Mr. Sumner remarked:--

I have no personal question with the Senator; I have for him nothing

but kindness and respect. I deal with this question simply as a

question of principle. The Senator tells us that he will not vote, when

the case comes up again. I believe him; he will not vote. But, Sir, he

has taken the Constitution in his hand, and, holding it up, he tells us

that he finds in that instrument authority for it in his case.…

Since the Senator makes the claim, it is important for us to meet it,

in some way or other,--by correcting the journal, or by a resolution

declaring that the Senator shall not vote,--fixing the precedent

forever, so that hereafter we shall not be left to the uncertain will

or opinion of a Senator whose seat may be in question. We must rely,

not upon his honor, but upon the Constitution, interpreted by this body

and fixed beyond recall. Therefore I think still it would be better, if

the Senate had corrected its journal. Being a vote that in itself was

null and void, it was to be treated as not having been given.

The Senator asks to withdraw his vote. To withdraw what? Something

which has never been done,--that is, legally done. There is no legal

vote of the Senator. His name is recorded as having voted, but it is a

vote that at the time was null and void. There is nothing, therefore,

for him to withdraw, but something for the Senate to annul.

Mr. Sherman moved the reference of Mr. Sumner’s resolution

to the Committee on the Judiciary. The Senate refused to

refer,--Yeas 18, Nays 22. The resolution was then adopted.

March 27th, the consideration of the resolution declaring Mr.

Stockton “duly elected” was resumed, when, after the failure

of an effort to postpone it, Mr. Clark moved to amend it by

declaring that he “is not entitled to a seat as Senator.” On

this amendment Mr. Stockton spoke at length. The amendment

was adopted,--Yeas 22, Nays 21,--Mr. Stockton not voting. He

said, “I desire to state, in order that it may be a part of the

record, that I do not vote on this question, on account of the

resolution passed by the Senate yesterday.” The resolution as

amended was then adopted,--Yeas 23, Nays 20.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 14 (of 20) · 第 17 / 125 题