CHAPTER X

NORMAN VILLAGES AND THE _DOMESDAY BOOK_

The coming of the Normans--_Domesday Book_--Its objects--Its contents--

Barkham in _Domesday_--Saxon families--Saxons who retained their

estates--Despoiled landowners--Village officers and artisans--

Villeins--_Bordarii_--_Cottarii_--_Servi_--Socmen--Presbyter--Names

of Normans--The teaching of _Domesday_.

There was a great stir in our English villages when the news was brought

to them that William of Normandy had landed in England, and intended to

fight for the English Crown. News travelled very slowly in those days.

First the villeins and the cottiers who were not fighting with their

lord heard that a great battle had been fought at Stamford Bridge, in

Yorkshire, in which their gallant King Harold had defeated his own

brother Tostig, aided by the King of Norway, Hardrada, and a large army.

Then the news reached them that William of Normandy had arrived, and

that Harold was marching night and day to meet him. Then they heard of

the fatal battle of Hastings; and when it was told them that their brave

King Harold was slain, and that William, the Norman, was the conqueror

of England and the acknowledged king of the country, all England groaned

to hear the fatal news. And then, after a few years, they found that

their old lord had been deprived of his estates, and a new, haughty,

proud Norman, who talked like a Frenchman, and laughed at their dear old

Saxon language, came and ruled over them. He brought Norman servants

with him, who took the best of the land, and made the Saxons do all the

hard work on the farm, treating them like slaves.

And now we must examine a most valuable document which throws a

wonderfully clear light on the condition of England just before and

after the Conquest. I refer to the _Domesday Book_, or survey of the

country which William caused to be made. The Anglo-Saxon chronicler

tells us that after a great Council at Gloucester the king "sent his men

over all England, into every shire, and caused to be ascertained how

many hundred hides were in the shire, or what land the king himself had,

and cattle within the land, or what dues he ought to have in twelve

months from the shire. Also he caused to be written how much land his

archbishops had, and his suffragan bishops, and abbots, and earls; and

though I may narrate somewhat prolixly, what or how much each man had

who was a holder of land in England, in land, or in cattle, and how much

money it might be worth. So very narrowly he caused it to be traced out,

that there was not one single hide, nor one yard of land, nor even, it

is shame to tell, though it seemed to him no shame to do, an ox, nor a

cow, nor a swine was left that was not set down in his writ. And all the

writings were brought to him afterwards."

The commissioners appointed by the king, among whom were Remigius,

Bishop of Lincoln, and Walter Giffard, Earl of Buckingham, were to

inquire the following details concerning each parish:--

Its name. Who held it in the time of King Edward the Confessor. The

present possessor. Number of hides in the manor, number of ploughs, of

homagers, villeins, cottars, free tenants, tenants in socage; how much

wood, meadow, and pasture; number of mills and fishponds; the value in

the time of the last king; and its present value.

Such a survey was of immense value. Its object, according to the king,

was that every man might know and be satisfied with his rightful

possessions, and not with impunity usurp the property of others. But it

was also of great service to the king, so that he might know who were

his vassals, the amount of taxation which he could draw from them, and

the actual strength of his new kingdom.

The commissioners performed their work with much care and exactness. The

survey is wonderfully complete, and was compiled in a very short time.

It is of great value to the historians of subsequent ages. The writing

of the book is very clear and beautiful, the abbreviations alone

presenting some difficulty to an unaccustomed reader. No illuminations

adorn the text. At the head of each page the name of the county is

written in red ink. The book is preserved in an ancient chest in the

Public Record Office, where it was removed from the Chapter House at

Westminster.

As an example we may take the _Domesday_ description of the parish of

Barkham, which runs as follows:--

"IN CERLEDONE HD.

"Rex ten in dnio Bercheha. AElmer Tenuit de rege. E. Te 7 m iii hid.

Tra e iii car. In dnio e una, 7 vi uilli 7 iiii bord cu iii car. Ibi

v. ac pti. Silua de XL pore. Valuit iiii lib. T.R.E. 7 m: iii. lib."

TRANSLATION.

"In the hundred of Charlton.

"The king holds Barkham in demesne. AElmer held it of King Edward. Then,

as now, it was rated for three hides. The land is three ploughlands. In

demesne there is one ploughland. There are six villeins, four borderers

with three ploughs. There are five acres of pasture. Wood for the

pasturage of forty hogs. It was worth 4l. in the time of King Edward,

afterwards, and now, 3l."

King Edward here mentioned was Edward the Confessor. A hide, when it is

used as a measure of land, may be taken at about one hundred and twenty

acres. A ploughland was as much land as one plough with oxen could

plough in a year. The villeins were men who tilled their lord's land,

and in return for certain services had holdings under him. The borderers

were cottagers who also worked for their lord and held smaller holdings,

from one to ten acres. In other entries we find the number of serfs

recorded, and also mention of the hall of the lord of the manor, where

the manorial courts were held, the church, the priest's house, the names

of landowners and tenants, the mill, and of the various officers and

artisans who made up the village community.

_Domesday_ tells us of the old Saxon families, many of whom lost their

estates when the Conqueror came, and were supplanted by the favourites

of the new king. Some of them contrived to weather the storm and retain

their lands. Almer, or Almar, the lord of Barkham, who succeeded his

brother Stigand as Bishop of Elmham in 1047, when the latter became

archbishop, was among the number of the dispossessed, and probably found

shelter with many of his compatriots in the cloister. Several of

William's Norman adventurers married the heiresses of the old Saxon

gentry, and thus became possessed of great estates. Thus Robert D'Oili

married the daughter of Wigod, lord of Wallingford, and soon gained

possession of his father-in-law's property.

