BLOWEN.

_Drachmarus_ (Vol. iii., p. 157.).--Your correspondent has my most cordial

thanks both for his suggestion, and also for his conjecture.

1. Perhaps you will kindly afford me space to say, that the name of

Drachmarus occurs in a well-written MS. account of Bishop Cosin's

controversy, during his residence in Paris, with the Benedictine Prior

Robinson, concerning the validity of our English ordination: in the course

of which, after stating the opinion of divers of the Fathers, that the keys

of order and jurisdiction were given John xx., "Quorum peccata," &c., Cosin

adds:

"I omit Hugo Cardinalis, the ordinary gloss, _Drachmarus_, Scotus, as

men of a later age (though all, as you say, of your church) that might

be produced to the same purpose."

I should here perhaps state, that no letter of Prior Robinson's is extant

in which any mention is made either of Drachmarus or of Druthmarus.

2. Before my Query was inserted, it had not only occurred to me as probable

that the transcriber might have written Drachmarus in mistake for

Druthmarus, but I had also consulted such of Druthmar's writings as are

found in the _Bibl. Patr._ I came to the conclusion, however, that a later

writer than Christian Druthmar was intended. _My_ conjecture was, that

Drachmarus must be a second name for some known writer of the age of the

schoolmen, just as _Carbajulus_ may be found cited under the name of

_Loysius_, or _Loisius_, which are only other forms of his Christian name,

_Ludovicus_.

Notes and Queries, Number 71, March 8, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 106 / 140 题