CHAPTER V.

MERITORIOUS SATISFACTION.

FROM the perfect equality of Unwritten Tradition and the Written Word of

God, we may next proceed to the doctrine of Meritorious Satisfaction.

I. The Church of Rome lays down her decision, respecting what she calls

_Works of Satisfaction_, in manner following.

_So great is the abundance of divine munificence_, _that we are able to

make satisfaction to God the Father through Jesus Christ_, _not only by

punishments __either spontaneously undergone by ourselves for the

avenging of sin or imposed upon us by the will of the priest according to

the measure of our offence_, _but also_ (_what is the greatest argument

of love_) _by temporal flagellations inflicted of God and by us patiently

endured_. {40a}

II. Thus speaks the Roman Church: let us now hear the declarations of

Holy Scripture.

1. _When ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you_,

_say_: _We are unprofitable servants_; _we have done that which it was

our duty to do_. {40b}

2. _Two men went up into the temple to pray_: _the one_, _a Pharisee_;

_and the other_, _a Publican_. _The Pharisee stood_, _and prayed thus

with himself_: _God_, _I thank thee_, _that I am not as other men are_,

_extortioners_, _unjust_, _adulterers_, _or even as this Publican_. _I

fast twice in the week_: _I give tythes of all that I possess_. _And the

Publican_, _standing afar off_, _would not lift up so much as his eyes

unto heaven_; _but smote upon his breast_, _saying_: _God be merciful to

me a sinner_! _I tell you_: _This man went down to his house justified

rather than the other_: _for every one_, _that exalteth himself_, _shall

be abased_; _and he_, _that humbleth himself_, _shall be exalted_. {40c}

3. _Where is boasting then_? _It is excluded_. _By what law_? _Of

works_? _Nay_, _but by the law of faith_. _Therefore we conclude_:

_that a man is justified by faith_, _without the deeds of the law_. {40d}

4. _If Abraham were justified by works_, _he hath whereof to glory_,

_but not before God_. _For what saith the Scripture_? _Abraham believed

God_: _and it was counted unto him for righteousness_. _Now_, _to him

that worketh_, _is the reward reckoned_, _not of grace_, _but of debt_.

_But_, _to him that worketh not_, _but believeth on him that justifieth

the ungodly_, _his faith is counted for righteousness_. {40e}

5. _Therefore_, _being justified by faith_, _we have peace with God_,

_through our Lord Jesus Christ_. {41a}

6. _They_, _being ignorant of God’s righteousness_, _and going about to

establish their own righteousness_, _have not submitted themselves unto

the righteousness of God_. {41b}

7. _We are all as an unclean thing_: _and all our righteousnesses are as

filthy rags_. {41c}

III. Let us next attend to the language of the old orthodox Fathers.

1. Clement of Rome, in the first century, speaks as follows.

All, therefore, have been glorified and magnified, not through themselves

or through their own works of righteousness which they have done, but

through the will of God. Wherefore, being called through his will in

Christ Jesus, we are justified, not through ourselves, or through our own

wisdom or intellect or piety, or through the works which we have wrought

in holiness of heart; but through faith, by which the Almighty God has

justified us all from everlasting. {41d}

2. The author of the Epistle to Diognetus, in the first or second

century, speaks exactly to the same purpose.

What else can cover our sins, than the righteousness of Christ? In what

can we lawless and impious wretches be justified, save only in the Son of

God? {41e}

3. Ambrose of Milan, in the fourth century, still holds the same

language.

(1.) By what labours, by what injuries, can we lighten our sins? The

sufferings of this time are, in reference to future glory, altogether

unworthy. Hence, toward man, the form of celestial decrees proceeds, not

according to our merits, but according to the mercy of God. {42a}

(2.) Would that the Lord would not reject, but collect, this my mere

stubble in the harvest, these empty wild oats of my fructification!—It is

fitting, therefore, to believe; both that penance is to be performed, and

that pardon is to be granted: nevertheless, in such manner, that we

should hope for pardon, as from faith, not as from debt. {42b}

4. Augustine, in the fourth and fifth centuries, exactly agrees with his

predecessors.

The sins are thine: the merits are God’s. To thee punishment is due: and

when the reward shall come, he will crown his own gifts, not thy merits.

{42c}

IV. Let the patient enquirer now judge for himself: whether the romish

doctrine, that _Punishments_, _either self-inflicted_, _or commanded by a

priest_, _or sent in the course of God’s providence_, _can make

satisfaction to the Father through Christ in our behalf_, be the doctrine

either of Scripture or of the early Church.

V. But, if no man can make satisfaction for _his own_ sins: still less,

according to the monstrous phantasy of Supererogation, can he make

satisfaction for the sins of _others_.

Yet this impious absurdity was openly advanced in the papal bull for the

observation of a jubilee is the recent year 1825.

_We have resolved_, says Pope Leo, BY VIRTUE OF THE AUTHORITY GIVEN TO US

FROM HEAVEN, _fully to unlock that sacred treasure_, _composed of the

merits_, _sufferings_, _and virtues_, _of Christ our Lord and of his

Virgin-Mother and of all the Saints_, WHICH THE AUTHOR OF HUMAN SALVATION

HAS ENTRUSTED TO OUR DISPENSATION.—_To you_, _therefore_, _venerable

brethren_, _Patriarchs_, _Primates_, _Archbishops_, _Bishops_, _it

belongs to explain with perspicuity the power of Indulgences_: _what is

their efficacy in the remission_, _not only of the canonical penance_,

_but also of the temporal punishment due to the divine justice for past

sin_; _and what succour is afforded_, _out of this heavenly treasure_,

_from the merits of Christ and his Saints_, _to such as have departed

real penitents in God’s love_, _yet before they had duly satisfied by

fruits worthy of penance for sins of commission and omission_, _and are

now purifying in the fire of Purgatory_, _that an entrance may be opened

for them into their eternal country where nothing defiled is admitted_.

1. Where is Pope Leo’s PROOF of the validity of his claim to _an

authority given to him from heaven_: _by virtue of which authority he

fully unlocks a sacred treasure_, _composed of the merits of Christ and

the Virgin Mary and all the Saints_, _and entrusted by the blessed author

of our salvation to the wisdom of his doling out_?

Let such PROOF be produced, if the Romish Clergy _can_ produce it, either

from the Bible, or even from the received doctrine of the primitive

Church Catholic.

2. By what evidence does Pope Leo SUBSTANTIATE his assertion: that

_Souls in Purgatory are benefited by the supererogatory merits of the

Virgin Mary and the Saints strangely associated with the all-sufficient

merits of the Redeemer_?

Let the Romish Clergy, if they be _able_, SUBSTANTIATE this most

extraordinary allegation.

3. Where is Pope Leo’s PROOF of the very position, upon which the whole

of his bull professedly reposes; the position, to wit: that _The Virgin

Mary and the Saints not only have merit enough to make satisfaction for

their own sins_, _but have even merit to spare for the benefit of less

privileged souls in Purgatory_?

From the Bible or from the Doctors of the primitive Church, let his

venerable brethren, Patriarchs, Primates, Archbishops, and Bishops, bring

forward, if they can accomplish such a feat, the PROOF of this very

remarkable position.

Facts and Assertions: or a Brief and Plain Exhibition of the Incongruity of the Peculiar Doctrines of the Church of Rome With Those Both of the Sacred Scriptures and of the Early Writers of the Christian Church Catholic · 第 5 / 10 章