OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE, AND MR. HUNTER.

REMARKS IN THE SENATE, ON AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULAR AND DIPLOMATIC

BILL, CREATING THE OFFICE OF SECOND ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE, MAY

16 AND 17, 1866.

May 16th, the Senate having under consideration the bill making

appropriations for the consular and diplomatic expenses,

Mr. Sumner moved an addition of twenty per cent. to the

compensation allowed to the clerks of the State Department. A

petition from the clerks was read. Mr. Sumner then said:--

I do not know that there is any necessity for me to add anything.

The petition speaks for itself. It states the whole case. But a word

will not be out of place with regard to the gentleman who heads the

petition,--Mr. Hunter. He is one of the oldest public servants now

connected with the Government. He has been in the Department of State

for more than thirty years. He may be called the living index to that

Department; and I believe I do not err in saying that in our Blue

Book of office there is no person whose integrity is more generally

recognized. Placed in a position of especial trust, where all the

foreign correspondence of the Government passes under his eye, that

which comes and that which goes, I believe he has passed a life without

blame. He has been in a position where, had his integrity been open to

seduction, he might have been tempted. No human being imagines that he

has ever yielded. He has discharged his very important trusts on a very

humble salary. I think the Senator from Maine [Mr. FESSENDEN] knows him

well enough to know that he has brought to those functions ability of a

peculiar character. And now, in the decline of life, he finds himself

with the small salary of a clerk, on which he can with difficulty

subsist,--and yet all the time rendering these important services and

discharging these considerable trusts, absorbed in the business of the

office so that he takes it home with him nightly. It leaves with him

in the evening and returns with him in the morning, and then it fills

the long day. I think that such a public servant deserves recognition.

I have for some time felt that his compensation was inadequate. I have

thought that his salary ought to be raised; but, after consideration of

the question in committee, and consultation with others, it was thought

best to present the case in a general proposition such as I have now

moved, being for the addition of twenty per cent. to the compensation

of all the clerks in the Department. The argument for this is enforced

in the petition from these gentlemen which has been read at the desk. I

can see no objection to it, especially after what we have done for the

clerks of the Treasury. Are not public servants at the State Department

as worthy as public servants at the Treasury?

The debate showed the indisposition of Senators to any general

addition to the compensation of the clerks of the State

Department, but with recognition of the merits of Mr. Hunter.

* * * * *

May 17th, after conversation and discussion, Mr. Sumner

changed his motion, so as to read:--

“_And be it further enacted_, That the President be, and he

is hereby, authorized to appoint, by and with the advice

and consent of the Senate, a second Assistant Secretary of

State in the Department of State, at an annual salary of

$3,500, to commence on the first day of July, 1866; and the

amount necessary to pay the same is hereby appropriated.”

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20) · 第 37 / 125 题