FIG. 47.--Mosaic of the Battle of Issus (Naples).]

This is, so far as we know, almost the only work of the early part of

the 3rd century which shows imagination. Sculptors often worked on a

colossal scale, producing such monsters as the colossal Apollo at

Rhodes, the work of Chares of Lindus, which was more than 100 ft. in

height. But they did not show freshness or invention; and for the most

part content themselves with varying the types produced in the great

schools of the 4th century. The wealthy kings of Syria, Egypt and Asia

Minor formed art galleries, and were lavish in their payments; but it

has often been proved in the history of art that originality cannot be

produced by mere expenditure.

[Illustration: FIG. 48.--Head of Anytus: Lycosura.]

A great artist, whose date has been disputed, but who is now assigned to

the Hellenistic age, Damophon of Messene, is known to us from his actual

works. He set up in the shrine of the _Mistress_ (Despoena) at Lycosura

in Arcadia a great group of figures consisting of Despoena, Demeter,

Artemis and the Titan Anytus. Three colossal heads found on the spot

probably belong to the three last-mentioned deities. We illustrate the

head of Anytus, with wild disordered hair and turbulent expression (fig.

48). Dr Dorpfeld has argued, on architectural grounds, that shrine and

images alike must be given to a later time than the 4th century; and

this judgment is now confirmed by inscriptional and other evidence.

In one important direction sculpture certainly made progress. Hitherto

Greek sculptors had contented themselves with studying the human body

whether in rest or motion, from outside. The dissection of the human

body, with a consequent increase in knowledge of anatomy, became usual

at Alexandria in the medical school which flourished under the

Ptolemies. This improved anatomical knowledge soon reacted upon the art

of sculpture. Works such as the Fighter of Agasias in the Louvre (Plate

IV. fig. 69), and in a less degree the Apoxyomenus (Plate VI. fig. 79),

display a remarkable internal knowledge of the human frame, such as

could only come from the habit of dissection. Whether this was really

productive of improvement in sculpture may be doubted. But it is

impossible to withhold one's admiration from works which show an

astonishing knowledge of the body of man down to its bony framework, and

a power and mastery of execution which have never since been surpassed.

With accuracy in the portrayal of men's bodies goes of necessity a more

naturalistic tendency in portraiture. As we have seen, the art of

portraiture was at a high ideal level in the Pheidian age; and even in

the age of Alexander the Great, notable men were rendered rather

according to the idea than the fact. To a base and mechanical naturalism

Greek art never at any time descended. But from 300 B.C. onwards we have

a marvellous series of portraits which may be termed rather

characteristic than ideal, which are very minute in their execution, and

delight in laying emphasis on the havoc wrought by time and life on the

faces of noteworthy men. Such are the portraits of Demosthenes, of

Antisthenes, of Zeno and others, which exist in our galleries. And it

was no long step from these actual portraits to the invention of

characteristic types to represent the great men of a past generation,

such as Homer and Lycurgus, or to form generic images to represent

weatherbeaten fishermen or toothless old women.

Altar of Pergamum.

