, who became Lord Chancellor, Rochester,

Lord President, and St. John, who succeeded Boyle as Secretary of State.

[Sidenote: Conference at Gertruydenberg. 1710.]

It was with this ministry that Louis attempted to renew the interrupted

negotiations of 1709. The battle of Malplaquet and the fall of Mons had

forced him to this course, and to consent that a congress should be held

at Gertruydenberg. At first Holland refused to treat except upon the

preliminaries of the preceding year, and they still demanded the

assistance of Louis in ejecting his grandson the King of Spain. Finally,

both English and Dutch seemed to have waived this point, but the

opposition of Austria and Savoy rendered any general negotiation

impossible, and the war was resumed.

[Sidenote: The war in Spain.]

In Flanders it produced nothing beyond the capture of Douay, but in

Spain it was of more importance. There Stanhope succeeded with some

difficulty in inducing his colleague Staremberg and the Archduke Charles

to advance towards Madrid. They defeated the Spaniards, from whom French

assistance was withdrawn during the negotiations, at Almenara and

Saragossa. They pushed on into Castile, and again occupied Madrid. Thus,

inasmuch as the war had been fairly successful, it was in favour of the

Whigs, although the successes having been chiefly in Spain (the

pursuance of the war in which country was a part of the Tory programme),

they were less important politically than they would have been had they

taken place in Flanders. But whatever advantage the Whigs might have

obtained from the war was neutralized when, before the end of the year,

events occurred in Spain which entirely altered the complexion of

affairs in that country. Stanhope's hopes for a successful issue of his

enterprise were based on the active co-operation of the army of

Portugal. Philip, with his Spanish army, having retired northwards,

there was nothing to prevent the junction of the two armies. But, in

spite of the entreaties of the English general, the Portuguese would not

move, and as the hope of any successful issue to the negotiations

dwindled, Louis again allowed assistance to be sent to Spain, and a

considerable army, which the national spirit of the Castilians had

formed round Philip, was placed under the able command of Vendome. He at

once saw the necessity for preventing the proposed union; and his

advance to the Bridge of Almaraz rendered it henceforward impossible.

Stanhope was for wintering in Castile, and the army withdrawing from the

capital amidst the joyful shouts of the inhabitants, took up a position

in accordance with Stanhope's wishes. But the Archduke Charles, who was

as uxorious as his rival, could not bear separation from his wife, and

hurried home with upwards of 2000 cavalry, the arm in which the allied

troops were already overmatched. When it became evident that no hope was

to be expected from Portugal, the general saw that to winter in Castile

was impossible, and withdrew towards Aragon. But Vendome, smarting under

the disgrace he had suffered at Oudenarde, outdid himself. With extreme

rapidity, he pressed upon his enemy, who was retreating in two parallel

armies, one under Staremberg, the other under Stanhope. With vastly

superior forces he came upon the latter general, as he was resting his

troops at Brihuega, without the least notion of the close approach of

Vendome. Stanhope made a most gallant defence, expecting to be relieved

by Staremberg, but hours passed by, and for some unexplained reason,

Staremberg did not appear; thus having continued his defence till

ammunition failed, Stanhope was compelled to capitulate. The surrender

was already completed before Staremberg appeared. His slowness had

ruined his cause, but he did what he could to re-establish it; and at

Villa Viciosa a great battle was fought, in which both parties claimed

the victory. But no fresh victory could have given Vendome more perfect

success. Staremberg was obliged to fall back, and reached Barcelona with

7000 men only, the relics of the army which had been so triumphant in

the earlier part of the year.

[Sidenote: Harley's policy for peace]

[Sidenote: and restoration of the Stuarts.]

The elections, made while the ferment of the trial of Sacheverell was

still unsubdued, produced a strong Tory majority. And it was thus,

strong at home and assisted by disaster abroad, that Harley and his

Government were able to set on foot their change of policy, and in spite

of the failure of the preliminaries at Gertruydenberg, to enter into

negotiations for a final peace. It seems probable that from the first

Harley's policy was directed to the restoration of the Stuarts, as well

as to a return to the main feature of their foreign policy, friendship

with France. It is of course possible that his intercourse with the

Jacobites was merely intended to secure his parliamentary position, but

certainly his conduct was quite in accordance with the belief that he

was in earnest. The tortuous and underhand manner in which the peace was

first set on foot points in this direction, still more so do the letters

of the Abbé Gaultier, written in the year 1710, which declare that the

new ministry had a great consideration for the Pretender, and that some

members of it were working for him only. The restoration of the Stuarts

would be rendered easier by three things. In the first place it was

scarcely possible without the assistance of France. This seems to

explain, better than the mere wish to follow the traditional Tory policy

of peace, the immediate steps taken to put an end to the war, and the

very favourable terms granted to Louis after his disasters. Secondly, it

could not be undertaken without the support of the High Church party,

which was very strong. This explains the constant support given by the

Government to that party. And thirdly, the success of such a scheme

would have been best secured by the assistance of Marlborough, who was

known to have already frequently intrigued with the Court of St.

