CHAPTER XIII.

CAUSES OF THE AFRICANDERS’ SECOND WAR OF INDEPENDENCE.

In one sense the causes of the Second War of Independence, like those

of the first, were as remote as the British seizure of Cape Colony in

1795, and as the years between 1814 and 1836, which saw the

accumulation of grievances that led to the “Great Trek.” Seeds of

dislike to the English were then sown in the Africander mind which have

never ceased to propagate themselves—an ominous heredity—from father to

son through all the intervening generations.

The immediate causes of that war were of a more recent date. Tracing

backward, the war was brought about by the alleged grievances of a

multitude of foreigners—vastly outnumbering the citizens—who, for their

own purposes, had entered the territory of the South African Republic

within a single decade; these foreigners went there in the pursuit of

wealth; the wealth that enticed them there was in the rich gold

deposits of the Witwatersrand district of the Transvaal. If the gold

had not been there, or had not been discovered, the excess of

foreigners would not have pressed into the country; if the foreigners

had not flocked into it in great excess of numbers over the citizens,

there would have been no alleged grievances to redress, and therefore

no war, unless one or both of the parties to it had predetermined to

bring about a conflict at this time and found some other pretext.

Tracing from cause to effect up to the war, we begin with unimportant

discoveries of gold near the eastern border of the Transvaal between

1867 and 1872. Though these were not rich in themselves, they

encouraged more vigorous and extensive prospecting than had been

practiced theretofore. This led to the discovery, in 1885, of the

marvelously rich deposits of the precious metal in beds of conglomerate

in the Witwatersrand district. The influx of strangers had been

considerable from 1882, but from 1885 to 1895 the foreign additions to

the population of the Transvaal threatened to submerge the native

Africander citizens, for the newcomers were mostly men, and largely

exceeded in number the entire Africander population, including the

women and the children.

The first result of the new mining industry and the rapid growth of the

towns was pleasant enough—the revenues of the needy republic were

increased, and there was a promise of unprecedented prosperity.

Nevertheless, in the tidal wave of incoming aliens from the British

colonies in South Africa, from Europe and from America—most of them

British, and nearly all speaking English—the far-seeing president, Paul

Kruger, and other leaders of political life in the Transvaal, early

recognized an element of peril to their cherished domestic

institutions.

As a defense against the passing of controlling power into the hands of

transient settlers, the electoral franchise was somewhat restricted. Up

to the convention of 1881 the probation of an alien seeking

enfranchisement in the Transvaal Republic was a residence in the

country for two years. At that time, with the arbitrary annexation of

1877 fresh in their minds, and knowing that the British authorities had

been solicited to take that step by English residents in the Transvaal,

it is a matter of no surprise that the Africanders extended the

probation for franchise to five years—the period required in the United

States of America. That provision was in force when the London

Convention was signed, in 1884; it passed unquestioned by the British

government, and was still in force in 1890. Up to that date the

franchise had kept the native Africander element in a safe majority.

As a concession to demands on the part of foreigners for a reduction of

the period of residence required for naturalization, Mr. Kruger

proposed, in 1890, to divide the volksraad, which consisted of

forty-eight members, into two chambers of twenty-four members each, the

first to retain supreme power, the second to be competent to legislate

in all matters local to the new industrial population gathered,

principally, in and about Johannesburg, and its acts to be subject

always to the veto of the first volksraad. The measure provided, also,

that in electing members of the second volksraad only two years’

residence and the ordinary process of naturalization should be required

of aliens, their franchise for the first volksraad still being subject

to an additional five years’ probation.

This measure was passed by the volksraad after a good deal of

opposition by the more conservative members. It has been condemned as

clumsy and inadequate; but it is worth while to weigh Mr. Kruger’s own

words explanatory of his purpose in it. “I intend this second

volksraad,” he said, “to act as a bridge. I want my burghers to see

that the new population may safely be trusted to take part in the

government of the country. When they see that this is done, and that no

harm happens, then the two volksraads may come together again, and the

distinction between the old and the new population can be obliterated.”

It should be remembered, however, that the two years’ franchise gave

the citizen no vote in the election of the president and the executive

council—for that privilege he had to fill out the additional five

years’ probation—and that no naturalized burgher could become a member

of the first volksraad.

Discontent continued to spread among the new industrial population, who

complained bitterly of exclusion from important political rights, and

of grievances which they and the mining industry suffered under the

existing laws and administration. As a means of redress a reform

association was formed in 1893. It is necessary to a correct judgment

of the situation at this time to consider the statements of both sides

as to the causes of complaint.

