THE FREEDOM OF THE SEAS

Colonel House, President Wilson’s personal representative, who spent some

time in the principal capitals of Europe in the endeavor to ascertain

whether there was any tangible peace sentiment which could be utilized

by the United States as a basis of mediation, has apparently convinced

the President that any movement in that direction would be useless at

present. Col. House came in touch with the leading soldiers and statesmen

of the various belligerent nations, and he found that no nation was ready

to accept any peace terms that the enemy would be likely to offer. One

important phase of public sentiment in Germany, as stated by Col. House

is the idea that Germany’s most important interests lie in colonial

expansion and the incidental development of over-seas commerce, rather

than in territorial expansion in Europe itself. To this end Germany,

it is believed, will demand as a condition of peace the freedom of the

seas—that is, the recognition of the principle that the property, except

contraband, of all private owners shall be exempt from seizure on the

high seas in time of war. This is a principle for which the United States

has always contended. There is no reason why private property on the seas

should not be exempt from seizure the same as is private property on the

land. Germany’s ambition for colonial expansion may be of vital interest

to the United States if that ambition takes the direction of colonial

expansion on any part of the American continents. It may be that when

peace comes to be arranged our Monroe Doctrine will be subject to closer

examination than it ever has been before, and if any disposition is shown

by the contracting powers to contravene it, it will be up to the people

and government of this country to decide whether they will let down the

bars or firmly maintain it. And if we are to maintain it, the question of

our physical power to do so will have to be considered.

The World Court (Vol. I, No. 1, Aug. 1915) · 第 26 / 64 题