The next day the Pra Palat called on us at our _sālā_,[3] and again

broached the subject. He was very anxious to have his son study English.

In my mission work I should be untrammelled. Before leaving us, he

mentioned the matter again. It was this time no courteous evasion when I

told him I would come if I could.—What did it all mean?

Footnote 3:

A public rest-house or shelter, such as Buddhist piety provides

everywhere for travellers, but especially in connection with the

monasteries.

I returned to Bangkok full of enthusiasm for Pechaburī. The more I

pondered it, the greater the offer seemed to be. Beyond my predilection

for a smaller city or for rural work, I actually did not like Bangkok.

Pechaburī, however, was beyond the limits of treaty rights. Permission

to establish a station there could be had only by sufferance from a

government not hitherto noted for liberality. Here was an invitation

equivalent to a royal permit, and with no further red tape about it. I

could see only one obstacle in the way. The senior member of the

mission—the one who was naturally its head—I feared would not approve.

And he did, indeed, look askance at the proposition. He doubted whether

we could trust the promises made. And then to go so far away alone! But

I thought I knew human nature well enough to trust that man. As to being

alone, I was willing to risk that. Possibly it might not be best to ride

a free horse too freely. I would go with my own equipment, and be at

least semi-independent; though the Palat had said that he did not mind

the expense, if only he could get his son taught English.

There could at least be no objection to making an experimental visit,

and then continuing it as long as might seem wise. Pechaburī is within

thirty hours of Bangkok. If taken sick, I could run over in a day or

two. With that understanding, and with the tacit rather than the

expressed sanction of the mission, I began to make preparations.

At last my preparations were complete, even to baking bread for the

trip. I had fitted up a touring-boat of my own, and had engaged captain

and boatmen; when, on the day before I was to start, cholera, which for

some time had been sporadic in Bangkok, suddenly became epidemic. Till

then Dr. James Campbell, physician to the British Consulate, and our

medical authority, thought that with caution and prudence I might safely

go. A general panic now arose all over the land. Dr. Bradley came to

tell me that deaths were occurring hourly on the canal by which I was to

travel. To go then would be to tempt providence. I had earnestly sought

direction, and it came in a way little expected.

The first man I met next morning was Dr. House, coming home from Mr.

Wilson’s. He had been called in the night to attend Mrs. Wilson, who had

been suddenly attacked with “the disease,” as the natives

euphemistically call it, being superstitiously afraid of uttering the

name. Dr. House had failed to check it, and sent me to call Dr.

Campbell. But he was not at home, and did not get the message till near

noon. By that time the patient had reached the stage when collapse was

about to ensue. The disease was finally arrested, but Mrs. Wilson was

left in a very precarious condition.

Meanwhile her little daughter Harriet was also taken ill, and for a time

the life of both mother and daughter was in suspense. The child lingered

on till May 13th, when she was taken to a better clime. On July 14th the

mother, too, ceased from her suffering, and entered on her everlasting

rest.

During these months, of course, all thoughts of Pechaburī had been

abandoned; nor would it then have been deemed wise to travel during the

wet season. Before the next dry season came, Bangkok began to have more

attractions, and I had become less ambitious to start a new station

alone. On the 11th of September I became engaged to Miss Sophia Royce

Bradley, daughter of the Rev. D. B. Bradley, M.D. On December 6th, 1860,

we were married. In my wife I found a helpmeet of great executive

ability, and admirably qualified for the diversified work before us. It

was something, too, to have inherited the best traditions of one of the

grand missionaries of his age.[4]

Footnote 4:

Dr. Bradley’s life would be the best history we could have of Siam

during its transition period. He left a voluminous diary, and it was

from his pen that most of the exact information concerning Siam was

long derived.

