Mr. Sumner said in reply:--

The objects which I seek in Reconstruction are regarded in very

different lights by myself and by Senators who have spoken. The

Senator from New Jersey, the Senator from Maryland, and the Senator

from Ohio all regard these requirements as in the nature of burdens or

penalties. Education is a burden or penalty; a homestead is a burden

or penalty. It is a new burden or penalty which I am seeking--so these

distinguished Senators argue--to impose upon the South. Are they right,

or am I right? Education can never be burden or penalty. Justice in the

way of a homestead can never be burden or penalty. Each is a sacred

duty which the nation owes to those who rightfully look to us for

protection.

Now, at this moment, in the development of events, the people at the

South rightfully look to us for protection. They rightfully look to

us, that, in laying the foundation-stone of future security, we shall

see that those things are done which will make the security real, and

not merely nominal. And yet, when I ask that the security shall be

real, and not merely nominal, I am encountered by the objection that

I seek to impose new burdens,--that I am harsh. Sir, if I know my own

heart, I would not impose a burden upon any human being. I would not

impose a burden even upon those who have trespassed so much against

the Republic. I do not seek their punishment. Never has one word

fallen from my lips asking for their punishment, for any punishment

of the South. All that I ask is the establishment of human rights on

a permanent foundation. Is there any Senator who differs from me? I

am sure that my friend from Ohio seeks the establishment of future

security; but he will allow me to say, that to my mind he abandons it

at the beginning,--he fails at the proper moment to require guaranties

without which future security will be vain.

This is not the first time that the Senator from Ohio has set himself

against fundamental propositions of Reconstruction. When, now more

than four years ago, I had the honor of introducing into this Chamber

a proposition declaring the jurisdiction of Congress over this whole

question, and over the whole Rebel region, I was met by the Senator,

who reminded me that I was alone, and did not hesitate to say that my

position was not unlike that of Jefferson Davis.

Here Mr. Sumner sent to the desk the speech of Mr. Sherman,

April 2, 1862, and the Secretary read what he said of Mr.

Sumner’s position.

I have not called attention to these remarks in any unkind spirit, for

I have none for the Senator; I have no feeling but kindness and respect

for him; but as I listened to him a few minutes ago, remonstrating

against the position I now occupy, I was carried back to that early

day when he remonstrated, if possible, more strenuously against the

position I then occupied. I had the audacity then to assert the

paramount power of Congress over the whole Rebel region. That was the

sum and substance of my argument; and you have heard the answer of the

Senator. And now, in the lapse of time, the Senator has ranged himself

by my side, voting for that measure of Reconstruction which is founded

on the jurisdiction of Congress over the whole Rebel region.

As time passed, the subject assumed another character. It was with

regard to the suffrage. A year ago I asserted on this floor that we

must give the suffrage to all colored persons by Act of Congress and

without Constitutional Amendment, founding myself on two grounds.

One was the solemn guaranty in the Constitution of a republican form

of government; and I undertook to show that any denial of rights on

account of color was unrepublican to such extent that the government

sanctioning it could not be considered in any just sense republican.

I then went further, and insisted, that, from the necessity of the

case, at the present moment, Congress must accord the suffrage to all

persons at the South, without distinction of color. I argued that the

suffrage of colored citizens was needed to counterbalance the suffrage

of the Rebels.[92] One year has passed, and now, by Act of Congress,

you have asserted the very power which the Senator from Ohio, and

other distinguished Senators associated with him, most strenuously

denied. That Senator and other Senators insisted that it could be only

by Constitutional Amendment. I insisted that it could be under the

existing text of the Constitution; nay, more, that from the necessity

of the case it must be in this way. And in this way it has been done.

But, in doing it, you have unhappily failed to make proper provision

for enforcing this essential security. You have provided no machinery,

and you have left other things undone which ought to be done. And

now, urging that these things should be done, I am encountered again

by my friend from Ohio, whom I had encountered before on these other

cardinal propositions; and he now, just as strenuously as before,

insists that it is not within our power or province at this moment to

make any additional requirements of the Rebel States. He is willing

that the bill in certain particulars shall be amended. I do not know

precisely to what extent he would go; but he will make no additional

requirements, as he expresses it, in the nature of burdens. Sir, I

make no additional requirements in the nature of burdens. I have

already said, I impose no burdens upon any man; but I insist upon the

protection of rights. And now, at this moment, as we are engaged in

this great work of Reconstruction, I insist that the work shall be

completely done. It will not be completely done, if you fail to supply

any safeguards or precautions that can possibly be adopted.

A great orator has told us that he had but one lamp by which his

feet were guided, and that was the lamp of experience.[93] There is

one transcendent experience, commanding, historic, which illumines

this age. It is more than a lamp; it is sunshine. I mean the example

afforded by the Emperor of Russia, when he set free twenty million

serfs. Did he stop with their freedom? He went further, and provided

for their education, and also that each should have a piece of land.

And now, when I ask that my country, a republic, heir of all the ages,

foremost in the tide of time, should do on this question only what

the Emperor of Russia has done, I am met by grave Senators with the

reproach that I am imposing new burdens. It is no such thing. I am

only asking new advantages for all in that distracted region, with new

securities for my country, to the end that it may be safe, great, and

glorious.

After remarks by Mr. Howard, of Michigan, the resolutions, on

motion of Mr. Frelinghuysen, were laid on the table,--Yeas 36,

Nays 10.

March 12th, the resolutions were again considered, when Mr.

Morton, of Indiana, spoke in favor of education, and Mr. Howe,

of Wisconsin, sustained the resolutions generally.

July 3d, Mr. Sumner made another attempt to have them

considered, speaking specially upon the importance of a

homestead for freedmen.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20) · 第 110 / 125 题