According to Canon Little, who cannot be accused of favoring the

Africanders—

“The grievances of the Uitlanders were these:

“1. That the customs tariff was excessive, making food shamefully dear,

and that the charges for railway freights were unduly heavy.

“2. That the duties on machinery and chemicals were extortionate.

“3. That these and the dynamite monopoly made the expense of all mining

operations excessive.

“4. The extreme unfairness as to the vexatious laws touching on

education and the use of language.”

Over against these allegations are the statements of Mr. F. Reginald

Statham in his “South Africa as It Is.” Mr. Statham writes from the

Africander viewpoint, but gives some guaranty of sincerity and of

confidence in his own averments by an appeal to figures—which can

always be verified. Speaking in a general way of the conditions

prevailing at this period, he says:

“The idea of the persecuted and oppressed Uitlanders has become so

fixed in the minds of English people—thanks to the efforts of those who

were occupied in preparing and justifying a revolt—that even the

plainest statement of facts seems powerless to dispossess it. No one

will claim, no one ever has claimed, that the government of the South

African Republic is perfect. Having regard to the extraordinary changes

that have come over the country during the last ten years, it is really

a marvel that the government is not much more imperfect than it is. The

present position of the Transvaal executive has been not inaptly

compared to the position of the crew of a collier brig who might

suddenly find themselves in control of a first-class mail steamer.

However desirous they might be of doing their best, they could hardly

avoid making some mistakes. If the foreign population had much more to

complain of than they have, it ought not to cause either surprise or

indignation.

“And what have they to complain of? Really, the life of the average

foreigner in Johannesburg is the freest imaginable. He can follow his

trade, he can follow his profession, no matter what it is, without any

question or hindrance from the government. His position as an Uitlander

in no way hinders him from investing in property, from practicing as a

lawyer in the courts, from undertaking, in fact, as freely as he could

undertake in his own country, any lawful kind of business or

occupation. If he pays a high rent for his house, that is not the fault

of the government, but of the land speculators who have bought up

building stands. If his water supply is somewhat defective, it is the

fault of the big foreign capitalists, who think more of the dividends

they put in their own pockets than of the water they put into the

people’s mouths.

“A government which depends on the goodwill of a strictly Sabbatarian

population allows the Uitlander to spend his Sunday exactly as he

pleases. He may play lawn tennis if he likes—and, indeed, he generally

does so; he may engage in cricket matches, he can attend so-called

sacred concerts, the programmes of which are drawn from the music hall

or the comic opera. If he is in a gayer mood he may witness on a Sunday

evening displays of “living pictures” which certainly would not be

tolerated at the Royal Aquarium. To put it shortly, allowing for little

drawbacks of climate and the expense of living, the Uitlander can live

more at his ease in Johannesburg or Pretoria than in almost any other

city under the sun.

“But he is taxed.

“How is he taxed? There is probably no one in the Transvaal, rich or

poor, whose personal taxes amount to more than £5 a year. If it is

complained that he is taxed through his interest in the gold industry

it is easy to make an appeal to published figures. In 1895 the Crown

Reef Gold Mining Company produced gold worth upward of £420,000, and

distributed nearly £97,000 in profits. Its payment to the Government

for rents, licenses, and all other privileges and rights amounted to

£1,191 9s 10d. In the same year the Robinson Company, which had

produced £651,000 in gold and distributed £346,000 in dividends, paid

to the government £395 11s 8d. The New Chimes Company, producing

£93,000 in gold and distributing £32,000 in profits, paid under the

head of rates and licenses, together with insurance premiums, £664 16s

5d. The Transvaal Coal Trust produced 266,945 tons of coal, and paid

the government £53 15s, while the Consolidated Land and Exploration

Company, in which the Ecksteins are the largest shareholders, and which

owns more than 250 farms of 6,000 acres each, paid to the government in

the shape of taxes, including absentee tax, no more than £722 2s 6d.

“These figures are sufficiently eloquent by themselves. They become

more eloquent when they are placed beside the 50 per cent impost

claimed by the Chartered Company on all gold-mining enterprise in

Rhodesia.

“But what about indirect taxation? Here are the facts:

“All machinery for mining purposes is subject to only 1½ per cent

impost dues, the term machinery being stretched by the government to

its uttermost possibilities to meet the mining industry, and it is made

to include sheet lead, cyanide, etc. All other articles not specially

rated are subject to an ad valorem duty of 7½ per cent, the Cape

Colonist paying an ad valorem duty of 12 per cent. Specially rated

articles affecting the white miners, such as tea, coffee, butter, rice,

soap, sugar, are in most cases subject to lower, and only in one

instance to higher, duties than in Cape Colony.

“Here is a comparison:

CAPE COLONY. TRANSVAAL.

