[AZ] See Appendix IV.

[BA] _Origin of Species_, p. 577.

[BB] _The Origin of Species_, xiii. 4th ed.

[BC] _The Origin of Species_, p. 1.

[BD] _Malay Archipelago_, 1869.

[BE] The passage is quoted as given by Schmidt in his _Doctrine of

Descent_, p. 132. Italics are inserted to guide the eye of the reader to

the successive stages.

[BF] Referring to organized being.

[BG] _Origin of Species_, p. 577.

[BH] _Doct. of Descent_, p. 161-2.

[BI] _Origin of Species_, 4th ed. p. 143.

[BJ] _Doct. of Descent_, 162.

[BK] _Origin of Species_, 4th ed. p. 141.

[BL] It may be well to mention here that the _third_ American edition is

from the _fifth_ English edition.

[BM] _Origin of Species_, 6th ed., p. 289.

[BN] _Origin of Species_, 6th. ed. chap. iv. p. 100.

[BO] _Contributions to the Natural History of the United States_,

Introduction, Boston, 1857; and _Essay on Classification_, p. 15,

published separately; London, 1859. See Appendix VI.

[BP] _Origin_, 4th ed. p. 143.

[BQ] _Origin of Species_, 6th. ed. chap. iv. p. 100.

LECTURE V.

RELATIONS OF LOWER AND HIGHER ORGANISMS.

From the general aspects of the theory of species, we pass to the

consideration of distinct groups of organism, with the view of

ascertaining their relations to each other. In doing so, it is better to

begin at the lower end of the scale, leaving for a more advanced stage

of inquiry the higher types of organism. In this department of the

subject, special obligations are due to the wide range of investigations

either occasioned or stimulated by the theory of evolution. For,

whatever may be the ultimate award passed on this theory, there will be

a unanimous recognition of the great value to science attending on the

varied forms of inquiry stimulated by the writings of Mr. Charles

Darwin. And one obvious and strong reason for such acknowledgment is

that so many of the results of these researches have an inherent value

quite distinct from their testimony in favor of the theory that the

struggle for existence is the principal factor in the origin of new

species.

One of the most interesting fields of observation thus opened, is that

concerned with the fertilization of plants by the intervention of

insects and birds. A beginning in this department was made by the German

naturalist, Christian Konrad Sprengel, who published in 1793 the report

of his observations. In this he has been followed by Darwin, in 1862; by

Dr. Hooker, Professor Asa Gray whose contributions appeared in the

_American Journal of Science and Art_ in 1862, and 1863, Moggridge,

Fritz Müller, and Sir John Lubbock. The facts now accumulated, rank as

an important contribution to botany and zoölogy, and naturally fall

within the circle of recent advances to which it is desirable that

attention be turned.

The general result is one of great interest, as illustrating a striking

degree of interdependence between lower and higher organisms,--the

vegetable and animal kingdom contributing to each other's subsistence

and propagation. Flowers present special attractions to insects flying

around, alluring them by varied colors, and providing for them by

secreting stores of honey; on the other hand, these insects (flies,

bees, wasps, etc.), seeking the honey which satisfies their wants, at

the same time carry the pollen from one flower to another, thus

providing for the fertilizing of the plants. In some cases,

fertilization is secured by a natural process within the organism

itself; in other cases, the pollen is scattered over a region by the

wind; but the most wonderful, and at the same time efficient mode of

providing for the growth of vigorous plants, is fertilization by the

agency of insect life.

A brief outline of the ordinary structure of the flower will introduce

to a ready appreciation of the scientific interest attaching to this

last mode of fertilization, both as concerning the functions of

different portions of the flowers, and the relation of dependence

established between higher and lower forms of organism, so that each is

dependent on the other.

