CHAPTER XIII.

DIGRESSION ON THE PASSAGE OF THE ARABIANS TO THEIR AGE OF REASON.

INFLUENCE OF MEDICAL IDEAS THROUGH THE NESTORIANS AND JEWS.

_The intellectual Development of the Arabians is guided by the

Nestorians and the Jews, and is in the Medical Direction.--The

Basis of this Alliance is theological._

_Antagonism of the Byzantine System to Scientific

Medicine.--Suppression of the Asclepions.--Their Replacement

by Miracle-cure.--The resulting Superstition and Ignorance._

_Affiliation of the Arabians with the Nestorians and Jews._

_1st. The Nestorians, their Persecutions, and the Diffusion of

their Sectarian Ideas.--They inherit the old Greek Medicine._

_Sub-digression on Greek Medicine.--The

Asclepions.--Philosophical Importance of Hippocrates, who

separates Medicine from Religion.--The School of Cnidos.--Its

Suppression by Constantine._

_Sub-digression on Egyptian Medicine.--It is founded on

Anatomy and Physiology.--Dissections and Vivisections.--The

Great Alexandrian Physicians._

_2nd. The Jewish Physicians.--Their Emancipation from

Superstition.--They found Colleges and promote Science and

Letters._

_The contemporary Tendency to Magic, Necromancy, the Black

Art.--The Philosopher's Stone, Elixir of Life, etc._

_The Arabs originate scientific Chemistry.--Discover the

strong Acids, Phosphorus, etc.--Their geological Ideas.--Apply

Chemistry to the Practice of Medicine.--Approach of the

Conflict between the Saracenic material and the European

supernatural System._

[Sidenote: Importance of the influence of the Arabians.]

The military operations of the Arabians, described in Chapter XI.,

overthrew the Byzantine political system, prematurely closing the Age of

Faith in the East; their intellectual procedure gave rise to an equally

important result, being destined, in the end, to close the Age of Faith

in the West. The Saracens not only destroyed the Italian offshoot, they

also impressed characteristic lineaments on the Age of Reason in Europe.

Events so important make it necessary for me to turn aside from the

special description of European intellectual advancement, and offer a

digression on the passage of the Arabians to their Age of Reason. It is

impossible for us to understand their action in the great drama about to

be performed unless we understand the character they had assumed.

[Sidenote: Their intellectual progress.]

In a few centuries the fanatics of Mohammed had altogether changed their

appearance. Great philosophers, physicians, mathematicians, astronomers,

alchemists, grammarians, had arisen among them. Letters and science, in

all their various departments, were cultivated.

[Sidenote: Their teachers were the Nestorians and Jews.]

A nation stirred to its profoundest depths by warlike emigration, and

therefore ready to make, as soon as it reaches a period of repose, a

rapid intellectual advance, may owe the path in which it is about to

pass to those who are in the position of pointing it out, or of

officiating as teachers. The teachers of the Saracens were the

Nestorians and the Jews.

[Sidenote: Their scientific progress was through medicine.]

It has been remarked that Arabian science emerged out of medicine, and

that in its cultivation physicians took the lead, its beginnings being

in the pursuit of alchemy. In this chapter I have to describe the origin

of these facts, and therefore must consider the state of Greek and

Egyptian medicine, and relate how, wherever the Byzantine system could

reach, true medical philosophy was displaced by relic and shrine-curing;

and how it was, that while European ideas were in all directions

reposing on the unsubstantial basis of the supernatural, those of the

Saracens were resting on the solid foundation of a material support.

When the Arabs conquered Egypt, their conduct was that of bigoted

fanatics; it justified the accusation made by some against them, that

they burned the Alexandrian library for the purpose of heating the

baths. But scarcely were they settled in their new dominion when they

exhibited an extraordinary change. At once they became lovers and

zealous cultivators of learning.

[Sidenote: Causes of their union with Nestorians and Jews.]

The Arab power had extended in two directions, and had been submitted to

two influences. In Asia it had been exposed to the Nestorians, in Africa

to the Jews, both of whom had suffered persecution at the hands of the

Byzantine government, apparently for the same opinion as that which had

now established itself by the sword of Mohammed. The doctrine of the

unity of God was their common point of contact. On this they could

readily affiliate, and hold in common detestation the trinitarian power

at Constantinople. He who is suffering the penalties of the law as a

heretic, or who is pursued by judicial persecution as a misbeliever,

will readily consort with others reputed to cherish similar

infidelities. Brought into unison in Asia with the Nestorians, and in

Africa with the Alexandrian Jews, the Arabians became enthusiastic

admirers of learning.

[Sidenote: Medicine becomes their neutral ground.]

Not that there was between the three parties thus coalescing a complete

harmony of sentiment in the theological direction; for, though the

Nestorians and the Jews were willing to accept one-half of the Arabian

dogma, that there is but one God, they could not altogether commit

themselves to the other, that Mohammed is his Prophet. Perhaps

estrangement on this point might have arisen, but fortunately a

remarkable circumstance opened the way for a complete understanding

between them. Almost from the beginning the Nestorians had devoted

themselves to the study of medicine, and had paid much attention to the

structure and diseases of the body of man; the Jews had long produced

distinguished physicians. These medical studies presented, therefore, a

neutral ground on which the three parties could intellectually unite in

harmony; and so thoroughly did the Arabians affiliate with these their

teachers, that they acquired from them a characteristic mental

physiognomy. Their physicians were their great philosophers; their

medical colleges were their foci of learning. While the Byzantines

obliterated science in theology, the Saracens illuminated it by

medicine.

[Sidenote: Byzantine suppression of medicine.]

[Sidenote: Substitution of public charities.]

When Constantine the Great and his successors, under ecclesiastical

influence, had declared themselves the enemies of worldly learning, it

became necessary for the clergy to assume the duty of seeing to the

physical as well as the religious condition of the people. It was

unsuited to the state of things that physicians, whose philosophical

tendencies inclined them to the pagan party, should be any longer

endured. Their education in the Asclepions imparted to them ideas in

opposition to the new policy. An edict of Constantine suppressed those

establishments, ample provision being, however, made for replacing them

by others more agreeable to the genius of Christianity. Hospitals and

benevolent organizations were founded in the chief cities, and richly

endowed with money and lands. In these merciful undertakings the

empress-mother, Helena, was distinguished, her example being followed by

many high-born ladies. The heart of women, which is naturally open to

the desolate and afflicted, soon gives active expression to its

sympathies when it is sanctified by Christian faith. In this, its

legitimate direction, Christianity could display its matchless

benevolence and charities. Organizations were introduced upon the most

extensive and varied scale; one had charge of foundlings, another of

orphans, another of the poor. We have already alluded to the parabolani

or visitors, and of the manner in which they were diverted from their

original intent.

[Sidenote: Gradual fall into miracle-cure.]