Butter 3d per lb. 5s 0d per 100 lbs.

Cheese 3d per lb. 5s 0d per 100 lbs.

Coffee 12s 6d per 100 lbs. 2s 6d per 100 lbs.

Rice 3s 6d per 100 lbs. 1s 6d per 100 lbs.

Soap 4s 2d per 100 lbs. 5s 0d per 100 lbs.

Sugar 6s 3d per 100 lbs. 3s 6d per 100 lbs.

Tea 8d per lb. 2s 6d per 100 lbs.

Guns £1 per barrel. 10s 0d per barrel.

“As regards monopolies and concessions, the dynamite monopoly is often

quoted as an instance of the manner in which monopolies are granted, to

the detriment of the mining interest. It has been complained that the

government retains a right to charge 90s a case for what can be

produced for 30s a case. These figures, however, are exaggerated both

ways. The government charge is 85s a case, and as the dynamite used by

De Beers, at Kimberley, costs more than 60s a case laid down there, it

can hardly be held that 85s is a high charge in Johannesburg, having

regard to the much greater distance of Johannesburg from the sea. In

this matter of the dynamite concession, moreover, it was a choice

between a foreign monopoly and a local monopoly, while in the reports

of mining companies in which explosives are separately accounted for it

is shown that while total working expenses run up to over 30s per ton,

the cost of explosives is less than 1s 3d per ton.

“As regards the railway concessions, the truth of the matter is that

the Transvaal Railway Company—the Netherlands South African Railway

Company, that is—by providing competing routes to Johannesburg from

Natal and Delagoa Bay, keeps in check the monopoly which would

certainly be taken great advantage of by the Cape Colony if the only

route to Johannesburg was from Cape ports.”

It may be allowed—it must be—that the old saw, “figures will not lie,”

is unsound. In the hands of capable and unscrupulous persons they will

lie like Ananias and Sapphira. But, like that of Ananias and Sapphira,

the lie in figures brings swift detection and punishment. It ought to

be easy, therefore, for those who have filled the ears of the world

with charges of Africander oppression practiced upon the foreigners in

the way of “excessive customs tariff,” “extortionate duties on

machinery,” and the “dynamite monopoly that made the expense of all

mining operations excessive,” to convince the world-jury to which they

have appealed that they have a case. They ought at least to be able to

show that in British Rhodesia the impost on the profits of gold mining

was not 50 per cent, while in the Transvaal it was about 8 per cent

thereof; that in British Cape Colony the ad valorem duty on articles

not specially rated was not 12 per cent, while in the Transvaal it was

7½ per cent; that in British Cape Colony specially rated articles

affecting the white miner as to expense of living were not taxed all

the way from 100 to 500 per cent higher than in the Transvaal, with the

single exception of soap; that an import duty of 1½ per cent on mining

machinery was extortionate as compared with the tariff of other

nations, or that a higher duty than 1½ per cent was collected in the

Transvaal; and that a profit of 25s a case on dynamite, less the cost

of transportation from Kimberley to Johannesburg, and only causing the

expense for explosives used in mining to be 1s 3d per ton of ore out of

a total cost of 30s per ton, was an oppressive monopoly causing the

cost of mining to be excessive.

Concerning the other grounds of complaint Mr. Statham writes:

“There are, besides the material grievances alluded to above, what may

be called the political grievances, such as (1) the alleged government

of the country by a small faction of Hollanders, (2) the language

grievance, (3) the educational grievance, and (4) the franchise

grievance.

“As regards the first mentioned of these, an honest and impartial

person would search for evidence of it in vain. All the members of the

executive, with one exception, are South African born; so are the

majority of heads and sub-heads of departments. * * * The only

Hollander of any distinction in the government is the state secretary,

Dr. Leyds, a man of exceptional ability and integrity, who, in spite of

enormous difficulties and constant attacks, has deserved and retained

the confidence both of the president and the volksraad. To say that he

is the ablest and most cultured official in South Africa is to say what

is simply true, and if his ability has excited jealousy and resentment,

it is only what a general study of human nature would lead one to

expect.

“As regards the language question and the education question,

consideration has to be paid to the language most usually spoken in the

country. Entirely misleading ideas are liable to be formed on this

point, owing to the erroneous impression as to the relative strength of

the Dutch and the foreign population. A habit has arisen of speaking as

if the foreign population greatly outnumbered the burgher population.

