Contrast this with Davenant:--

“As the case now stands, we shall show that they [the Colonies]

are a spring of wealth to this nation, that they work for us,

that their treasure centres all here, and that the laws have

tied them fast enough to us; so that it must be through our

own fault and misgovernment, _if they become independent of

England_.… Corrupt governors by oppressing the inhabitants

may hereafter provoke them to withdraw their obedience, and

by supine negligence or upon mistaken measures we may let

them grow, more especially New England, in naval strength and

power, _which if suffered, we cannot expect to hold them long

in our subjection_. If, as some have proposed, we should think

to build ships of war there, we may teach them an art which

will cost us some blows to make them forget. Some such courses

may, indeed, drive them, or put it into their heads, _to erect

themselves into independent Commonwealths_.”[288]

Davenant then, following Child, remarks upon New England as “the most

proper for building ships and breeding seamen,” and adds:--

“So that, if we should go to cultivate among them the art of

navigation and teach them to have a naval force, _they may set

up for themselves and make the greatest part of our West India

trade precarious_.”[289]

These identical words are quoted by Chalmers, who exclaims: “Of that

prophecy we have lived, alas! to see the fulfilment.”[290]

Chalmers emigrated from Scotland to Maryland, and practised in the

colonial courts, but, disgusted with American independence, returned

home, where he wrote and edited much, especially on colonial questions,

ill concealing a certain animosity, and on one occasion stating that

among the documents in the Board of Trade and Paper Office were “the

most satisfactory proofs of the settled purpose of the revolted

colonies, from the epoch of the Revolution in 1688, to acquire direct

independence.”[291] But none of these proofs are presented. The same

allegation was also made by Viscount Bury in his “Exodus of the Western

Nations,”[292] but also without proofs.

The name of De Foe is always interesting, and I cannot close this

article without reference to the saying attributed to him by Chalmers.

I know not where in his multitudinous writings it may be found, unless

in his “Plan of the English Commerce,” and here careful research

discloses nothing nearer than this:--

“What a glorious trade to England it would be to have those

colonies increased with a million of people, to be clothed,

furnished, and supplied with all their needful things, food

excepted, only from us, and _tied down forever to us by that

immortal, indissoluble bond of trade, their interest_!”[293]

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 15 (of 20) · 第 74 / 123 题