Samrē, our mission station in Bangkok, was four miles distant from the

heart of the city. We greatly needed a more central station for our

work. Dr. Bradley offered us the use of a house on his own premises—one

of the most desirable situations in Bangkok—if we would come and live

there. The mission accepted his generous offer. With reluctance I

resigned whatever claim I might have to be the pioneer of the new

station at Pechaburī. We were settled, as it would seem, for life, in

Bangkok.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV

PECHABURĪ—THE CALL OF THE NORTH

By this time the mission generally had become interested in the

establishment of a new station at Pechaburī. Dr. and Mrs. House were

designated for the post. The Doctor actually went to Pechaburī; procured

there, through the help of our friend the Palat, a lot with a house on

it; and thus committed the mission to the project. But the day before he

was to start homeward to prepare for removal thither, he was so

seriously hurt by a fall from his horse that he was confined to his bed

for several months. It was even feared that he was permanently disabled

for active life. A new adjustment of our personnel was thus

necessitated. Dr. Mattoon had just returned from the United States with

the Rev. S. G. McFarland, the Rev. N. A. McDonald, and their wives. Dr.

Mattoon could not be spared from Bangkok, nor was he enthusiastic over

the new station. Mr. McDonald had no desire for such experiments. Both

Mr. and Mrs. McFarland were anxious to move, but were too new to the

field to be sent out alone. They were urgent that we should go with

them. My opportunity had come. So, early in June, 1861, we broke up the

first home of our married life, and, in company with the McFarlands,

moved on to our new home and our new work.

Our friend, the Pra Palat, seemed pleased that we had come, after all.

His slight knowledge of English had been learned as a private pupil from

Mrs. McGilvary’s own mother. He was glad, whenever he had leisure, to

continue his studies with Mrs. McGilvary. Mr. McFarland preferred school

work. He took the son that I was to have taught, and left me

untrammelled to enter upon evangelistic work. The half-hour after each

evening meal we spent in united prayer for guidance and success. Two

servants of each family were selected as special subjects of prayer; and

these, in due time, we had the pleasure of welcoming into the church.

Of the incidents of our Pechaburī life I have room for but a single one.

As we were rising from the dinner-table one Sunday shortly after our

arrival, we were surprised to see a man coming up the steps and crossing

the veranda in haste, as if on a special errand. He led by the hand a

little boy of ten or twelve years, and said, “I want to commit this son

of mine into your care. I want you to teach him.” Struck by his earnest

manner, we drew from him these facts: He was a farmer named Nāi Kawn,

living some five miles out in the country. He had just heard of our

arrival, had come immediately, and was very glad to find us.

We asked whether he had ever met a missionary before. No, he said, but

his father—since dead—had once met Dr. Bradley, and had received a book

from him. He had begged other books from neighbours who had received

them but did not value them. Neither did he at first, till the great

cholera scourge of 1849, when people were dying all around him. He was

greatly alarmed, and learned from one of the books that Pra Yēsū heard

prayer in trouble, and could save from sin. For a long time he prayed

for light, until, about three years ago, he believed in Jesus, and was

now happy in heart. He had heard once of Dr. Bradley’s coming to

Pechaburī, but not until he was gone again. He preached to his

neighbours, who called him “Kon Pra Yēsū” (Lord Jesus’ man). He had

prayed for Dr. Bradley and the missionaries; he had read the story of

Moses, the Epistle to the Romans, the Gospel of John, a tract on Prayer,

and “The Golden Balance”; and he believed them. He could repeat portions

of Romans and John verbatim; and he had his son repeat the Lord’s

Prayer.

My subject at the afternoon service was Nicodemus and the New Birth. Nāi

Kawn sat spellbound, frequently nodding assent. At the close we asked

him to speak a few words; which he did with great clearness. On being

questioned as to the Trinity, he replied that he was not sure whether he

understood it. He gathered, however, that Jehovah was the Father and

Ruler; that the Son came to save us by dying for us; and that the Holy

Spirit is the Comforter. The difference between Jesus and Buddha is that

the latter entered into Nirvana, and that was the last of him; while

Jesus lives to save. He even insisted that he had seen a vision of Jesus

in heaven. His other experiences were characterized by such marks of

soberness that we wondered whether his faith might not have been

strengthened by a dream or a vision.

This incident, coming so soon after our arrival, greatly cheered us in

our work. His subsequent story is too long to follow out in detail here.

