CHAPTER IV

MYTHS AND LEGENDS

The Andamanese have a number of stories which are told to the younger

people by their elders and relate to the doings of their ancestors in a

time long ago. Some of these stories are recorded in the present

chapter. A difficulty in the way of giving any clear and readable

account of them is the fact that there are many slightly different

versions of one and the same legend. To some extent the variations are

local, each tribe, and even each portion of a tribe having its own set

of legendary stories. Besides these local variations there are also

individual variations. Two men of the same tribe may relate what is

substantially the same story, yet each chooses his own words and

gestures, and to some extent they may even arrange the incidents

differently.

In the last chapter it was mentioned that there are certain

individuals, known as oko-ǰumu in the North Andaman and oko-paiad in

the South, who are believed to have special knowledge as to the spirits

and as to the magical efficacy of remedies for sickness. It is these

oko-ǰumu also who are the authorities on the legendary lore of the

Andamanese. In the case of magical remedies there is a certain common

stock of beliefs as to the efficacy to be attributed to different

substances, such as leaves of different plants, and on the basis of

these beliefs the oko-ǰumu elaborates the remedies that he uses in

particular cases. Each oko-ǰumu, however, prides himself on being, to

some extent, original. An example of this has been already mentioned.

When a great storm arose an oko-ǰumu of one of the Northern tribes

succeeded in stopping it (in the belief of the natives) by placing a

piece of the crushed stem of the Anadendron creeper under a particular

stone in the sea. On a later occasion another storm arose, and the

successor of the first-mentioned oko-ǰumu was appealed to that he might

exert his powers. He did not simply imitate his predecessor, but he

placed a piece of crushed bark and twigs of the Ficus laccifera in the

sea under a different stone. In very much the same way there is a

common stock of beliefs as to the events that took place in the time of

the ancestors, but each oko-ǰumu builds up on this basis his own

particular set of legends, so that it is rarely that two of them tell

the same story in the same way. An oko-ǰumu may obtain for himself a

reputation by relating legends of the ancestors in a vivid and amusing

way. Such a man would be able to invent new stories by combining

together in his own way some of the traditional incidents. The desire

on the part of each oko-ǰumu to be original and so to enhance his own

reputation is a fertile source of variation in the legends.

This lack of traditional form, which is a very important characteristic

of the Andamanese mythology, may be compared with their lack of

traditional songs. Just as every man composes his own songs, so, within

certain limits, every oko-ǰumu relates in his own way the legends of

his tribe. But whereas every man is a composer of songs, only a certain

number are regarded as having authority to speak on the legends.

Underlying the legends of any tribe there are a certain number of

beliefs or representations with which every native is familiar. It is

on the basis of these that the oko-ǰumu elaborates his own doctrine, if

we may call it so, which he hands on to his followers, who in turn may

become oko-ǰumu and produce further slight modifications of their own.

Thus the legends are continually being changed, though in any one

generation the changes introduced are slight, and it would take a long

time for important changes in belief to be brought about. There is

evidence, however, that a succession of leading men in the A-Pučikwar

tribe have succeeded in introducing a new doctrine as to the weather,

making Bilik the name of a class of beings instead of the name of a

single being, and that this doctrine, while it has not entirely ousted

the former beliefs, has yet succeeded in gaining currency not only in

the A-Pučikwar tribe, but also in the Aka-Ko̱l and O̱ko̱-J̌uwo̱i tribes.

At the present time it is only possible to recover a small part of the

many different legends with their variants. The introduction of many

new interests into the lives of the natives, through the European

settlement and the many changes it has produced, has caused the ancient

legends to be neglected. Most of the old oko-ǰumu have died without

leaving any followers to take their place. Many of the legends recorded

here are merely what some of the men not specially skilled in legendary

lore can remember of the stories told them in former days by oko-ǰumu

who are now dead.

One feature of the legends that must be pointed out is their

unsystematic nature. The same informant may give, on different

occasions, two entirely different versions of such a thing as the

origin of fire, or the beginning of the human race. The Andamanese, to

all appearance, regard each little story as independent, and do not

consciously compare one with another. They thus seem to be entirely

unconscious of what are obvious contradictions to the student of the

legends. It is necessary to emphasise the fragmentary and unsystematic

nature of the Andaman mythology because Mr Man, in his work on the

Andamanese, has brought together a number of legends from the tribes of

the South Andaman and has combined them into a continuous and fairly

consistent narrative, and has thus, undoubtedly not intentionally,

given a wrong impression to the reader of what the nature of the

disconnected stories really is. While each of the stories included in

Mr Man’s account is derived directly from the natives, it would seem

certain that the arrangement of them into a more or less consistent

narrative is due to Mr Man.

In recording the legends in this chapter, only the English translation

is given. In some cases the legends were translated on the spot and

written down in English. In other cases they were written down in the

native language and then translated. When I was recording the legends I

very frequently had to ask what was meant by a particular statement,

the meaning of which might be quite clear to a native, but which was

obscure to one not accustomed to thinking in the same way as the

natives. In some cases I could obtain no satisfactory explanation, and

such legends are given in this chapter in as nearly as possible an

exact literal translation of the original. In other cases the

explanations given by the natives have been incorporated in the

translation itself.

In order to give the reader a fair idea of the nature of the legends as

they are told, one is here given in the native language (Aka-Čari) with

a word-for-word translation.

A Maia Dik iǰokoduko; o ko̱nmo teč inǰukte̱rto̱ia;

Sir Prawn makes fire; yam leaf catches fire;

ko̱nmo teč bi ikterbie; kete uiǰoko; uiǰokobiko;

yam leaf is dry; that one it burns; he makes a fire;

Maia Dik ubenoba; Maia Totemo emato; uǰokil uektebalo;

Sir Prawn slept; Sir Kingfisher takes; he fire with he runs away

Maia Totemo ǰokobiko; Maia Totemo taǰeo ubiko;

Sir Kingfisher makes a fire; Sir Kingfisher fish (food) cooks;

upetil ubeno; Maia Mite ǰuktebalo uemato.

his belly in he sleeps; Sir Dove runs away taking.

The above translation is hardly comprehensible without a little

explanation. The word iǰoko means “something burns,” the word ubiko

means “he cooks (by roasting).” The compound iǰokobiko may mean either

“he makes a fire and cooks something at it” or it may simply mean “he

makes up a fire (by adding firewood).” The word iǰokoduko has a quite

different meaning, “to produce fire.” The derivation of inǰukte̱rto̱ia is

uncertain, as I am not sure of the proper use of er-to̱ia; it is

translated on the basis of the explanation given me by the man who told

the story. The word ikterbie is descriptive of the dryness of dead

leaves.

A free translation would be as follows: “It was Sir Prawn who first

produced or obtained fire. Some yam leaves, being shrivelled and dry by

reason of the hot weather, caught fire and burnt. The prawn made a fire

with some firewood and went to sleep. The kingfisher stole fire and ran

away with it. He made a fire and cooked some fish. When he had filled

his belly he went to sleep. The dove stole fire from the kingfisher and

ran away.” It is implied that it was the dove who gave the fire to the

ancestors of the Andamanese.

Versions of legends of the origin of fire are given by Mr Portman, in

each of the languages of the Southern group of tribes. [95]

All the legends relate to events that are supposed to have happened in

the past, and deal with the doings of the ancestors of the Andamanese.

In the North Andaman the ancestors are sometimes called Lau t’er-kuro,

i.e. the big spirits, “big” being used in the sense of our word

“chief.” Another term for them is N’a-mai-koloko, from n’ or nio =

they, aka-mai = father, and koloko = people, so that the phrase

literally means “the father people,” or the ancestors. In the South

Andaman the ancestors are sometimes called Čauga tabaŋa, which is the

equivalent of Lau t’er-kuro. Mr Man seems to have misunderstood the

exact meaning of this term. He writes: “Lači Lora-lola, the chief of

the survivors from the Deluge [96], gave, at his death, the name of

Čauga tabaŋa to their descendants.... The Čauga tabaŋa are described as

fine tall men with large beards, and they are said to have been long

lived, but, in other respects and in their mode of living they did not

differ from the present inhabitants. The name seems to have been borne

till comparatively recent times, as a few still living are said to

remember having seen the last of the so-called Čauga tabaŋa [97].”

Mr Man has evidently not realised that the term čauga cannot be applied

to any living Andamanese, but may be applied to every dead one. The

Čauga are the spirits of dead natives, and new Čauga are continually

coming into existence by death. Any person who is of such importance

when alive as to form the subject of legends or stories after his death

may be distinguished (after his death only) as a Čauga tabaŋa. The name

may thus be applied to the purely mythical ancestors of the legends,

and also to the spirits of men recently dead whose memory is preserved

owing to fame acquired in some way when they were alive. It is thus

possible that some of the natives with whom Mr Man formerly conversed

are now Čauga tabaŋa, i.e. big spirits, having been “big men” when they

were alive.

Another name sometimes used in the South Andaman to denote the

ancestors is Tomo-la [98]. This word, however, is sometimes used in the

singular to denote the mythical first man. Its use is thus similar to

that of the name Bilik in the A-Pučikwar tribe, which is used both as

the name of a single mythical being and also as the name of a class of

beings. Only the early ancestors of the Andamanese, i.e. those about

whom the legends are related, can be called Tomo-la.

Among the ancestors who appear in the legends there are a few who bear

names that are used as personal names of men and women at the present

time, and who appear in the legends simply as men and women. The larger

number of the ancestors, however, bear names that are those of species

of animals. In each case the ancestor is identified with the species

which bears the same name. Yet others of the mythical ancestors have

names that are neither personal names at the present day, nor names of

animals. It may perhaps be supposed that in all such cases the name has

some sort of meaning, but in many instances it was not found possible

to discover the meaning with certainty.

When speaking of the ancestors, the natives generally add to the name

the appropriate title. These titles are, in the North Andaman Maia

(Sir) and Mimi (Lady), in Akar-Bale Da (Sir) and In (Lady), and in

Aka-Bea Maia and Čana.

