in words, as Shelley and Tennyson and Swinburne learned to do later.

The attempt to naturalize the classical metres, for example, began at a

very early period of our literary history, and many learned treatises

were written to prove them your only proper vehicle for English poetry.

Perhaps it was the ill-success of these efforts that made our poets so

long shy of wandering in their metres away from the beaten track and

the simplest forms. Up to the time of Campbell we may say that the

iambus and the trochee reigned supreme in English verse; the anapest

and the dactyl, of which such effective use has been made by the later

poets, were either unknown or contemned. Suckling’s _Session of the

Poets_, the metrical intention of which appears to be anapestic, shows

what desperate work even the best lyrists could make when they strayed

after strange metrical gods.[80]

It may be said, then, that until within a comparatively recent period

Horace could not be properly translated into English verse at all.

English verse was not yet ready to receive so noble a guest. Compare

Martin’s or Conington’s versions with one of the earlier translations,

and the truth of this, we think, will be apparent at once. Creech,

indeed, seems to have had a dim notion of the truth, and his version

shows a perceptible striving for metrical effect, at least in the

arrangement of his stanza; but Creech had too little of the poetical

faculty to make the effort with taste or success. Francis for the most

part is content with the orthodox measures, and Father Prout was

perhaps first to bring to the work this essential accomplishment of the

Horatian translator. Prout’s metrical inventions are bold, and often

elegant; and his versions, though free, are always spirited, and often

singularly felicitous. Among the most striking of his metres is the one

he employs for the _Solvitur acris hiems_ (_Carm._ i. iv.):

“Now Venus loves to group

Her merry troop

Of maidens,

Who, while the moon peeps out,

Dance with the Graces round about

Their queen in cadence;

While far ’mid fire and noise

Vulcan his forge employs,

Where Cyclops grim aloft their ponderous sledges poise.”

A paraphrase that, not a translation; but not even Horace could find it

in his heart to gainsay so graceful a paraphrase. Another effective

metrical arrangement which shows off well Prout’s astonishing

copiousness of rhyme is that of the _Quum tu Lydia_ (i. 13):

“But where meet (thrice fortunate!)

Kindred hearts and suitable,

Strife comes ne’er importunate,

Love remains immutable;

On to the close they glide ‘mid scenes Elysian,

Through life’s delightful vision.”

Mr. Martin is here somewhat closer and not less skilful in handling his

metre:

“Oh! trebly blest, and blest for ever,

Are they whom true affection binds,

In whom no doubts or janglings sever

The union of their constant minds;

But life in blended current flows

Serene and sunny to the close.”

Compare with these Francis, who is scarcely more literal than Prout,

and not so literal as Martin:

“Thrice happy they whom love unites

In equal rapture and sincere delights,

Unbroken by complaints or strife

Even to the latest hours of life.”

Is not the advantage in point of poetry altogether on the side of the

moderns, and is it not largely due to their superior mastery of rhythm?

The passage, it may be said, has been paraphrased by Moore in the

lines,

“There’s a bliss beyond all that the minstrel has told,

When two that are linked in one heavenly tie,

With heart never changing and brow never cold,

Love on through all ills, and love on till they die.”

Both Mr. Martin and Prof. Conington have given close and successful

attention to this part of their task. But it was left for Lord Lytton

to attempt something like a systematic imitation of the Horatian

metres. His plan, as set forth in his preface, “was in the first

instance to attempt a close imitation of the ancient measure—the

scansion being, of course (as in English or German hexameters and

pentameters), by accent, not quantity—and then to make such

modifications of flow and cadence as seemed to me best to harmonize the

rhythm to the English ear, while preserving as much as possible that

which has been called the type of the original.” Something of this

kind, no doubt, Milton had in view in the measure he took for his _Ad

Pyrrham_, and which the Wartons and Professor Conington adapted to the

same purpose after him, the latter, however, adding the embellishment

or, as Milton himself had called it, the “barbarous jingle” of rhyme.