But, noble as were these charities, they laboured under an essential

defect in having substituted for educated physicians well-meaning but

unskilful ecclesiastics. The destruction of the Asclepions was not

attended by any suitably extensive measures for insuring professional

education. The sick who were placed in the benevolent institutions were,

at the best, rather under the care of kind nurses than under the advice

of physicians; and the consequences are seen in the gradually increasing

credulity and imposture of succeeding ages, until, at length, there was

an almost universal reliance on miraculous interventions. Fetiches, said

to be the relics of saints, but no better than those of tropical

Africa, were believed to cure every disorder. To the shrines of saints

crowds repaired as they had at one time to the temples of Æsculapius.

The worshippers remained, though the name of the divinity was changed.

[Sidenote: Closing of the schools of medicine and philosophy.]

Scarcely were the Asclepions closed, the schools of philosophy

prohibited, the libraries dispersed or destroyed, learning branded as

magic or punished as treason, philosophers driven into exile and as a

class exterminated, when it became apparent that a void had been created

which it was incumbent on the victors to fill. Among the great prelates,

who was there to stand in the place of those men whose achievements had

glorified the human race? Who was to succeed to Archimedes, Hipparchus,

Euclid, Herophilus, Eratosthenes? who to Plato and Aristotle? The

quackeries of miracle-cure, shrine-cure, relic-cure, were destined to

eclipse the genius of Hippocrates, and nearly two thousand years to

intervene between Archimedes and Newton, nearly seventeen hundred

between Hipparchus and Kepler. A dismal interval of almost twenty

centuries parts Hero, whose first steam-engine revolved in the Serapion,

from James Watt, who has revolutionized the industry of the world. What

a fearful blank! Yet not a blank, for it had its products--hundreds of

patristic folios filled with obsolete speculation, oppressing the

shelves of antique libraries, enveloped in dust, and awaiting the worm.

[Sidenote: Its deplorable results.]

[Sidenote: Insecurity of the Byzantine system.]

Never was a more disastrous policy adopted than the Byzantine

suppression of profane learning. It is scarcely possible now to realize

the mental degradation produced when that system was at its height. Many

of the noblest philosophical and scientific works of antiquity

disappeared from the language in which they had been written, and were

only recovered, for the use of later and better ages, from translations

which the Saracens had made into Arabic. The insolent assumption of

wisdom by those who held the sword crushed every intellectual

aspiration. Yet, though triumphant for a time, this policy necessarily

contained the seeds of its own ignominious destruction. A day must

inevitably come when so grievous a wrong to the human race must be

exposed, and execrated, and punished--a day in which the poems of Homer

might once more be read, the immortal statues of the Greek sculptors

find worshippers, and the demonstrations of Euclid a consenting

intellect. But that unfortunate, that audacious policy of usurpation

once entered upon, there was no going back. He who is infallible must

needs be immutable. In its very nature the action implied compulsion,

compulsion implied the possession of power, and the whole policy insured

an explosion the moment that the means of compression should be weak.

[Sidenote: Bigotry of the first Saracens.]

[Sidenote: The nobler policy soon pursued.]

It is said that when the Saracens captured Alexandria, their victorious

general sent to the khalif to know his pleasure respecting the library.

The answer was in the spirit of the age. "If the books be confirmatory

of the Koran, they are superfluous; if contradictory, they are

pernicious. Let them be burnt." At this moment, to all human appearance,

the Mohammedan autocrat was on the point of joining in the evil policy

of the Byzantine sovereign. But fortunately it was but the impulse of a

moment, rectified forthwith, and a noble course of action was soon

pursued. The Arab incorporated into his literature the wisdom of those

he had conquered. In thus conceding to knowledge a free and

unembarrassed career, and, instead of repressing, encouraging to the

utmost all kinds of learning did the Koran take any harm? It was a high

statesmanship which, almost from the beginning of the impulse from

Mecca, bound down to a narrow, easily comprehended, and easily expressed

dogma the exacted belief, and in all other particulars let the human

mind go free.

[Sidenote: The true causes of the preceding events.]

In the preceding paragraphs I have criticized the course of events,

condemning or applauding the actions and the actors as circumstances

seem to require, herein following the usual course, which implies that

men can control affairs, and that the agent is to be held responsible

for his deed. We have, however, only to consider the course of our own

lives to be satisfied to how limited an extent such is the case. We are,

as we often say, the creatures of circumstances. In that expression

there is a higher philosophy than might at first sight appear. Our

actions are not the pure and unmingled results of our desires; they are

the offspring of many various and mixed conditions. In that which seems

to be the most voluntary decision there enters much that is altogether

involuntary--more, perhaps, than we generally suppose. And, in like

manner, those who are imagined to have exercised an irresponsible and

spontaneous influence in determining public policy, and thereby fixing

the fate of nations, will be found, when we understand their position

more correctly, to have been the creatures of circumstances altogether

independent and irrespective of them--circumstances which they never

created, of whose influence they only availed themselves. They were

placed in a current which drifted them irresistibly along.

From this more accurate point of view we should therefore consider the

course of these events, recognizing the principle that the affairs of

men pass forward in a determinate way, expanding and unfolding

themselves. And hence we see that the things of which we have spoken as

though they were matters of choice were, in reality, forced upon their

apparent authors by the necessity of the times. But, in truth, they

should be considered as the presentations of a certain phase of life

which nations in their onward course sooner or later assume. In the

individual, how well we know that a sober moderation of action, an

appropriate gravity of demeanour, belong to the mature period of life; a

change from the wanton wilfulness of youth, which may be ushered in, or

its beginning marked, by many accidental incidents: in one perhaps by

domestic bereavements, in another by the loss of fortune, in a third by

ill health. We are correct enough in imputing to such trials the change

of character, but we never deceive ourselves by supposing that it would

have failed to take place had those incidents not occurred. There runs

an irresistible destiny in the midst of all these vicissitudes.

[Sidenote: Succession of affairs determined by law.]

We may therefore be satisfied that, whatever may have been the

particular form of the events of which we have had occasion to speak,

their order of succession was a matter of destiny, and altogether beyond

the reach of any individual. We may condemn the Byzantine monarchs, or

applaud the Arabian khalifs--our blame and our praise must be set at

their proper value. Europe was passing from its Age of Inquiry to its

Age of Faith. In such a transition the predestined underlies the

voluntary. There are analogies between the life of a nation and that of

an individual, who, though he may be in one respect the maker of his own

fortunes for happiness or for misery, for good or for evil, though he

remains here or goes there, as his inclinations prompt, though he does

this or abstains from that as he chooses, is nevertheless held fast by

an inexorable fate--a fate which brought him into the world

involuntarily so far as he was concerned, which presses him forward

through a definite career, the stages of which are absolutely

invariable--infancy, childhood, youth, maturity, old age, with all their

characteristic actions and passions, and which removes him from the

scene at the appointed time, in most cases against his will. So also it

is with nations; the voluntary is only the outward semblance, covering,

but hardly hiding the predetermined. Over the events of life we may have

control, but none whatever over the law of its progress. There is a

geometry that applies to nations, an equation of their curve of advance.

That no mortal man can touch.

[Sidenote: Arabian science in its stage of sorcery.]