There are legends as to the origin of mankind, i.e., of their own race,

for they did not recognize, until recently, the existence of any men of

other races than their own, calling aliens Lau (spirits). There is,

however, no unanimity in their beliefs as to how mankind originated,

even in any one tribe. An Aka-Bo legend is as follows:

“The first man was J̌utpu [99]. He was born inside the joint of a big

bamboo, just like a bird in an egg [100]. The bamboo split and he came

out. He was a little child. When it rained he made a small hut for

himself and lived in it. He made little bows and arrows. As he grew

bigger he made bigger huts, and bigger bows and arrows. One day he

found a lump of quartz and with it he scarified himself. J̌utpu was

lonely, living all by himself. He took some clay (ko̱t) from a nest of

the white ants and moulded it into the shape of a woman. She became

alive and became his wife. She was called Ko̱t. They lived together at

Teraut-buliu. Afterwards J̌utpu made other people out of clay. These

were the ancestors. J̌utpu taught them how to make canoes and bows and

arrows, and how to hunt and fish. His wife taught the women how to make

baskets and nets and mats and belts, and how to use clay for making

patterns on the body.”

The same story was told me by Aka-J̌eru men, the only difference being

that they gave the name of the place where J̌utpu lived differently,

mentioning a spot in the Aka-J̌eru country.

From the Aka-J̌eru I also obtained what is really another version of the

same legend, though the name of the first ancestor is given

differently. “The first man came out of the buttress of a po̱ičo

(Sterculia) tree, and was called Po̱ičotobut (Sterculia buttress). He

had no wife, so he cohabited with an ant’s nest (ko̱t) and thus obtained

a large number of children. These were the first Andamanese, and

Po̱ičotobut taught them all their arts and customs. Po̱ičotobut lived at

Bo̱ro̱ŋ Buliu (in Aka-J̌eru country).”

The association between the origin of the Andamanese and an ant’s nest

(ko̱t) is retained in another legend, told by an Aka-J̌eru man. “Tarai

(the south-west monsoon) was the first man. His wife was Ko̱t. They

lived at Tarai-era-poŋ [101]. Their children were Tau (the sky), Bo̱to

(wind), Piribi (storm), and Air (the foam on a rough sea).”

An entirely different legend, of which, however, I could not obtain a

detailed version, is also found in the Aka-J̌eru tribe. This is to the

effect that the first living being was Maia Čara [102]. He made the

earth, and caused it to be peopled with inhabitants. He also made the

sun and moon. In the last chapter Čara was mentioned as a mythical

being associated with the sun, with daylight and with fine weather. One

of my informants of the Aka-J̌eru tribe said that Čara had a wife named

Nimi (a common personal name), and that his children were Čeo (knife),

Ino (water), Loto, and Luk. It is Maia Čara, according to one commonly

received account, who makes the daylight every day.

I could not obtain any Aka-Kede legend as to the origin of mankind. One

informant of that tribe said that it was Bilika (the north-east

monsoon) who made the world and the first men and women, but he could

give me no detailed legend.

In the Aka-Ko̱l and A-Pučikwar tribes there are several versions of a

legend that makes the monitor lizard (Varanus salvator) the progenitor

of the Andaman race. In all the versions there is no mention of how the

lizard himself originated. The following was told me by an Aka-Ko̱l man.

“When Ta Pe̱tie (Sir Monitor Lizard) was aka-go̱i (i.e. unmarried, but

having completed the initiation ceremonies), he went into the jungle to

hunt pig. He climbed up a Dipterocarpus tree, and got stuck there

[103]. Beyan (civet-cat, Paradoxurus) found him there, stuck in the

tree. She released him and helped him to get down. The two got married.

Their children were the Tomo-la (i.e. the ancestors).”

Another legend telling how the monitor lizard obtained a wife was

related to me on more than one occasion by A-Pučikwar men. “The first

of the ancestors (Tomo-la) was Ta Pe̱tie (Sir Monitor Lizard). He lived

at Tomo-la-tog. At first he had no wife. One day, when he was out

fishing, he found a piece of black wood of the kind called ko̱lotat

(Diospyros sp.). He found it in the creek, and brought it to his hut,

where he put it on the little platform over the fire [104]. He sat down

by the fire and set to work over an arrow that he was making. As he

bent over his work he did not see what was happening. By and by he

heard some one laugh, and looked up. Then he saw that the piece of wood

had turned into a woman. He got up and took her down from the platform.

She sat down with him and became his wife. They had a son named Po̱i (a

species of small bird, possibly a woodpecker), and afterwards many

other children. They lived together for a long time at Tomo-la-tog. One

day Ta Pe̱tie went fishing and was drowned in the creek. He turned into

a kara-duku.”

There is some doubt about the translation of the word kara-duku. It is

an Aka-Bea word, although it was used as given above, by an A-Pučikwar

man. Mr Man translates it “cachalot.” Mr Portman says that kara-duku is

“crocodile,” but that the cachalot, the proper name of which is

biriga-ta, is also sometimes called kara-duku [105]. The only authority

for the existence of crocodiles in the Andamans is the statement of Mr

Portman, who says that the natives killed one in the Middle Andaman and

brought the bones to him. Although I was in many of the creeks of the

Andamans at different times I never saw a crocodile, and none of the

other officers of the Settlement, who have repeatedly explored a large

part of the islands, ever seems to have seen one, so that the one

recorded by Mr Portman may possibly have been a single one that had

come oversea from the mainland of Asia.

Another A-Pučikrwa account of the origin of the first woman Ko̱lotat, is

as follows: “At first there were no women, only men. A man called

Ko̱lotat came to live in the A-Pučikwar country. Ta Pe̱tie (Sir Monitor

Lizard) caught him and cut off his genitals and made him into a woman.

She became his wife. Their children were the first of the ancestors

(Tomo-la).”

Another account given by members of the A-Pučikwar tribe is that the

first man was Tomo, or Tomo-la. One version that I heard is that Tomo

made the world and peopled it with the ancestors. He made the moon

(Puki) who is his wife. Tomo and his wife invented all the arts of the

Andamanese and taught them to the ancestors. After his death Tomo went

to live in the sky, where he now is. It is Tomo who sends the fine

weather, while Bilik sends the bad weather. In the world where Tomo now

lives it is always daylight and is always fine. When men die their

spirits go up to the sky and live with Tomo. The man who gave me this

version said that he did not know how Tomo originated, but was quite

sure that he was not made by Bilik. Tomo came first and Bilik came

afterwards. The Andamanese are all the children of Tomo [106].

In disagreement with this story, another man of the same tribe said

that Tomo was made by Bilik. He (i.e., Tomo) had a wife Mita (Dove),

and they were the ancestors of the Andamanese. Yet another informant

said: “Ta Tomo was the first man. He made bows and arrows and canoes.

His canoes were made of the wood of the Pandanus tree. Mita (Dove) was

his wife. It was she who first made nets and baskets and discovered the

uses of red paint and white clay.” When I asked how Tomo and his wife

originated my informant replied that he did not know.

A species of bird (perhaps a woodpecker), called Po̱i in A-Pučikwar and

Ko̱io in Aka-Ko̱l, is often said to have been the son of Tomo. I was once

told that Ko̱io was the first of the Andamanese, from whom they are all

descended, and that his wife was Mita. Another informant said that

Pe̱tie (Monitor Lizard) was the first man and Mita was his wife, while

still another stated that Ta Mita (Sir Dove) was the progenitor of the

race, making the dove male instead of female. These different versions

will give some idea of the contradictory nature of the statements of

the Andamanese. All of them come from only two tribes, the A-Pučikwar

and the Aka-Ko̱l.

From the Akar-Bale tribe I obtained the following legend. “Puluga made

the first of the ancestors. He made one man and one woman called Nyali

and Irap [107]. He gave them fire, and taught them how to hunt and

fish, and how to make bows and arrows and baskets and nets. The place

where they lived is called Irap because they lived there [108].”

Another Akar-Bale version is that the first man was Da Duku (Sir

Monitor Lizard), and that his wife was In Bain (Lady Civet-cat).

Mr E. H. Man, in his account of the South Andaman, says that there are

a few discrepancies in their accounts of the creation and origin of the

human species, but in the main features all the natives with whom he

spoke are agreed. The world was created by Puluga, who then made a man

named Tomo, the first of the human race. Tomo was black, like the

present Andamanese, but was much taller and bearded. Puluga showed him

the various fruit-trees in the jungle, which then existed only at

Wota-emi, a spot in the country of the A-Pučikwar tribe. The wife of

Tomo was Čana Elewadi (Lady Crab), and as to her origin there are

different legends. According to some, Puluga created her after he had

taught Tomo how to sustain life; others say that Tomo saw her swimming

near his home and called to her, whereupon she landed and lived with

him; while a third story represents her as coming pregnant to Kyd

Island, where she gave birth to several male and female children, who

subsequently became the progenitors of the present race. Tomo had two

sons and two daughters by Čana Elewadi; the names of the former were

Biro-la and Bo̱ro-la, and of the latter Rie-la and Čo̱rmi-la.

A story that tells how Tomo came to his end states that one day, while

hunting, he fell into the creek called Yara-tig-ǰig and was drowned. He

was at once transformed into a kara-duku (which Mr Man translates as

“cachalot”). Čana Elewadi, ignorant of the accident that had befallen

her husband, went in a canoe with some of her grandchildren to

ascertain the cause of his continued absence; on seeing them, Kara-duku

upset their skiff and drowned his wife and most of her companions. She

became a small crab, of a description still named after her, elewadi,

and the others were transformed into lizards (duku). Another version of

this story is that, wearied with an unsuccessful day’s hunting, Tomo

went to the shore, where he found a čidi (Pinna) shell-fish; while

playing with it, it fastened on him, and he was unable to free himself

until a baian (Paradoxurus) seized the čidi and liberated him at the

expense of one of his members. Shortly after this he saw his wife and

some of their children coming after him in a canoe; unwilling that they

should become aware of the misfortune that had befallen him he upset

the canoe, drowning its occupants and himself. He then became

kara-duku, and the others duku, which are now plentiful in the jungles

[109].