Milton’s measure (well known as that of Collins’ “Ode to Evening”),

which consists of two unrhymed iambic pentameters, followed by two

unrhymed iambic trimeters—or, to be “more English and less nice,” of

two ordinary blank-verses followed by two three-foot verses—resembles

Horace’s metre, which the grammarians would tell us is the third

Asclepiadian strophe, “rather,” says Prof. Conington, “in the length of

the respective lines than in any similarity of the cadences.” Lord

Lytton attempted something more, and with only partial success, though

the task, it must be owned, was not an easy one. Horace, in the _Odes_

and _Epodes_, uses eighteen different varieties of metre, ranging from

the grave sadness of what is called the first Archilochian strophe, the

lovely measure in which one of the loveliest of all the _Odes_ is

written (iv. 7)—

“Diffugere nives; redeunt jam gramina campis

Arboribusque comæ,”[81]

to the quick sharpness of the first iambic strophe in which the poet

mauls the unsavory Mævius. And not only this, but each of these metres

is used by Horace to express widely differing moods of feeling. Thus,

the same measure which in the beautiful lament for Quinctilius breathes

the tenderest spirit of grief and resignation, serves equally well to

guy Tibullus on his luckless loves, to sound “stern alarums” to the

absent Cæsar, or to bid Virgil or Varius to “delightful meetings.” The

Sapphic rises to the lofty height of the _Carmen Seculare_ or stoops to

chide a serving-boy for his super-serviceable zeal; is equally at home

with an invocation to the gods or an invitation to dinner; while the

Alcaic—what subject is there that in Horace’s hands the Alcaic cannot

be made to sing?

This flexibility of the Latin metres Lord Lytton has recognized, and

sought to meet by a corresponding variation of his own, “according as

the prevalent spirit of the ode demanded lively and sportive or serious

and dignified expression.” Thus, for the Alcaic stanza he employs “two

different forms of rhythm”; one as in i. 9:

“See how white in the deep fallen snow stands Soracte;

Laboring forests no longer can bear up their burden;

And the rush of the rivers is locked,

Halting mute in the gripe of the frost”;

the other as in i. 34:

“Worshipper rare and niggard of the gods,

While led astray, in the Fool’s wisdom versed,

Now back I shift the sail,

Forced in the courses left behind to steer,”

or, with a slight modification, as in i. 35:

“Goddess who o’er thine own loved Antium reignest,

Present to lift Man, weighted with his sorrows

Down to life’s last degree,

Or change his haughtiest triumphs into graves.”

For the Sapphic, likewise, he has two varieties; for the statelier odes

three lines of blank-verse and what may be called an English Adonic;

for “the lighter odes a more sportive and tripping measure.” Thus, for

iv. 2 he gives us:

“Julus, he who would with Pindar vie

Soars, with Dædalian art, on waxen wings,

And, falling, gives his name unto the bright

Deeps of an ocean”;

for iii. 14 a nearer approach to the _Knife Grinder_ jingle:

“Nothing cools fiery spirits like a gray hair;

In every quarrel ’tis your sure peacemaker:

In my hot youth, when Plancus was the consul,

I was less patient.”

Lord Lytton’s experiment is full of interest to Horatians—as, indeed,

what translation is not?—even the worst, even the Rev. Mr. Sewell’s,

may be of use in teaching the translator how not to do it—and his

failures, which are many, are scarcely less instructive than his

successes, which seem to us fewer than for so bold an essay could be

wished; but both alike are suggestive of many possibilities. It is in

the lighter odes that he is least satisfactory, and we doubt if these

can be done full justice to without the aid of rhyme. Horace’s grace of

form in these is so delicate and exquisite that it taxes all the

resources and embellishments of our English verse to give any adequate

idea of it. Take, as an illustration of Lord Lytton’s method, and as

giving, perhaps, the measure of his success, his version of that

delicious little landscape, _Ad Fontem Blandusiæ_ (iii. 13):

“Fount of Blandusia, more lucid than crystal,

Worthy of honeyed wine, not without flowers,

I will give thee to-morrow a kid

Whose front, with the budded horn swelling.

“Predicts to his future life Venus and battles;

Vainly! The lymph of thy cold running waters

He shall tinge with the red of his blood,

Fated child of the frolicsome people!

“The scorch of the Dogstar’s fell season forbears thee;

Ever friendly to grant the sweet boon of thy coolness

To the wild flocks that wander around,

And the oxen that reek from the harrow.

“I will give thee high rank and renown among fountains,

When I sing of the ilex o’erspreading the hollows,

Of rocks whence in musical fall

Leap thy garrulous silvery waters.”

This is better because more literal than Joseph Warton’s unrhymed

version in the Miltonian stanza, with which it may be compared:

“Ye waves that gushing fall with purest streams,

Blandusian fount! to whom the products sweet

Of richest wines belong,

And fairest flowers of spring,

To thee a chosen victim will I slay—

A kid who, glowing in lascivious youth,

Just blooms with budding horn,

And, with vain thought elate,

Yet destines future war; but, ah! too soon

His reeking blood with crimson shall enrich

Thy pure, translucent flood

And tinge thy crystal clear.

Thy sweet recess the sun in midday hour

Can ne’er invade; thy streams the labor’d ox

Refresh with cooling draughts

And glad the wand’ring herds.