Germains. On the other hand the Duke would be the most formidable

opponent. Steps were therefore taken to secure his assistance, and when

that was found impossible, his complete ruin became the object to be

sought.

[Sidenote: Marlborough only anxious to keep his place.]

On his return from his somewhat unfruitful campaign, Marlborough seemed

inclined, with his usual selfishness, to submit to anything for the

continuation of his personal position. We are told by St. John that he

expressed his sorrow for his former wrong step in joining the Whigs. He

even attempted to soften the angry vehemence of his wife, but her fate

was in fact determined by the personal feelings of the Queen. No

entreaties of the Duke, who even threw himself on his knees before her,

could induce the Queen to go back from her wish to deprive the Duchess

of all her offices. She was compelled to surrender her gold key, and

left her apartments at St. James's, having first gratified her spite by

carrying off the brass locks and marble chimney-pieces. The Duke

himself, though he had suffered many indignities, was permitted to

continue the conduct of the war, being assured that he should be well

supported.

[Sidenote: Secret peace negotiations.]

Having thus for the time secured themselves from his opposition, the

Government proceeded to open secret negotiations with the Court of

Versailles. The agent employed was a priest named Gaultier, who had been

Tallard's chaplain, and was a warm friend of the Pretender's cause.

This sudden idea of peace was most unexpected and welcome to the French.

"Asking us whether we wished for peace," says Torcy, "was like asking a

sick man whether he wishes to recover." Gaultier returned with the

message that Louis could not, so soon after the failure of the late

treaty, suggest peace to the Dutch, but he would gladly listen to the

mediation of England; a shrewd answer, which at once tended towards

separating England from her allies. The knowledge that a peace with

France was likely, and that all further help from England was hopeless,

induced a French refugee of the name of Guiscard, who had been prominent

in arranging attacks upon France and assistance to the rebels in the

Cevennes, to turn traitor. His correspondence was discovered, and in

despair, upon being examined in the Council, he determined to revenge

himself upon the authors of his misfortune, and stabbed Harley with a

penknife. Harley's popularity was raised still higher by this attack on

him; he was made Earl of Oxford, and shortly after, on the supposed

success of his financial scheme for incorporating the public creditors

into a company to trade in the South Seas, was made Lord Treasurer. The

High Church temper of the time was further illustrated by the passage of

a Bill for erecting fifty new churches in London, and of the Occasional

Conformity Act, now proposed in the House of Lords which had always

previously obstructed it.

[Sidenote: Marlborough's plans for the campaign of 1712.]

The negotiations opened by Gaultier were also continued, Prior was sent

to Paris, and a more specific scheme was set on foot than had been

produced by the verbal negotiations of the spring, although, unmoved or

ignorant of the action of the Government, Marlborough was attempting to

continue his great career. He had planned a combined movement with

Eugene against Villars, who had constructed lines near Arras and Cambrai

so strong that he boastfully said he had brought Marlborough to the "non

plus ultra." The vigour of the campaign was checked by the withdrawal of

Eugene, who was required to superintend and guard the Electoral Diet at

Frankfort, which had been summoned to elect the successor to the Emperor

Joseph, who had died on the 17th of April. It was Marlborough's

intention to reduce Bouchain and Le Quesnoy, to winter in France, and in

the spring press forward towards Paris. His schemes were only partially

successful, owing principally to the slowness of the Imperialists. By

some skilful manœuvres he succeeded in passing the formidable lines,

and besieged and took Bouchain, but was unable to carry his great

project further.

[Sidenote: Proposed terms of peace.]

