Awaiting your reply, and hoping for your co-operation, I remain

Yours very truly,

To my great surprise only ten accepted this offer, leaving 93

institutions devoted to training preachers either indifferent or

unwilling to permit their students to accept and read, without expense,

the same literature on the subject of Tithing that active Pastors have

ordered in quantities aggregating many millions during the last 27

years for circulation among their people.

In contrast with so much apathy and indifference or opposition, many

of the replies received were of the most encouraging character, the

writers expressing deep interest in the subject and promising hearty

co-operation.

Another obstacle, and second only in importance, is found in the

attitude of a large proportion of the editors of our Religious

Newspapers. It should be remembered in their behalf that nearly all of

them are Ministers, and as a result are themselves the victims of false

teaching or no teaching on this subject, which to at least nine-tenths

of their constituency, is of the most vital importance. The few

lay-editors of Religious Newspapers that I have the honor of knowing

all believe in and practice the Tithe System.

As in the case of Theological Teachers, I have very recent confirmation

of this opinion.

A year or two ago a fellow worker in this field, the Rev. Henry

Lansdell, D. D. of Morton College, Black Heath, England, an extensive

traveler in Oriental countries, and noted author realizing that

Religious books are read by so few people as compared with Religious

newspapers, conceived and put into execution the unique idea of

publishing serially in slip form suitable for printers’ proof, some of

the results of the latest archaeological researches and discoveries

bearing on the subject of Tithing, supplementing and enriching them

with his own researches and interviews with eminent archaeologists. I

copy from a letter received from him dated July 8th, 1903:

My Dear Sir--Your letter of the 23d June, quite cheered me. I

have circularized and sent slips to upwards of 1,250 editors in

114 countries, Kingdoms and States, sending also with my offer in

167 cases an autograph or dictated letter. Thus far the result is

approximately as follows: No answer received from 976, and the number

who have declined is 248, whilst about 26 have accepted the series

in whole or in part. The number of copies printed of four of these

publications amounts to over 400,000 weekly; of the rest I do not

know the circulation, but supposing that each paper has four readers,

it does not seem at all an extravagant estimate that the articles

will be brought before two million readers weekly. This surely is

something to thank God for!

Out of the 1,250, more than half were sent to America and Canada. Not

one Canadian paper thus far has accepted, but in the United States

the papers accepting are California, 1; Arkansas, 1; Texas, 1; Ohio,

2; New York, 1; New Jersey, 1; Pennsylvania, 1; Illinois, 1.

It is my belief--certainly my hope--that Dr. Lansdell has in

preparation a volume in which he will exhaustively treat of the early

history of the Tithe.

Unfortunately I have mislaid the first three slips, each about a

newspaper column, sent me by Dr. Lansdell, and hence am unable to give

their titles. Commencing with the fourth, the titles are as follows:--

IV. Egyptian War Tithes.

V. Pre-Historic and Spartan Greece.

VI. Græco-Persian and Later Greece.

VII. The Romans.

VIII. The Pelasgi, Britons and German-Saxons.

IX. Where Did Abram Learn Tithing?

X. Jacob’s Vow.

XI. Israel’s First Tithe.

XII. Israel’s Second, or Festival Tithe.

Naturally the first three would have reference to the very earliest

history, including lately discovered evidences of Tithing in

pre-historic times.

One would suppose that such original and late matter as these titles

indicate, prepared by a thorough scholar, would be gladly accepted

and published by the religious press. That it is not carries its own

comment.

My own experience has in some respects been similar. To illustrate: Two

or three years ago I offered for a limited time to send gratis, express

prepaid, to Christian Endeavor societies, Epworth Leagues, and Baptist

Young People’s Unions such literature as I publish on the subject of

Tithing sufficient to furnish one of each to every family represented.

I had the offer printed, occupying about an inch of newspaper space,

and sent it with a personal letter asking publication to practically

all the Evangelical religious newspapers in the United States and

Canada. I kept no accurate record of the replies, but probably

one-fourth, possibly one-third, cheerfully published the offer; two or

three editorially called attention to it, while a few returned it with

an offer to insert it at regular advertising rates. The rest ignored it.

_As to Results._ These, judged by any fair standard are not only

deplorable, but a shame to our profession as Christian men and women.

The old lady who boasted that she had been a Christian for twenty-five

years and had never failed to give a dollar a year to Foreign Missions

was a good deal above the average. If she had given a like sum, less

than ten cents a month, to Home Missions, she would not have suffered

by comparison with the rest of us; and yet we are the richest nation

in the world, and while now passing through a season of unexampled

prosperity, our gifts to Missions show very slight increase; in many

cases they are less than ordinary. No wonder the world sneers at our

profession of love for Christ and desire to see His Kingdom established

throughout the world. They have the right to sneer in this regard and

we are the last people in the world who have a right to criticise them

for doing it.

In this respect both our Heavenly Father and the world about us occupy

the same standpoint of judgment. No matter what our profession may be,

both God and the world measure our real interest in this as in all

other subjects by what we do for it, and for us laymen and lay-women

our doing is measured rightly and of necessity by our contributions,

the money we give.

So far as we are concerned I can think of but one excuse. I admit that

it is a poor one but it is the best we have. We have either been

wrongly, or insufficiently, taught by our religious teachers regarding

this of all subjects to us the most important. There has been little

or no “Thus saith the Lord” about it; nearly all our teaching has been

on the line of ‘Give, Give, Give’; very little of definite _payment of

what we owe_ and letting free-will offerings commence after our debt

has been paid. We have been continuously and persistently taught that

we can _give_ money to God. We have even been exhorted and urged to

be systematically benevolent in the matter of gifts to God. Think of

it! Systematic benevolence applied to our Heavenly Father. The whole

system of our teaching on this subject has been based on “Giving,”

everlastingly “Giving.” If this teaching is right we laymen can justly

claim the right to _give_ what we please and _as_ we please. Gifts and

payment occupy very different standpoints. If I owe a debt, it is a

definite amount and I must pay it when it is due, or be branded as a

defaulter, but no man _owes_ a gift. True, we both give and pay when we

pay Tithes, but the payment is to God, the giving as His stewards and

agents is to our fellow men for the upbuilding and advancement of His

Kingdom.

It is only fair in this connection to say that ministers have the same

excuse, poor as it is, that we laymen and lay-women have. They have

been the victims of wrong teaching by their professors of theology and

teachers of practical--not theoretical--religion. The only sensible

thing for us all to do is to repent and reform.

That I may not be accused of overstating or misrepresenting the

situation, I copy the Pledge of the Tenth Legion of the Christian

Endeavor Society. This Pledge has been signed by over 25,000 of the

young people of our churches. It clearly perpetuates this false

teaching and will of course bear its legitimate fruit. At the time the

Tenth Legion was started the attention of its officers was called to

the mistake as I regard it in the language, but they declined to change

it. It reads as follows:

“Unto God the Things that are God’s”

Enrollment Blank.

The tithe · 第 9 / 16 题