3. A retiring allowance upon going out of office.

These three elements are as important factors of the problem as any of

the others. To eliminate them from the English system would effect a

most radical change in its theory and practice.

The avowed purpose of that system is to induce the educated young men of

the country to devote their lives to public employment by an assurance

that having once entered upon it they need never leave it, and that

after voluntary retirement they shall be the recipients of an annual

pension. That this system as an entirety has proved very successful in

Great Britain seems to be generally conceded even by those who once

opposed its adoption.

To a statute which should incorporate all its essential features I

should feel bound to give my approval; but whether it would be for the

best interests of the public to fix upon an expedient for immediate and

extensive application which embraces certain features of the English

system, but excludes or ignores others of equal importance, may be

seriously doubted, even by those who are impressed, as I am myself, with

the grave importance of correcting the evils which inhere in the present

methods of appointment.

If, for example, the English rule which shuts out persons above the age

of 25 years from a large number of public employments is not to be made

an essential part of our own system, it is questionable whether the

attainment of the highest number of marks at a competitive examination

should be the criterion by which all applications for appointment should

be put to test. And under similar conditions it may also be questioned

whether admission to the service should be strictly limited to its

lowest ranks.

There are very many characteristics which go to make a model civil

servant. Prominent among them are probity, industry, good sense, good

habits, good temper, patience, order, courtesy, tact, self-reliance,

manly deference to superior officers, and manly consideration for

inferiors. The absence of these traits is not supplied by wide knowledge

of books, or by promptitude in answering questions, or by any other

quality likely to be brought to light by competitive examination.

To make success in such a contest, therefore, an indispensable condition

of public employment would very likely result in the practical exclusion

of the older applicants, even though they might possess qualifications

far superior to their younger and more brilliant competitors.

These suggestions must not be regarded as evincing any spirit of

opposition to the competitive plan, which has been to some extent

successfully employed already, and which may hereafter vindicate the

claim of its most earnest supporters; but it ought to be seriously

considered whether the application of the same educational standard to

persons of mature years and to young men fresh from school and college

would not be likely to exalt mere intellectual proficiency above other

qualities of equal or greater importance.

Another feature of the proposed system is the selection by promotion of

all officers of the Government above the lowest grade, except such as

would fairly be regarded as exponents of the policy of the Executive

and the principles of the dominant party.

To afford encouragement to faithful public servants by exciting in their

minds the hope of promotion if they are found to merit it is much to be

desired.

But would it be wise to adopt a rule so rigid as to permit no other mode

of supplying the intermediate walks of the service?

There are many persons who fill subordinate positions with great credit,

but lack those qualities which are requisite for higher posts of duty;

and, besides, the modes of thought and action of one whose service in

a governmental bureau has been long continued are often so cramped by

routine procedure as almost to disqualify him from instituting changes

required by the public interests. An infusion of new blood from time to

time into the middle ranks of the service might be very beneficial in

its results.

The subject under discussion is one of grave importance. The evils which

are complained of can not be eradicated at once; the work must be

gradual.

The present English system is a growth of years, and was not created by

a single stroke of executive or legislative action.

Its beginnings are found in an order in council promulgated in 1855, and

it was after patient and cautious scrutiny of its workings that fifteen

years later it took its present shape.

Five years after the issuance of the order in council, and at a time

when resort had been had to competitive examinations as an experiment

much more extensively than has yet been the case in this country, a

select committee of the House of Commons made a report to that House

which, declaring its approval of the competitive plan, deprecated,

nevertheless, any precipitancy in its general adoption as likely to

endanger its ultimate success.

During this tentative period the results of the two methods of pass

examination and competitive examination were closely watched and

compared. It may be that before we confine ourselves upon this important

question within the stringent bounds of statutory enactment we may

profitably await the result of further inquiry and experiment.

The submission of a portion of the nominations to a central board of

examiners selected solely for testing the qualifications of applicants

may perhaps, without resort to the competitive test, put an end to the

mischiefs which attend the present system of appointment, and it may be

feasible to vest in such a board a wide discretion to ascertain the

characteristics and attainments of candidates in those particulars which

I have already referred to as being no less important than mere

intellectual attainment.

