This may suffice to give an idea of the first chapter of the _Descent

of Man_, and even of the whole work. Everywhere we find the same want

of rigorous logic, the same absence of method, the same disregard of

principles, and the same abundance of fanciful assumptions. Such is not

the proceeding of science. “I believe,” says Prof. Agassiz, “that the

Darwinian system is pernicious and fatal to the progress of the

sciences.” “This system,” says Dr. Constantin James, “starts from the

unknown, appeals to evidences which are nowhere to be found, and falls

into consequences which are simply absurd and impossible. One would say

that Darwin merely undertook to blot out creation and bring back

chaos.”[111] We cannot, without trespassing on the limits prescribed to

this article, give the scientific arguments by which these and other

eminent writers set at naught the assumptions, the reasonings, and the

conclusions of our eccentric “mammalian,” but we venture to say that if

the reader procures a copy of Dr. James’ work, and examines the

Darwinian theory in the light of the facts that the learned author has

culled from physiology, palæontology, and other branches of science

connected with the history of the animal world, he will be fully

satisfied that the _Descent of Man_ is nothing but a congeries of

blunders.

But we may be asked: How is it possible to admit that a theory so

manifestly absurd should have been received with enthusiasm and lauded

to the skies by men of recognized ability and scientific eminence? The

answer is obvious. Scientific eminence, as now understood, means only

acquaintance with the materials of science, and is no warrant against

false reasoning. “There can be fools in science as well as in any other

walk in life,” says a well-known English writer: “in fact, in

proportion to the small aggregate number of scientific men, I should be

disposed to think that there is a greater percentage in that class than

in any other.” But the same writer gives us another remarkable

explanation of the fact.

“I have read,” says he, “the writings of Mr. Darwin and Prof.

Huxley and others, and had the advantage of personal talk with

an eminent friend of theirs who shares their views, and I have

read without prejudice, but failed to find that they advanced

one solid argument in support of their views. I am quite

certain that, if this controversy could be turned into a law

suit, any judge on the bench would dismiss the case against the

evolutionists with costs, without calling for a reply. The

eminent friend I allude to, himself one of the first of living

mathematicians, and an intimate associate of Tyndall, Huxley,

Spencer, etc., and sharing their views, was candid enough to

admit that the theory was beset with difficulties, that quite

as many facts were against it as for it, that it hardly seemed

susceptible of proof. And when I asked why he held the theory

under such a condition of the evidence; why, on the assumption

of this law, Dr. Tyndall chaffed and derided prayer, and Prof.

Huxley gnashed his teeth at dogma and chuckled over the base

descent of man, his reply was: ‘We are bound to hold it,

because it is the only theory yet propounded which can account

for life, all we see of life, without the intervention of a

God. Nature must be held to be capable of producing everything

by herself and within herself, with no interference _ab extra_,

and this theory explains how she may have done it. Hence we

feel bound to hold it, and to teach it.’ Shade of Bacon! here

is science!”[112]

These words need no comment of ours. We knew already from other

evidences that a conspiracy had been formed with the aim of turning

science against religion, and we now see its work. We have here a

candid avowal that the enthusiasm of certain scientists for the new

theory has its root in malice, not in reason, and is kept up, though

with ever-increased difficulty, in the interest not of science but of a

brutal atheism. In fact, science has nothing to do with the origin of

man; and the very attempt at transforming a historical event into a

scientific speculation clearly reveals the wicked determination of

obscuring, corrupting, and discrediting truth. To carry out their

object the leaders of the conspiracy organized a body of infidel

scientists, doctors, professors, lecturers, and journalists; they took

hold of the scientific press, which was to illustrate the names and

magnify the merits of such men as Moleschott, Louis Büchner, Wolff, Von

Baer, or such men as Clausius, Tyndall, Spencer, and Comte, or as

Huxley, Draper, and Häckel—a task not at all difficult, as these men,

and others whom we might name, were all bound together in a

mutual-admiration society, in which the celebrity of each member was an

honor and an encouragement for all the other members, and the praises

lavished upon each one were repaid with interest to all the others.

Thus they have become great scientific oracles, each and all; and by

ignoring as completely as possible the writings, the discoveries, and

even the existence of those men of science who did not fall on their

knees before the new ideas, they succeeded in creating a belief that

they alone were in possession of scientific truth, and they alone were

enlightened enough to point out with infallible certainty the hidden

path of progress.

