CHAPTER I.

The Island of Anarchy.

A Fragment of History in the 20th Century.

BY

E. W.

“Bind thyself with one cord.”

[Illustration]

PUBLISHED BY MISS LANGLEY,

LOVEJOY’S LIBRARY, READING.

1887.

Chiswick Press:

Charles Whittingham and Co.,

Tooks Court, London.

THE ISLAND OF

ANARCHY.

CHAPTER I.

“As for my particular, I am verily perswaded, that since that age

(thirtie yeares), both my spirit and my body have more decreased than

encreased, more recoyled than advanced. It may be that knowledge and

experience shall encrease in them, together with life, that bestow

their time well: but vivacitie, promptitude, constancie, and other

parts much more our owne, more important, and more essentiall, they

droope, they languish, and they faint.”—MONTAIGNE (_Florio’s

translation_).

The ending of the nineteenth century, like that of the eighteenth, was a

time of terrible and strange things, as if it were coming to be the law

of human affairs that the sunsets of the centuries should be red with a

“Terror” and dark with despair.

In England—then, as in the past, the refuge of banished men—social

disorder reached a height that would soon have driven all her quiet

dwellers to seek more peaceful homes on the other side of the globe, had

not a new and strange thing changed the whole aspect of affairs.

It began to be perceived, and was soon widely acknowledged, that the

cause of the great weakness and futility of our government lay in the

advanced age of those by whom the most important offices were held. Age

is wont to trifle, to take things lightly, and to study life, of which

it can at best hope to possess so little, from a frivolous and temporary

point of view.

“Things are well enough as they are,” say they; “a little tinkering

here, a little fancy legislation there, and they will last our time;

meanwhile, let us hear ourselves talk.”

The only wonder now seemed that the world had been so slow to perceive

this, that it had taken the human race so many thousand years to

discover a truth which now seemed as simple and patent as the converse

one, that it would not be wise to entrust grave affairs to children in

their first decade.

And so the younger men of England, by a sudden and united effort at the

general election of 19—, secured the return of a House of Commons

containing no man over the age of thirty-five, and no woman: (for women

had begun to come in and to make matters worse).

This House of Commons, strong, in earnest for real work, and not divided

by Party, that frivolous pastime of politicians who were too old for

other games, passed without difficulty a wise “superannuation law.” And

the government of the country, thus at last able to govern indeed, made

the almost foundering ship of our unhappy State once more answer to the

helm, and steered for that haven of peaceful order and settled rule

which men remembered sadly as a lost Paradise or longed for as an

undiscoverable “Atlantis.”

That _laws are made to be obeyed_ had glided in those days from the

place of a truism into that of a fallacy. It was the first principle of

the new Cabinet.

To two classes this principle had to be made clear—Criminals, or

law-breakers; Anarchists, or law-deniers.

Of the first of these we will speak first. It will now hardly be

believed that there existed at that time in England what were called

“the Criminal Classes”—thousands of men, women, and children known to be

living in the continual commission of crime, as other people are engaged

in commerce, husbandry, and the like, spending much of their time in

prison, and never doing or desiring any honest work.

This state of things the young government set themselves to bring to an

end.

Instead of progressing towards that universal slipshod leniency which

the philanthropists of an earlier time had set before themselves as a

goal—with capital punishment evaded for awhile and eventually

abolished,—these rulers, with all the ruthless severity of youth,

extended the area of crimes punishable by death. To those whose lives

were hurtful to the innocent community, mercy could only be shown, so

they held, at the expense of those to whom mercy, that is, protection,

was really due. Not only all who compassed, or even attempted the lives

of others, but all who after repeated smaller punishments still lived

the lives of evildoers, were counted unworthy longer to live,—and this

without any attempted distinction of sane or insane,—the existence of

the latter being considered even more hopelessly injurious to the State

than that of the former, and, on the other hand, less valuable to

themselves.

But while the punishment of death was certain and frequent, it was no

longer inflicted in the barbarous manner which continued, a ghastly

anachronism, through the reign of the tender-hearted Victoria.