We have now to examine in what manner the glimmering lamp of knowledge

was sustained when it was all but ready to die out. By the Arabians it

was handed down to us. The grotesque forms of some of those who took

charge of it are not without interest. They exhibit a strange mixture of

the Neo-platonist, the Pantheist, the Mohammedan, the Christian. In such

untoward times, it was perhaps needful that the strongest passions of

men should be excited and science stimulated by inquiries for methods of

turning lead into gold, or of prolonging life indefinitely. We have now

to deal with the philosopher's stone, the elixir vitæ, the powder of

projection, magical mirrors, perpetual lamps, the transmutation of

metals. In smoky caverns under ground, where the great work is

stealthily carried on, the alchemist and his familiar are busy with

their alembics, cucurbites, and pelicans, maintaining their fires for so

many years that salamanders are asserted to be born in them.

Experimental science was thus restored, though under a very strange

aspect, by the Arabians. Already it displayed its connexion with

medicine--a connexion derived from the influence of the Nestorians and

the Jews. It is necessary for us to consider briefly the relations of

each, and of the Nestorians first.

* * * * *

[Sidenote: The Nestorians.]

[Sidenote: They deny the virginity of the queen of heaven.]

[Sidenote: They begin to cultivate medicine.]

[Sidenote: The Arabs affiliate with them.]

In Chapter IX. we have related the rivalries of Cyril, the Bishop of

Alexandria, and Nestorius, the Bishop of Constantinople. The theological

point of their quarrel was whether it is right to regard the Virgin Mary

as the mother of God. To an Egyptian still tainted with ancient

superstition, there was nothing shocking in such a doctrine. His was the

country of Isis. St. Cyril, who is to be looked upon as a mere

ecclesiastical demagogue, found his purposes answered by adopting it

without any scruple. But in Greece there still remained traces of the

old philosophy. A recollection of the ideas of Plato had not altogether

died out. There were some by whom it was not possible for the Egyptian

doctrine to be received. Such, perhaps, was Nestorius, whose sincerity

was finally approved by an endurance of persecutions, by his sufferings,

and his death. He and his followers, insisting on the plain inference of

the last verse of the first chapter of St. Matthew, together with the

fifty-fifth and fifty-sixth verses of the thirteenth of the same Gospel,

could never be brought to an acknowledgment of the perpetual virginity

of the new queen of heaven. We have described the issue of the Council

of Ephesus: the Egyptian faction gained the victory, the aid of court

females being called in, and Nestorius, being deposed from his office,

was driven, with his friends into exile. The philosophical tendency of

the vanquished was soon indicated by their actions. While their leader

was tormented in an African oasis, many of them emigrated to the

Euphrates, and founded the Chaldæan Church. Under its auspices the

college at Edessa, with several connected schools, arose. In these were

translated into Syriac many Greek and Latin works, as those of Aristotle

and Pliny. It was the Nestorians who, in connexion with the Jews,

founded the medical college of Djondesabour, and first instituted a

system of academical honours which has descended to our times. It was

the Nestorians who were not only permitted by the khalifs the free

exercise of their religion, but even intrusted with the education of the

children of the great Mohammedan families, a liberality in striking

contrast to the fanaticism of Europe. The Khalif Alraschid went so far

as even to place all his public schools under the superintendence of

John Masué, one of that sect. Under the auspices of these learned men

the Arabian academies were furnished with translations of Greek authors,

and vast libraries were collected in Asia.

[Sidenote: Their great spread in the East,]

Through this connexion with the Arabs, Nestorian missionaries found

means to disseminate their form of Christianity all over Asia, as far as

Malabar and China. The successful intrigues of the Egyptian politicians

at Ephesus had no influence in those remote countries, the Asiatic

churches of the Nestorian and Jacobite persuasions outnumbering

eventually all the European Christians of the Greek and Roman churches

combined. In later times the papal government has made great exertions

to bring about an understanding with them, but in vain.

[Sidenote: and persecutions in the West.]

The expulsion of this party from Constantinople was accomplished by the

same persons and policy concerned in destroying philosophy in

Alexandria. St. Cyril was the representative of an illiterate and

unscrupulous faction that had come into the possession of power through

intrigues with the females of the imperial court, and bribery of eunuchs

and parasites. The same spirit that had murdered Hypatia tormented

Nestorius to death. Of the contending parties, one was respectable and

had a tincture of learning, the other ignorant, and not hesitating at

the employment of brute force, deportation, assassination. Unfortunately

for the world, the unscrupulous party carried the day.

[Sidenote: They inherit the old Greek medicine.]

By their descent, the Nestorians had become the depositaries of the old

Greek medical science. Its great names they revered. They collected,

with the utmost assiduity, whatever works remained on medical topics,

whether of a Greek or Alexandrian origin, from the writings of

Hippocrates, called, with affectionate veneration by his successors,

"The Divine Old Man," down to those of the Ptolemaic school.

[Sidenote: Origin of Greek medicine--Asclepions.]

[Sidenote: Hippocrates destroys the theological theory of disease.]

Greek medicine arose in the temples of Æsculapius, whither the sick were

in the habit of resorting for the assistance of the god. It does not

appear that any fee was exacted for the celestial advice; but the

gratitude of the patient was frequently displayed by optional gifts, and

votive tablets presented to the temple, setting forth the circumstances

of the case, were of value to those disposed to enter on medical

studies. The Asclepions thus became both hospitals and schools. They

exercised, from their position, a tendency to incorporate medical and

ecclesiastical pursuits. At this time it was universally believed that

every sickness was due to the anger of some offended god, and especially

was this supposed to be the case in epidemics and plagues. Such a

paralyzing notion was necessarily inconsistent with any attempt at the

relief of communities by the exercise of sanitary measures. In our times

it is still difficult to remove from the minds of the illiterate classes

this ancient opinion, or to convince them that under such visitations we

ought to help ourselves, and not expect relief by penance and

supplications, unless we join therewith rigorous personal, domestic,

municipal cleanliness, fresh air, and light. The theological doctrine of

the nature of disease indicated its means of cure. For Hippocrates was

reserved the great glory of destroying them both, replacing them by more

practical and material ideas, and, from the votive tablets, traditions,

and other sources, together with his own admirable observations,

compiling a body of medicine. The necessary consequence of his great

success was the separation of the pursuits of the physician from those

of the priest. Not that so great a revolution, implying the diversion of

profitable gains from the ancient channel, could have been accomplished

without a struggle. We should reverence the memory of Hippocrates for

the complete manner in which he effected that object.

[Sidenote: Writings of Hippocrates.]

Of the works attributed to Hippocrates, many are doubtless the

production of his family, his descendants, or his pupils. The

inducements to literary forgery in the times of the Ptolemies, who paid

very high prices for books of reputation, have been the cause of much

difficulty among critics in determining such questions of authorship.

The works indisputably written by Hippocrates display an extent of

knowledge answering to the authority of his name; his vivid descriptions

have never been excelled, if indeed they have ever been equalled. The

Hippocratic face of the dying is still retained in our medical treatises

in the original terms, without any improvement.

[Sidenote: His opinions.]