Their success, to judge from the number and tone of their scientific

publications, must have been very flattering to their vanity. It is

probable, however, that their noise is greater than their success. The

profligate and the sceptic may, of course, relish a theory which

assimilates them to the ape or the hog, makes the soul a modification

of matter, and suppresses God; but the honest, the pure, the thoughtful

are not easily duped by the low hypotheses of these modern thinkers.

Society in general rejects with disgust a doctrine which aims at

degrading humanity and destroying the bases of morality, religion, and

civilization. If there is no God, rights and duties, the main ties of

the social body, must be given up; justice will become an unmeaning

word, and civil and criminal courts a tyrannical institution. If man is

only a modified beast, if his soul is not immortal, if his end is like

that of the dog, then why should the stronger refrain from hunting and

devouring the weaker? Do we not hunt and kill and eat other animals?

Alas! the progress of humanity towards barbarism and cannibalism is so

intimately and inevitably connected with Darwinism that even the most

uncivilized of human beings would protest against its admission.

That society is still unwilling to submit to the dictation of this

advanced science, and that common sense is yet strong enough to silence

the present scientific blustering, is a fact of which we find an

implicit confession in the writings and addresses of anti-Christian

thinkers. _Nature_, a weekly illustrated journal of science, the

_Popular Science Monthly_, and other publications of the infidel party,

do not cease to inculcate the introduction of science (materialism,

evolution, pantheism, etc.) into the schools frequented by our

children. They have found that our schools are not godless enough to

secure the triumph of unbelief: they are godless in a negative sense

only, inasmuch as they ignore God; but now they must be made positively

godless by teaching theories which do away with creation, which deny

providence, which leave no hope of reward, and ridicule all fear of

punishment in an after-life; and they must be made positively immoral

by teaching that man is always right in following his animal

proclivities, as all other animals do, and that no human being can be

justly called to account for his doings, it being demonstrated by

science that what we call “free-will” is an organic function subject to

invariable laws, like everything else in the material world, with no

greater freedom to choose its course than a stone has under terrestrial

attraction. These doctrines are widely circulated in printed works, but

make few converts, owing to the fact that they come too late, and find

the minds of men already imbued with principles of an opposite nature;

and, therefore, it is now proposed to instil all this poison into the

minds of the young, who have no antidote at hand to counteract its

destructive action. We hope that this new attempt will be defeated; but

when we see that the attempt is considered necessary for a successful

diffusion of the false scientific theories of the day, we cannot be

much mistaken if we infer that the success of such theories up to the

present time has been less satisfactory to the infidel schemers than

their publications pretend.

As for the _Descent of Man_, however, no amount of sophistry, in our

opinion, will succeed in making it fashionable. The Darwinian theory is

utterly unscientific and unphilosophical. Common sense, geology, and

history condemn it; logic proclaims it a fraud; and human dignity

throws upon it a look of pity and dismisses it with ineffable contempt.

Mr. Darwin may yet live long enough to see his theory totally eclipsed

and forgotten, when he will ask himself whether it would not have been

better to devote his talents, his time, and his labor to striving to

elevate rather than striving to debase his kind.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

MICKEY CASEY’S CHRISTMAS DINNER-PARTY.

In a large, gloomy, bald-looking house in Merrion Street, Dublin, lived

a red-faced, red-haired little attorney rejoicing in the name of Mickey

Casey. There is no man better known in Green Street than Mickey, and no

member of the profession whose services are more eagerly retained by

the luckless ones whose “misfortunes” have brought them within range of

the “blessing of the recorder.” Mickey knows the exact moment to bully,

concede, or back out; and as for the law, it has been said of him that

there is not a dirty lane or alley in the whole of the Acts of

Parliament in which he has not mentally resided for the benefit of his

_clientèle_, as well as to his own especial emolument. When Mr. Casey

was put up for membership of the Law Club, there was much muttering and

considerable frowning in the smoking-room of that legally exclusive

establishment while his chances of success were being weighed in the

balance and found wanting; but the election being judiciously set down

for the long vacation, and Mickey having offered several of the leading

members unlimited shooting over his trifle of property in the

neighborhood of Derrymachulish—which, as all well-informed people are

aware, lies in the very heart of the County Tipperary—somehow or other

he pulled through by the “skin of his teeth,” and became socially, as

he was by act of Parliament, a _gentleman_ in the profession.