In some of the preceding legends reference is made to Biliku or Puluga.

There is a very general belief, in all parts of the islands, that in

the time of the ancestors, Biliku or Puluga lived on earth. Each tribe

has at least one spot in its territory that is pointed out as the place

where Biliku (or Puluga) lived. In some tribes there are three or four

such places, each of which is claimed as the original home of Biliku by

the people living in the neighbourhood. In many cases the name of the

spot contains a reference to the legend, as Puluga l’od-baraiǰ (the

village of Puluga) in Akar-Bale or Biliku era-poŋ (the cave of Biliku)

in the North Andaman.

I was able to obtain a few legends relating to the time when Biliku

lived on earth, though there were probably many more that I was not

fortunate enough to hear.

The following is an Aka-J̌eru legend:

“In the time of the ancestors Biliku lived at Ar-ko̱l. One day the

people caught a turtle and brought it to the camp. Biliku was sitting

there. They asked her if she would eat some of it. She said ‘No.’ They

put the meat in the roof of the hut and went away. When they had gone

Biliku ate the whole turtle. Then she went to sleep. The people came

back and found the turtle gone. They said ‘Biliku has eaten it.’ They

left the camp and all went to Tebi-čiro. They left Biliku asleep. Some

of the people went to hunt for turtle. Their canoe passed near Ar-ko̱l.

Biliku saw the people in the canoe. She called to them and asked to be

taken with them. The people refused saying ‘You ate up all the turtle.’

Biliku had a round stone and several be shells (pearl shells). She

threw the shells at the people in the canoe. The first shell did not

hit them but came back and fell at her feet; and so also with the

second. Then Biliku got very angry and threw a third time. The shell

struck the canoe and killed all the people in it. The canoe and its

occupants became a reef of rocks that is still there. The other people

at Tebi-čiro called across to Biliku saying ‘Come over here.’ She

answered ‘Very well! I am coming.’ She took the stone that she had and

put it in the sea, and it floated. She got on to it to cross over. When

she had got half way across Biliku and her stone sank in the sea. They

became two big rocks that are there still.” This legend refers to the

west coast of the North Andaman. The pearl shells that Biliku throws

seem to be lightning, and the round stone the one that she rolls about

to make thunder.

A few other statements about Biliku and Tarai from the four tribes of

the North Andaman are given below just as they were taken down in my

note-books.

(1) “Biliku lived at Pura-’ra-poŋ in the time of the ancestors. Her

husband was Pe̱rǰido and her children Totaimo, Mite (cicada) and Tarai.

She made the sun and the moon. It was she who first invented all the

things that are now made and used by women, such as baskets, nets,

etc., and it was she who discovered fire, and who first discovered the

use of edible roots such as ko̱nmo and mino (two species of Dioscorea).”

(2) “Biliku used to live at Čaura. She had a husband Tarai and a son

Pe̱rǰido, and a daughter Mite. She used to live only on certain

vegetable foods, lo̱ito, pata, bui, čo, ko̱nmo and mino and others. It

was Biliku who made the earth (the forest, ti-miku). She began at

Čaura.”

(3) “Biliku lived at Ar-Ko̱l in the time of the ancestors. Her husband

was Tarai and their children were the birds, To̱ro̱i, Taka, Čoto̱t,

Poruatoko, Kelil, Mite, Čo̱pčura, Benye, Biratkoro, Čereo, Milidu,

Bobelo, Ko̱lo, and Teo.” (Aka-J̌eru.)

(4) “Biliku lived at Poroket. She was unmarried. She had a son Pe̱rǰido,

and her other children were To̱ro̱i, Čelene, Čoto̱t and Čerei. (These four

are the names of birds.) It was Pe̱rǰido who invented all the arts of

the Andamanese such as their bows and arrows, etc.” (Aka-Bo?)

(5) “Biliku used to live at Peč-meo with her husband To̱ro̱i (a bird).

She used to eat lo̱ito, and when anyone else ate that root she was

angry. Tarai lived at Čaroŋa with his wife Kelil (a bird). He ate only

mikulu.” (Aka-Ko̱ra.)

(6) “Tarai has very long legs and a short body. He used to live on a

small island beyond Interview Island, which is now submerged. When

Tarai goes to sleep he breathes very heavily and this makes the wind.”

The next is an Aka-Kede legend. “In the days of the ancestors Bilika

lived at Purum-at-čape in the Aka-Kede country, with her husband

Po̱ro̱kul. One day Po̱ro̱kul was out hunting. He returned with a pig that

he had killed and came to the creek on the other side of which was his

home (Co̱ti-te̱r-buli Buliu). Laden as he was with the pig he could not

swim across the creek. Bilika was sleeping, but her children were

playing near and saw their father on the other side of the creek. They

ran and told their mother that their father was coming but could not

cross the creek. Bilika went and lay down on one bank of the creek and

stretched out her leg so that it reached the other bank. Po̱ro̱kul walked

across her leg and so reached home.”

While it is clear from this legend that Bilika was of super-human size,

the same was also true of her husband, if we may judge from another

legend. “Po̱ro̱kul made for himself a bow (of the large southern

pattern), with which to shoot pig. At this time the sky was low down

near the earth, only just above the tops of the trees. When Po̱ro̱kul had

finished his bow he lifted it upright. The top of it struck the sky and

lifted it up to its present position where it has remained ever since.”

In another legend from another part of the Aka-Kede tribe Bilika is

spoken of as being male. “Bilika lived at Po̱ro̱ŋ-et-čo with his wife

Mite. They had a child. The ancestors ate Bilika’s food, lo̱ito and kata

and other plants. Bilika was very angry. He used to smell their mouths

to see if they had eaten his food. When he found a man or woman who had

done so he would cut his throat. The ancestors were very angry with

Bilika, because he killed the men and women when they ate his foods.

They all came together and killed Bilika and his wife Mite. Maia Burto

(a species of fish) took the child (of Bilika) away to the north-east.”

Owing to my lack of knowledge of the Aka-Kede language there are some

points of the above legend that remain obscure. I think that the child

of Bilika is also named Bilika, and that it is he (or she) who now

lives in the north-east and sends the storms. The plants (lo̱ito, kata,

etc.), called here the “food” of Bilika, are those mentioned in the

last chapter as specially belonging to Bilika, who is angry when the

natives eat them. As regards the name, Mite, of Bilika’s wife, I do not

know whether this is the name of the bronze-winged dove, or of the

cicada. In some of the Andamanese languages the names of these two are

very similar, the only difference being a very slight one in the way of

pronouncing the two vowels.

The A-Pučikwar people who live on the east coast of Baratang Island say

that in the beginning the ancestors lived at a place called Wota-emi,

and Bilik lived opposite to them across the strait at a place called

To̱l-l’oko-tima. In a rock at Wota-emi there is a large peculiarly

shaped hollow. This is said to be where Bilik used to sit when he was

on earth.

An Akar-Bale legend is as follows. “In the days of the ancestors Puluga

lived at J̌ila off the east coast of Henry Lawrence Island and the

ancestors lived at Puluga l’od-baraiǰ (the village of Puluga) on the

main island just opposite to J̌ila. Puluga was always getting angry with

the ancestors, because they dug up yams and ate čakan (Entada scandens)

and barata (Caryota sobolifera). When he was angry he used to destroy

their huts and property. So the people sent him out of the world,

saying ‘We do not want you here. You are always angry with us.’ Puluga

went away to the north-east.”

It is worth while to note that J̌ila is north-east from Puluga

l’od-baraiǰ, just as To̱l-l’oko-tima is north-east from Wota-emi. In

both cases there is a narrow strait between the place where the

ancestors lived and the home of Puluga or Bilik.

There are a number of different legends that relate how the ancestors

first obtained fire [110]. In many of these legends there is a

reference to Biliku or Puluga. A common statement in the North Andaman

is that “Fire was stolen from Biliku by Maia Tiritmo (Sir Kingfisher).”

Some of the legends give further details. An Aka-Čari legend is as

follows:

“Biliku had a red stone and a pearl shell (be). She struck them

together and obtained fire. She collected firewood and made a fire. She

went to sleep. Mite (the bronze-winged dove) came and stole fire. He

made a fire for himself. He gave fire to all the people in the village.

Afterwards fire was given to all the places. Each village had its own.”

The next is an Aka-J̌eru version.

“In the days of the ancestors they had no fire. Biliku had fire. While

Biliku slept Maia Lirčitmo (Sir Kingfisher) came and stole fire. As he

was taking the fire Biliku awoke and saw him. Lirčitmo swallowed the

fire. Biliku took a pearl shell (be) and threw it at Lirčitmo and cut

off his head. The fire came out (of his neck). The ancestors got the

fire. Lirčitmo became a bird.”

The next is also, I believe, an Aka-J̌eru story. “Maia Tiritmo (Sir

Kingfisher) lived at Tolepar Buruin. He had no fire. When he caught

fish he had no fire with which to cook it. He went to the place where

Čo̱kčura (heron) lived. There was no fire there. Tiritmo took some

rotten wood of the piń tree and hit it on a rock, and thus made fire.

He gave fire to Čo̱kčura. Čo̱kčura gave fire to Totemo (a species of

kingfisher). Totemo gave it to all the others.”

A slightly different and less detailed version of the same story is as

follows:

“Tiritmo made fire. Totemo stole fire (from Tiritmo) and gave it to

Mo̱ičo (Rail). Mo̱ičo gave fire to all the people.”

The next version, which was taken down in Aka-J̌eru, I did not fully

understand.

“Some one shot an arrow. The arrow hit the hill of fire. Tiriń (a

species of kingfisher) found the arrow. It was on fire. He took the

fire to his camp. He would not give fire to any one. The others asked

him. They went to their homes. At night they came to Tiriń’s hut and

stole fire. They went away, each to his own place.”