Every flower as it unfolds from the bud, consists of a series of whorls,

or layers of substance twined or twirled round in such a manner as to

unfold or coil back, as the flower opens. The _outermost_ of these

whorls (_calyx_) is a mere covering or sheath, usually of a green

color, which protects the bud during the more tender period, curling up

and withering as the flower opens, spreading forth its beauty. The

_second_ whorl (_corolla_) is what we more commonly regard as the flower

proper, the colored leaves, or cup, or bell, according to the specific

shape distinguishing the plant. The _third_ whorl consists of a series

of stalks or filaments (_stamens_) which as the flower matures or ripens

stand up distinct from each other, each one having at its summit a

little tuft or cushion (_anther_) covered with a fine dust or powder

(_pollen_). The _fourth_ or inner-most whorl, the centre piece of the

flower (_pistil_) is that in which the seed is generated and brought to

maturity. We may thus say of the flower, that its outermost whorl is a

temporary covering which withers and shrinks out of view, when the

beauty of the inner structure is laid open; that the second is that

which attracts the eye by the loveliness of its hues; while the two

which belong to the internal structure of the flower are concerned with

the reproduction or propagation of the plant, providing for the healthy

germ from which a fresh plant of the same order may spring up. The

relation of the fine yellow powder produced at the tips of the third

whorl, to the seeds which are gathered together within the fourth whorl,

is the matter to which special attention has been directed by the recent

discoveries which have rewarded patient research. The fine powder or

pollen needs to be carried to the seed, so that its properties may

operate upon that seed, if it is to be fertilized, or so matured, as to

fulfil its function in generating a new plant when it is committed to

the soil. In many cases it is enough that the fine powder should fall

down from its elevation on the seeds below. This is self-fertilization,

and is easily provided for by the mere bending of the head of the flower

as it approaches maturity, or by the swaying of it in the breeze. But a

more difficult, and as we might be inclined to add, more precarious,

because less certain, method for fertilization is required in many

cases. The experiments carried on by all our gardeners, and in a still

more extended scale in all our centres of botanic research, have

established the fact that in many cases, the yellow powder of one plant

must be in some manner carried over to the seed produced within another

flower, if that seed is to yield a satisfactory result to the

horticulturist.

We have thus two prominent facts here. The one is _the essential

importance of the pollen_ for fertilization; and the other, _the need

for the transference of the pollen_ from one plant to another in order

to secure reproduction of vigorous growth by the sowing of the seed. As

to the first, the pollen, which appears a fine powder or flour contains

fluid protoplasm, that which Professor Huxley has described as the

"single physical basis of life under all the diversities of vital

existence."[BR] These pollen grains falling on the seed discharge their

protoplasmic fluid upon it, and by this means contribute to

fertilization. This original or primordial form of vitalising agency is

carried from one part of the flower to another, and this transference is

the law regulating the propagation of flowering plants.

But, just at this point, we come upon the most striking results of

recent research. Though all pollen is of this primary nature, named

protoplasm, it is not found to hold true that pollen is of the same

value for fertilization from whatever quarter it comes. On the

contrary, most important differences result according to the source of

the pollen. There is first the process of self-fertilization. But in

many cases,--Mr. Darwin has shown that this holds of the majority of the

orchids,--transference of the pollen from one plant to another proves to

be a great advantage, if not an actual necessity for propagation of the

plant. This process, known as cross-fertilization, gives a healthy and

vigorous growth; want of it, will lead to degeneration, and ultimate

extinction. This discovery has introduced a whole series of the most

striking observations, throwing a flood of light on the distribution and

interdependence of distinct forms of organism. The necessary relation

between the pollen and the seed having been acknowledged, and next the

value of transference of pollen from one plant to another, the first

step in the line of discovery was made by the observation of a natural

provision to _prevent self-fertilization_ by rendering it impossible

that the pollen of a plant should fall on the seed of that plant. This

entrance on the line of discovery was made by Sprengel so far back as

1790, by whom it was observed that in many plants the pollen and the

seed did not come to ripeness at the same time.[BS] In some cases, the

pollen is ripened before the seeds are ready; in other cases, the order

of events is reversed. This observation naturally suggested transference

of pollen from one plant to another; and this, connected with the

continual coming and going of flies, bees, and butterflies, led to the

further discovery, that _insects_ unwittingly perform a large part of

the work needful in order to _provide for fertilization_. Mr. Darwin has

pointed out that from the paper of Robert Brown in the _Linnean

Transactions_, in 1833; and from that of Dr. Hooker in the _Philosophic

Transactions_ for 1854, the peculiar phenomena had begun to awaken

scientific interest. It was, however, when the researches as to origin

of species had given fresh motive to observation concerning the

relations of different types of organism, that the whole facts were

brought to view, separately recorded, and at length systematized so as

to lead to their full interpretation. Mr. Darwin himself concentrated on

the orchids as peculiarly interesting and suggestive, while a host of

workers all over the world were turning their energies into this new

field of observation which promised ample return for patient research.