Those whose lives were forfeit were placed for a time—the length of

which depended on various circumstances—in a place of solemn

sequestration, to the care of which a society of holy men and women

devoted their existence, and which was placed rather under the authority

of the Church than of the State. The State, indeed, had done with them;

they were already cut off from their place as citizens; it only remained

for the Church to lead them with kind hand through paths of penitence

and prayer to the door of a new life, a new hope—where this was

possible. With some, with many perhaps, the soul seemed already dead

before the body.

When the time came, surrounded by a serious company of the “Brethren of

Death,” whose prayers and solemn hymns made the last moments beautiful

to those who were repentant, and awful to those who were hardened, the

condemned drank an opiate, which closed their eyes in a painless sleep

from which there was no waking, while those about them still prayed for

the departing spirit on its way to a higher judgment.

Beautiful histories were told of some who in the quiet of their cells,

aided by the gentle ministrations of the Brothers and Sisters, came to

see with an anguish of repentance the sinfulness of their past, and to

rejoice in the thought of passing, sprinkled with fresh dews of

penitence and forgiveness, away from a world whose temptations had been

too strong for them. Of their forfeit lives they made a willing

sacrifice, and they were glad to be allowed to lay them down.

Children who had committed crimes, after fitting punishment were placed

in settlements where they were kept under strict discipline and

carefully instructed, the rudiments of some useful art being added to a

simple education in general subjects. Girls were trained in household

work, and all, as soon as they were grown men and women, were removed

from these settlements to places where their past was unknown, unless

they showed themselves so dyed with their early habits and so resolved

to return to them that this would have been harmful to the State.

In these cases, which were very few, they were treated in the same way

as the hardened offenders of whom I have just spoken.

There were not wanting intelligent persons to whom the punishment of

death for a misused life seemed a terrible and even a wicked thing. Yet,

not only had such punishment been in use for just such offences in the

time of Queen Elizabeth and of other sovereigns, but at so late a time

as the commencement of the present century, war among civilized nations

was considered justifiable, and the profession of a soldier was even

held to be a noble and Christian calling. The very women whose tender

hearts cried out against the new law would send their young sons away

with their blessing to face death in compassing that of other innocent

and unwilling victims in a cause for which, often, none of them cared.

Those who thus perished in war, believing that it was for their

country’s honour that they fought, were among the best and bravest of

the nation—men to whom discipline and order were their very breath.

Those whom the new law excluded from life were scarcely worthy of the

name of men, and more hostile to their country than any of the soldiers

of other states.

This then was the course adopted with reference to the Law-Breakers. We

must now speak of the Law-Deniers. Anarchy, Socialism, free-land

leagues, communistic democracy more or less indigenous, and every shade

of Nihilism and Dynamitism introduced from the East and the West, had so

long had free course that a large mass of the population had come to

believe practically that might was right, and the problems of the

earliest stages of barbarism were staring men in the face as the

products of an over-ripe civilization.

It was true, and the young rulers recognized this, that much of the

discontent of the poorer classes had had just ground in the indifference

and selfish luxury of the rich, but that cause was already in great part

removed, and in two ways.

Women as highly educated as men, and now wise enough to see that they

were made for better things than the dust of politics, turned their

thoughts to home reforms. Their higher standard of principle and

refinement of taste led to a contempt for what was gorgeous or costly in

dress or equipage, food or furniture, as essentially vulgar, or at best

barbaric. Thus their quiet ways and simple attire left little space to

be bridged over as regards outward show between them and the thrifty

women of a humbler class, and that space was bridged by kindly

intercourse, by knowledge shared, and by the ready sympathy which is the

gift of the highest intelligence.

This was one great power for good. The other was the fact that so many

owners of land had devoted large portions of it to sites for Industrial

Villages, and even those who had no sympathy for the poor or enthusiasm

for the good of their country, partly for fashion’s sake, and partly

because these schemes proved not only useful to the poor but beneficial

to the landowner, joined to aid the great work of withdrawing the

population from the towns into the country.

The gradual disuse of steam, with all its dismal accompaniments of

blackened skies and unlovely chimneys, allowed of almost all

manufactures being carried on under healthy and cheerful conditions. On

every hill, rows of windmills gathered the force which produced

electricity and stored it for the use of the village below; while by

every stream, and on every shore visited by tides, the forces of water

were in the same way brought into a service which, being no longer

intermittent, was of permanent and continuous value.