Thy name shall shine, with endless honors graced,

While in my shell I sing the nodding oak

That o’er thy cavern deep

Waves his embowering head.”

It would almost seem as if the author of this version had taken pains

to rub out every Horatian characteristic. The pretty touch of the

_loquaces lymphæ_ is thus omitted, unless the first line be meant to do

duty for it, while by such padding as “chosen victim” and “endless

honors” Horace’s sixteen lines are diluted into twenty—a danger to

which the unrhymed translator, constantly seeking by inversions and

paraphrases to cover the baldness of his medium, is peculiarly liable.

Whatever may be said to the contrary, rhyme compels conciseness, and

helps to point quite as often as it entices to expansion. Prof.

Conington’s version, in the same metre as Warton’s, but rhymed in

alternate lines, will be found greatly superior to it, and is perhaps,

on the whole, the best we have seen—better even than Mr. Martin’s, who

cannot get his Latin into less than twenty-four octosyllabic lines.

Instead of giving either, let us see if all that is essential in Horace

cannot be given in the same number of lines of what is known as the

Tennysonian stanza, which is somewhat less capacious than the Alcaics

of the original, though, by a certain pensive grace, peculiarly fitted

to render the sentiment of this delightful ode:

“Blandusian fount, as crystal clear,

Of garlands worthy and of wine,

A kid to-morrow shall be thine,

Whose swelling brows, just budding, bear

“The horns that presage love and strife;

How vainly! For his crimson blood

Shall stain the silver of thy flood

With all the herd’s most wanton life.

“The burning Dogstar’s noontide beam

Knows not thy secret nook; the ox

Parched from the plough, the fielding flocks,

Lap grateful coolness from thy stream.

“Thee, too, ‘mid storied founts my lay

Shall shrine: thy bending holm I’ll sing,

Shading the grottoed rocks whence spring

Thy laughing waters far away.”

Though terseness and fidelity are two of the chief merits claimed by

the advocates of the unrhymed measures, it is just here that they

oftenest fail; and Lord Lytton is no exception. Space permits us to

give but few instances. “Trodden by all, and only trodden once,” is

Lord Lytton’s version of _calcanda semel_, i. 28—seven English words

for two Latin, and the sense then but vaguely given at best.

_Feriuntque summos Fulgura montes_ is in like manner diluted into

“The spots on earth most stricken by the lightning

Are its high places.”

Awkwardness of style, too, is a much more frequent characteristic of

Lord Lytton’s renderings than we should look for either from his own

command of style or the freedom which disuse of rhyme is claimed to

ensure. For instance, in ii. 2:

“Him shall uplift, and on no waxen pinions,

Fame, the survivor,”

might surely have been bettered; and in the same ode a line in the

stanza already quoted above, _Latius regnes avidum domando Spiritum_,

is translated, “Wider thy realm a greedy soul subjected,” which would

be scarcely intelligible without the Latin. “Bosom _more seen through_

than glass” is by no means the neatest possible equivalent for _per

lucidior vitro_, and such expressions as “closed gates of Janus vacant

of a war,” “lest thou owe a mock,” “but me more have stricken with

rapture,” are scarcely English.

Nevertheless, with all its faults and shortcomings, Lord Lytton’s essay

is in some respects the most interesting translation of Horace that has

yet appeared, and may pioneer the way to more fortunate results in the

same direction. It has, at least, the _raison d’être_ which Mr. Matthew

Arnold denies to such translations as Wright’s and Sotheby’s Homer; it

has a distinct and novel method of its own, and does not simply repeat

the method and renew the faults and virtues of any predecessor. The

American edition, it is worthy of remark, is printed in the

old-fashioned way, with the Latin text to face the English—an

innovation, or, more properly, a _re_novation, which will no doubt be

welcome to lovers of the Venusian, whose love has outlived their

memory, and who, though loyal to the spirit of our poet, are no longer

so familiar with his letter as in the days, the far-off sunny days,

when Horace was the heaviest task that life had yet laid upon us.

We have dwelt upon this subject at somewhat greater length than we

intended; for to us it is full of a fascination we should be glad to

hope we had made our readers in some sort share. But it has also a

practical side which the most fanatical opponent of the classics, the

most zealous upholder of utilitarian education, must recognize and

admit. As a means of training in English composition, as an aid to

discover the resources of our own tongue, there is no better practice

than translating Horace into English verse, with due attention to his

epithets. That, perhaps, may serve in some degree to reconcile the

practical mind to his retention in the modern curriculum, even though

Homer be kicked out of doors and Virgil sent flying through the window;

for a practical man is none the worse equipped for business in being

able to say what he means in “good set phrase.” To be sure it does not

ask the pen of an Addison to write an order for a “hnd. trces. lard,”

but we dare say if Mr. Richard Grant White were called upon to make out

a bill of lading, he would do it none the worse for knowing all about

the English language that is worth knowing, if not more than is worth

telling. There are mysteries in our English speech that the _Complete

Letter-Writer_, or even the “editorials” of the daily newspaper, do not

quite explore, and some of these our old friend Horace may help us to

find out. _Fas est ab hoste doceri._

------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE LITTLE CHAPEL AT MONAMULLIN.