However, the names of the fortunate Saxons who retained their estates

are few in comparison with those who were dispossessed. We find Edgar

Atheling, real heir to the throne, retaining a small estate; but he was

a feeble prince, and therefore not to be feared by William. His sister

Cristina had also land in Oxfordshire. Bishop Osbern, of Exeter, a

kinsman of the late king, also held his estates; and amongst the list we

find Seward the huntsman, of Oxfordshire; Theodric the goldsmith; Wlwi

the huntsman, of Surrey; Uluric the huntsman, of Hampshire, who were not

deprived of their lands, their occupations being useful to the king.

The list of despoiled landowners is a long one, and need not here be

recorded. One Brictric was very unfortunate. When ambassador to Baldwin

of Flanders he refused to marry the count's daughter Maud. The slighted

lady became the Conqueror's consort, and in revenge for her despised

love caused Brictric to be imprisoned and his estates confiscated, some

of which were given to the queen. The luckless relations and connections

of the late royal house were consistently despoiled, amongst them

Editha, the beautiful queen of King Edward, and daughter of Earl Godwin,

of whom it was written: "_Sicut spina rosam genuit Godwynus Editham_";

and Gida, the mother of Harold; Godric, his son; and Gwith, his brother.

Harold himself--the earl, as he is called, and not the king, who fought

and died at Senlac, if he did not, as the romance states, end his life

as a holy hermit at Chester--had vast estates all over England, which

went to enrich William's hungry followers. Hereward the Wake, the

English hero, also held in pre-Norman days many fat manors. Few of the

Saxon landowners were spared, and it is unnecessary here to record the

names of the Uchtreds, Turgots, Turchils, Siwards, Leurics, who held

lands "in the time of King Edward," but whose place after Domesday knows

them no more.

_Domesday_ tells us also the names of the officers and artisans who

played important parts in the old village communities. The _villani_, or

villeins, corresponding to the Saxon _ceorls_, were the most important

class of tenants in villeinage, and each held about thirty acres in

scattered acre or half-acre strips, each a furlong in length and a perch

or two in breadth, separated by turf balks. The villein thus supported

himself and his family, and in return was bound to render certain

services to the lord of the manor, to work on the home farm, and provide

two or more oxen for the manorial plough-team. He was not a free tenant,

could acquire no property, and his lord's consent was needed for the

marriage of his daughters. But the law protected him from unjust usage;

his holdings were usually regranted to his son. He could obtain freedom

in several ways, and by degrees acquired the rights and privileges of a

free tenant.

Next to the villeins were the _bordarii_, who lived in _bords_ or

cottages, _i.e._ boarded or wooden huts, and ranked as a lower grade of

villeins. They held about five acres, but provided no oxen for the

manorial plough-team. Below them were the _cottarii_, or cottiers, who

were bound to do domestic work and supply the lord's table. They

corresponded to the modern labourer, but lacked his freedom. The lowest

class of all were the _servi_, or serfs, who corresponded to the Saxon

_theows_. In Norman times their condition was greatly improved; they

mingled with the cottiers and household servants, and gradually were

merged with them.

The _sochemanni_, or socmen, our yeomen, who abounded chiefly in the

Danish district of England, were inferior landowners who had special

privileges, and could not be turned out of their holdings, though they

rendered certain services to the lord of the manor, and in this respect

differed little from the villeins. _Domesday Book_ also mentions a class

of men called _burs_ or _geburs_, who were the same as _coliberti_; also

the _commendati_, who received privileges in return for services

rendered to the lord of the manor.

Each village community was self-contained, and had its own officers.

Although _Domesday Book_ was not compiled in order to ascertain the

condition of the Church and its ministers, and frequently the mention of

a parish church is omitted where we know one existed, the _presbyter_,

or priest, is often recorded. Archbishop Egbert's _Excerptiones_

ordained that "to every church shall be allotted one complete holding

(mansa), and that this shall be free from all but ecclesiastical

services." According to the Saxon laws every tenth strip of land was

set aside for the Church, and _Domesday_ shows that in many villages

there was a priest with his portion of land set apart for his support.

Then there was a _prepositus_, bailiff or reeve, who collected the lord's

rents, assisted by a _bedellus_, beadle or under-bailiff. _Bovarii_, or

oxherds, looked after the plough-teams. The _carpentarius_, or carpenter;

the _cementarius_, or bricklayer; the _custos apium_, or beekeeper; the

_faber_, or smith; the _molinarius_, or miller--were all important

officers in the Norman village; and we have mention also of the

_piscatores_ (fishermen), _pistores_ (bakers), _porcarii_ (swineherds),

_viccarii_ (cowmen), who were all employed in the work of the village

community.

_Domesday Book_ enables us to form a fairly complete picture of our

villages in Norman and late Saxon times. It tells us of the various

classes who peopled the village and farmed its fields. It gives us a

complete list of the old Saxon gentry and of the Norman nobles and

adventurers who seized the fair acres of the despoiled Englishmen. Many

of them gave their names to their new possessions. The Mandevilles

settled at Stoke, and called it Stoke-Mandeville; the Vernons at

Minshall, and called it Minshall-Vernon. Hurst-Pierpont, Neville-Holt,

Kingston-Lysle, Hampstead-Norris, and many other names of places

compounded of Saxon and Norman words, record the names of William's

followers, who received the reward of their services at the expense of

the former Saxon owners. _Domesday Book_ tells us how land was measured

in those days, the various tenures and services rendered by the tenants,

the condition of the towns, the numerous foreign monasteries which

thrived on our English lands, and throws much light on the manners and

customs of the people of this country at the time of its compilation.

_Domesday Book_ is a perfect storehouse of knowledge for the historian,

and requires a lifetime to be spent for its full investigation.

[Illustration: DIAGRAM OF A MANOR]

English Villages · 第 10 / 23 章