In his medical doctrine, Hippocrates starts with the postulate that the

body is composed of the four elements. From these are formed the four

cardinal humours. He thinks that the humours are liable to undergo

change; that health consists in their right constitution and proper

adjustment as to quantity; disease, in their impurities and

inequalities; that the disordered humours undergo spontaneous changes or

coction, a process requiring time, and hence the explanation of critical

days and critical discharges. The primitive disturbance of the humours

he attributed to a great variety of causes, chiefly to the influence of

physical circumstances, such as heat, cold, air, water. Unlike his

contemporaries, he did not impute all the afflictions of man to the

anger of the gods. Along with those influences of an external kind, he

studied the special peculiarities of the human system, how it is

modified by climate and manner of life, exhibiting different

predispositions at different seasons of the year. He believed that the

innate heat of the body varies with the period of life, being greatest

in infancy and least in old age, and that hence morbific agents affect

us with greater or less facility at different times. For this reason it

is that the physician should attend very closely to the condition of

those in whom he is interested as respects their diet and exercise, for

thereby he is able not only to regulate their general susceptibility,

but also to exert a control over the course of their diseases.

Referring diseases in general to the condition or distribution of the

humours, for he regards inflammation as the passing of blood into parts

not previously containing it, he considers that so long as those liquids

occupy the system in an unnatural or adulterated state, disease

continues; but as they ferment or undergo coction, various

characteristic symptoms appear, and, when their elaboration is

completed, they are discharged by perspiration or other secretions, by

alvine dejections, etc. But where such a general relief of the system is

not accomplished, the peccant humours may be localized in some

particular organ or special portion, and erysipelatous inflammation,

mortification, or other such manifestations ensue. It is in aiding this

elimination from the system that the physician may signally manifest his

skill. His power is displayed much more at this epoch than by the

control he can exert over the process of coction. Now may he invoke the

virtues of the hellebores, the white and the black, now may he use

elaterium. The critical days which answer to the periods of the process

of coction are to be watched with anxiety, and the correspondence of the

state of the patient with the expected condition which he ought to show

at those epochs ascertained. Hence the physician may be able to predict

the probable course of the disease during the remainder of its career,

and gather true notions as to the practice it would be best for him to

pursue to aid Nature in her operations.

[Sidenote: The character of his practice.]

It thus appears that the practice of medicine in the hands of

Hippocrates had reference rather to the course or career of disease than

to its special nature. Nothing more than this masterly conception is

wanted to impress us with his surprizing scientific power. He watches

the manner in which the humours are undergoing their fermenting coction,

the phenomena displayed in the critical days, the aspect and nature of

the critical discharges. He does not attempt to check the process going

on, but simply to assist the natural operation.

When we consider the period at which Hippocrates lived, B.C. 400, and

the circumstances under which he had studied medicine, we cannot fail to

admire the very great advance he made. His merit is conspicuous in

rejecting the superstitious tendency of his times by teaching his

disciples to impute a proper agency to physical causes. He altogether

discarded the imaginary influences then in vogue. For the gods he

substituted, with singular felicity, Impersonal Nature. It was the

interest of those who were connected with the temples of Æsculapius to

refer all the diseases of men to supernatural agency; their doctrine

being that every affliction should be attributed to the anger of some

offended god, and restoration to health most certainly procured by

conciliating his power. So far, then, as such interests were concerned,

any contradiction of those doctrines, any substitution of the material

for the supernatural, must needs have met with reprehension. Yet such

opposition seems in no respect to have weighed with this great

physician, who developed his theory and pursued his practice without

giving himself any concern in that respect. He bequeathed an example to

all who succeeded him in his noble profession, and taught them not to

hesitate in encountering the prejudices and passions of the present for

the sake of the truth, and to trust for their reward in the just

appreciation of a future age.

[Sidenote: His doctrine is truly scientific.]

With such remarks we may assert that the medical philosophy of

Hippocrates is worthy of our highest admiration, since it exhibits the

scientific conditions of deduction and induction. The theory itself is

compact and clear; its lineaments are completely Grecian. It presents,

to one who will contemplate it with due allowance for its times, the

characteristic quick-sightedness, penetration, and power of the Greek

mind, fully vindicating for its author the title which has been

conferred upon him by his European successors--the Father of

Medicine--and perhaps inducing us to excuse the enthusiastic assertion

of Galen, that we ought to reverence the words of Hippocrates as the

voice of God.

[Sidenote: The school of Cnidos.]

[Sidenote: Is destroyed by Constantine.]

[Sidenote: Classes of physicians.]

The Hippocratic school of Cos found a rival in the school of Cnidos,

which offered not only a different view of the nature of disease, but

also taught a different principle for its cure. The Cnidians paid more

particular attention to the special symptoms in individual cases, and

pursued a less active treatment, declining, whenever they could, a

resort to drastic purgatives, venesection, or other energetic means. As

might be expected, the professional activity of these schools called

into existence many able men, and produced many excellent works: thus

Philiston wrote on the regimen for persons in health; Diocles on hygiene

and gymnastics; Praxagoras on the pulse, showing that it is a measure of

the force of disease. The Asclepion of Cnidos continued until the time

of Constantine, when it was destroyed along with many other pagan

establishments. The union between the priesthood and the profession was

gradually becoming less and less close; and, as the latter thus

separated itself, divisions or departments arose in it, both as regards

subjects, such as pharmacy, surgery, etc., and also as respects the

position of its cultivators, some pursuing it as a liberal science, and

some as a mere industrial occupation. In those times, as in our own,

many who were not favoured with the gifts of fortune were constrained to

fall into the latter ranks. Thus Aristotle, than whom few have ever

exerted a greater intellectual influence upon humanity, after spending

his patrimony in liberal pursuits, kept an apothecary's shop at Athens.

Aristotle the druggist, behind his counter, selling medicines to chance

customers, is Aristotle the great writer, whose dictum was final with

the schoolmen of the Middle Ages. As a general thing, however, the

medical professors were drawn from the philosophical class. Outside of

these divisions, and though in all ages continually repudiated by the

profession, yet continually hovering round it, was a host of impostors

and quacks, as there will always be so long as there are weak-minded and

shallow men to be deluded, and vain and silly women to believe.

[Sidenote: Egyptian medicine. The Museum.]

[Sidenote: Philadelphus founds medicine on anatomy.]

[Sidenote: He authorizes dissection and human vivisection.]

[Sidenote: Physicians of the Alexandrian school.]

When the Alexandrian Museum was originated by Ptolemy Philadelphus, its

studies were arranged in four faculties--literature, mathematics,

astronomy, medicine. These divisions are, however, to be understood

comprehensively: thus, under the faculty of medicine were included such

subjects as natural history. The physicians who received the first

appointments were Cleombrotus, Herophilus, and Erasistratus; among the

subordinate professors was Philo-Stephanus, who had charge of natural

history, and was directed to write a book on Fishes. The elevated ideas

of the founder cannot be better illustrated than by the manner in which

he organized his medical school. It was upon the sure basis of anatomy.