CONCLUSION.

Father Maurice sped upon his journey to Moynalty Castle. The dinner

hour was eight o’clock, but he had delayed so long with his guest that

it took the little pony her “level best” to do the seven miles within

the necessary time.

“Av we wor wanst beyant the Mouladharb berrin’ groun’ I wudn’t care a

thraneen; but sorra a step the little pony’ll pass it afther dark,”

observed Murty Mulligan, bestowing a liberal supply of whip upon the

astonished nag, whose habit it was to proceed upon her travels at her

own sweet will, innocent of lash, spur, or admonition.

“Tut, tut! Nonsense, Murty! Push on.”

“It’s thruth I’m tellin’ yer riverince. We’re at it. See that,

now—curse of Crummell on her! she won’t put wan foot afore the other,”

adding, in a whisper full of consternation: “Mebbe she sees ould Casey,

that was berried a Munda. He was a terrible naygur—”

“Jump down and take her head,” said the priest.

“Be the powers! I’ll have for to carry her, av we want to raich the

castle to-night.”

Father Maurice dismounted, as did Murty, and, by coaxing and

blandishment of every description, endeavored to induce the pony to

proceed; but the animal, with its ears cocked, and trembling in every

limb, refused to budge an inch.

“Och, wirra, wirra! we’re bet intirely. It’s Missis Delaney he sees,

that died av the horrors this day month,” growled Mulligan.

“Silence, you jackass!” cried Father Maurice, “and help me to blindfold

the pony.”

This _ruse_ eventually succeeded, and they spun merrily along the road,

the terrified animal clattering onwards at racing speed.

“This pace is dangerous, Murty,” said the priest.

“Sorra a lie in it, yer riverince.”

“Pull in.”

“I can’t hould her. She’s me hands cut aff, bad cess to her!”

“Is the road straight?”

“Barrin’ a few turns, it’s straight enough, sir.”

The words had hardly escaped his lips when the wheel attached to the

side of the car upon which the priest was sitting came into contact

with a pile of stones, the car was tilted upwards and over, Father

Maurice shot into a thorn hedge, and Murty Mulligan landed up to his

neck in a ditch full of foul and muddy water, while the pony, suddenly

freed from its load, and after biting the dust, quietly turned round to

gaze at the havoc it had made.

“Are ye kilt, yer riverince? For I’m murdhered intirely, an’ me

illigant Sunda’ shuit ruined complately. Och, wirra, wirra! how can I

face the castle wud me duds consaled in mud? How can I uphould

Monamullin, an’ me worse nor a scarecrow? Glory be to God! we’re safe

anyhow, an’ no bones bruck. O ye varmint!” shaking his fist at the

unconscious cause of this disaster, “its meself that’ll sarve ye out

for this. Won’t I wallop ye, ye murdherin’ thief, whin I catch a hould

of ye!”

“Hold your nonsense, Murty. How near are we to the castle?”

“Sorra a know I know, yer riverince; the knowledgeableness is shuk out

o’ me intirely.”

“The shafts are broken.”

“Av course th’ are.”

“Here, help me to shove the car over to the ditch and pile the cushions

under this hedge. God be praised! neither of us is even scratched.”

A carriage with blazing lamps came along.

“Hi! hi! hi!” roared Murty, “we’re wracked here. Lind us a hand! We’re

desthroyed be a villain av a pony that seen a ghost, an’ we goin’ to

dine at Moynalty Castle.”

The carriage belonged to Mr. Bodkin, the senior member for the county,

who was only too delighted to act the Good Samaritan; and as he, with

his wife and daughter, was bound for the castle, which still lay two

miles distant, the meeting proved in every respect a fortunate one.

The worthy priest was received by his host and hostess with the most

flattering courtesy, and by Miss Julia Jyvecote as though he formed

part and parcel of her personal property. He took Mrs. Jyvecote into

dinner, and said grace both before and after.