His piety and his sincerity were undoubted. He lived and died a

Christian; yet he never fully identified himself with the church. He

insisted that he had been baptized by the Holy Ghost, and that there was

no need of further baptism. Not long after this Dr. Bradley and Mr.

Mattoon visited Pechaburī, examined the man, and were equally surprised

at his history.

* * * * *

What changed our life-work from the Siamese to the Lāo? There were two

principal causes. The various Lāo states which are now a part of Siam,

were then ruled by feudal princes, each virtually sovereign within his

own dominions, but all required to pay a triennial visit to the Siamese

capital, bringing the customary gifts to their suzerain, the King of

Siam, and renewing their oath of allegiance to him. Their realms served,

moreover, as a “buffer” between Siam and Burma. There were six of these

feudal principalities. Five of them occupied the basins of five chief

tributaries of the Mênam River; namely—in order from west to

east—Chiengmai, Lampūn, Lakawn, Prê, and Nān. The sixth was Lūang

Prabāng on the Mê Kōng River. The rapids on all these streams had served

as an effectual barrier in keeping the northern and the southern states

quite separate. There was no very frequent communication in trade. There

was no mail communication. Official despatches were passed along from

one governor to the next. Very little was known in Bangkok about the Lāo

provinces of the north. A trip from Bangkok to Chiengmai seemed then

like going out of the world. Only one Englishman, Sir Robert Schomburgk

of the British Consulate in Bangkok, had ever made it.

[Illustration:

PAGODA OF WAT CHÊNG, BANGKOK]

Of these Lāo states, Chiengmai was the most important. After it came

Nān, then Lūang Prabāng (since ceded to the French), Lakawn, Prê, and

Lampūn. The Lāo people were regarded in Siam as a very warlike race; one

chieftain in particular being famed as a great warrior. They were withal

said to be suspicious and unreliable.

Almost the only visible result of my six months’ stay within the city of

Bangkok, after my marriage, was the formation of a slight acquaintance

with the Prince of Chiengmai and his family. Just before my marriage he

had arrived in Bangkok with a great flotilla of boats and a great

retinue of attendants. The grounds of Wat Chêng monastery, near to Dr.

Bradley’s compound, had always been their stopping-place. The

consequence was that, of all the missionaries, Dr. Bradley had become

best acquainted with them and most deeply interested in them. He

earnestly cultivated their friendship, invited them to his

printing-office and to his house, and continually preached unto them the

Gospel. They were much interested in vaccination, which he had

introduced, and were delighted to find that it protected them from

smallpox.

The day after our marriage, in response to a present of some wedding

cake, the Prince himself, with his two daughters and a large train of

attendants, called on us in our new home. This was my first introduction

to Chao Kāwilōrot and his family, who were to play so important a rôle

in my future life. All that I saw of him and of his people interested me

greatly. During the short time we remained in their neighbourhood, I

made frequent visits to the Lāo camp. The subject of a mission in

Chiengmai was talked of, with apparent approval on the part of the

Prince. My interest in Pechaburī was increased by the knowledge that

there was a large colony of Lāo[5] there. These were captives of war

from the region of Khōrāt, bearing no very close resemblance to our

later parishioners in the north. At the time of our stay in Pechaburī,

the Lāo in that province were held as government slaves, engaged all day

on various public works—a circumstance which greatly impeded our access

to them, and at the same time made it more difficult for them to embrace

Christianity. Neither they nor we dared apply to the government for the

requisite sanction, lest thereby their case be made worse. Our best

opportunity for work among them was at night. My most pleasant memories

of Pechaburī cluster about scenes in Lāo villages, when the whole

population would assemble, either around a camp-fire or under the bright

light of the moon, to listen till late in the night to the word of God.

The conversion of Nāi Ang, the first one from that colony, anticipated

that of Nān Inta, and the larger ingathering in the North.

