SWARAJ MY IDEAL

The following is a fairly full report of Mr. Gandhi's important speech

at Calcutta on the 13th December 1920:--

The very fact, that so many of you cannot understand Hindi which is

bound to be the National medium of expression throughout Hindustan in

gatherings of Indians belonging to different parts of the land, shows

the depth of the degradation to which we have sunk, and points to the

supreme necessity of the non-co-operation movement which is intended to

lift us out of that condition. This Government has been instrumental in

degrading this great nation in various ways, and it is impossible to be

free from it without co-operation amongst ourselves which is in turn

impossible without a national medium of expression.

But I am not here to day to plead for the medium. I am to plead for the

acceptance by the country of the programme of non-violent, progressive

non-co-operation. Now all the words that I have used here are absolutely

necessary and the two adjectives 'progressive' and 'non-violent' are

integral part of a whole. With me non-violence is part of my religion, a

matter of creed. But with the great number of Mussalmans non-violence is

a policy, with thousand, if not millions of Hindus, it is equally a

matter of policy. But whether it is a creed or a policy, it is utterly

impossible for you to finish the programme for the enfranchisement of

the millions of India, without recognising the necessity and the value

of non-violence. Violence may for a moment avail to secure a certain

measure of success but it could not in the long run achieve any

appreciable result. On the other hand all violence would prove

destructive to the honour and self-respect of the nation. The blue books

issued by the Government of India show that inasmuch as we have used

violence, military expenditure has gone up, not proportionately but in

geometrical progression. The bonds of our slavery have been forged all

the stronger for our having offered violence. And the whole history of

British rule in India is a demonstration of the fact that we have never

been able to offer successful violence. Whilst therefore I say that

rather than have the yoke of a Government that has so emasculated us, I

would welcome violence. I would urge with all the emphasis that I can

command that India will never be able to regain her own by methods

of violence.

Lord Ronaldshay who has done me the honour of reading my booklet on Home

Rule has warned my countrymen against engaging themselves in a struggle

for a Swaraj such as is described in that booklet. Now though I do not

want to withdraw a single word of it, I would say to you on this

occasion that I do not ask India to follow out to-day the methods

prescribed in my booklet. If they could do that they would have Home

Rule not in a year but in a day, and India by realising that ideal wants

to acquire an ascendancy over the rest of the world. But it must remain

a day dream more or less for the time being. What I am doing to-day is

that I am giving the country a pardonable programme not the abolition of

law courts, posts, telegraphs and of railways but for the attainment of

Parliamentary Swarja. I am telling you to do that so long as we do not

isolate ourselves from this Government, we are co-operating with it

through schools, law courts and councils, through service civil and

military and payment of taxes and foreign trade.

The moment this fact is realised and non-co-operation is effected, this

Government must totter to pieces. If I know that the masses were

prepared for the whole programme at once, I would not delay in putting

it at once to work. It is not possible at the present moment, to prevent

the masses from bursting out into wrath against those who come to

execute the law, it is not possible, that the military would lay down

their arms without the slightest violence. If that were possible to-day,

I would propose all the stages of non-co-operation to be worked

simultaneously. But we have not secured that control over the masses, we

have uselessly frittered away precious years of the nation's life in

mastering a language which we need least for winning our liberty; we

have frittered away all those years in learning liberty from Milton and

Shakespeare, in deriving inspiration from the pages of Mill, whilst

liberty could be learnt at our doors. We have thus succeeded in

isolating ourselves from the masses: we have been westernised. We have

failed these 35 years to utilise our education in order to permeate the

masses. We have sat upon the pedestal and from there delivered harangues

to them in a language they do not understand and we see to-day that we

are unable to conduct large gatherings in a disciplined manner. And

discipline is the essence of success. Here is therefore one reason why I

have introduced the word 'progressive' in the non-co-operation

Resolution. Without any impertinence I may say that I understand the

mass mind better than any one amongst the educated Indians. I contend

that the masses are not ready for suspension of payment of taxes. They

have not yet learnt sufficient self-control. If I was sure of

non-violence on their part I would ask them to suspend payment to-day

and not waste a single moment of the nations time. With me the liberty

of India has become a passion. Liberty of Islam is as dear to me. I

would not therefore delay a moment if I found that the whole of the

programme could be enforced at once.

It grieves me to miss the faces of dear and revered leaders in this

assembly. We miss here the trumpet voice of Surendranath Banorji, who

has rendered inestimable service to the country. And though we stand as

poles asunder to-day, though we may have sharp differences with him, we

must express them with becoming restraint. I do not ask you to give up a

single iota of principle. I urge non-violence in language and in deed.

If non-violence is essential in our dealings with Government, it is more

essential in our dealings with our leaders. And it grieves me deeply to

hear of recent instances of violence reported to have been used in East

Bongal against our own people. I was pained to hear that the ears of a

man who had voted at the recent elections had been cut, and night soil

had been thrown into the bed of a man who had stood as a candidate.

