THE GREAT WAR.

Speech by David Lloyd George, Chancellor of the Exchequer, at Queen's

Hall, London, Sept. 19.

My Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen: I have come here this afternoon to talk

to my fellow-countrymen about this great war and the part that we ought

to take in it. I feel my task is easier after we have been listening to

the greatest war song in the world ("The March of the Men of Harlech").

[Applause.]

Why Our National Honor Is Involved.

There is no man in this room who has always regarded the prospect of

engaging in a great war with greater reluctance and with greater

repugnance than I have done throughout the whole of my political life.

["Hear, hear!"] There is no man either inside or outside of this room

more convinced that we could not have avoided it without national

dishonor. [Great applause.] I am fully alive to the fact that every

nation who has ever engaged in any war has always invoked the sacred

name of honor. Many a crime has been committed in its name; there are

some being committed now. All the same, national honor is a reality,

and any nation that disregards it is doomed. ["Hear, hear!"] Why is our

honor as a country involved in this war? Because, in the first instance,

we are bound by honorable obligations to defend the independence, the

liberty, the integrity, of a small neighbor that has always lived

peaceably. [Applause.] She could not have compelled us; she was weak;

but the man who declines to discharge his duty because his creditor is

too poor to enforce it is a blackguard. [Loud applause.] We entered into

a treaty--a solemn treaty--two treaties--to defend Belgium and her

integrity. Our signatures are attached to the documents. Our signatures

do not stand alone there; this country was not the only country that

undertook to defend the integrity of Belgium. Russia, France, Austria,

Prussia--they are all there. Why are Austria and Prussia not performing

the obligations of their bond? It is suggested that when we quote this

treaty it is purely an excuse on our part--it is our low craft and

cunning to cloak our jealousy of a superior civilization--[Laughter]--that

we are attempting to destroy. Our answer is the action we took in 1870.

["Hear, hear!"] What was that? Mr. Gladstone was then Prime Minister.

[Applause.] Lord Granville, I think, was then Foreign Secretary. I have

never heard it laid to their charge that they were ever Jingoes.

France and Belgium in 1870.

What did they do in 1870? That treaty bound us then. We called upon the

belligerent powers to respect it. We called upon France, and we called

upon Germany. At that time, bear in mind, the greatest danger to Belgium

came from France, and not from Germany. We intervened to protect Belgium

against France, exactly as we are doing now to protect her against

Germany. [Applause.] We proceeded in exactly the same way. We invited

both the belligerent powers to state that they had no intention of

violating Belgian territory. What was the answer given by Bismarck? He

said it was superfluous to ask Prussia such a question in view of the

treaties in force. France gave a similar answer. We received at

that time the thanks of the Belgian people for our intervention in a

very remarkable document. It is a document addressed by the Municipality

of Brussels to Queen Victoria after that intervention, and it reads:

The great and noble people over whose destinies you preside have

just given a further proof of its benevolent sentiment toward our

country.... The voice of the English nation has been heard above

the din of arms, and it has asserted the principles of justice and

right. Next to the unalterable attachment of the Belgian people to

their independence, the strongest sentiment which fills their

hearts is that of an imperishable gratitude. [Great applause.]

That was in 1870. Mark what followed. Three or four days after that

document of thanks a French army was wedged up against the Belgian

frontier, every means of escape shut out by a ring of flame from

Prussian cannon. There was one way of escape. What was that? Violating

the neutrality of Belgium. What did they do? The French on that occasion

preferred ruin and humiliation to the breaking of their bond. [Loud

applause.] The French Emperor, the French Marshals, 100,000 gallant

Frenchmen in arms, preferred to be carried captive to the strange land

of their enemies rather than dishonor the name of their country.

[Applause.] It was the last French army in the field. Had they violated

Belgian neutrality the whole history of that war would have been

changed, and yet, when it was the interest of France to break the treaty

then, she did not do it.

"A Scrap of Paper."

It is the interest of Prussia today to break the treaty, and she has

done it. [Hisses.] She avows it with cynical contempt for every

principle of justice. She says: "Treaties only bind you when it is your

interest to keep them." [Laughter.] "What is a treaty?" says the German

Chancellor, "A scrap of paper." Have you any five-pound notes about you?

[Laughter and applause.] I am not calling for them. [Laughter.] Have you

any of those neat little Treasury one-pound notes? [Laughter.] If you

have, burn them; they are only scraps of paper. [Laughter and

applause.] What are they made of? Rags. [Laughter.] What are they worth?

The whole credit of the British Empire. [Loud applause.] Scraps of

paper! I have been dealing with scraps of paper within the last month.

One suddenly found the commerce of the world coming to a standstill. The

machine had stopped. Why? I will tell you. We discovered--many of us for

the first time, for I do not pretend that I do not know much more about

the machinery of commerce today than I did six weeks ago, and there are

many others like me--we discovered that the machinery of commerce was

moved by bills of exchange. I have seen some of them, [laughter,]

wretched, crinkled, scrawled over, blotched, frowsy, and yet those

wretched little scraps of paper move great ships laden with thousands of

tons of precious cargo from one end of the world to the other.

[Applause.] What is the motive power behind them? The honor of

commercial men. [Applause.] Treaties are the currency of international

statesmanship. [Applause.] Let us be fair--German merchants, German

traders, have the reputation of being as upright and straightforward as

any traders in the world, ["Hear, hear"] but if the currency of German

commerce is to be debased to the level of that of her statesmanship, no

trader from Shanghai to Valparaiso will ever look at a German signature

again. [Loud applause.] This doctrine of the scrap of paper, this

doctrine which is proclaimed by Bernhardi, that treaties only bind a

nation as long as it is to its interest, goes under the root of all

public law. It is the straight road to barbarism. ["Hear, hear!"] It is

as if you were to remove the magnetic pole because it was in the way of

a German cruiser. [Laughter.] The whole navigation of the seas would

become dangerous, difficult, and impossible; and the whole machinery of

civilization will break down if this doctrine wins in this war. ["Hear,

hear!"] We are fighting against barbarism, [applause,] and there is only

one way of putting it right. If there are nations that say they

will only respect treaties when it is to their interest to do so, we

must make it to their interest to do so for the future. [Applause.]

Germany's Perjury.

What is their defense? Consider the interview which took place between

our Ambassador and the great German officials. When their attention was

called to this treaty to which they were parties, they said: "We cannot

help that. Rapidity of action is the great German asset." There is a

greater asset for a nation than rapidity of action, and that is honest

dealing. [Loud applause.] What are Germany's excuses? She says Belgium

was plotting against her; Belgium was engaged in a great conspiracy with

Britain and France to attack her. Not merely is it not true, but Germany

knows it is not true. ["Hear, hear!"] What is her other excuse. That

France meant to invade Germany through Belgium. That is absolutely

untrue. ["Hear, hear!"] France offered Belgium five army corps to defend

her if she were attacked. Belgium said: "I do not require them; I have

the word of the Kaiser. Shall Caesar send a lie?" [Laughter and

applause.] All these tales about conspiracy have been vamped up since. A

great nation ought to be ashamed to behave like a fraudulent bankrupt,

perjuring its way through its obligations. ["Hear, hear!"] What she says

is not true. She has deliberately broken this treaty, and we were in

honor bound to stand by it. [Applause.]

New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2 Who Began the War, and Why? · 第 125 / 211 题