Herophilus and his colleagues were authorized to resort to the

dissection of the dead, and to ascertain, by that only trustworthy

method, the true structure of the human body. The strong hand of Ptolemy

resolutely carried out his design, though in a country where popular

sentiment was strongly opposed to such practices. To touch a corpse in

Egypt was an abomination. Nor was it only this great man's intention to

ascertain the human structure; he also took measures to discover the

mode in which its functions are carried forward, the manner in which it

works. To this end he authorized his anatomists to make vivisections

both of animals, and also of criminals who had been condemned to death,

herein finding for himself that royal road in physiology which Euclid

once told him, at a dinner in the Museum, did not exist in geometry, and

defending the act from moral criticism by the plea that, as the culprits

had already forfeited their lives to the law, it was no injury to make

them serviceable to the interests of humanity. Herophilus had been

educated at Cos; his pathological views were those known as humouralism;

his treatment active, after the manner of Hippocrates, upon whose works

he wrote commentaries. His original investigations were numerous; they

were embodied, with his peculiar views, in treatises on the practice of

medicine; on obstetrics; on the eye; on the pulse, which he properly

referred to contractions of the heart. He was aware of the existence of

the lacteals, and their anatomical relation to the mesenteric glands.

Erasistratus, his colleague, was a pupil of Theophrastus and Chrysippus:

he, too, cultivated anatomy. He described the structure of the heart,

its connexions with the arteries and veins, but fell into the mistake

that the former vessels were for the conveyance of air, the latter for

that of blood. He knew that there are two kinds of nerves, those of

motion and those of sensation. He referred all fevers to inflammatory

states, and in his practice differed from the received methods of

Hippocrates by observing a less active treatment.

[Sidenote: Improvements in surgery and pharmacy.]

By these physicians the study of medicine in Alexandria was laid upon

the solid foundation of anatomy. Besides them there were many other

instructors in specialties; and, indeed, the temple of Serapis was used

for a hospital, the sick being received into it, and persons studying

medicine admitted for the purpose of familiarizing themselves with the

appearance of disease, precisely as in similar institutions at the

present time. Of course, under such circumstances, the departments of

surgery and pharmacy received many improvements, and produced many able

men. Among these improvements may be mentioned new operations, for

lithotomy, instruments for crushing calculi, for reducing dislocations,

etc. The active commerce of Egypt afforded abundant opportunity for

extending the materia medica by the introduction of a great many herbs

and drugs.

[Sidenote: Decline of Alexandrian medicine.]

The medical school of Alexandria, which was thus originally based upon

dissection, in the course of time lost much of its scientific spirit.

But the influence of the first teachers may be traced through many

subsequent ages. Thus Galen divides the profession in his time into

Herophilians and Erasistratians. Various sects had arisen in the course

of events, as the Dogmatists, who asserted that diseases can only be

treated correctly by the aid of a knowledge of the structure and

functions, the action of drugs, and the changes induced in the affected

parts; they insisted, therefore, upon the necessity of anatomy,

physiology, therapeutics, and pathology. They claimed a descent from

Hippocrates. Their antagonists, the Empirics, ridiculed such knowledge

as fanciful or unattainable, and relied on experience alone. These

subdivisions were not limited to sects; they may also be observed under

the form of schools. Even Erasistratus himself, toward the close of his

life, through some dispute or misunderstanding, appears to have left the

Museum and established a school at Smyrna. The study of the various

branches of medicine was also pursued by others out of the immediate

ranks of the profession. Mithridates, king of Pontus, thus devoted

himself to the examination of poisons and the discovery of antidotes.

What a fall from this scientific medicine to the miracle-cure which soon

displaced it! What a descent from Hippocrates and the great Alexandrian

physicians to the shrines of saints and the monks!

* * * * *

[Sidenote: The Jewish physicians.]

To the foregoing sketch of the state of Greek medicine in its day of

glory, I must add an examination of the same science among the Jews

subsequently to the second century; it is necessary for the proper

understanding of the origin of Saracen learning.

[Sidenote: Their emancipation from the supernatural.]

In philosophy the Jews had been gradually emancipating themselves from

the influence of ancient traditions; their advance in this direction is

shown by the active manner in which they aided in the development of

Neo-platonism. After the destruction of Jerusalem all Syria and

Mesopotamia were full of Jewish schools; but the great philosophers, as

well as the great merchants of the nation, were residents of Alexandria.

Persecution and dispersion, if they served no other good purpose,

weakened the grasp of the ecclesiastic. Perhaps, too, repeated

disappointments in an expected coming of a national temporal Messiah had

brought those who were now advanced in intellectual progress to a just

appreciation of ancient traditions. In this mental emancipation their

physicians took the lead. For long, while their pursuits were yet in

infancy, a bitter animosity had been manifested toward them by the

Levites, whose manner of healing was by prayer, expiatory sacrifice, and

miracle; or, if they descended to less supernatural means, by an

application of such remedies as are popular with the vulgar everywhere.

Thus, to a person bitten by a mad dog, they would give the diaphragm of

a dog to eat. As examples of a class of men soon to take no obscure

share in directing human progress may be mentioned Hannina, A.D. 205,

often spoken of by his successors as the earliest of Jewish physicians;

Samuel, equally distinguished as an astronomer, accoucheur, and oculist,

the inventor of a collyrium which bore his name; Rab, an anatomist, who

wrote a treatise on the structure of the body of man as ascertained by

dissections, thereby attaining such celebrity that the people, after his

death, used the earth of his grave as a medicine; Abba Oumna, whose

study of insanity plainly shows that he gave a material interpretation

to the national doctrine of possession by devils, and replaced that

strange delusion by the scientific explanation of corporeal derangement.

This honourable physician made it a rule never to take a fee from the

poor, and never to make any difference in his assiduous attention

between them and the rich. These men may be taken as a type of their

successors to the seventh century, when the Oriental schools were broken

up in consequence of the Arab military movements. In the Talmudic

literature there are all the indications of a transitional state, so far

as medicine is concerned; the supernatural seems to be passing into the

physical, the ecclesiastical is mixed up with the exact: thus a rabbi

may cure disease by the ecclesiastical operation of laying on of hands;

but of febrile disturbances, an exact, though erroneous explanation is

given, and paralysis of the hind legs of an animal is correctly referred

to the pressure of a tumour on the spinal cord. Some of its aphorisms

are not devoid of amusing significance: "Any disease, provided the

bowels remain open; any kind of pain, provided the heart remain

unaffected; any kind of uneasiness, provided the head be not attacked;

all manner of evils, except it be a bad woman."

[Sidenote: The Arabs affiliate with them.]

[Sidenote: Rise of Jewish physicians to influence.]

[Sidenote: They found medical colleges,]

[Sidenote: and promote science and literature.]