On his arrival in Paris, Prior found that Louis had authority to treat

for Spain as well as for himself, and proceeded to explain the

conditions demanded. England no longer insisted upon the surrender of

the Spanish crown, but would be satisfied with the pledge that the two

crowns should never be united; Gibraltar, Minorca, and Newfoundland must

be secured to England; Dunkirk demolished, and four towns granted for

trade in South America. Great commercial advantages must be granted both

to the English and Dutch, and fortified towns given as barriers for the

Dutch in the Low Countries, and for Austria on the Rhine. All this was

as yet kept profoundly secret. The negotiation was subsequently

transferred to London, and there, in September, eight preliminary

articles were drawn up. Louis was to acknowledge Anne and the Protestant

succession; a new treaty of commerce was to be made; Dunkirk was to be

demolished, some fair equivalent being given; Gibraltar, Minorca, and

Newfoundland, with the exception of some fishing rights, were to be

secured to the English. In addition to this, the Assiento, or grant of

the slave trade with America, was withdrawn by Spain from France and

given to England. A second set of preliminaries was prepared for

Holland, omitting the chief advantages gained by England, but

introducing stipulations to secure a barrier and to prevent the junction

of the crowns of France and Spain. The Dutch, though much dissatisfied

with the desertion of the English, were compelled to give in their

adhesion, and Utrecht was appointed as the place where the conference

was to be held. Austria was even more outspoken in its anger, and the

Imperial minister in London, who was rash enough to express the

indignation of his Court in a published appeal to the people, was

compelled to leave the country.

[Sidenote: Attack on Marlborough on his return.]

[Sidenote: Parliament, Dec. 7.]

Affairs had reached this point when Marlborough returned from his

campaign. Entering into communication with his old friends the Whigs, he

found that they had formed a coalition with a section of the Tories

under Nottingham, who was much displeased at having been excluded from

all the late ministerial arrangements. Marlborough's object was no doubt

to join the strongest side. The present position of the Whig party

seemed to him so promising that he gave it his adhesion. Nor was he

mistaken as things then stood. On the opening of Parliament, Nottingham

moved, as an amendment to the Address, the old Tory resolution that no

peace could be safe or honourable to Great Britain or Europe if Spain or

the West Indies were allotted to any branch of the Bourbons, and after a

hot discussion succeeded in beating the Government by a majority of

eight. In the House of Commons, on the other hand, the Government

commanded a large majority. Harley and St. John had now to consider what

steps to take against this hostile coalition in the Lords. They

determined, in the first place, to strike a heavy blow at Marlborough,

and the report of a Commission which had been issued to examine into the

public accounts afforded them an opportunity of doing so. Basing its

assertion on the deposition of Sir Solomon Medina, who had contracted to

supply the army in Flanders with bread, the Commission reported that the

Duke had received on those contracts large sums of money, amounting on

the whole to £63,000, while his secretary, Cardonnel, had also received

large douceurs. It also declared that Marlborough had received 2½ per

cent. on all subsidies to foreign troops, amounting on the whole to

£177,000. Acting on this report, the ministry stripped Marlborough of

all his offices. Marlborough was so notoriously avaricious, and his

character was so mean, that these charges seemed to the public probable;

but, in fact, his reply was tolerably complete. The bread money had

habitually been received by every commander-in-chief in Flanders, and

had been expended chiefly in obtaining information as to the enemies'

plans. The percentage on the subsidies was a free gift from the princes

to whom they were paid, and Marlborough had not accepted them without

the royal warrant. In the state of feeling at the time these excuses

were not much regarded. Having got rid of their most powerful enemy, the

ministry made use of the royal prerogative to neutralize the influence

of the Lords. Twelve new Peers were created, which gave them a permanent

majority.

[Sidenote: Command of the army given to Ormond. 1712.]

[Sidenote: The Queen announces the treaty. June 6.]

Having by these strong measures secured their position in Parliament,

Harley and St. John proceeded with their negotiations. There was some

difficulty with regard to the prosecution of the war while the Congress

was sitting. The command had been given to the Duke of Ormond, a man of

strong Jacobite principles; he was privately instructed not to undertake

any offensive operations against the French, and he consequently

informed Villars that he need not be afraid of attacks from the English,

although the pressure which Eugene put upon him was so strong that he

could not refuse to join in the siege of Quesnoy. His strange lukewarm

prosecution of the war, which seemed rather like friendship than

hostility, did not pass unnoticed in England. But all complaints were

answered by the assertion that the Queen would shortly lay before

Parliament the conditions of a peace. In fact, she was only waiting till

Philip of Spain should have made up his mind whether to accept an

equivalent for the Spanish crown, and retain his rights on France, or

remain where he was and renounce those claims. When the answer arrived,

preferring the latter alternative, the Queen went down to the House and

explained the proposed treaty. Though violently opposed, addresses of

confidence were carried.

[Sidenote: Peace of Utrecht. 1713.]

A History of England, Period III. Constitutional Monarchy · 第 13 / 78 段