There is a certain amount of obscurity about two other versions, which

are given in a translation as nearly literal as possible. “Maia Dik

(Sir Prawn) made fire. Some ko̱nmo (yam) leaves caught fire, being dry.

Maia Dik made a fire. Maia Dik slept. Maia Totemo (Sir Kingfisher)

stole fire and ran away. Maia Totemo made a fire. He cooked fish. When

he had eaten, he slept. Maia Mite (Sir Dove) stole fire (from Totemo)

and ran away.”

The other is as follows. “Piribi got fire from a stone. He threw fire

at Bilika. It set some ko̱nmo (yam) leaves on fire. Čo̱rolo (Parrot) got

fire (from the burning leaves). He gave it to the ancestors.”

These two legends were taken down in Aka-Čari, but they are perhaps

really Aka-Ko̱ra or Aka-J̌eru stories. I have the word piribi in my notes

as meaning a storm, but the translation is doubtful.

The next is an Aka-Kede version of what is the most widespread of the

legends.

“The ancestors had no fire. Bilika had fire. The ancestors tried to

steal fire from Bilika. Lirtit (Kingfisher) went one night while Bilika

was sleeping and stole fire. Bilika awoke and saw him going away with

the fire. She threw a pearl shell (ba) at him, which cut off his wings

and his tail. Lirtit dived into the water and swam with the fire to

Bet-’ra-kudu and gave it to Te̱pe. Te̱pe gave fire to Mite (the

bronze-winged dove). Mite gave it to the others [111].”

An Aka-Kede legend of the origin of the sun may conveniently be given

in this place, as it is connected with the possession of fire by

Bilika. “Bilika made fire of purum wood. One day, when she was very

angry, she started throwing fire about. One large fire-brand she threw

into the sky, and there it became the sun.” This legend explains the

name of the place Purum-at-čape, at which Bilika is said to have lived

when on earth. Purum is the name of a tree, not identified; at means

either “fire” or “fire-wood,” and čape means a village or a hut. The

whole word therefore means “Purum fire village.”

I did not obtain any legend of the origin of fire from the Oko̱-J̌uwo̱i

and Aka-Ko̱l tribes, but a version from each of these tribes has been

given by Mr Portman. A translation of Mr Portman’s Oko̱-J̌uwo̱i story is

as follows [112]. “Mo̱m Mirit [113] stole a fire-brand from

Kuro-t’on-mika while Bilik was sleeping. He gave the brand to the late

Leč, who then made fire at Karat-tatak-emi.”

Mr Portman’s Aka-Ko̱l story is somewhat obscure. “Bilik was sleeping at

To̱l-l’oko-tima. Luratut (Kingfisher) took away fire to Oko-emi. Ko̱lotat

went to Min-to̱ŋ-ta (taking with him fire from Oko-emi). At Min-to̱ŋ-ta

the fire went out. Ko̱lotat broke up the charred firewood and made fire

again (by blowing up the embers). They (the people there) became alive.

Owing to the fire they became alive. The ancestors (Jaŋil) thus got

fire at Min-to̱ŋ-ta village.”

From the A-Pučikwar tribe I only obtained one version of the fire

legend. “When the ancestors lived at Wota-emi, Bilik lived at

To̱l-l’oko-tima across the strait. In those days the ancestors had no

fire. Bilik took some wood of the tree called pe̱rat and broke it and

made fire for himself. Luratut (Kingfisher) came to To̱l-l’oko-tima

while Bilik was sleeping and stole some fire. Bilik awoke and saw

Luratut. He (Bilik) took up a lighted brand and threw it at Luratut. It

hit him in the back of the neck and burnt him. Luratut gave the fire to

the people at Wota-emi. Bilik was very angry about this and went away

to live in the sky.”

The kingfisher of the story (Alcedo beavani?) has a patch of bright red

feathers on its neck. This is where it was burnt by the brand thrown by

Bilik.

Mr Portman gives a slightly different version from the same tribe

[114]. “Bilik was sleeping at To̱l-l’oko-tima. Luratut went to bring

fire. He caught hold of the fire, and in doing so burnt Bilik. Bilik

awoke and seized some fire. He hit Luratut with the fire. Then he hit

Tarčal (a fish) with the fire. Čalter (another species of kingfisher)

caught hold of the fire. He gave it to the ancestors at Wota-emi. The

ancestors made fires.”

From the Akar-Bale tribe I obtained the following legend: “The people

had no fire. Dim-do̱ri (a fish) went and fetched fire from

J̌ereg-l’ar-mugu (the place of departed spirits). He came back and threw

the fire at the people and burnt them, and marked them all. The people

ran into the sea and became fishes. Dim-do̱ri went to shoot them with

his bow and arrows, and he also became a fish.” This story is supposed

to account for the bright colouring of certain species of fish.

Mr Portman gives a somewhat similar version from the same tribe [115].

“Dim-do̱ra (a fish), a very long time ago, at Keri-l’oŋ-tower, was

bringing fire from Puluga’s platform (fireplace). He, taking the fire,

burnt everybody with it. Bolub and Tarko̱r and Biličau fell into the sea

and became fishes. They took the fire to Rokwa-l’ar-toŋa village and

made fires there.”

Another Akar-Bale legend is that fire was given to the first ancestors

(Da Duku and In Bain) by Puluga. Still another is that fire was

obtained by the ancestors from Aga, the skink (Mabuia tytleri). The

mist that is often seen hanging over the jungle in small patches, after

rain or at dawn, is said to be the smoke of Aga’s fire. An island in

the Archipelago is called Aga l’od-baraij, Aga’s village.

Mr Portman gives an Aka-Bea legend, which, however, relates that the

events took place at Wota-emi in the A-Pučikwar country [116].

“Puluga was asleep at To̱l-l’oko-tima. Luratut came, stealing fire. The

fire burnt Puluga. Puluga awoke. Puluga seized some fire. Taking the

fire he burnt Luratut with it. Luratut took the fire. He burnt

Tar-čeker (another kind of kingfisher) with it in Wota-emi village. The

ancestors lit fires. They (the ancestors) were the Tomo-la.”

Mr Man gives three different versions of legends as to the origin of

fire. According to the first of these, Puluga, after he had made the

first man, Tomo, gave him fire and taught him its use. Puluga obtained

fire by stacking in alternate layers two kinds of wood known as co̱r and

ber, and then bidding the sun to come and sit on or near the pile until

she ignited it, after which she returned to her place in the sky [117].

The second version is that Puluga came to Tomo with a spirit named Lači

Puŋa Ablola to instruct Tomo, who at his direction, prepared a pyre and

then struck it, on which the fire was kindled and Puŋa Ablola proceeded

to teach him how to cook food [118]. This legend contains an obvious

contradiction. Lači Puŋa Ablola, as is shown by the name itself (Lači =

the late), is the name of some one who is supposed to have lived and

died and so become a spirit. Yet at the same time Tomo is supposed to

have been the first of the Andamanese. There is the possibility,

however, that this inconsistency is due not to the natives themselves,

but to Mr Man’s transcription. It is possible that the legend is that

fire was discovered and was given to the ancestors (the Tomo) by a

person who, being dead, is now Lači Puŋa Ablola, but who was then alive

and one of the ancestors (Tomo) themselves.

A third legend about fire given by Mr Man is associated by him with

another legend about a flood that once overwhelmed the ancestors.

According to Mr Man’s version the fires were all extinguished by the

flood, so that the few survivors were left without fire. “At this

juncture one of their recently deceased friends appeared in their midst

in the form of a bird named Luratut. Seeing their distress he flew up

to Mo̱ro, the sky, where he discovered Puluga seated beside his fire; he

thereupon seized and attempted to carry away in his beak a burning log,

but the heat, or weight, or both, rendered the task impossible, and the

blazing brand fell on Puluga, who, incensed with pain, hurled it at the

intruder; happily for those concerned, the missile missed its mark and

fell near the very spot where the survivors were deploring their

condition. As Luratut alighted in their midst at the same moment, he

gained the full credit for having removed the chief cause of their

distress [119].”

We may now consider a group of legends that relate how a great

catastrophe overwhelmed the ancestors. In many of the versions the

legend relates how the ancestors were transformed into animals. Some of

the legends are connected with Biliku or Puluga and others are

connected with the first discovery of fire. Beginning with the North

Andaman, the following is, I believe, an Aka-J̌eru version. “Mimi Čara

once broke some firewood in the evening (while the cicada was singing).

A great storm came and killed many people, who were turned into fishes

and birds. The water rose up till it covered the trees. Mimi Čara and

Mimi Kota took the fire and went up the hill to the cave at Ŋaram. They

carried the fire under a cooking-pot. They kept the fire alight in the

cave, until the storm was over.”

Another Aka-J̌eru legend was taken down hurriedly and the full details

were not obtained. “The people made a noise in the evening when Mite

(the cicada) was singing. Mite went to see her mother Biliku. Her

mother saw her eyes and face. She looked bad. Her eyes were red (with

weeping). Biliku was very angry. There was a big storm and heavy rain.

Biliku threw her pearl shells (lightning). She went mad. She destroyed

the whole world. Biliku went up to live in the sky. The earth was bare

(literally, empty). One day Biliku dropped a Dipterocarpus seed from

the sky. Out of this all the different kinds of tree grew, and the

earth was again covered with forest.” There was more of the legend,

which I was unable at the time to understand, and which I did not hear

again. My informant added “It was on this occasion that Maia Taolu

saved the fire.”

An Aka-Čari legend relates how the birds and beasts and fishes arose.

“Maia Dik (Sir Prawn) once got angry and threw fire at the people (the

ancestors). They all turned into birds and fishes. The birds flew into

the jungle. The fishes jumped into the sea. Maia Dik [120] himself

became a large prawn which is still called by the same name.” In

connection with this legend it must be remembered that it was Maia Dik,

according to one legend, who first discovered the use of fire. One

version of the story said that he made fire by striking a piece of

paraŋo wood. Then he threw the burning wood about amongst the ancestors

and they turned into birds and fishes.