Thus the real misery of the honest poor in England was becoming a thing

of the past, and the large class of people whose stock-in-trade was the

discontent of others became at once more reckless and more dangerous

when, flinging away all disguise and separated from those whose wrongs

had lent colour to their schemes, they appeared under their true flag as

the enemies of all law and duty, industry and religion.

The young Cabinet saw at once the way to meet them. Those who would not

obey the laws of one country must seek a home in another. Banishment

seemed at once the mildest and the most reasonable punishment (if indeed

it can be so called),—not transportation to some special spot, but

simply exile from England and from all British dominions and

colonies—the Great Federation being absolutely united in this important

matter—under penalty of death if the banished returned.

On conviction the Anarchist was marked, by an indelible brand in a

painless manner, with a red O in sign of outlawry, and received his

sentence of banishment—and in this way some thousands of the disaffected

and idle were at once removed from our shores.

Some of them were of the lowest and most violent class, who are

naturally rude and lawless because bound by no inner law themselves

(though, as has been shown, those leading an actually criminal life were

dealt with in other ways); and associated with them, indignant at the

new law, and therefore enthusiastically determined to share the fate of

the exiled, were men and women of a far higher type, mistaken, yet nobly

in the wrong. Some few were poets, historians, religious visionaries,

women whose dreams of a millennium were based on a false notion of the

origin and essence of law. All these last gave themselves up at once,

and stretched out the right hand that had held the pen, or blessed the

chalice, or soothed the dying forehead, for the circle in which they

gloried as a sign of their fellowship with the oppressed.

At first the result was, of course, that in other countries the

Anarchists found hearers for their doctrines and ready adherents to

their destructive schemes, the false notion that lawlessness is liberty

being one readily welcomed by the unthinking. But one by one the

countries to which they had fled followed the precedent of England, and

banished from their shores also the men and women of the red right hand.

In those days the States of Europe were already bound in a sort of

confederation, with an International Court in which matters of common

interest were discussed, and it was agreed that a place must be found

for the growing nation of outlaws, who else might justly plead for a

home in a law-obeying state as a mere necessity of humanity.

In the terrible era of volcanic action which began about the year 1885

and lasted nearly half a century, many coasts and islands had been

submerged, with great loss of human life and of the results of human

industry. Among others the beautiful Island of Meliora in the South

Pacific had been the scene of the sudden formation of a volcano and of a

fearful eruption. It seemed as if the whole heart of the Island were

poured for many days and nights into the sultry sky, and then sank into

the sea and was seen no more.

After a period of several years, the captain of a merchant vessel,

looking with his corrected chart for the circle of coral reef which

marked the place of the lost Island, saw with wonder Meliora re-arisen

from the sea, crowned by the wide crater of its fatal mountain and

already clothed with brilliant vegetation. It would seem strange that

its re-appearance had not been noticed by other vessels, as the trees

upon it showed that it must have been some years above water, but this

will not appear remarkable when it is known that no ordinary course for

vessels carried them within sight of the Island, and that the new reefs

which had been raised around it by the action of the volcano were so

dangerous that captains who entered those seas avoided their

neighbourhood. The line of coral reef which encircled the Island had not

sunk more than a few feet, hence the thick growth of Coco-palms that

covered it had not been submerged, and no doubt directly Meliora arose

from the waves seeds from these would at once begin to take root and

make rapid growth in that wonderful soil and climate.

When the captain of the “Ville d’Is,” driven out of his way by adverse

winds, saw the wonder of the restored land, it was at the moment of

perplexity of which I have spoken as to where the outlawed nation should

find a home.

It was at once resolved by the united governments of Europe that they

should be offered transport to this Island—an offer which the most part

gladly accepted, chased as they had been from country to country, and

very weary of their wandering.

Indeed, what other chance remained for them, since to enter any

civilized country, any country governed by settled rule of law, was to

die?

From all points of the compass ships with various flags entered the

circle of reefs that surrounded Meliora, and set down their strange

passengers on that beautiful shore.

A land large enough for all, fertile as a garden of romance, perfect in

climate, and abounding in all they could need for food, clothing and

shelter, what more could the outlaws desire?

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

The island of anarchy: A fragment of history in the 20th century · 第 1 / 4 章