As a reward of these investigations important facts have been

established on ample evidence. First, it has been confirmed by varying

lines of evidence that transference of pollen, or cross-fertilization,

is of special value in the development of plant life. Investigation has

strengthened the evidence of disadvantage arising from fertilization by

exclusive dependence on self-produced pollen. Fritz Müller has recorded

a variety of observations that the pollen of some flowers has so little

influence on the seed produced on the same stem that when it falls upon

the seeds no effect is produced; the pollen lies there as if possessed

of no more vitalizing power than grains of dust. And, what is even more

surprising, Müller has found examples in which the pollen does act upon

the seeds of its own flower, but acts _injuriously_, insomuch that the

flower, the pollen, and the seed-producing portion of the plant begin to

decay.[BT] So deep has been the impression made on Mr. Darwin's mind by

the evidence of provision for transference of pollen, that he closes his

valuable and interesting book on the _Fertilization of Orchids_ with the

following statements. Having remarked that "self-fertilization would

have been an incomparably safer and easier process than the transportal

of pollen from flower to flower," he adds these words,--"It is hardly an

exaggeration to say that Nature tells us, in the most emphatic manner,

that she abhors perpetual self-fertilization."[BU]

The next result secured presents an important relation between animal

life and vegetable. These flowers do not depend for their fertilization

upon the action of the wind, which in scattering profusely in all

directions must occasion large waste of pollen. There is found to be

distinct provision for carrying the pollen from one flower to another by

insects, such as the bees, whose industry in gathering honey has been

celebrated from ancient times, specially because of our interest in the

storehouse, but with little suspicion of the double work being done by

the bees, who add to their other industry that of horticulturists. These

bees are the pollen-bearers,--the recognized local carriers, regularly

on the road,--doing the work which the flowers, in lack of locomotive

power, could not do for each other. Or, looking at the relation of

things from another point of view, the bees are at the same time

gathering the honey, and sowing the seed for a future harvest. This

reference to the honey, however, introduces to notice a companion series

of facts, showing the provision in completed form for an interchange of

services. The plants supply an attraction to the animals, while the

animals render a service to the plants. This phase of interdependence is

made more conspicuous by the contrast apparent in the structure and

functions of plants fertilized by the wind, such as the larger shrubs

and trees, which as they present a greater surface to the breeze, do not

call for the same detailed provision for carrying the pollen. In

contrast with these more bulky representatives of the vegetable kingdom,

the more lowly and insignificant in size, as well as more short-lived,

present many attractions in color, scent, and secretion of honey, all

adapted to the nature of insects, suited for the work of pollen

carrying. The attractions of form, color, and scent in the flowers are

well known to us; but they are also appreciated by the insects,--a fact

which may possibly suggest that a high degree of intellectual power is

not required for appreciation of these qualities, as no one professes

that bees rank high intellectually. At the same time, if comparisons are

to be made at this point, the farther suggestion may also be introduced,

that there is little testimony to intelligence where search for food is

concerned, and while the human race do not feed on flowers, insects are

constantly feeding from them. The attractions in the two cases therefore

vary considerably in their significance. Restricting attention, however,

to the special field of observation now before us, with the view simply

of ascertaining the relations of plants and insects, color and honey

present the two most prominent attractions accounting for the perpetual

hum of life heard amongst the flowering plants. Different parts of the

flower provide for variegated coloring, and stores of honey; these

present attractions to the insects; and the structure of the flowers as

they provide for the landing of the insects, and require that they

penetrate to their centre for the secreted honey, secures that the work

needful for fertilization be effectually done. This last feature of

adaptation is that on which attention may be specially concentrated

here. Mr. Darwin in treating of orchids has described this part of their

structure in these words;--"In almost all the species, one of the petals

(or leaves of the flower) which is properly the upper one, is larger

than the others and stands on the lower side of the flower, where it

offers a landing-place for insects."[BV] Towards the inner or root end

of this leaf (_labellum_) is the gland, in some flowers appearing only

as a slit, in others forming like a tube, (_nectary_) which secrets the

honey. Just over the entrance to the part where the honey is to be found

stands that which secrets the pollen prepared for fertilizing some other

flower. So soon as the bee or other insect presses its head well into

the centre of the flower, some of the pollen adheres to it; when the

head is withdrawn, this pollen is borne off to the flower which the bee

next visits; and as the head is pressed into the core of this flower

the pollen is deposited, and provision for fertilization is complete.