An Aka-J̌eru version is very similar. “The people were all asleep. Maia

Ko̱lo (Sir Sea-eagle) came and threw fire amongst them. They awoke in a

fright and all ran in different directions. Some ran into the sea and

became fishes and turtle; others ran into the jungle and became birds.”

The Aka-Kede version of the catastrophe that overtook the ancestors is

as follows. “It was at the place called Čilpet. The people collected a

lot of honey. They refused to give any to Ko̱po-tera-wat (a bird, not

identified). The latter got very angry, and in the evening, when the

cicadæ were singing he made a great noise and disturbed their song.

Then there arose a great storm, and it rained very heavily, and the sea

rose over the land. It rose very rapidly till only the top of a big

Dipterocarpus tree showed above the water. The people took refuge in

the branches of this tree. Mima Mite (Lady Dove) managed to rescue some

fire and keep it alight under a cooking pot. The waters at length

subsided. Then the people did not know how to get down from the tree.

Mima Čarami-lebek made a long piece of string and with this she lowered

the people safely to the ground.” The čarami-lebek, which was not

identified, is a species of bird that lives, so the natives say, only

at the top of the very tallest trees of the forest.

An Aka-Ko̱l version of the same legend is as follows: “At first there

were no birds in the jungle and no fish in the sea. The ancestors were

playing one evening and making a noise while the peti (cicada) was

singing. Then Bilik got angry and sent a great cyclone. All the people

were turned into birds and fishes and turtles and jungle beasts.”

There is an A-Pučikwar legend that, in the days of the ancestors, there

was a big cyclone. There was a flood at Wota-emi and the water rose up

over the trees. Some of the ancestors climbed up into a big

Dipterocarpus tree and remained there till the waters had subsided. I

was not able to hear any more detailed version of the legend.

The following legend explaining how the ancestors were turned into

animals was told me by an A-Pučikwar man, but it is probably really of

Akar-Bale origin.

“It was in the days of the ancestors. Ta Ko̱lwo̱t (Sir Tree-lizard) went

over to a big meeting at Teb-ǰuru (in the Archipelago). There was a lot

of dancing. Ko̱lwo̱t decided to give a big dancing party of his own. He

invited everybody and they all came to his place. Ko̱lwo̱t danced a great

deal. He began to get wild. All the people were afraid, because he was

very strong. They caught hold of him by the arms. Ko̱lwo̱t got very

angry. He threw the people from him. He threw them so violently that

some fell in the sea and became fishes and turtle. Others fell on

different islands and became birds and animals. No one could hold

Ko̱lwo̱t. At last Berep (a species of crab) caught hold of his arm and

would not let go. And thus Berep stopped him. Before this there had

been no birds in the jungles nor any fish in the sea.”

A more complete version of this story was obtained from the Akar-Bale

tribe. “Da Tigbul (Sir Dugong) took all the people to dance at Kwaičo.

In Bain (Lady Civet-cat) told Da Kwo̱ko̱l (Sir Tree-lizard) that people

were coming from Tar-mugu to dance and that Da Karami [121] would

quarrel with him. Da Kwo̱ko̱l replied ‘Oh! I don’t care. I can fight all

those people easily enough.’ All the people came together for the dance

and Karami quarrelled with Kwo̱ko̱l. The latter got very angry. The

people were afraid. Tigbul (Dugong) caught hold of Kwo̱ko̱l by the arm.

Kwo̱ko̱l threw him from him with such force that Tigbul fell into the sea

and became a dugong. Then Kočurag-boa caught hold of Kwo̱ko̱l and Kwo̱ko̱l

threw him into the jungle [122]. Kwo̱ko̱l threw all the people into the

sea or into the jungle and they became birds and beasts and fishes. No

one could hold him. Da Kwo̱ko̱l went away to Teb-ǰuru. The people told Da

Berag (Sir Crab) what had happened at Kwaičo and how no one could hold

Da Kwo̱ko̱l. Da Berag went after him to Teb-ǰuru. Da Kwo̱ko̱l had covered

himself with ko̱iob (red paint) [123]. Da Berag pretended that he wanted

some paint to put on his upper lip, saying that he was sick. There was

no more red paint in the place, so Da Kwo̱ko̱l said ‘You had better come

and take some off me.’ Da Berag put his nose to Kwo̱ko̱l’s arm as though

to get some paint, and bit deeply into Kwo̱ko̱l’s shoulder. Kwo̱ko̱l could

not get loose, and so he died. The people at Teb-ǰuru attacked Da Berag

and beat him. They could not kill him, because his skin was too hard,

so they threw him into the sea. When Kwo̱ko̱l’s mother, Kegŋa, came and

found her son dead she was very angry. She wept for a long time. Then

she went into the jungle and cut the plant to̱kul which belongs to

Puluga. Puluga was angry because the to̱kul was cut and sent a big storm

which killed Kegŋa and all the other people in that place.”

Mr Man records another version of this legend.

“To explain the origin of certain fish, they say that one day before

the Deluge, Maia Ko̱lwo̱t went to visit an encampment of the Tomola

situated in the Archipelago. While engaged in his song the women,

through inattention to his instructions, marred the effect of the

chorus, so, to punish them, he seized his bow, whereupon the whole

party in terror fled in all directions; some escaping into the sea were

changed into dugongs, porpoises, sharks, and various other fish which

till then had not been seen [124].”

Mr Man gives still another version of the same story. “One day, at the

commencement of the rainy season, a tomola named Berebi came to visit

Ko̱lwo̱t’s mother, Čana Erep, with the express intention of seeing her

son, of whom he was extremely jealous. When he appeared Berebi

treacherously bit him in the arm, but his teeth became fixed in the

flesh and he was therefore unable to detach himself from his victim,

whose friends promptly avenged his murder, and disposed of the corpses

by throwing them into the sea. (Ko̱lwo̱t, after death, was transformed

into a species of tree-lizard, which is still named after him, and

Berebi became a fish called Koŋo, which is armed with a row of

poisonous barbs in its back.) The bereaved mother, in her rage, grief

and despair, committed various acts, against which Tomo had been warned

by Puluga, and while so doing incited others to follow her example by

the following words:—

e, e, e, dia ra-gumul l’ab-dala,

e, e, e, ŋul kaǰa piǰ pugatken,

e, e, e, ŋul čoaken toaiken,

e, e, e, ŋul boarato aga-kolaken,

e, e, e, ŋul gono boaŋken,

e, e, e, ŋul toŋ čoara boaŋken,

e, e, e, ŋig arlot pulaiǰoken.

The translation of which is:—

e, e, e (sobbing)— My grown-up handsome son,

,, ,, ,, ,, Burn the wax,

,, ,, ,, ,, Grind the seed of the čakan (Entada),

,, ,, ,, ,, Destroy the barata (Caryota),

,, ,, ,, ,, Dig up the gono (yam),

,, ,, ,, ,, Dig up the čati (yam),

,, ,, ,, ,, Destroy everything.

Thereupon Puluga was exceeding wroth, and sent the flood, that which

destroyed all living things with the exception of two men and two

women.

“This tradition is preserved in the following lines:—

Keledoat ibaji lar čora,

Ra-gumul ab-gorga en ig-boadi

Ra-gumul le liga koarna

Ra-gumul ab-gorka

Toala arbo eb dagan čoarpo.

The meaning of which is:—

Bring the boat to the beach

I will see your fine grown-up son,

The grown-up son who threw the youths (into the sea)

The fine grown-up son,

My adze is rusty, I will stain my lips with his blood.

In this, as in all their songs and chants, a good deal is left to the

imagination, but from their explanations which have been given by the

aborigines, the following appear to afford some light on the

subject:—Berebi, being jealous of the renown Ko̱lwo̱t had won for himself

by his numerous accomplishments and great strength, took advantage of

meeting him and his mother one day on the water to ask them to let him

enter their boat. On their complying with his request, he provided

himself with a rusty adze and hone, remarking on the rusty condition of

the former; then taking Ko̱lwo̱t by the arm he sniffed it from the wrist

to the shoulder as if admiring the development of the muscles; while

doing so he muttered the threat of staining his lips with blood, which

he shortly after fulfilled in the manner already described [125].”

As the songs given in this legend are in the Akar-Bale language

(Southern dialect), it is probable that the legend is an Akar-Bale one.

It is really another version of the legend already given.

Another Akar-Bale story tells how the first ancestors Duku, the monitor

lizard, and Bain the civet-cat, managed to keep the fire alight when a

flood overwhelmed them. “One day in the time of the ancestors there

came a great storm, and the water rose over the land. The rain put out

the fires. Da Duku (Sir Monitor Lizard) took a smouldering log and

tried to climb up a tree with it. He could not climb with the fire in

his hand. His wife In Bain (Lady Civet-cat) took the fire from him and

took it up to the top of a hill and there kept it alight till the rain

stopped and the water went away. The hill is called Bain l’it-čapa

(Bain’s fire) to the present day.” The hill is a rather steep-sided

hill of no great height in Havelock Island.

Mr Portman [126] connects the story of the flood with the story of the

dispersion of the ancestors over the islands. Referring to the names of

the tribes he says, “The Andamanese state that these names were given

to the different tribes by Maia Tomo-la when they were dispersed after

a cataclysm. They have a tradition that this group of tribes was once

all one tribe, and that the Andaman Islands were much larger than at

present. Some great cataclysm occurred during which part of the islands

subsided and many aborigines were drowned, the remainder being

separated into different territories as at present by the orders of

Maia Tomo-la, apparently the chief at that time of the collected tribe.

(The above is of course a matter-of-fact version of the fanciful and

impossible legends of the Andamanese.)”