Mickey was a cheery little man, who loved a drop of the “crayture” not

wisely but too well, and whose whole soul was wrapped up in his only

child, a daughter, a mincing young lady, who was now close upon her

nineteenth birthday, and who bore a most unmistakable resemblance to

her sire in the color of her hair, her “chaney blue” eyes, and a

bulbous-shaped—vulgarly termed thumbottle—nose.

“I’ve spent oceans of money on me daughter’s education, sir,” Mickey

would exclaim. “Oceans—Atlantic and Pacific. She’s had masters and

mistresses, and tutors and governesses, and short lessons and long

lessons, some at a guinea apiece, sir—yes, begar, a guinea for thirty

minutes jingling on a piana. But she’s come out of it well; I’ve got

her through, and the sentence of the court is that she’s as fine a

performer as there is in Dublin in the way of an amatewer.”

Mrs. Casey was a very stout, very florid, very untidy lady, whose face

never bore traces of any recent lavatory process, and whose garments

appeared to have dropped upon her from the ceiling by chance, retaining

their original _pose_. The parting of her hair bore a strong

resemblance to forked lightning, and her nails reminded the visitor of

family bereavement, so deep the mourning in which they were invariably

enshrined. She, in common with her husband, was wrapped up in her

daughter, and lost to every consideration other than the advancement of

her child’s welfare and happiness.

Matilda Casey was spoiled in her cradle, spoiled at school, spoiled at

home. Her word was law, her every whim gratified, her every wish

anticipated. Her parents were her slaves. Dressed by Mrs. Manning, the

Worth of Dublin, at fancy prices, the newest Parisian toilettes were

flaunted upon Miss Casey’s neat little figure, whilst her mother went

in greasy gowns of antiquated date and old-world pattern. The brougham

was at her beck, and Mrs. Casey was flattered beyond measure when

offered a seat in it. She asked whom she pleased to Merrion Street, and

many people came and went whom her mother never even saw. In

furtherance of her musical talents she had boxes at the Theatre Royal

and Gaiety for any performance it pleased her Serene Highness to

select, while she forced her father to run the gauntlet of musical

societies in order to ensure the necessary vouchers of admission.

And yet Matilda Casey was by no means a bad sort of girl. Her heart was

in the right place, but her brains were blown out—to use a homely

metaphor—by the flattery and incense which were being perpetually

offered up at her shrine, until she was seized with a mad craving to

enter the portals of the best society.

Hitherto she had but stood at the gate, like the Peri, gazing through

the golden bars, and was more or less inclined to accept her position;

but there came a time when she resolved upon endeavoring to _force_ her

way through.

The task that lay before her was a terrible one—a task full of weeping,

and wailing, and mortification, and heart-burning, and gnashing of

teeth. Society in Dublin is as exclusive as in the Faubourg St.

Germain. The line is so distinctly drawn that no person can cross it by

mere accident. “No trespassers admitted” is written up in letters of

cold steel. The viceregal “set” won’t have the professional set, save

those whose offices entitle them to the _entrèe_, and then they are but

tolerated. The professional set won’t know the mercantile set, and here

society stops short. A shopkeeper, be his store as large as Stewart’s

and be he as wealthy as Rothschild, has no chance. He is a Pariah, and

must pitch his tent out in that wilderness peopled by nobodies. The

great struggle lies with the mercantile people to become blended with

the professionals. This is done by money. Of course there are

exceptional cases, but such a case is _rara avis in terris_.

Matilda Casey was in no set. The people with whom she was acquainted,

though not amongst the outcasts, held no position whatsoever. Clerks in

the Bank of Ireland residing at Rathmines; commercial travellers;

custom-house employés; attorneys of cadaverous practice, or of a

practice that meant no weight in the profession; needy barristers

perpetually kotowing to her father for business, and obsequiously civil

to her _as business_—these people with their wives formed her

surroundings, and she was sick of them, tired, disgusted, bored to

death. Why should she not be acquainted with the daughter of Mr.

Bigwig, Q.C., who resided next door? Surely she played better than Miss

Bigwig, and dressed better, and rode in her brougham, while Miss B.

trudged in thick-soled boots in the mud. She had left cards on the

Bigwigs upon their coming to Merrion Street, but her visit had never

been returned, while that shabby little girl, Miss Oliver, was for ever

in and out there; and what was Miss Oliver’s papa but an attorney?

Why was she not at some of the balls perpetually going on around

her?—the rattling of the cabs to and from which, during the night and

morning, kept her awake upon her tear-bedewed pillow.