Father Maurice was positively startled with the splendor and exquisite

taste of the surroundings. The room in which they dined—not _the_

dinner-room, but a delightful little snuggery, where the anecdote was

the property of the table, and the _mot_ did not require to be handed

from plate to plate like an _entrée_—was richly decorated in the

Pompeiian style, with walls of a pale gray, while the hangings were of

a soft amber relieved by red brown. The dinner was simply perfect, the

_entourages_ in the shape of cut glass, flowers, and fruit—veritable

poems—while the quiet simplicity and easy elegance lent an

indescribable charm which fell upon the simple priest like a potent

spell.

Every effort that good breeding combined with generous hospitality

could make was called into requisition in order to render the timid,

blushing clergyman perfectly at home; and so happily did this action on

the part of his entertainers succeed that before the lapse of a few

moments he felt as though he had lived amongst them for years.

Mrs. Jyvecote promised to send him flowers for the altar, and Julia to

work an altar-cloth for him.

“I must go over and pay you a visit, father,” she said. “I am one of

your parishioners, although I go to Mass at Thonelagheera.”

“I wish you would, my dear child; but I have no inducements to offer

you, although at present perhaps I have.” And he narrated the arrival

of the guest to whom Mrs. Clancy was playing the _rôle_ of _châtelaine_

during his absence.

“Why, this is quite a romance, Father Maurice. I must see your artist

_coûte que coûte_, and shall drive over next week.”

But fate determined that she should drive over the next day.

When, upon the following morning, Father Maurice came to examine the

condition of his pony, he found both the knees barked and the luckless

animal unfit to travel.

“We couldn’t walk her home, Murty, could we?” he asked of his

_factotum_.

“Och, the poor crayture couldn’t stir a step wudout tears comin’ to her

eyes. Me heart is bleedin’ for her this minnit,” replied the wily

Mulligan, sagaciously perceiving that so long as the pony remained at

the castle he should abide with her; and as his reception in the

servants’ hall had been of the same flattering description as that of

his master up-stairs, he resolved to continue in such delightful

quarters as long as he possibly could.

“Poor Rosy!” he cried, affectionately scratching the pony’s forehead,

“shure it’s yerself that wud dance on yer head for his riverince, av ye

wor able; but yer bet up, poor little wumman, an’ it’s rest ye want for

a cupple o’ days, anyhow.”

When Father Maurice mentioned the predicament he found himself in, Mrs.

Jyvecote instantly proposed sending him home in the carriage, since he

could not be induced to prolong his stay; but Julia insisted upon

driving him herself to Monamullin in her basket phaeton; and so, laden

with flowers, hot-house pines, grapes, a hamper of grouse and a brace

of hares, and under solemn promise to make another visit at no distant

date, Father Maurice turned homewards under the “whip” of his

newly-found and exceedingly charming parishioner.

As they jogged along by the sad sea-wave she told him the entrancing

history of her conversion—of her meeting with Cardinal Manning at a

garden party at Holland House, and of a casual conversation which led

to so much.

Father Maurice felt as if he had a white-robed angel by his side, and

revelled in the absorbing narrative until the phaeton stopped at the

cottage gate. The pony was duly stabled, and, while the priest set

forth to attend to a sick-call, Miss Jyvecote proceeded to the chapel,

where she encountered his artist guest.

Brown started, despite himself, when Father Maurice mentioned her name.

“A parishioner of mine, Mr. Brown.”

“I—I saw you in the church just now,” muttered the artist. “It’s an

awfully seedy—I mean it’s a very quiet little place.”

“I could pray more fervently in a church like that than in the

Madeleine,” she replied in a soft, silvery voice.

“The Madeleine is too rowy, too many chairs creaking, too many swells,

and all that sort of thing, you know.”

Insensibly the drawl of society had come upon him, and the slanginess

of expression which passes current in Mayfair and Belgravia.

“Miss Jyvecote is going to brighten me up, Mr. Brown; she is going to

work me an altar-cloth,” exclaimed the delighted priest.

“And I am going to paint you an altar-picture, a copy of Raphael’s

Virgin and Child—that is, if you will kindly accept it,” he added,

blushing to the roots of his hair.

“Oh! how charming, how generous,” cried Miss Jyvecote.

“My dear Mr. Brown,” said Father Maurice, crossing the room and taking

his guest by the hand, “I am deeply, _deeply_ sensible of the kindly,

the noble spirit which actuates you to make this offer; but you are a

young man, with a grand future before you, with God’s help, and by and

by, when you have leisure, perhaps you will get a stiff letter from me

calling on you to fulfil your promise. You’ll find me a very tough

customer to deal with, I assure you.”

“He thinks I cannot afford it,” said Brown to himself; “and how

delicately he has refused me!”

The Catholic World, Vol. 26, October, 1877, to March, 1878 · 第 43 / 116 段