The dispersion legend in the South Andaman is connected with the name

of the A-Pučikwar tribe. The name (of which the Aka-Bea equivalent is

Aka-Boǰig-yab) means “those who talk the original language,” it being

believed that the A-Pučikwar language was the one originally spoken by

the ancestors.

The only version of the dispersion legend that I heard was from the

Aka-Kede tribe. It was to the effect that Bilika once seized all the

ancestors and put them in a netted bag (such as the natives use for

carrying small objects of various kinds). She (or he) took them out a

few at a time and put them in different parts of the country, where

their descendants have been ever since.

Mr Man speaks of a legend of how the tribes came to be dispersed over

the islands. From his account it would seem that there were two

different dispersions, one before the Deluge, and a second after it. Mr

Man’s account is as follows. “Tomo lived to a great age, but even

before his death his offspring became so numerous that their home could

no longer accommodate them. At Puluga’s bidding they were furnished

with all necessary weapons, implements, and fire, and then scattered in

pairs all over the country. When this exodus occurred Puluga provided

each party with a distinct dialect. It would almost seem that, without

straining the legend to suit facts, we might discern in this a faint

echo of the Biblical account of the confusion of tongues and dispersion

at Babel [127].”

“Consequent on the disappearance of Tomo and his wife, the duties of

headship over the community at Wota-emi devolved on one of their

grandchildren, named Ko̱lwo̱t, who was distinguished by being the first

to spear and catch turtles. The tomola remained on the islands long

after Tomo’s transformation, but after Ko̱lwo̱t’s death, according to one

legend, they grew disobedient, and as Puluga ceased to visit them,

became more and more remiss in their observance of the commands given

at the creation. At last Puluga’s anger burst forth, and, without any

warning, he sent a great flood that covered the whole land, and

destroyed all living. Four persons (two men, Lo̱ra-lola and Po̱i-lola,

and two women, Ka-lola and Rima-lola), who happened to be in a canoe

when the catastrophe occurred, were able to effect an escape. When the

waters subsided, they found themselves near Wota-emi, where they landed

and discovered that every living thing on earth had perished; but

Puluga re-created the animals, birds, etc. [128].”

“When, for the second time in their history, their numbers had

increased to so great an extent that it became impossible for them to

remain together in one spot, an exodus, similar to the first, took

place; each party being furnished with fire and every other essential,

started in a different direction, and on settling down adopted a new

and distinct dialect. They each received a tribal name, and from them

have sprung the various tribes still existing on the islands [129].”

In the Southern tribes there is a legend to account for the origin of

night. The following version was obtained from the A-Pučikwar tribe.

“In the early days of the world, in the time of the ancestors, there

was no night; it was always day. Ta Pe̱tie (Sir Monitor Lizard) went

into the jungle to dig up yams. He found some yams. He also found some

resin (teki), and a cicada (ro̱to). He brought them to the camp of the

ancestors at Wota-emi. He sat down and the people came round him. Ta

Pe̱tie took the cicada and rubbed it between his hands and crushed it.

As he did this the cicada uttered its cry. Then the day went away and

it was dark. It remained dark for several days. The ancestors came

together and tried to get back the day. They made torches of resin, and

danced and sang songs. First Kotare (a bird) sang a song, but he could

not get back the daylight. Then Bumu (a beetle?) sang, but the day

would not come. Then Pecero̱l (the bulbul, Otocompsia emeria) sang, and

after him Ko̱io (a bird), but both in vain. Then Ko̱ŋoro (a species of

ant) sang a song and morning came. After that, day and night followed

one another alternately.”

A similar legend was obtained from the Akar-Bale tribe. “Da Teŋat [130]

lived at Golugma Bud. He went fishing one day and got only one small

fish of the kind called čelau (Glyphidodon sordidus?). He turned to go

home, and as he went he shot his arrows before him into the jungle

[131]. Then he went after his arrows to find them again. As he went he

spoke to the fruits of the jungle, asking them their names. In those

days the ancestors did not know the names of the fruits and trees.

First he asked the puiam, and then the guluba, and then the čakli, but

none of them replied to him. Then he found his first arrow. It was

stuck fast in a big yam (gono). He took the arrow and said to the yam

‘What is your name?’ At first the yam did not answer. Teŋat turned to

go away. He had gone a few steps when the yam called him back, saying

‘My name is gono.’ Teŋat replied ‘Oh! I did not know. Why did not you

say so before?’ He dug up the yam, which was a very big one. He went

off to look for his second arrow. As he went he spoke to the stones of

the jungle, asking their names, but none of them replied. Then he found

his second arrow fixed in a large lump of resin (tug) [132]. He took

the arrow, and as he was going away the resin called him back, saying

‘Here! my name is tug; you can take me along with you.’ So Teŋat took

the resin. Then Teŋat found a cicada (rita), and he took that also.

When Teŋat got to the hut (bud), everyone came to look at the things he

had brought. He showed them the yam. He told them its name and showed

them how to cook it. This was the first time that the ancestors ate

gono. Then Teŋat took in his hand the cicada and squashed it between

his palms. As he killed it the cicada uttered its cry and the whole

world became dark. When the people saw that it was dark they tried to

bring back the daylight. Teŋat took some of the resin and made torches.

He taught the people how to dance and sing. When Da Ko̱ŋoro (Sir Ant)

sang a song the day came back. After that the day and night came

alternately.”

Mr Man records a different version of this story.

“The manner in which the world was illuminated at the beginning is not

clearly to be ascertained from their legends, for one story states that

the sun and moon were subsequently created at Tomo’s request, as he

found that, under the then existing circumstances, it was impossible to

catch fish by night or to hunt by day; while, in direct disagreement

with this, another story tells us that night was a punishment brought

upon mankind by certain individuals who angered Puluga by killing a

caterpillar. The tale informs us that the sun, one day, burned so

fiercely as to cause great distress. Two women named Čana Limi and Čana

J̌araŋud, became exceedingly irritable, and while in this unhappy frame

of mind they discovered a caterpillar (gurug) and a certain plant

called utura. By way of venting their spleen, one crushed the helpless

grub, and the other destroyed the plant. These wanton acts so

displeased Puluga that he determined to punish them, and to teach them

to appreciate the privilege of daylight, which they had hitherto

uninterruptedly enjoyed. He accordingly visited the earth with a

long-continued darkness, which caused every one much inconvenience and

distress. At last their chief, Maia Ko̱lwo̱t, to whom reference has

already been made, hit upon a happy expedient of inducing Puluga to

restore the former state of things by trying to assure him that they

were quite unconcerned, and could enjoy themselves in spite of light

being withheld from them. To accomplish this, he invented the custom of

dancing and singing, the result of which was that Puluga, finding that

they had frustrated his intention, granted, as a first concession

alternate periods of day and night, and subsequently, moved by the

difficulties often occasioned by the latter, created the moon to

mitigate their troubles. It is in this way that they account for the

same word being used to denote a caterpillar and night [133].”

From the Akar-Bale tribe I obtained a legend about the origin of death.

No other version of the same legend was obtained.

“At J̌o̱ŋo-l’ar-bo̱ŋ lived In Kalwadi with her sons Yaramurud and Toau

[134]. Yaramurud went to hunt pig for his mother, but was unsuccessful.

When he came home his mother brought him some pork that was in the hut.

As he took his knife from the back of his neck to cut the meat with it,

he cut himself [135]. Then his mother knew that he was dead. She said

to him ‘You are dead now. You had better go away. We do not want you

here any more.’ She took him up and carried him into the jungle and

buried him, returning home. Very soon Yaramurud returned. His mother

exclaimed ‘Oh! I thought you had gone.’ He replied ‘Mother, I did not

die. Why did you bury me?’ But she knew he was dead, so she took him

and buried him again. He came back again. This happened three times.

Then Kalwadi took him into the jungle to a big dumla tree (Pisonia

excelsa), in which there was a big hole. She kicked the tree with her

foot and said ‘You go in there.’ Yaramurud went inside. ‘Well! Have you

gone?’ his mother asked. He answered ‘Yes!’ ‘Tell me how the spirits

(čauga) talk’ she asked him, and he replied ‘To̱ kit [136].’ Then his

mother knew that he was with the spirits, and said ‘Oh! my child, you

are finished now. You will never come back again.’ After a few days

Yaramurud came back (as a spirit) to see his brother Toau. Toau was

busy building a hut. When Yaramurud saw him he killed him. Before this

there had been no death. But In Kalwadi told the people, saying ‘You

see what has happened; well, we shall all of us die like this, like

these two have done’.”

There is a widespread legend to account for the origin of creeks and

islands. The following is an A-Pučikwar version.

“At first there was only one big island with the sea all round it.

There were no small islands and no creeks. Ko̱ŋoro (a species of ant)

made a turtle net and went fishing. He caught a very big fish of the

kind called ko̱ro-ŋiti-čau in his net, and dived down and attached a

rope to its tail. The fish got very angry and made furious plunges to

get away, striking the land in its struggles, and each time knocking

off a bit of the land or making a long split. This is the origin of the

smaller islands and the creeks.”

Mr Man records the same legend, but says it was Tomo who caught the

fish [137]. In an Akar-Bale version it was Da Pečero̱l who caught the

fish (ko̱roŋadi). Pečero̱l is the bulbul (Otocompsia emeria). I have the

name ko̱roŋadi in my notes as being Sphyraena acutipinnis, but the

identification is a doubtful one. In the Aka-Kede tribe there is a

version in which it is stated that one of the ancestors captured a fish

called talepo. This does not seem to be the same species of fish as

that called ko̱ro-ŋiti-čau or ko̱roŋadi in the South. In the North

Andaman the legend is that Pe̱rǰido, the son of Biliku, shot a large eel

(bol) with an arrow, and in its endeavours to get free from the arrow

the eel wriggled about till it made all the creeks.

In the Southern tribes there is a legend that relates how the pig first

got its senses. A version from the A-Pučikwar tribe is as follows.