At first, after the fall of the Alexandrian school, it was all that the

Jewish physicians could do to preserve the learning that had descended

to them. But when the tumult of Arabic conquest was over, we find them

becoming the advisers of crowned heads, and exerting, by reason of their

advantageous position, their liberal education, their enlarged views, a

most important influence on the intellectual progress of humanity. Maser

Djaivah, physician to the Khalif Moawiyah, was distinguished at once as

a poet, a critic, a philosopher; Haroun, a physician of Alexandria,

whose Pandects, a treatise unfortunately now lost, are said to have

contained the first elaborate description of the small-pox and method of

its treatment. Isaac Ben Emran wrote an original treatise on poisons

and their symptoms, and others followed his example. The Khalif Al

Raschid, who maintained political relations with Charlemagne by means of

Jewish envoys, set that monarch an example by which indeed he was not

slow to profit, in actively patronising the medical college at

Djondesabour, and founding a university at Bagdad. He prohibited any

person from practising medicine until after a satisfactory examination

before one of those faculties. In the East the theological theory of

disease and of its cure was fast passing away. Of the school at Bagdad,

Joshua ben Nun is said to have been the most celebrated professor, the

school itself actively promoting the translation of Greek works into

Arabic--not alone works of a professional, but also those of a general

kind. In this manner the writings of Plato and Aristotle were secured;

indeed, it is said that almost every day camels laden with volumes were

entering the gates of Bagdad. To add to the supply, the Emperor Michael

III. was compelled by treaty to furnish Greek books. The result of this

intellectual movement could be no other than a diffusion of light.

Schools arose in Bassora, Ispahan, Samarcand, Fez, Morocco, Sicily,

Cordova, Seville, Granada.

[Sidenote: Intermingling of magic and sorcery.]

[Sidenote: Dedication of portions of matter and time to the

supernatural.]

[Sidenote: Origin of the week.]

Through the Nestorians and the Jews the Arabs thus became acquainted

with the medical science of Greece and Alexandria; but to this was added

other knowledge of a more sinister kind, derived from Persia, or perhaps

remotely from Chaldee sources, the Nestorians having important Church

establishments in Mesopotamia, and the Jews having been long familiar

with that country; indeed, from thence their ancestors originally came.

More than once its ideas had modified their national religion. This

extraneous knowledge was of an astrological or magical nature, carried

into practice by incantations, amulets, charms, and talismans. Its

fundamental principle was that the planetary bodies exercise an

influence over terrestrial things. As seven planets and seven metals

were at that time known--the sun, the moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter,

Venus, Saturn, being the planets of astrology--a due allotment was made.

Gold was held sacred to the sun, silver to the moon, iron to Mars, etc.

Even the portions of time were in like manner dedicated; the seven days

of the week were respectively given to the seven planets of astrology.

The names imposed on those days, and the order in which they occur, are

obviously connected with the Ptolemaic hypothesis of astronomy, each of

the planets having an hour assigned to it in its order of occurrence,

and the planet ruling first the hour of each day giving its name to that

day. Thus arranged, the week is a remarkable instance of the longevity

of an institution adapted to the wants of man. It has survived through

many changes of empire, has forced itself on the ecclesiastical system

of Europe, which, unable to change its idolatrous aspect, has encouraged

the vulgar error that it owes its authenticity to the Holy Scriptures,

an error too plainly betrayed by the pagan names that the days bear, and

also by their order of occurrence.

These notions of dedicating portions of matter or of time to the

supernatural were derived from the doctrine of a universal spirit or

soul of the world, extensively believed in throughout the East. It

underlies, as we have seen in Chapter III., all Oriental theology, and

is at once a very antique and not unphilosophical conception. Of this

soul the spirit of man was by many supposed to be a particle like a

spark given off from a flame. All other things, animate or inanimate,

brutes, plants, stones, nay, even natural forms, rivers, mountains,

cascades, grottoes, have each an indwelling and animating spirit.

[Sidenote: Alexandrian necromancy.]

Amulets and charms, therefore, did not derive their powers from the

material substance of which they consisted, but from this indwelling

spirit. In the case of man, his immaterial principle was believed to

correspond to his personal bodily form. Of the two great sects into

which the Jewish nation had been divided, the Pharisees accepted the

Assyrian doctrine; but the Sadducees, who denied the existence of any

such spirit, boasted that theirs was the old Mosaic faith, and denounced

their antagonists as having been contaminated at the time of the

Babylonian captivity, before which catastrophe, according to them, these

doctrines were unheard of in Jerusalem. In Alexandria, among the

leading men there were many adherents to these opinions. Thus Plotinus

wrote a book on the association of dæmons with men, and his disciple

Porphyry proved practically the possibility of such an alliance; for,

repairing to the temple of Isis along with Plotinus and a certain

Egyptian priest, the latter, to prove his supernatural power, offered to

raise up the spirit of Plotinus himself in a visible form. A magical

circle was drawn on the ground, surrounded with the customary

astrological signs, the invocation commenced, the spirit appeared, and

Plotinus stood face to face with his own soul. In this successful

experiment it is needless to inquire how much the necromancer depended

upon optical contrivances, and how much upon an alarmed imagination. But

if thus the spirit of a living man could be called up, how much more

likely the souls of the dead.

[Sidenote: These ideas originate in Pantheism.]

In reality, these wild doctrines were connected with Pantheism, which

was secretly believed in everywhere; for, though, in a coarse mode of

expression, a distinction seemed thus to be made between matter and

spirit, or body and soul, it was held by the initiated that matter

itself is a mere shadow of the spirit, and the body a delusive semblance

of the soul.

[Sidenote: The black art.]

In the eighth century, many natural facts of a surprising and

unaccountable description, well calculated to make a profound impression

upon those who witnessed them, had accumulated. They were such as are

now familiar to chemists. Vessels tightly closed were burst open when

tormented in the fire, apparently by some invisible agency; intangible

vapours condensed into solids; from colourless liquids gaudy

precipitates were suddenly called into existence; flames were disengaged

without any adequate cause; explosions took place spontaneously. So much

that was unexpected and unaccountable justified the title of "the occult

science," "the black art." From being isolated marvels unconnected with

one another, these facts had been united. The Chaldee notions of a soul

of the world, and of indwelling spirits, had furnished a thread on which

all these pearls, for such they proved to be, might be strung.

[Sidenote: The Arabians fall into these delusions,]

With avidity--for there is ever a charm in the supernatural--did the

Arabs receive from their Nestorian and Jewish medical instructors these

mystical interpretations along with true knowledge. And far from resting

satisfied with what their masters had thus delivered, they proceeded

forthwith to improve and extend it for themselves. They submitted all

kinds of substances to all kinds of operations, greatly improving the

experimental process they had been taught. By exposing various bodies to

the fire, they found it possible to extract from them more refined

portions, which seemed to concentrate in themselves the qualities

pertaining in a more diffuse way to the substances from which they had

been drawn. These, since they were often invisible at their first

disengagement, yet capable of bursting open the strongest vessels, and

sometimes of disappearing in explosions and flames, they concluded must

be the indwelling spirit or soul of the body, from which the fire had

driven them forth. It was the Chaldee doctrine realized. Thus they

obtained the spirit of wine, the spirit of salt, the spirit of nitre. We

still retain in commerce these designations, though their significance

is lost. When first introduced they had a strictly literal meaning.

Alchemy, with its essences, quintessences, and spirits, was Pantheism

materialized. God was seen to be in everything, in the abstract as well

as the concrete, in numbers as well as realities.

