Mr. Edmunds then moved the following amendment:--

“That this act shall take effect with the fundamental and

perpetual condition that within said State of Nebraska

there shall be no abridgment or denial of the exercise of

the elective franchise or of any other right to any person

by reason of race or color, excepting Indians not taxed.”

It will be observed that this differs from Mr. Sumner’s in

not requiring the submission of the fundamental condition to

the voters of the Territory. This amendment was lost by a

tie-vote,--Yeas 18, Nays 18. At the next stage of the bill,

being again moved by Mr. Edmunds, it was adopted,--Yeas 20,

Nays 18. The bill was then passed by the Senate,--Yeas 24, Nays

15.

* * * * *

In the other House, the proviso adopted by the Senate was

changed, on motion of Mr. Boutwell, of Massachusetts, so as to

require that the Legislature of the State should by a solemn

public act declare consent to the fundamental condition, and

the bill was then passed,--Yeas 103, Nays 55. In this amendment

the Senate concurred.

February 8th, the bill was again passed in the Senate, by a

two-thirds vote, over the veto of the President,--Yeas 31,

Nays 9; and February 9th, in the other House, by a two-thirds

vote,--Yeas 120, Nays 44. And so the bill became a law.[49]

Colorado was less fortunate.[50]

* * * * *

Thus the protracted struggle for Equal Rights in Nebraska,

establishing a fundamental condition, was crowned with success,

preparing the way for similar requirement in the Rebel States.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20) · 第 67 / 125 题