THE HISTORY COMMISSION'S VIEW.

Reuben G. Thwaites, Secretary and Editor of the Wisconsin History

Commission, speaking for the Commission, writes thus:

"OPINIONS, OR ERRORS OF FACT, on the part of the respective authors

represented, both in original narratives and in reprints issued by

the Commission HAVE NOT, NOR WILL THEY BE MODIFIED BY THE LATTER. For

all statements of whatever character, the author alone is

responsible.

"Could any plainer statement than the foregoing be phrased in the

English language, to indicate that this Commission certainly does

not endorse whatever criticisms may have contemporaneously been

offered by Lieutenant Haskell?"

As the question has been asked us we reply: As Haskell has been dead for

more than 45 years, and the foul slanders were made public by the

Wisconsin History Commission in November, 1908, defaming President

Lincoln, Generals Sickles, Howard, Doubleday, Barlow, Schurz, Geary, Webb,

Banes and other officers, and thousands of brave soldiers, it certainly

does look to the Comrades of the Philadelphia Brigade as though the

Wisconsin History fully endorsed everything that Haskell wrote. Just how

the Corps, Brigade and Regimental Associations, Grand Army Posts, Loyal

Legion Commanderies, public libraries, the newspaper press, and others to

whom this "Reply" will be sent will regard the actions of the Wisconsin

Commission and the Massachusetts Loyal Legion has yet to be determined.

Writing further, Secretary and Editor Thwaites says:

"If Haskell's account was worth reprinting at all (and we thought it

well worth doing), the only course open to us, as historians, was to

present it just as it was originally issued, and not in the

emasculated form adopted by the Dartmouth editor, and the

Massachusetts Loyal Legion; changes of such character in a

contemporary document are unwarranted, and utterly ruin it as

historical material."

As this seems to be a question of ethics between history makers, it is up

to the Dartmouth editor, and the Massachusetts Loyal Legion to satisfy the

Wisconsin Commission why the unwarranted emasculation was made of the

Haskell "Narrative."

The Wisconsin History Commission concludes its letter of explanation and

excuse to the Philadelphia Brigade Association in these words:

"In reprinting various other rare Wisconsin Civil War material, as we

intend to do, it may happen that the original authors thus selected

for treatment have criticised certain commands; it certainly would

not tend to smooth the path of the Commission if each such command

was thereupon to pass condemnatory resolutions. WE shall certainly

hope to be spared such treatment."

In reprinting the Haskell "Narrative" the Wisconsin History Commission

invited the criticism it justly deserves, and must expect to receive; and

in their reprints in the future, if it permits their authors to criticise

other commands--as they intend to do--They cannot escape the condemnatory

resolutions they hope to be spared.

The Man of Nazareth said: Give, and it shall be given unto you; good

measure, pressed down, and running over, shall men give into your bosom.

For with the same measure that ye mete, withal it shall be measured to you

again.

Reply of the Philadelphia Brigade Association to the Foolish and Absurd Narrative of Lieutenant Frank A. Haskell · 第 15 / 22 题