Our knowledge of the art of the later Hellenistic age has received a

great accession since 1875 through the systematic labours directed by

the German Archaeological Institute, which have resulted in recovering

the remains of Pergamum, the fortress-city which was the capital of the

dynasty of the Philetaeri. Among the ancient buildings of Pergamum none

was more ambitious in scale and striking in execution than the great

altar used for sacrifices to Zeus, a monument supposed to be referred to

in the phrase of the Apocalypse "where Satan's throne is." This altar,

like many great sacrificial altars of later Greece, was a vast erection

to which one mounted by many steps, and its outside was adorned with a

frieze which represented on a gigantic scale, in the style of the 2nd

century B.C., the battle between the gods and the giants. This enormous

frieze (see PERGAMUM) is now one of the treasures of the Royal Museums

of Berlin, and it cannot fail to impress visitors by the size of the

figures, the energy of the action, and the strong vein of sentiment

which pervades the whole, giving it a certain air of modernity, though

the subject is strange to the Christian world. In early Greek art the

giants where they oppose the gods are represented as men armed in full

panoply, "in shining armour, holding long spears in their hands," to use

the phrase in which Hesiod describes them. But in the Pergamene frieze

the giants are strange compounds, having the heads and bodies of wild

and fierce barbarians, sometimes also human legs, but sometimes in the

place of legs two long serpents, the heads of which take with the giants

themselves a share in the battle. Sometimes also they are winged. The

gods appear in the forms which had been gradually made for them in the

course of Greek history, but they are usually accompanied by the animals

sacred to them in cultus, between which and the serpent-feet of the

giants a weird combat goes on. We can conjecture the source whence the

Pergamene artist derived the shaggy hair, the fierce expression, the

huge muscles of his giants (fig. 49); probably these features came

originally from the Galatians, who at the time had settled in Asia

Minor, and were spreading the terror of their name and the report of

their savage devastations through all Asia Minor. The victory over the

giants clearly stands for the victory of Greek civilization over Gallic

barbarism; and this meaning is made more emphatic because the gods are

obviously inferior in physical force to their opponents, indeed, a large

proportion of the divine combatants are goddesses. Yet everywhere the

giants are overthrown, writhing in pain on the ground, or transfixed by

the weapons of their opponents; everywhere the gods are victorious, yet

in the victory retain much of their divine calm. The piecing together of

the frieze at Berlin has been a labour of many years; it is now

complete, and there is a special museum devoted to it. Some of the

groups have become familiar to students from photographs, especially the

group which represents Zeus slaying his enemies with thunderbolts, and

the group wherein Athena seizes by the hair an overthrown opponent, who

is winged, while Victory runs to crown her, and beneath is seen Gaia,

the earth-goddess who is the mother of the giants, rising out of the

ground, and mourning over her vanquished and tortured children. Another

and smaller frieze which also decorated the altar-place gives us scenes

from the history of Telephus, who opposed the landing of the army of

Agamemnon in Asia Minor and was overthrown by Achilles. This frieze,

which is quite fragmentary, is put together by Dr Schneider in the

_Jahrbuch_ of the German Archaeological Institute for 1900.

[Illustration: FIG. 49.--Giant from Great Altar: Pergamum.]

Since the Renaissance Rome has continually produced a crop of works of

Greek art of all periods, partly originals brought from Greece by

conquering generals, partly copies, such as the group at Rome formerly

known as Paetus and Arria, and the overthrown giants and barbarians

which came from the elaborate trophy set up by Attalus at Athens, of

which copies exist in many museums. A noted work of kindred school is

the group of Laocoon and his sons (Plate I. fig. 52), signed by Rhodian

sculptors of the 1st century B.C., which has been perhaps more discussed

than any work of the Greek chisel, and served as a peg for the

aesthetic theories of Lessing and Goethe. In our days the histrionic and

strained character of the group is regarded as greatly diminishing its

interest, in spite of the astounding skill and knowledge of the human

body shown by the artists. To the same school belong the late

representations of Marsyas being flayed by the victorious Apollo (Plate

II. fig. 54), a somewhat repulsive subject, chosen by the artists of

this age as a means for displaying their accurate knowledge of anatomy.

On what a scale some of the artists of Asia Minor would work is shown us

by the enormous group, by Apollonius and Tauriscus of Tralles, which is

called the Farnese Bull (Plate I. fig. 51), and which represents how

Dirce was tied to a wild bull by her stepsons Zethus and Amphion.

Rome.

The extensive excavations and alterations which have taken place at Rome

in recent years have been very fruitful; the results may be found partly

in the palace of the Conservatori on the Capitol, partly in the new

museum of the Terme. Among recently found statues none excel in interest

some bronzes of large size dating from the Hellenistic age. In the

figure of a seated boxer (Plate V. fig. 72), in scale somewhat exceeding

life, attitude and gesture are expressive. Evidently the boxer has

fought already, and is awaiting a further conflict. His face is cut and

swollen; on his hands are the terrible caestus, here made of leather,

and not loaded with iron, like the caestus described by Virgil. The

figure is of astounding force; but though the face is brutal and the

expression savage, in the sweep of the limbs there is nobility, even

ideal beauty. To the last the Greek artist could not set aside his

admiration for physical perfection. Another bronze figure of more than

life-size is that of a king of the Hellenistic age standing leaning on a

spear. He is absolutely nude, like the athletes of Polyclitus. Another

large bronze presents us with a Hellenistic type of Dionysus.

