TURKISH PEACE TERMS

The question of question to-day is the Khilafat question, otherwise

known as that of the Turkish peace terms. His Excellency the Viceroy

deserves our thanks for receiving the joint deputation even at this late

hour, especially when he was busy preparing to receive the head of the

different provinces. His Excellency must be thanked for the unfailing

courtesy with which he received the deputation and the courteous

language in which his reply was couched. But mere courtesy, valuable as

it is at all times, never so valuable as at this, is not enough at this

critical moment. 'Sweet words butter no parsnips' is a proverb more

applicable to-day than ever before. Behind the courtesy there was the

determination to punish Turkey. Punishment of Turkey is a thing which

Muslim sentiment cannot tolerate for a moment. Muslim soldiers are as

responsible for the result of the war as any others. It was to appease

them that Mr. Asquith said when Turkey decided to join the Central

Powers that the British Government had no designs on Turkey and that His

Majesty's Government would never think of punishing the Sultan for the

misdeeds of the Turkish Committee. Examined by that standard the

Viceregal reply is not only disappointing but it is a fall from truth

and justice.

What is this British Empire? It is as much Mahomedan and Hindu as it is

Christian. Its religious neutrality is not a virtue, or if it is, it is

a virtue of necessity. Such a mighty Empire could not be held together

on any other terms. British ministers are therefore bound to protect

Mahomedan interests as any other. Indeed as the Muslim rejoinder says,

they are bound to make the cause their own. What is the use of His

Excellency having presented the Muslim claim before the Conference? If

the cause is lost the Mahomedans will be entitled to think that Britain

did not do her duty by them. And the Viceregal reply confirms the view.

When His Excellency says that Turkey must suffer for her having joined

the Central Powers he but expresses the opinion of British ministers.

We hope, therefore, with the framers of the Muslim rejoinder that His

Majesty's ministers will mend the mistakes if any have been committed

and secure a settlement that would satisfy Mahomedan sentiment.

What does the sentiment demand? The preservation of the Khilafat with

such guarantee as may be necessary for the protection of the interests

of the non-Muslim races living under Turkish rule and the Khalif's

control over Arabia and the Holy Places with such arrangement as may be

required for guaranteeing Arab self-rule, should the Arabs desire it. It

is hardly possible to state the claim more fairly than has been done. It

is a claim backed by justice, by the declarations of British ministers

and by the unanimous Hindu and Muslim opinion. It would be midsummer

madness to reject or whittle down a claim so backed.

Freedom's Battle Being a Comprehensive Collection of Writings and Speeches on the Present Situation · 第 94 / 189 题