Footnote 5:

The application of this name is by no means uniform throughout the

peninsula. From Lūang Prabāng southward along the eastern frontier,

the tribes of that stock call themselves Lāo, and are so called by

their neighbours. But the central and western groups do not

acknowledge the name as theirs at all, but call themselves simply Tai;

or if a distinction must be made, they call themselves Kon Nûa

(Northerners), and the Siamese, Kon Tai (Southerners). The Siamese, on

the other hand, also call themselves Tai, which is really the

race-name, common to all branches of the stock; and they apply the

name Lāo alike to all their northern cousins except the Ngīo, or

Western Shans. Nothing is known of the origin of the name, but the

same root no doubt appears in such tribal and geographical names as

Lawā, Lawa, Lawō—the last being the name of the famous abandoned

capital now known as Lophburi.—ED.

But there was more than a casual connection between the two. My labours

among them increased the desire, already awakened in me, to reach the

home of the race. Here was another link in the chain of providences by

which I was led to my life-work. The time, however, was not yet ripe.

The available force of the mission was not yet large enough to justify

further expansion. Moreover, our knowledge of the Lāo country was not

such as to make possible any comprehensive and intelligent plans for a

mission there. The first thing to do was evidently to make a tour of

exploration. The way to such a tour was opened in the fall of 1863. The

Presbytery of Siam met in Bangkok early in November. I had so arranged

my affairs that, if the way should open, I could go north directly,

without returning to Pechaburī. I knew that Mr. Wilson was free, and I

thought he would favour the trip. This he readily did, and the mission

gave its sanction. So I committed my wife and our two-year-old daughter

to the care of loving grandparents, and, after a very hasty preparation,

we started on the 20th of November in search of far-away Chiengmai.

The six-oared touring-boat which I had fitted up in my bachelor days was

well adapted for our purpose as far as the first fork of the Mênam. The

Siamese are experts with the oar, but are unused to the setting-pole,

which is well-nigh the only resource all through the upper reaches of

the river. It was sunset on a Friday evening before we finally got off.

But it was a start; and it proved to be one of the straws on which the

success of the trip depended. The current against us was very strong; so

we slept within the city limits that night. We spent all day Saturday

traversing a canal parallel with the river, where the current was

weaker. It was sunset before we entered again the main stream, and

stopped to spend Sunday at a monastery. To our great surprise we found

that the Prince of Chiengmai—of whose coming we had had no

intimation—had camped there the night before, and had passed on down to

Bangkok that very morning. We had missed him by taking the canal!

We were in doubt whether we ought not to return and get a letter from

him. A favourable letter would be invaluable; but he might refuse, or

even forbid our going. If we may judge from what we afterwards knew of

his suspicious nature, such probably would have been the outcome. At any

rate, it would delay us; and we had already a passport from the Siamese

government which would ensure our trip. And, doubtless, we did

accomplish our design with more freedom because of the Prince’s absence

from his realm. It was apparently a fortuitous thing that our men knew

of the more sluggish channel, and so missed the Lāo flotilla. But it is

quite possible that upon that choice depended the establishment of the

Lāo mission.

All went well until we reached the first fork at Pāknam Pō. There the

water came rushing down like a torrent, so swift that oars were of no

avail. We tried first one side of the stream and then the other, but all

in vain. Our boatmen exchanged their oars for poles. But they were

awkward and unaccustomed to their use. The boat would inevitably drift

down stream. The poor boatmen laughed despairingly at their own failure.

At last a rope was suggested. The men climbed the bank, and dragged the

boat around the point to where the current was less swift. But when, as

often happened, it became necessary to cross to the other side of the

river, the first push off the bank would send us into water so deep that

a fifteen-foot pole could not reach bottom. Away would go the boat some

hundreds of yards down stream before we could bring up on the opposite

bank. We reached Rahêng, however, in nineteen travelling days—which was

not by any means bad time.

