BLACKMAIL.

On Saturday, May 29th, the Master Masons' association met and talked

over the situation, congratulating each other on the promised success of

their movement for freedom.

At the request of Mr. Tapper Mr. Victor Falkenau made a statement to

show the corrupt methods of the walking delegate. He said that in

October, 1886, he was erecting a building on Astor street for Mr. Post,

when Walking Delegate Healy appeared on the scene and objected to some

pressed brick being put into arches that had been cut at the

manufactory, insisting that they should be cut on the job. Healy

insisted on calling the men off the job, but in consideration of $5,

which was then paid to him, he let the work proceed. A committee from

the Bricklayers' union had called on him to ascertain what had been

done, and he had put it in possession of the facts in the case. The

money was paid to Healy Oct. 21st. In the face of this statement, which

was backed by ample proof, the walking delegate was not removed from his

high position. Other members referred to similar cases in which walking

delegates had shown themselves to be walking blackmailers.

When Delegate Healy heard of the statement of Mr. Falkenau he threatened

to bring suit against him for $10,000 damages. Mr. Falkenau remarked

that he was glad he was to be sued as a hearing of the cause in a court

would bring out the facts under oath in a manner that would satisfy

anyone as to the truth or falsity of the charge. A contractor who was

familiar with the facts in the case said the statement of Mr. Falkenau

would be supported by other testimony when the time came, but he was

satisfied there would be no libel suit. And there was none.

30,000 locked out · 第 53 / 139 题