“Ta Mita (Sir Dove) went into the jungle and found a lot of pigs. They

did not run away when he came because they had no eyes to see him, no

ears to hear, and no nostrils with which to smell. They had no mouths.

Mita made mouths for them and gave them tusks which he made of tobur

wood. He made eyes and ears and nostrils in their heads and taught them

how to grunt and how to sneeze [138].”

Another version from the same tribe is as follows.

“At first the pigs had neither nose nor ears nor eyes. They used to

stand about at Wota-emi when the ancestors lived there. The people ate

a great many of them. They were such a nuisance that Mita (Dove), the

wife of Tomo, thought of a plan to get them out of the way. She bored

holes in their heads, two for eyes, two for ears, and two for nostrils.

The pigs ran off into the forest where they have been ever since.”

I did not obtain any version of this legend from the Northern tribes.

The Aka-Kede have a different legend about the pigs.

“At first there were no pigs. One of the ancestors, Mimi Čau (Lady

Civet-cat), invented a new game, and made the ancestors run on all

fours and grunt. Those playing were turned into pigs, and went to live

in the jungle. Mimi Čau became a civet-cat (čau).”

In the North Andaman there is a legend connected with the pig which

explains the origin of the dugong.

“Pe̱rǰido was the first man to catch a pig. He went into the forest and

found a pig. Pe̱rǰido was hungry. He caught the pig and took it home.

The pig had no eyes nor ears nor mouth. Pe̱rǰido did not disembowel the

pig, nor did he sever the joints of its legs [139]. He made a fire and

put the pig on it. The pig swelled up in the heat of the fire and

burst. This made holes in the pig’s head, two for ears, two for eyes,

two for nostrils. The pig perceived that it was being burnt. It jumped

up from the fire and ran away. Pe̱rǰido threw a ko̱bo (Licuala) leaf at

it. The pig ran into the sea and became a dugong. The leaf became its

flipper.”

In the Aka-Čari tribe there is a legend describing the origin of

turtles.

“At first there was only one big turtle. He came to the camp of the

Aka-Čari people and called them, saying ‘Bring your canoes and catch

me.’ They got into their canoes and followed the turtle. They could not

catch him. The turtle swam away and the canoes followed. When the

canoes were far from land the big turtle came and upset the canoes. The

men were all turned into turtles of the same kind and size as those

that are seen now. The canoes (and the big turtle?) were turned into a

reef.”

In the South Andaman it is supposed that the custom of scarifying the

skin was invented by the first ancestor of the Andamanese, the monitor

lizard. An Akar-Bale version of the story is as follows.

“Duku (Monitor Lizard) lived with his wife Bain (Civet-cat). Duku said

‘I am going to scarify myself.’ His wife tried to dissuade him. He

would not listen to her. He went into the jungle and found a piece of

to̱lma (quartz) and scarified himself all over. His wife was very angry

and asked him why he had done it. Duku replied ‘I look very well like

this, and you will see, all the other people will do the same’.”

Mr Man gives a version of the same legend.

“Maia Duku, who appears to be identical with Tomo, is said to have been

the first to tattoo himself. One day, while out on a fishing

expedition, he shot an arrow; missing its object it struck a hard

substance which proved to be a piece of iron, the first ever found.

With it Duku made an arrow-head and tattooed himself, after which he

sang the ditty:—

To̱ŋ ma lir pireŋa? to̱ŋ yitiken! to̱ŋ yitiken!

to̱ŋ ma lir pireŋa? to̱ŋ yitiken!

the interpretation of which is

‘What can now strike me?

I am tattooed, I am tattooed!’ etc. (Da capo) [140].”

It would seem that Mr Man, or else his informant, was not very clear

about the details of the legend. In the South Andaman scarification is

never performed with an arrow-head, nor with any instrument of iron,

but with a flake of quartz or glass. It is only in the North and Middle

Andaman that an arrow-head is used for such a purpose, and even then it

is only so used to make the big scars on the back and chest, the

ordinary scarification being performed with a flake of stone or glass.

The legend is certainly a Southern one, and the song given is in the

Aka-Bea language. The accuracy of the transcription of the legend

therefore seems very doubtful.

Yams and honey, being two of the most important foods of the Andaman

Islanders, are the subject of several legends. A common belief about

yams is that they were made, or their qualities were first discovered,

by Biliku or Puluga. We have already seen that there is a special

connection between Biliku (or Puluga) and the yams and other edible

roots. There are also other legends, however, on the same subject. An

account of the first discovery of the yam called gono is contained in

the Akar-Bale legend of the origin of night, already given [141].

In the North Andaman the following tale is told about the discovery of

one kind of yam.

“Maia Dik (Sir Prawn) discovered ko̱nmo (Dioscorea sp.). He was very

hungry and went to look for something to eat. He found a very large

ko̱nmo. There was only one ko̱nmo. He cooked it in the fire and ate as

much as he could. He dashed the remainder on a rock, and the fragments

scattered everywhere and grew into fresh plants. After this there were

plenty of ko̱nmo everywhere.”

A legend is also told in the North Andaman about the first discovery of

another kind of yam.

“Maia Pulimu (Sir Fly) and Maia Mo̱ičo (Sir Rail) went to hunt pig. They

killed one pig. There was nothing to tie up the pig (to carry it home).

Maia Pulimu went to look for a creeper (with which to tie up the pig).

He caught hold of a creeper and pulled it and found it was a mino

(Dioscorea sp.). Maia Pulimu was a long time away. Maia Mo̱ičo went and

found some creeper for himself and tied up the pig and carried it home.

When Maia Pulimu came back he found that Maia Mo̱ičo had gone and taken

the pig. He followed him and went home. He showed the ancestors how to

cook and eat mino.”

I believe that there is a fuller version of this legend, which I was

unable, however, to obtain. Another of my informants told me the story

as follows.

“Mimi Mo̱ičo (Lady Rail) had a son Pulimu (Fly). Pulimu found a mino in

the forest and brought it to his mother. They roasted it in the fire.”

Mr Man gives a story from the South Andaman.

“Another of their antediluvian ancestors was famous for propagating

yams. This was Maia Bumroag, who in shooting an arrow, struck the

creeper belonging to the favourite variety called gono; his curiosity

being excited he dug up the root, and tasted it: the result being

satisfactory, he informed his friends of his discovery, and they all

feasted upon it; when they had had sufficient, he scattered the remains

in different directions; this apparent waste so angered his mother

that, on pretence of shaving him, she split his head open with a flint.

After his death it was found that the act for which he had suffered had

tended to the spread of the plant which is now plentiful [142].”

In the North Andaman it is supposed that honey was discovered by

Pe̱rǰido the son of Biliku.

“Pe̱rǰido was the first to eat honey. One day he went to shoot fish. He

saw a nyuri (Plotosus sp.). The nyuri disappeared amongst the roots of

the mangrove trees. Pe̱rǰido was looking for the fish. There was a

honeycomb in a mangrove tree. Pe̱rǰido saw its reflection in the water.

He took some fire and tried to get the honey out of the water [143].

The water put out the fire. He could not get the honey. He went home

and told his mother what he had been doing. She went with him and saw

the honey. ‘What a fool you are’ she said, ‘don’t you see that it is in

the trees.’ Pe̱rǰido took some fire and smoked out the bees and took the

honey. After that Pe̱rǰido used to go and collect honey. He ate it all

himself. He did not tell the others (the ancestors) about it. Maia

Po̱rubi (Sir Frog) found out that Pe̱rǰido was getting honey and eating

it. He went in to the forest to look for some. He found five or six

combs. He ate them all and brought none home to his children. Be̱re̱t (a

smaller species of frog) was the child of Po̱rubi. One day Be̱re̱t said to

his father ‘Bring us some honey.’ The children went with their father

and showed him the combs in the trees. Po̱rubi went up the tree, and

each time he ate the honey in the tree and did not bring any of it down

for his children. Then Be̱re̱t saw another honeycomb in a very tall tree.

He pointed it out to his father. Po̱rubi went up to get it. Be̱re̱t cut

the creeper up which his father had climbed [144]. Po̱rubi wrapped up

the honeycomb to bring it down. Be̱re̱t said ‘Father, this creeper is

bad. How will you come down?’ Po̱rubi replied ‘How can it be bad, when I

have just climbed up it?’ Be̱re̱t made some sharp stakes of čo̱m (Areca)

wood, and put them round the tree. Po̱rubi jumped (or fell) from the

tree on to the stakes and was killed. Be̱re̱t took the honey and ran away

home.”

In the Aka-Čari tribe there is another legend connected with the frog

(po̱rubi) which may conveniently be given here.

“The ancestors were at enmity with Maia Po̱rubi. They went to kill him.

They shot him with their arrows, but they could not kill him. Maia

Po̱rubi caught hold of them all in his arms, and jumped into the sea. He

jumped from the hill called Čauanara. He found a big round stone

(boulder) and put the people under it and left them there. All the

people turned into stone, and may be seen there now. The next night

some more of the people went to hunt turtle near Maia Po̱rubi’s place.

They caught a turtle and shouted [145]. Maia Po̱rubi heard them

shouting. ‘They are coming again to kill me,’ he said. While they were

catching turtle he threw a round stone at them. The stone sank the

canoe. The canoe and the people in it were turned to stone.”

A story in which there is a connection between honey and a toad is

given by Mr Man.

“Another curious fable is told to account for a drought from which

their early ancestors suffered: it relates that once upon a time, in

the dry season, a woodpecker discovered a black honeycomb in the hollow

of a tree; while regaling himself on this dainty he observed a toad

eyeing him wistfully from below, so he invited him to join in the

feast; the toad gladly accepted, whereupon the woodpecker lowered a

creeper, giving instructions to his guest to fasten his bucket (dakar)

thereto, and then to seat himself in it, so that he might be drawn up.