In our various journeyings hitherto we had controlled our own means of

transportation. Henceforth we were at the mercy of native officials, to

whose temperament such things as punctuality and speed are altogether

alien. From Rahêng the trip by elephant to Chiengmai should be only

twelve days. By boat, the trip would be much longer, though the return

trip would be correspondingly shorter. We had a letter from Bangkok to

the officials along the route, directing them to procure for us boats,

elephants, or men, as we might need. We were in a hurry, and, besides,

were young and impulsive. The officials at Rahêng assured us that we

should have prompt despatch. No one, however, seemed to make any effort

to send us on. The governor was a great Buddhist, and fond of company

and argument. He could match our Trinity by a Buddhist one: Putthō,

Thammō, Sangkhō—Buddha, the Scriptures, the Brotherhood. Men’s own good

deeds were their only atonement. The one religion was as good as the

other. On these subjects he would talk by the hour; but when urged to

get our elephants, he always had an excuse. At last, in despair, we

decided to take our boatmen and walk. When this news reached the

governor, whether from pity of us, or from fear that some trouble might

grow out of it, he sent word that if we would wait till the next day, we

should have the elephants without fail.

We got the elephants; but, as it was, from preference I walked most of

the way. Once I paid dear for my walk by getting separated from my

elephant in the morning, losing my noonday lunch, and not regaining my

party till, tired and hungry, I reached camp at night. Our guide had

taken a circuitous route to avoid a band of robbers on the main route

which I had followed! This was my first experience of elephant-riding.

We crossed rivers where the banks were steep, and there was no regular

landing. But whether ascending or descending steep slopes, whether

skirting streams and waterfalls, one may trust the elephant’s sagacity

and surefootedness. The view we had from one of the mountain ridges

seemed incomparably fine. The Mê Ping wound its way along the base

beneath us, while beyond, to right and to left, rose range beyond range,

with an occasional peak towering high above the rest. But that was tame

in comparison with many mountain views encountered in subsequent years.

We were eight days in reaching Lakawn,[6] which we marked as one of our

future mission stations. On being asked whether he would welcome a

mission there, the governor replied, “If the King of Siam and the Prince

of Chiengmai approve.” At Lakawn we had no delay, stopping there only

from Friday till Monday morning. Thence to Lampūn we found sālās, or

rest-houses, at regular intervals. The watershed between these towns was

the highest we had crossed. The road follows the valley of a stream to

near the summit, and then follows another stream down on the other side.

The gorge was in places so narrow that the elephant-saddle scraped the

mountain wall on one side, while on the other a misstep would have

precipitated us far down to the brook-bed below.

Footnote 6:

A corruption of Nakawn (for Sanskrit _nagara_, capital city), which is

the first part of the official name of the place, Nakawn Lampāng. The

Post Office calls it Lampāng, to distinguish it from another Nakawn

(likewise Lakawn in common speech), in the Malay Peninsula—the place

known to Europeans as Ligor. The general currency of this short name,

and its regular use in all the missionary literature, seem to justify

its retention in this narrative.—ED.

At Lampūn my companion was not well, so that I alone called on the

authorities. The governor had called the princes together to learn our

errand. They seemed bewildered when told that we had no government

business, nor were we traders—were only teachers of religion. When the

proper officer was directed to send us on quickly, he began to make

excuses that it would take two or three days. Turning sharply upon him,

the governor asked, “Prayā Sanām, how many elephants have you?” “Four,”

was the response. “See that they get off to-morrow,” was the short

reply. He meekly withdrew. There was evidently no trifling with that

governor. One day more brought us to Chiengmai—to the end of what seemed

then a very long journey. As we neared the city, Mr. Wilson’s elephant

took fright at the creaking noise of a water-wheel, and ran away,

crashing through bamboo fences and trampling down gardens. Fortunately

no one was hurt.

We reached the city on January 7th, 1864, on the forty-ninth day of our

journey. The nephew of the Prince had been left in charge during the

Prince’s absence. He evidently was in doubt how to receive us. He could

not ignore our passport and letter from Bangkok. On the other hand, why

did we not have a letter from the Prince? Our story of missing him

through choosing the canal instead of the main river might or might not

be true. If the deputy were too hospitable, his Prince might blame him.

So he cut the knot, and went off to his fields. We saw no more of him

till he came in to see us safely off.

A Half Century Among the Siamese and the Lāo: An Autobiography · 第 3 / 29 段