[Sidenote: and the Christians also.]

Anticipating what will have hereafter to be considered in detail, I may

here remark that it was not the Mohammedan alone who delivered himself

up to these mystic delusions; Christendom was prepared for them also. In

its opinion, the earth, the air, the sea, were full of invisible forms.

With more faith than even by paganism itself was the supernatural power

of the images of the gods accepted, only it was imputed to the influence

of devils. The lunatic was troubled by a like possession. If a spring

discharged its waters with a periodical gushing of carbonic acid gas, it

was agitated by an angel; if an unfortunate descended into a pit and was

suffocated by the mephitic air, it was by some dæmon who was secreted;

if the miner's torch produced an explosion, it was owing to the wrath of

some malignant spirit guarding a treasure, and whose solitude had been

disturbed. There was no end to the stories, duly authenticated by the

best human testimony, of the occasional appearance of such spirits under

visible forms; there was no grotto or cool thicket in which angels and

genii had not been seen, no cavern without its dæmons. Though the names

were not yet given, it was well understood that the air had its sylphs,

the earth its gnomes, the fire its salamanders, the water its undines;

to the day belonged its apparitions, to the night its fairies. The foul

air of stagnant places assumed the visible form of dæmons of abominable

aspect; the explosive gases of mines took on the shape of pale-faced,

malicious dwarfs, with leathery ears hanging down to their shoulders,

and garments of grey cloth. Philosophical conceptions can never be

disentangled from social ideas; the thoughts of man will always gather a

tincture from the intellectual medium in which he lives.

In Christendom, however, the chief application of these doctrines was to

the relics of martyrs and saints. As with the amulets and talismans of

Mesopotamia, these were regarded as possessing supernatural powers. They

were a sure safeguard against evil spirits, and an unfailing relief in

sickness.

[Sidenote: Transmutation of metals--Alchemy.]

[Sidenote: Philosopher's stone.]

A singular force was given to these mystic ideas by the peculiar

direction they happened to take. As there are veins of water in the

earth, and apertures through which the air can gain access, an analogy

was inferred between its structure and that of an animal, leading to an

inference of a similarity of functions. From this came the theory of the

development of metals in its womb under the influence of the planets,

the pregnant earth spontaneously producing gold and silver from baser

things after a definite number of lunations. Already, however, in the

doctrine of the transmutation of metals, it was perceived that to Nature

the lapse of time is nothing--to man it is everything. To Nature, when

she is transmuting a worthless into a better metal, what signify a

thousand years? To man, half a century embraces the period of his

intellectual activity. The aim of the cultivator of the sacred art

should be to shorten the natural term; and, since we observe the

influence of heat in hastening the ripening of fruits, may we not

reasonably expect that duly regulated degrees of fire will answer the

purpose? by an exposure of base material in the furnace for a proper

season, may we not anticipate the wished for event? The Emperor

Caligula, who had formerly tried to make gold from orpiment by the force

of fire, was only one of a thousand adepts pursuing a similar scheme.

Some trusted to the addition of a material substance in aiding the fire

to purge away the dross of the base body submitted to it. From this

arose the doctrine of the powder of projection and the philosopher's

stone.

[Sidenote: Transmutation and transubstantiation.]

This doctrine of the possibility of transmuting things into forms

essentially different steadily made its way, leading, in the material

direction, to alchemy, the art of making gold and silver out of baser

metals, and in theology to transubstantiation. Transmutation and

transubstantiation were twin sisters, destined for a world-wide

celebrity; one became allied to the science of Mecca, the other to the

theology of Rome.

[Sidenote: The elixir of life.]

[Sidenote: Potable gold.]

[Sidenote: Chemical waters.]

While thus the Arabs joined in the pursuit of alchemy, their medical

tendencies led them simultaneously to cultivate another ancient

delusion, the discovery of a universal panacea or elixir which could

cure all diseases and prolong life for ever. Mystical experimenters for

centuries had been ransacking all nature, from the yellow flowers which

are sacred to the sun, and gold his emblem and representative on earth,

down to the vilest excrements of the human body. As to gold, there had

been gathered round that metal many fictitious excellences in addition

to its real values; it was believed that in some preparation of it would

be found the elixir vitæ. This is the explanation of the unwearied

attempts at making potable gold, for it was universally thought that if

that metal could be obtained in a dissolved state, it would constitute

the long-sought panacea. Nor did it seem impossible so to increase the

power of water, as to impart to it new virtues, and thereby enable it to

accomplish the desired solution. Were there not natural waters of very

different properties? were there not some that could fortify the memory,

others destroy it; some re-enforce the spirits, some impart dulness,

and some, which were highly prized, that could secure a return of love?

It had been long known that both natural and artificial waters can

permanently affect the health, and that instruments may be made to

ascertain their qualities. Zosimus, the Panopolitan, had described in

former times the operation of distillation, by which water may be

purified; the Arabs called the apparatus for conducting that experiment

an alembic. His treatise on the virtues and composition of waters was

conveyed under the form of a dream, in which there flit before us

fantastically white-haired priests sacrificing before the altar;

cauldrons of boiling water, in which there are walking about men a span

long; brazen-clad warriors in silence reading leaden books, and sphinxes

with wings. In such incomprehensible fictions knowledge was purposely,

and ignorance conveniently concealed.

[Sidenote: The Arabs originate scientific chemistry.]

The practical Arabs had not long been engaged in these fascinating but

wild pursuits, when results of very great importance began to appear. In

a scientific point of view, the discovery of the strong acids laid the

true foundation of chemistry; in a political point of view, the

invention of gunpowder revolutionized the world.

[Sidenote: Gunpowder and fireworks.]

There were several explosive mixtures. Automatic fire was made from

equal parts of sulphur, saltpetre, and sulphide of antimony, finely

pulverized and mixed into a paste, with equal parts of juice of the

black sycamore and liquid asphaltum, a little quick-lime being added. It

was directed to keep the material from the rays of the sun, which would

set it on fire.

[Sidenote: Incombustible men.]

Of liquid or Greek fire we have not a precise description, since the

knowledge of it was kept at Constantinople as a state secret. There is

reason, however, to believe that it contained sulphur and nitrate of

potash mixed with naphtha. Of gunpowder, Marcus Græcus, whose date is

probably to be referred to the close of the eighth century, gives the

composition explicitly. He directs us to pulverize in a marble mortar

one pound of sulphur, two of charcoal, and six of saltpetre. If some of

this powder be tightly rammed in a long narrow tube closed at one end,

and then set on fire, the tube will fly through the air: this is

clearly the rocket. He says that thunder may be imitated by folding some

of the powder in a cover and tying it up tightly: this is the cracker.

It thus appears that fireworks preceded fire-arms. To the same author we

are indebted for prescriptions for making the skin incombustible, so

that we may handle fire without being burnt. These, doubtless, were

received as explanations of the legends of the times, which related how

miracle-workers had washed their hands in melted copper, and sat at

their ease in flaming straw.

[Sidenote: Arabian chemists.]