If Congress should deem it advisable at the present session to establish

competitive tests for admission to the service, no doubts such as have

been suggested shall deter me from giving the measure my earnest

support.

And I urgently recommend, should there be a failure to pass any other

act upon this subject, that an appropriation of $25,000 per year may be

made for the enforcement of section 1753 of the Revised Statutes.

With the aid thus afforded me I shall strive to execute the provisions

of that law according to its letter and spirit.

I am unwilling, in justice to the present civil servants of the

Government, to dismiss this subject without declaring my dissent from

the severe and almost indiscriminate censure with which they have been

recently assailed. That they are as a class indolent, inefficient, and

corrupt is a statement which has been often made and widely credited;

but when the extent, variety, delicacy, and importance of their duties

are considered the great majority of the employees of the Government

are, in my judgment, deserving of high commendation.

The continuing decline of the merchant marine of the United States is

greatly to be deplored. In view of the fact that we furnish so large

a proportion of the freights of the commercial world and that our

shipments are steadily and rapidly increasing, it is cause of surprise

that not only is our navigation interest diminishing, but it is less

than when our exports and imports were not half so large as now,

either in bulk or value. There must be some peculiar hindrance to the

development of this interest, or the enterprise and energy of American

mechanics and capitalists would have kept this country at least abreast

of our rivals in the friendly contest for ocean supremacy.

The substitution of iron for wood and of steam for sail have wrought

great revolutions in the carrying trade of the world; but these changes

could not have been adverse to America if we had given to our navigation

interests a portion of the aid and protection which have been so wisely

bestowed upon our manufactures. I commend the whole subject to the

wisdom of Congress, with the suggestion that no question of greater

magnitude or farther reaching importance can engage their attention.

In 1875 the Supreme Court of the United States declared unconstitutional

the statutes of certain States which imposed upon shipowners or

consignees a tax of $1.50 for each passenger arriving from a foreign

country, or in lieu thereof required a bond to indemnify the State and

local authorities against expense for the future relief or support of

such passenger. Since this decision the expense attending the care and

supervision of immigrants has fallen on the States at whose ports they

have landed. As a large majority of such immigrants, immediately upon

their arrival, proceed to the inland States and the Territories to seek

permanent homes, it is manifestly unjust to impose upon the State whose

shores they first reach, the burden which it now bears. For this reason,

and because of the national importance of the subject, I recommend

legislation regarding the supervision and transitory care of immigrants

at the ports of debarkation.

I regret to state that the people of Alaska have reason to complain

that they are as yet unprovided with any form of government by which

life or property can be protected. While the extent of its population

does not justify the application of the costly machinery of Territorial

administration, there is immediate necessity for constituting such a

form of government as will promote the education of the people and

secure the administration of justice.

The Senate at its last session passed a bill providing for the

construction of a building for the Library of Congress, but it failed

to become a law. The provision of suitable protection for this great

collection of books and for the copyright department connected with it

has become a subject of national importance and should receive prompt

attention.

The report of the Commissioners of the District of Columbia herewith

transmitted will inform you fully of the condition of the affairs of

the District.

They urge the vital importance of legislation for the reclamation and

improvement of the marshes and for the establishment of the harbor lines

along the Potomac River front.

It is represented that in their present condition these marshes

seriously affect the health of the residents of the adjacent parts of

the city, and that they greatly mar the general aspect of the park in

which stands the Washington Monument. This improvement would add to

that park and to the park south of the Executive Mansion a large area

of valuable land, and would transform what is now believed to be a

dangerous nuisance into an attractive landscape extending to the river

front.

They recommend the removal of the steam railway lines from the surface

of the streets of the city and the location of the necessary depots in

such places as may be convenient for the public accommodation, and they

call attention to the deficiency of the water supply, which seriously

affects the material prosperity of the city and the health and comfort

of its inhabitants.

A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents. Volume 8, part 2: Chester A. Arthur · 第 30 / 623 题