Why did the Serges, of the firm of Serge & Twist, the linen-drapers in

Sackville Street, leave her out of their invitations to their afternoon

teas? Assuredly they were no great swells, and she had driven Miss

Serge on more than one occasion in her brougham, and had sent Mrs.

Serge a bouquet of hot-house flowers when that lady was laid up with

the measles.

How came it that their social circle never increased save in the wrong

direction? Had she not persuaded her papa to give a brief to young Mr.

Bronsbill, who was possessed of as much brains as a nutmeg-grater, and

whose advocacy cost Mr. Casey’s client his cause, in order to become

acquainted with his family?—Mr. B. having informed her—the treacherous

villain!—that his mother and sisters intended to call upon her.

Had she not thrown open the house to Mr. and Mrs. Minnion, whom she had

met at the Victoria Hotel, Killarney, the preceding summer, in the hope

of those delightful introductions which the artful Mrs. M. had held out

like a glittering jewel before her entranced and eager gaze? Had not

Mr. and Mrs. Minnion eaten, drunk, and slept in Merrion Street? And

whom did they introduce? A little drunken captain of militia, who

insisted upon coming there at unlawful hours of the night, and in

calling for brandy and soda-water, as if the establishment was a

public-house, and not even a respectable hotel!

But Fortune is not for ever cruel, and the wheel will turn up a prize

at possibly the least expected moment.

Mickey Casey knew his daughter’s heart-burning, and strove might and

main to ease it by even one throb. He gave dinner-parties to the best

class of men with whom he was acquainted, feeding them like

“fighting-cocks” upon _petit dîners_ served by Mitchell, of Grafton

Street, and giving them wines of the rarest vintages from the cellars

of Turbot & Redmond.

“Ye’ll come to see us again, won’t ye?” he would say to his guest. “And

I say, just bring your wife the next time. Me daughter will send the

brougham—cost a hundred and fifty at Hutton’s—say Monday next.”

The guest would declare how delighted his wife would be to make the

acquaintance of so charming a young lady as Miss Casey; but when the

Monday came round, and with it a dinner fit for the viceroy, the guest

would arrive wifeless, the lady being laid up with a cold, or “that

dreadful baby, you know,” or “visitors from the country,” and the

banquet would be served in a lugubrious silence, save when the daughter

of the house ventured upon some cutting sarcasm anent snobbery and

stuck-up people.

Matilda Casey could make such a guest wish himself over a mutton-chop

in his own establishment, instead of the salmi of partridge or plover’s

eggs served in silver dishes at Number 190 Merrion Street: and she did

it, too.

“I’ve news for ye, Matilda,” exclaimed Casey one evening as he took his

seat at the dinner-table. “I’ve news for ye, pet. I defended old

Colonel Bowdler in a case in which a servant sued him for wages, and

got him off at half-price. He’s on half-pay, lives with his wife in

Stephen’s Green, and is a tip-topper, mixing with the lord-lieutenant’s

household as if they were his own.”

“Well, and what is that to me?” exclaimed Miss Casey with considerable

asperity.

“This, me darling: he was so pleased at the way I got him out on

half-pay—ha! ha! ha!—that he and his wife—wife, mind ye—are coming to

call on you to-morrow.”

Mrs. Casey was never taken into account, Matilda being the central

figure.

“Pshaw! I wonder you can be such a fool, papa. It’s the old story,”

retorted his daughter. “This colonel will come here, eat our dinners,

drink our wine, and perhaps drop his wife’s card without her knowledge,

as Mr. Neligan did—as we found out to our mortification when we went to

return a visit that was never paid, and were politely told by Mrs.

Neligan that her husband had never even mentioned our names to her.”

“Never fear, Matilda. We’re in the right box this time. They’ll be here

to-morrow, you may depend upon it.”

Casey had his own good reasons for believing that the colonel would

bide tryste—of which more anon. The morrow came, and with it Colonel

and Mrs. Bowdler.

The colonel was a chatty, elderly gentleman of imposing aspect and dyed

hair; his wife a tall, gaunt female, with a vulture-like appearance,

and a sort of sergeant-major-in-petticoats look—the outcome of many a

hard-fought campaign. The colonel had sketched Casey and Casey’s social

desires, and Mrs. Bowdler, like the shrewd veteran that she was, took

in the situation at a glance.

The flutter of excitement at 190 Merrion Street was intense when the

thundering knock came to the door, accompanied by a crashing pull at

the bell.

“Be awfully civil to these people, Jemima,” whispered the colonel as he

entered, “and we can forage here three times a week. Promise them the

moon.”