The case is quite the opposite of this. The census of Johannesburg

taken in 1896 by the Johannesburg Sanitary Commission showed that the

population of the place had been greatly overestimated, the male

European population of all ages amounting to 31,000. As there are

25,000 burghers on the military register of the republic, it seems fair

to assume that the burgher population is at least 150,000, while the

foreign population is probably not more than half of that. Of the

150,000 burghers and their families fully two-thirds do not understand

English. Is it, then, unreasonable to claim that the official language,

the language of official documents, shall be the language spoken by

two-thirds of the people, or do the women and children count for

nothing? But although the official language by law is Dutch, there is

not a single government office in which there is not English or German

spoken to those who cannot speak Dutch. In the higher courts the judges

frequently shut their eyes to the use of the English language in the

witness-box, and in the lower courts English is invariably spoken by

English litigants.

“As regards the education question, there is not now much need to

discuss it. The volksraad during the session of 1896 passed a law in

further expansion of the principles laid down in the law of 1892, and

under the regulations drawn up in accordance with the law, as now

expanded, state schools, in which English-speaking children will be

taught in English, and which are placed under the control of

representative school boards, have been established in the gold-mining

districts.

“The franchise question has been made the subject of special complaint.

Here, however, there are several difficulties in the way. In the first

place, the majority of the foreign population do not want the

franchise, because they are quite content with their position as it is

and do not want to become—as they would have to do if they exercised

the franchise—burghers of the South African Republic. The very

agitation over the question has increased the difficulty, for the more

there seems to be a possibility of a serious misunderstanding between

the Transvaal and Great Britain, the less disposed British subjects

become to place themselves in a position which might compel them to

fight against their own countrymen. Meantime the government and the

volksraad have been compelled to the conclusion that the agitation for

the franchise is not genuine—that it has not been encouraged with the

view to obtaining a concession, but with the object of establishing a

grievance. They have seen, too, that to grant wholesale political

privileges to the foreign residents in Johannesburg, even if those

foreign residents were willing to become naturalized, would be to a

great extent to deliver up the interests of all the dependent

classes—the shopkeepers, the miners, the professional men—into the

hands of a small group of capitalists, who would use their influence,

as they have used it elsewhere, to corrupt the political atmosphere and

to subject the interests of every individual to their own. The

political tyranny that exists in Kimberley, where employes of De Beers

are compelled to vote to order on pain of dismissal, supplies a

sufficient illustration of what would happen in Johannesburg if once

the financial conspirators secured political control. A further and

most significant illustration is supplied by a well-known incident in

connection with the revolutionary movement in Johannesburg, when miners

under the control of the leading conspirators were ordered to take up

arms under penalty of forfeiting their wages. That in the great

majority of cases they preferred the latter course is in itself a

complete exposure of the hollowness of the whole revolutionary

movement. In all known cases of revolution arising from discontent on

the part of a mining population it has been the miners who have taken

the lead and dragged others in with them. In this case the miners, who

had never dreamed of discontent, were ordered to take up arms and

refused.

“Out of the facts of the position actually existing in Johannesburg and

other gold-mining centers it was utterly impossible for any honest man

to manufacture a serious complaint, least of all such a complaint as

would in any respect justify a revolution to secure redress. So far

from being treated with unfairness or hardship, the foreign residents

in the Transvaal have been treated with marked consideration. The

interests of the gold industry have been consulted in every possible

way. If the government has not in some instances been able to do all it

might have wished to do, it has been because the reckless language of a

portion of the press and the overbearing attitude of the capitalist

agitators have aroused the suspicion and the resentment of the

volksraad.

“Yet out of this position of things a case had to be got up against the

Transvaal government in order to justify the revolutionary movement

that had been planned in the interest of the small groups of

capitalists who had determined to make themselves as supreme over the

gold industry in Johannesburg as they had become over the diamond

industry in Kimberley.”

It has seemed necessary to quote Mr. Statham thus at length in order

that the alleged grievances of the foreigners in the Transvaal, and the

Africander answer thereto may be considered side by side. To say the

least, Mr. Statham has not dealt in vague generalities. His assertions

are specific and his figures can easily be investigated. It is for

those who sympathize with the complaints which led to prolonged

agitation and finally to war, to show that Mr. Statham was in error.

Until they shall have done so charges of “oppressive” and

“extortionate” imposts, taxes and tariffs will lie, not against the

South African Republic, but against the British administration in Cape

Colony, Natal and Rhodesia.

Mr. Statham’s contention that the Dutch ought to be the official

language of the Transvaal seems well founded. The account he gives of a

somewhat tardy provision—made after the raid of December, 1895—for the

instruction of English children in the English language evinces a

disposition to meet the reasonable demands of the foreigners in that

regard; but the delay in doing so is to be regretted. The matter of

franchise became the subject of acrimonious diplomatic negotiation and

the immediate cause of war, which will be treated of more fully in a

later chapter.

The Africanders · 第 13 / 17 章