Among the Saracen names that might be mentioned as cultivators of

alchemy, we may recall El-Rasi, Ebid Durr, Djafar or Geber, Toghragé,

who wrote an alchemical poem, and Dschildegi, one of whose works bears

the significant title of "The Lantern." The definition of alchemy by

some of these authors is very striking: the science of the balance, the

science of weight, the science of combustion.

[Sidenote: Djafar discovers nitric acid and aqua regia,]

[Sidenote: and that oxidation increases weight.]

[Sidenote: He solves the problem of potable gold.]

To one of these chemists, Djafar, our attention may for a moment be

drawn. He lived toward the end of the eighth century, and is honoured by

Rhazes, Avicenna, and Kalid, the great Arabic physicians, as their

master. His name is memorable in chemistry, since it marks an epoch in

that science of equal importance to that of Priestley and Lavoisier. He

is the first to describe nitric acid and aqua regia. Before him no

stronger acid was known than concentrated vinegar. We cannot conceive of

chemistry as not possessing acids. Roger Bacon speaks of him as the

magister magistrorum. He has perfectly just notions of the nature of

spirits or gases, as we call them; thus he says, "O son of the doctrine,

when spirits fix themselves in bodies, they lose their form; in their

nature they are no longer what they were. When you compel them to be

disengaged again, this is what happens: either the spirit alone escapes

with the air, and the body remains fixed in the alembic, or the spirit

and body escape together at the same time." His doctrine respecting the

nature of the metals, though erroneous, was not without a scientific

value. A metal he considers to be a compound of sulphur, mercury, and

arsenic, and hence he infers that transmutation is possible by varying

the proportion of those ingredients. He knows that a metal, when

calcined, increases in weight, a discovery of the greatest importance,

as eventually brought to bear in the destruction of the doctrine of

Phlogiston of Stahl, and which has been imputed to Europeans of a much

later time. He describes the operations of distillation, sublimation,

filtration, various chemical apparatus, water-baths, sand-baths, cupels

of bone-earth, of the use of which he gives a singularly clear

description. A chemist reads with interest Djafar's antique method of

obtaining nitric acid by distilling in a retort Cyprus vitriol, alum,

and saltpetre. He sets forth its corrosive power, and shows how it may

be made to dissolve even gold itself, by adding a portion of sal

ammoniac. Djafar may thus be considered as having solved the grand

alchemical problem of obtaining gold in a potable state. Of course, many

trials must have been made on the influence of this solution on the

animal system, respecting which such extravagant anticipations had been

entertained. The disappointment that ensued was doubtless the reason

that the records of these trials have not descended to us.

[Sidenote: Rhazes discovers sulphuric acid.]

[Sidenote: Bechil discovers phosphorus.]

With Djafar may be mentioned Rhazes, born A.D. 860, physician-in-chief

to the great hospital at Bagdad. To him is due the first description of

the preparation and properties of sulphuric acid. He obtained it, as the

Nordhausen variety is still made, by the distillation of dried green

vitriol. To him are also due the first indications of the preparation of

absolute alcohol, by distilling spirit of wine from quick-lime. As a

curious discovery made by the Saracens may be mentioned the experiment

of Achild Bechil, who, by distilling together the extract of urine,

clay, lime, and powdered charcoal, obtained an artificial carbuncle,

which shone in the dark "like a good moon." This was phosphorus.

[Sidenote: Geological views of Avicenna.]

[Sidenote: His works indicate the attainment of the times.]

And now there arose among Arabian physicians a correctness of thought

and breadth of view altogether surprising. It might almost be supposed

that the following lines were written by one of our own contemporaries;

they are, however, extracted from a chapter of Avicenna on the origin of

mountains. This author was born in the tenth century. "Mountains may be

due to two different causes. Either they are effects of upheavals of the

crust of the earth, such as might occur during a violent earthquake, or

they are the effect of water, which, cutting for itself a new route, has

denuded the valleys, the strata being of different kinds, some soft,

some hard. The winds and waters disintegrate the one, but leave the

other intact. Most of the eminences of the earth have had this latter

origin. It would require a long period of time for all such changes to

be accomplished, during which the mountains themselves might be somewhat

diminished in size. But that water has been the main cause of these

effects is proved by the existence of fossil remains of aquatic and

other animals on many mountains." Avicenna also explains the nature of

petrifying or incrusting waters, and mentions ærolites, out of one of

which a sword-blade was made, but he adds that the metal was too brittle

to be of any use. A mere catalogue of some of the works of Avicenna will

indicate the condition of Arabian attainment. 1. On the Utility and

Advantage of Science; 2. Of Health and Remedies; 3. Canons of Physic; 4.

On Astronomical Observations; 5. Mathematical Theorems; 6. On the Arabic

Language and its Properties; 7. On the Origin of the Soul and

Resurrection of the Body; 8. Demonstration of Collateral Lines on the

Sphere; 9. An Abridgment of Euclid; 10. On Finity and Infinity; 11. On

Physics and Metaphysics; 12. An Encyclopædia of Human Knowledge, in 20

vols., etc., etc. The perusal of such a catalogue is sufficient to

excite profound attention when we remember the contemporaneous state of

Europe.

[Sidenote: Effect of the search for the elixir on practical medicine.]

The pursuit of the elixir made a well-marked impression upon Arab

experimental science, confirming it in its medical application. At the

foundation of this application lay the principle that it is possible to

relieve the diseases of the human body by purely material means. As the

science advanced it gradually shook off its fetichisms, the spiritual

receding into insignificance, the material coming into bolder relief.

Not, however, without great difficulty was a way forced for the great

doctrine that the influence of substances on the constitution of man is

altogether of a material kind, and not at all due to any indwelling or

animating spirit; that it is of no kind of use to practise incantations

over drugs, or to repeat prayers over the mortar in which medicines are

being compounded, since the effect will be the same, whether this has

been done or not; that there is no kind of efficacy in amulets, no

virtue in charms; and that, though saint-relics may serve to excite the

imagination of the ignorant, they are altogether beneath the attention

of the philosopher.

[Sidenote: Medical conflict between Europe and Africa.]

It was this last sentiment which brought Europe and Africa into

intellectual collision. The Saracen and Hebrew physicians had become

thoroughly materialized. Throughout Christendom the practice of medicine

was altogether supernatural. It was in the hands of ecclesiastics; and

saint relics, shrines, and miracle-cures were a source of boundless

profit. On a subsequent page I shall have to describe the circumstances

of the conflict that ensued between material philosophy on one side, and

supernatural jugglery on the other; to show how the Arab system gained

the victory, and how, out of that victory, the industrial life of Europe

arose. The Byzantine policy inaugurated in Constantinople and Alexandria

was, happily for the world, in the end overthrown. To that future page I

must postpone the great achievements of the Arabians in the fulness of

their Age of Reason. When Europe was hardly more enlightened than

Caffraria is now, the Saracens were cultivating and even creating

science. Their triumphs in philosophy, mathematics, astronomy,

chemistry, medicine, proved to be more glorious, more durable, and

therefore more important than their military actions had been.

History of the Intellectual Development of Europe, Volume I (of 2) Revised Edition · 第 13 / 14 章