Mrs. Casey fled to her bedroom for the purpose of arranging her person

in a gorgeous mauve moire-antique all over grease-spots, and Matilda

rushed frantically to the drawing-room, in order to be _en pose_ to

receive the welcome visitors.

The coachman, who acted also in the capacity of butler, was feverishly

hurried from his den at the back of the house, bearing with him a

gentle aroma of the stable, and, even while opening the hall-door, was

engaged in thrusting his arms into the sleeves of a coat—a perfect suit

of mail in buttons.

“Mrs. Casey at home?” asked Mrs. Bowdler.

“I dunno whether the misthris is convaynient, ma’am, but Miss Casey is

above in the dhrawin’-room. Won’t yez come in anyhow?” And the man

motioned them to ascend with considerable cordiality and welcome.

“Take these cards, please.”

“Well, ma’am, me hands is a thrifle dirty; but av it obliges ye—” and

hastily brushing the fingers of his right hand upon the legs of his

trowsers, he took the extended pasteboard in as gingerly a manner as if

he expected it to explode there and then.

The visitors stood in the hall, and so did Luke Fogarty.

“What am I for to do wud this ma’am?” he asked, eyeing it with a glance

full of concern.

“Hand it to Miss Casey,” replied Mrs. Bowdler.

“Oh! that’s it, is it?” And he darted up-stairs with an alarming

alacrity.

“This is a charming _ménage_,” said Mrs. Bowdler.

“A fine open country, my dear; no concealed enemy.”

“Yez are for to folly me,” shouted Fogarty from the top of the stairs.

Matilda was enchanted to see them, and ordered sherry and cake. Mrs.

Bowdler professed herself charmed to make Miss Casey’s acquaintance,

and declared she quite resembled the lord-lieutenant’s youngest

daughter “And in manner, too, Miss Casey, you quite remind me of her.

We are perpetually at the Viceregal Lodge, and _very_ intimate with the

Abercorns. We are asked to everything, and—he! he! he!—it costs us a

small fortune for cabs.”

“You can have my brougham, Mrs. Bowdler.”

“Oh! dear, no, my dear young lady, that would never do; but if you lend

it to me occasionally to take out _dear_ Lady Maude Laseilles, who is

_such_ an invalid. Do you know her?”

Matilda replied in the negative.

As a matter of fact, no such person existed, but it suited Mrs. Bowdler

to create her, Mrs. B. being a lady who would make a shilling do duty

for half a crown. She was a veteran of infinite resources, who had

borne the burden and heat of the day, and who was now bent upon taking

her change out of the world. She had heard of the craving to enter the

portals of society that was devouring Matilda Casey—the attorney had

openly confided the fact to the colonel—and was resolved upon making

the most of the situation. The Bowdlers were hangers-on at the Castle,

mere hacks, who attended the drawing-rooms, the solitary state ball to

which they were annually invited, and St. Patrick’s ball with

undeviating punctuality. They resided in a pinched-looking house in

Stephen’s Green, where Mrs. Bowdler “operated” the colonel’s half-pay

with the financial ability of a Dudelac, stretching every sixpence and

racking the silver coin to its final gasp. They went everywhere,

accepting every invitation, “foraging on the enemy” as the colonel

expressed it, giving no return. Trading upon his military rank, they

managed to go about a good deal amongst very third-rate people, who

were glad to have a colonel to dinner, and a lady who could talk so

familiarly of half the peerage as his wife. A more singularly worthless

or selfish pair was not to be found, or a pair who better knew how “to

work the oracle,” than Colonel Brownlow Bowdler, late of Her Majesty’s

Fifty-ninth Regiment of Infantry, and Jemima, his consort.

Mrs. Casey came smilingly into the drawing-room and almost embraced

Mrs. Bowdler.

“What will ye take, now? Sure ye must take something. Matilda, make

Mrs. Colonel Bowdler take something. Colonel, you’ll take a bottle of

champagne—do, now, that’s right; and I’ll get a little jelly for Mrs.

Colonel Bowdler, and then Matilda will play for ye. She plays lovely.”

“O mamma!” exclaimed Matilda.

“Now, ye know ye do, darling.” And Mrs. Casey, who is the soul of

hospitality, joyously descended to the lower regions, in order to send

up the delicacies she so temptingly set forth.

The Catholic World, Vol. 26, October, 1877, to March, 1878 · 第 69 / 116 段