Special features appearing in certain classes of the orchids illustrate

how it is possible for the bee so laden to visit many flowers without

depositing the pollen, yet a little later accomplish the object quite

simply. The following illustration from Mr. Darwin's account of the

first orchid selected, will suffice. Just _above_ the entrance to the

honey store, lies a pouch connected with the pollen store. As the head

of the bee is pressed down towards the honey, this pouch is burst open,

and from it issues a little sticky gland or disc, or it may be two of

these discs. These adhere at once to the head of the bee, and being

connected by a slight band with packets of pollen grains so soon as the

animal retires the pollen is drawn with it, standing out like a seed

vessel on the head. The strangest part of the contrivance appears in

what thereafter follows. "The viscid matter has the peculiar chemical

quality, of setting like cement, hard and dry in a few minutes." Suppose

both the little viscid balls have been withdrawn, the bands bearing the

pollen will appear "projecting up like horns." "How then can the flower

be fertilized? This is effected by a beautiful contrivance; though the

viscid surface remains immovably affixed, the apparently insignificant

and minute disc of membrane to which the caudicle adheres is endowed

with a remarkable power of contraction, which causes the pollinium to

sweep through an angle of about ninety degrees, always in one direction

towards the apex of the proboscis, in the course of thirty seconds on an

average."[BW] That is, the two erections bearing packets of pollen which

formerly stood up almost perpendicular, like horns, begin to lower until

they reach the horizontal; in this way when the bee enters a flower the

packets of pollen inevitably touch the seed stores, communicating what

is required for their fertilization. Nor have we even yet the whole of

the contrivances adapted for this end. "Here comes into play another

pretty adaptation." The seed vessel to be fertilized is very sticky,

"but not so viscid as when touched by a pollinium to pull the whole off

an insect's head." But it is sufficiently adhesive "to break the elastic

threads by which the packets of pollen grains are tied together." In

this way, it tears off so much from the store adhering to the head of

the bee, and still leaves there what may supply the requirements of many

flowers besides. The description thus given will suffice to indicate how

close is the relation of the lower orders of animal life with vegetable

life, and will illustrate how the lower organism may be dependent for

existence on the higher, an illustration in some respect the converse of

the facts illustrating origin of species by development.

There remains in this department of inquiry only one additional set of

facts, to which reference may be made, as illustrating _distribution of

work among insects and birds_, assigning them to different orders of

plants. This will illustrate contrivance on a still wider scale,

discovering distinct sets of affinity, which imply common localization

for given plants and animals. In this it appears that flies, humble

bees, and birds with long slender bills, such as the humming birds, all

have a share in the work required for fertilizing plants.

There is one example, _epipactis latifolia_, with a cup-shaped labellum,

in which honey is secreted, and which bees are never seen to frequent.

What, however, the bees pass, the wasps suck eagerly, and by them it is

fertilized. Of this flower, Mr. Darwin says,--"It is very remarkable

that the sweet nectar of this _epipactis_ should not be attractive to

any kind of bee. If wasps were to become extinct in any district, so

probably would the _Epipactis Latifolia_."[BX]

Another example there is of an orchid _(Spiranthes Autumnalis_),

commonly known as _Ladies' Tresses_, having a series of spikes, of which

the lowest flowers are first matured, the others following in order as

they rise towards the summit. This plant is frequented by bees, whose

practice it is to begin with the lowest flowers and ascend gradually to

the top. This order in seeking to extract the honey, proves to be the

proper one for fertilizing of the plant, because the pollen which the

bee brings will be received by the riper flower on which it lands, and

when that has been deposited, fresh pollen will adhere to the bee as it

rises to the less matured flowers, and thus it departs laden with pollen

destined for the lowest flowers of the next plant it visits.[BY]

[Illustration: 1 SECTION OF ORCHID FLOWER SHOWING POLLEN VESSEL, SEED

STORE AND HONEY STORE 2 BEE ENTERING 3 POLLEN VESSEL 4 BEE RETREATING 5

BEE PREPARED FOR ENTERING ANOTHER FLOWER]

These examples introduce us to a general plan for fertilization of

plants by the intervention of insects, so complete in the order of

distribution that we may classify the plants according to the insect by

which they are fertilized, making it natural to speak of fly orchids,

spider orchids, wasp orchids, and bee orchids. In all cases the search

for honey determines the visits made, leaving still unexplained,

however, the fact that the nectar of some plants is shunned by certain

insects, and eagerly absorbed by others. With the general source of

attraction in the flowering plants, there are diversities of arrangement

among the insects, according to the comparative size of the flower, and

strength required in order to penetrate to the inner chamber where the

honey is stored. Because of the minuteness of the aperture, there are

flowers from which the bee can not draw supplies; on the other hand,

because of the size and strength of the flower, there are cases in which

the ordinary bee is incapable of reaching the store, and the stronger

humble bee alone succeeds in effecting an entrance.

The Relations of Science and Religion The Morse Lecture, 1880 · 第 8 / 16 段