The toad complied with the directions and the woodpecker proceeded to

haul him up; but just when he had brought him near the comb he

mischievously let go the creeper, and his confiding and expectant guest

experienced an unpleasant fall. The trick so exasperated him that he at

once repaired to the streams far and near in the island and drained

them, the result of which was that great distress was occasioned to all

the birds, as well as to the rest of the animate creation. The success

of his revenge so delighted the toad that, to show his satisfaction,

and to add to the annoyance of his enemies, he thoughtlessly began to

dance, whereupon all the water flowed from him, and the drought soon

terminated [146].”

One of the incidents of the North Andaman story of the frog (Po̱rubi)

and his son (Be̱re̱t) appears in a different story from the South and

Middle Andaman. The following is an Aka-Ko̱l version of this legend.

“Ta Mita (Sir Dove) and Ta Ko̱io (a species of small bird) went hunting

together and got a great number of pigs. Ta Ko̱io told Ta Mita to get

some canes to tie up all the pigs. As soon as Ta Mita had gone to look

for the cane, Ta Ko̱io went up a big Dipterocarpus tree, taking half the

pigs with him. He came down and took the rest of the pigs. He stayed up

in the tree with the pigs. When Ta Mita came back he found that the

pigs had disappeared. He was very angry and went home. As there was

nothing to eat, Mita and his two children, Čada and Čoda (two species

of fish) went fishing. Ko̱io was still up the tree. He was cooking the

pigs up there. Mita and his children passed under the tree and some

burning resin [147] fell on them. In this way they discovered that Ko̱io

was in the tree. Mita planned to punish Ko̱io. He cut a great number of

sharp stakes of Areca wood and fixed them all round the tree, pointing

upwards. Ko̱io was asleep. Mita made the tree sink into the ground. As

soon as it was low enough he took some water and threw it into the ear

of the sleeping Ko̱io, who awoke in a fright and jumped from the tree.

He was impaled on the stakes of wood and so died.”

Another version of the same tale was obtained from the Akar-Bale tribe.

“Da Bumu (a species of bird) went hunting pig with Da Berakwe (another

species of bird), and they got a large number of pigs. Then Berakwe

said to Bumu ‘We want some cane to tie up all these pigs. You go and

get it.’ When Bumu had gone Berakwe climbed up into a big Dipterocarpus

tree, taking all the pigs with him, except one very small one which he

left behind. When Bumu came back with the cane he found only one small

pig, and he was very angry. He went home with the pig. Bumu’s wife

Yakoŋ (a species of fish) said ‘I am very hungry. We will go and get

some fish by night.’ At night Yakoŋ went out to get some fish and she

passed under the tree where Berakwe was cooking his pigs. Some burning

resin fell on her and burnt her. She looked up and saw Berakwe and said

‘Oh! there you are; you stole all my husband’s pigs.’ She went home and

told Bumu. In the morning Bumu got up very early and cut a number of

pointed stakes of Areca (čam) wood, and fixed them all round the tree

where Berakwe was, with the sharp points upwards. Then Bumu made the

tree sink gradually into the ground. Berakwe fell from the tree on to

the stakes and so was killed. Bumu and his wife got the pigs.”

Mr Man records a version of the same story.

“The legend regarding the origin of the evil spirits known as Čo̱l is as

follows:—Their ancestor, Maia Čo̱l, one day stole a pig which had been

captured by Maia Ko̱lwo̱t, and climbed up into a gurjon-tree with his

prize. Now Maia Ko̱lwo̱t was remarkable for his great strength, and being

enraged, determined to revenge himself; he thereupon planted a number

of spikes all round the tree in which the thief had taken refuge, and

then proceeded to force it into the ground. On finding that if he

remained where he was, he must inevitably be buried alive, Maia Čo̱l

sprang off the tree, and thereby met a more terrible fate, for he was

impaled on the spikes, and perished miserably. His disembodied spirit

did not pass to Čaitan (Hades), but took up its abode on the invisible

bridge, where, by Puluga’s orders, numbers of his descendants were sent

to join him, in the form of black birds with long tails [148].”

In reference to this version it may be noted that the Čo̱l are not

“spirits” if that word is used to translate the native term čauga or

lau. Čo̱l is the name of a species of bird, which I believe is the

racket-tailed drongo. These birds, though according to Mr Man they live

on the rainbow, are to be seen every day in the jungle, and may be

heard calling čo̱l! čo̱l! čo̱l!

Throughout the Great Andaman there is a belief in a huge animal that

haunts the jungles, or that haunted them in the days of the ancestors.

In the North Andaman this beast is called J̌irmu. In the days of the

ancestors it is supposed to have lived at Ulibi-taŋ, where it attacked

and killed any men and women who came in its way. No detailed legend

about the J̌irmu was obtained.

In the Akar-Bale language Kočurag-boa is the name of the same or a

similar monster. In the A-Pučikwar language it is called Uču. This is

the name applied to two rocks of limestone which are situated about two

or three miles south of Wota-emi, one being in a mangrove swamp, and

the other some little way out in the sea. The following legend is told

about these rocks.

“In the early days of the Andamanese, Ta Pe̱tie (Sir Monitor Lizard),

the first ancestor, went into the jungle and found a čo̱ti tree, up

which he climbed to eat the fruit. The other people (who lived with him

at Wota-emi) came and found him, and Ta Pe̱tie threw down some of the

fruit to them, which they ate. The people began to bully Pe̱tie to make

him throw down more of the fruit. Pe̱tie got angry and said ‘If you

bully me like that I will call the Uču, and they will kill you all.’

The people only laughed at him. Pe̱tie called the Uču, calling ‘Dire!

dire!’ The Uču came, one male and one female. They caught all the

people and ate them. Only Pe̱tie they did not eat because he was up in

the high tree. The Uču went off to cross the strait to To̱l-l’oko-tima.

They had eaten so much that they were very heavy and stuck in the sand

and mud at the edge of the mangrove swamp. When Pe̱tie came down from

the tree he found all the people gone. He said ‘Hallo! the Uču must

have eaten them all.’ He went to look. He found the Uču stuck fast at

the edge of the mangrove swamp, so that they could not move. He cut

open their bellies and all the people came out, for the Uču had

swallowed them whole. The Uču are there to this day.”

When elephants were first introduced into the Andamans for the use of

the Forest Department, they were named Uču by the natives, and have

ever since retained that name. Similarly the natives of the Northern

tribes call them J̌irmu.

In the Akar-Bale tribe there is a legend to account for the origin of a

rock standing in the sea at a place called Kwaičo-bur.

“Ra-gumul Kwo̱ko̱l went fishing with his bow and arrows in the sea. His

bow and arrows and he himself were turned into stone, and may be seen

there to the present day.”

Kwo̱ko̱l is the common tree-lizard. Ra-gumul is the term applied to a

youth or girl who has just passed through the pig-eating ceremony

described in Chap. II. A youth is not permitted to handle a bow for

some days after the ceremony in question. A version of the same legend

is recorded by Mr Man.

“The story regarding certain Tomola who failed to observe the rules for

neophytes, states that, on the day after they broke their fast of

reg-ǰiri (kidney-fat of pig), they left the encampment without giving

notice of their intention to their friends, and the result was that,

when they were missed and searched for, it was found that they had gone

to the shore to fish, and had there met a sad fate; the body of one was

discovered adhering to a large boulder, and turned into stone, while

the other, likewise in a state of petrifaction, was standing erect

beside it [149].”

A reef on the east side of Ritchie’s Archipelago is said to have

originated as follows.

“The people of Kwaičo went to J̌ila to hunt turtle, taking two canoes.

While they were away their wives made up a big fire in the evening at

Kwaičo. The hunters and their canoes were turned to stone, and formed

the reefs that are now there.”

I believe that the explanation of this story is the belief that the

moon is angry when a bright fire is visible at the time when he rises

in the evening shortly after sunset [150].

There seems to be a legend relating to a large snake called o̱r-čubi in

the North Andaman, but I was not able to obtain a detailed version. The

following was told me in Aka-J̌eru.

“At Dalamio, in the time of the ancestors, there used to be a big snake

of the kind called o̱r-čubi. He used to catch men and women when they

were gathering honey, and kill them and eat them.”

An Akar-Bale version is a little fuller.

“There was a man named Biča who went to look for honey in the jungle.

He saw a big snake (wara-ǰobo) and from its neck was hanging a

honeycomb. The snake was as big as a tree. ‘Why don’t you make your

honey in the trees?’ Biča said to the bees. He went home and called

several of the men. They took their bows and arrows. They found the

snake, and shot it with a great many arrows. They could not kill the

snake, which ran away and was never seen again.”

An Akar-Bale story relates how the first murder came to pass.

“Da Ko (Sir Crow) was the first of the Andamanese. He lived at

Kared-čar-buaro with his wife In Mud (Lady Dove). He had a friend,

Badgi-beria (Hawk). Badgi-beria had no wife and was jealous of Da Ko

and wanted to get his wife. When Da Ko knew this he was very angry. He

went into the jungle and hid himself. By and by he saw Badgi-beria and

Mud coming along the path together. He took his bow and arrows and

killed them.”

Another Akar-Bale story about the dove is as follows.

“Mud and Kulal were cooking pig and got very hot. They went to bathe

and were turned into birds.”

Mud is the bronze-winged dove, Chalcophaps indica, and kulal is the

teal, Nettium albigulare.

In the North Andaman there are tales about the sea-eagle (ko̱lo). One is

to the effect that at first he used ko̱bo (Licuala) leaves to fly with.

This was before he had wings of his own. Another story is as follows.

“Maia Ko̱lo (Sir Sea-eagle) lived at Čona in Tau-’ra-miku. He had a hut

in the top of a to̱ro̱ktato tree. He was unmarried. When the men went

fishing he used to steal their wives. He would only take good-looking

girls. He would call out to a girl to come and catch hold of his foot,

saying ‘I have a fish for you.’ If an old or ugly woman came, he would

say ‘No! not you; go away.’ When a young woman came and caught hold of

his foot he flew away with her to his hut in the tree.”

The Andaman Islanders · 第 5 / 11 章