Non-co-operation is never going to succeed in this way. It will not

succeed unless we create an atmosphere of perfect freedom, unless we

prize our opponents liberty as much as our own. The liberty of faith,

conscience, thought and action which we claim for ourselves must be

conceded equally to others. Non co-operation is a process of

purification and we must continually try to touch the hearts of those

who differ from us, their minds, and their emotions, but never their

bodies. Discipline and restraint are the cardinal principles of our

conduct and I warn you against any sort of tyrannical social ostracism.

I was deeply grieved therefore to hear of the insult offered to a dead

body in Delhi and feel that if it was the action of non-co-operators

they have disgraced themselves and their creed. I repeat we cannot

deliver our land through violence.

It was not a joke when I said on the congress platform that Swaraj could

be established in one year if there was sufficient response from the

nation. Three months of this year are gone. If we are true to our salt,

true to our nation, true to the songs we sing, if we are true to the

Bhagwad Gita and the Koran, we would finish the programme in the

remaining nine months and deliver Islam the Punjab and India.

I have proposed a limited programme workable within one year, having a

special regard to the educated classes. We seem to be labouring under

the illusion that we cannot possibly live without Councils, law courts

and schools provided by the Government. The moment we are disillusioned

we have Swaraj. It is demoralising both for Government and the governed

that a hundred thousand pilgrims should dictate terms to a nation

composed of three hundred millions. And how is it they can thus dictate

terms. It is because we have been divided and they have ruled. I have

never forgotten Humes' frank confession that the British Government was

sustained by the policy of "Divide and Rule." Therefore it is that I

have laid stress upon Hindu Muslim Unity as one of the important

essentials for the success of Non-co-operation. But, it should be no lip

unity, nor bunia unity it should be a unity broad based on a recognition

of the heart. If we want to save Hinduism, I say for Gods sake, do not

seek to bargain with the Mussalmans. I have been going about with

Maulana Shaukat Ali all these months, but I have not so much as

whispered anything about the protection of the cow. My alliance with the

Ali Brothers is one of honour. I feel that I am on my honour, the whole

of Hinduism is on its honour, and if it will not be found wanting, it

will do its duty towards the Mussalmans of India. Any bargaining would

be degrading to us. Light brings light not darkness, and nobility done

with a noble purpose will be twice rewarded. It will be God alone who

can protect the cow. Ask me not to-day--'what about the cow,' ask me

after Islam is vindicated through India. Ask the Rajas what they do to

entertain their English guests. Do they not provide beef and champagne

for their guests. Persuade them first to stop cow killing and then think

of bargaining with Mussalmans. And how are we Hindus behaving ourselves

towards the cow and her progeny! Do we treat her as our religion

requires us? Not till we have set our own house in order and saved the

cow from the Englishmen have we the right to plead on her behalf with

the Mussalmans. And the best way of saving the cow from them is to give

them unconditional help in their hour of trouble.

Similarly what do we owe the Punjab? The whole of India was made to

crawl on her belly in as much as a single Punjabi was made to crawl in

that dirty lane in Amritsar, the whole womanhood of India was unveiled

in as much as the innocent woman of Manianwalla were unveiled by an

insolent office; and Indian childhood was dishonoured in that, that

school children of tender age were made to walk four times a day to

stated places within the martial area in the Punjab and to salute the

Union Jack, through the effect of which order two children, seven years

old died of sunstroke having been made to wait in the noonday sun. In my

opinion it is a sin to attend the schools and colleges conducted under

the aegis of this Government so long as it has not purged itself of

these crimes by proper repentance. We may not with any sense of

self-respect plead before the courts of the Government when we remember

that it was through the Punjab Courts that innocent men were sentenced

to be imprisoned and hanged. We become participators in the crime of the

Government by voluntarily helping it or being helped by it.

The women of India have intuitively understood the spiritual nature of

the struggle. Thousands have attended to listen to the message of

non-violent non-co-operation and have given me their precious ornaments

for the purpose of advancing the cause of Swaraj. Is it any wonder if I

believe the possibility of gaining Swaraj within a year after all these

wonderful demonstrations? I would be guilty of want of faith in God if I

under-rated the significance of the response from the women of India. I

hope that the students will do their duty. The country certainly expects

the lawyers who have hitherto led public agitation to recognise the new

awakening.

I have used strong language but I have done so with the greatest

deliberation, I am not actuated by any feeling of revenge. I do not

consider Englishmen as my enemy. I recognise the worth of many. I enjoy

the privilege of having many English friends, but I am a determined

enemy of the English rule as is conducted at present and if the

power--tapasya--of one man could destroy it, I would certainly destroy

it, if it could not be mended. An Empire that stands for injustice and

breach of faith does not deserve to stand if its custodians will not

repent and non-co-operation has been devised in order to enable the

nation to compel justice.

I hope that Bengal will take her proper place in this movement of

self-purification. Bengal began Swadeshi and national education when the

rest of India was sleeping. I hope that Bengal will come to the front

in this movement for gaining Swaraj and gaining justice for the Khilafat

and the Punjab through purification and self-sacrifice.

Freedom's Battle Being a Comprehensive Collection of Writings and Speeches on the Present Situation · 第 120 / 189 题