Those to which I am more particularly indebted are:--In Scotland--

The "Dundee Advertiser," a consistent support during a past lengthened

period, including powerful leading articles and notices.

The "Montrose Standard," several cordial and able articles of the

highest value, while the same is to be gratefully noticed of the other

Forfarshire papers.

The "Brechin Advertiser," the "Forfar Herald," the "Arbroath Guide," the

"Montrose Review."

The "North British Daily Mail," of Glasgow, in a leading article headed

"A Neglected Inventor," after stating the case, goes on to say: "It is

not creditable to the generosity of the Government of this country that

an important invention of this kind, which has conferred such a great

boon upon the public, should have remained so long unacknowledged and

unrewarded." This article has been extensively reproduced.

The "Glasgow News" and the "Christian Leader," of Glasgow, cordial

articles.

The "Paisley Herald," the same on several occasions.

The "Aberdeen Free Press," a warm and able support.

The "Blairgowrie Advertiser" has taken much interest and pains to

support me; also the "Perthshire Constitutional," the "Fifeshire

Journal," the "North British Advertiser," to all of which my best thanks

are due.

In the Metropolis and neighbourhood, considering how short a period has

elapsed since the opinion has been almost unanimously expressed that the

reformed Penny Postage scheme was the "sole and undisputed invention of

Sir Rowland Hill," to whom has also been erroneously attributed the

invention and proposal as well as the ultimate adoption of the adhesive

stamp, fair progress has already been made in obtaining a recognition of

Mr. Chalmers' services. That greater progress has not been made may be

attributed to the powerful influences which have been at work to stifle

the whole subject, including an attempt on the part of Mr. Pearson Hill

to stop the publication of pamphlets.

In the "Illustrated London News" Mr. G. A. Sala writes: "It seems

tolerably clear that Sir Rowland Hill was not the inventor, in the

strict sense of the term, either of the Penny Postage or of the Adhesive

Postage Stamp ... Anent the invention of the Adhesive Stamp, a pamphlet

has recently been published, but I have not yet had time to read it....

Whoever discovered the Adhesive Stamp, the discovery has socially

revolutionised the world." According to this high authority, the

Adhesive Stamp was thus at least _not_ the invention of Sir Rowland

Hill.

The "Whitehall Review" has given me consistent and most valuable

support; also the "Metropolitan," the "People," the "Home and Colonial

Mail." The "Machinery Market," of London and Darlington, a practical

monthly journal of high position, while retaining all its former

admiration for Sir Rowland Hill's services, decides, in a long and able

article, in favour of James Chalmers as respects the stamp. The

"Inventors' Record," in an article on "Disputed Inventions," supports

the same view. The pretensions brought forward on the part of Sir

Rowland Hill are declared to be wholly groundless, and the invention

accorded to James Chalmers.

The "Croydon Review," a monthly, in a series of able articles, has

informed its readers candidly with respect to the untenable pretensions

of Sir Rowland Hill, both as respects the scheme and the stamp,

cordially ascribing the latter to James Chalmers.

The "Surrey Independent" has ably supported me in several leading

articles. As far as conception went, "Sir Rowland Hill displayed a

remarkable facility for picking other people's brains."

To the "Surrey Comet" and "Wimbledon Courier" my best thanks are due for

cordial notices and recognition; as also to the "West Middlesex

Advertiser," the "South Hampstead Advertiser," the "North Middlesex

Advertiser," the "Christian Union," the "Hornsey and Finsbury Park

Journal," the "American Bookseller," the "Acton and Chiswick Gazette,"

"Figaro," "Vanity Fair," the "Kensington News," "Life," and others.

The Adhesive Postage Stamp · 第 24 / 27 题