WHAT LABOUR WILL SAY.

Under these conditions they will soon come to argue like this:—Was it

not enough to demand of industry that it should fight the battles for

the government? Was it not enough that the working-classes should lay

down their lives by thousands upon a hundred fields of battle? Was it

not enough that mothers and wives should give their sons and husbands to

fill the soldier’s grave that the wealth of the country might remain

inviolate? Was it not enough that we did all this without now being

forced to give our toil year after year to return these rich, who did

nothing, these loans? Is it too much to ask of wealth that it pay the

expenses of the war? Should we not rather demand, in tones of thunder if

lesser ones are insufficient to rouse its holders to a sense of their

duty, that it shall bear its part of the burden? We have looked on

quietly and seen the sufferings to which this people are reduced by the

rapacity of the usurers, until we can no longer hold our peace; and if

it be in our power, we intend that wealth and not industry shall yet be

made to pay what it should have been made to pay at first; that it shall

return to the government the bonds which the toiling masses have

redeemed by the rivers of blood that they have shed, and that the

government shall return the $2,000,000,000 of interest that it has

already filched from industry for interest on this most unjust debt. In

other words, since we gave the lives that it was necessary to sacrifice

to conquer the rebellion from our ranks, we intend that the rich shall

give from what they had when the rebellion broke out, to pay all the

expenses of the war, and we will never rest until this be done.

These, I say, are the arguments to which the suffering labourers will

resort if you permit them to is driven to desperation by hunger from

want of employment. If the rich were wise, they would forestall all

opportunity for such arguments to be used, by coming forward voluntarily

to do them justice. If what I have suggested will be their arguments, is

true, as you know that it is, then wealth should pay the expenses of the

war without any further delay, because it is a gross injustice, not to

say an unwarrantable imposition on good nature, to make the men who did

the fighting also pay this debt, while those for whom it was mostly

fought have done nothing but to speculate out of it. Perhaps you have

never looked at it in this light; but if you have not, then I pray you

look at it so now, before your attention shall be called to it in an

unpleasant way; for, unless relief come soon to those who are suffering

the pangs of hunger, by reason of your blindness, there will be an

imperious demand made of you.

A lecture by Victoria Claflin Woodhull ...: The review of a century; or, the fruit of five thousand years · 第 28 / 42 题