Besides the bronzes found in Rome we may set those recently found in the

sea on the coast of Cythera, the contents of a ship sailing from Greece

to Rome, and lost on the way. The date of these bronze statues has been

disputed. In any case, even if executed in the Roman age, they go back

to originals of the 5th and 4th centuries. The most noteworthy among

them is a beautiful athlete (Plate V. fig. 73) standing with hand

upraised, which reflects the style of the Attic school of the 4th

century.

After 146 B.C. when Corinth was destroyed and Greece became a Roman

province, Greek art, though by no means extinct, worked mainly in the

employ of the Roman conquerors (see ROMAN ART).

IV. SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY.[3]--I. General works on Greek Art.--The only

recent general histories of Greek art are: H. Brunn, _Griechische

Kunstgeschichte_, bks. i. and ii., dealing with archaic art; W. Klein,

_Geschichte der griechischen Kunst_, no illustrations; Perrot et

Chipiez, _Histoire de l'art dans l'antiquite_, vols. vii. and viii.

(archaic art only).

Introductory are: P. Gardner, _Grammar of Greek Art_; J. E. Harrison,

_Introductory Studies in Greek Art_; H. B. Walters, _Art of the

Greeks_.

Useful are also: H. Brunn, _Geschichte der griechischen Kunstler_,

(new edition, 1889); J. Overbeck, _Die antiken Schriftquellen zur

Geschichte der bildenden Kunste bei den Griechen_; untranslated

passages in Latin and Greek; the Elder Pliny's _Chapters on the

History of Art_, edited by K. Jex-Blake and E. Sellers; H. S. Jones,

_Ancient Writers on Greek Sculpture_.

II. Periodicals dealing with Greek Archaeology.--England: _Journal of

Hellenic Studies_; _Annual of the British School at Athens_;

_Classical Review_. France: _Revue archeologique_; _Gazette

archeologique_; _Bulletin de correspondance hellenique_. Germany:

_Jahrbuch des K. deutschen arch. Instituts_; _Mitteilungen des arch.

Inst._, Athenische Abteilung, Romische Abteilung; _Antike Denkmaler_.

Austria: _Jahreshefte des K. Osterreich. arch. Instituts_. Italy:

Publications of the _Accademia dei Lincei_; _Monumenti antichi_; _Not.

dei scavi_; _Bulletino comunale di Roma_. Greece: _Ephemeris

archaiologike_; _Deltion archaiologikon_; _Praktika_ of the Athenian

Archaeological Society.

III. Greek Architecture.--General: Perrot et Chipiez, _Histoire de

l'art dans l'antiquite_, vol. vii.; A. Choisy, _Histoire de

l'architecture_, vol. i.; Anderson and Spiers, _Architecture of Greece

and Rome_; E. Boutmy, _Philosophie de l'architecture en Grece_; R.

Sturgis, _History of Architecture_, vol. i.; A. Marquand, _Greek

Architecture_.

IV. Greek Sculpture.--General: M. Collignon, _Histoire de la sculpture

grecque_ (2 vols.); E. A. Gardner, _Handbook of Greek Sculpture_; A.

Furtwangler, _Masterpieces of Greek Sculpture_, translated and edited

by E. Sellers; Friederichs and Wolters, _Bausteine zur Geschichte der

griechisch-romischen Plastik_ (1887); von Mach, _Handbook of Greek and

Roman Sculpture_, 500 plates; H. Bulle, _Der schone Mensch in der

Kunst: Altertum_, 216 plates; S. Reinach, _Repertoire de la statuaire

grecque et romaine_, 3 vols.

V. Greek Painting and Vases.--Woltmann and Woermann, _History of

Painting_, vol. i., translated and edited by S. Colvin (1880); H. B.

Walters, _History of Ancient Pottery_ (2 vols.); Harrison and MacColl,

_Greek Vase-paintings_ (1894); O. Rayet et M. Collignon, _Histoire de

la ceramique grecque_ (1888); P. Girard, _La Peinture antique_ (1892);

S. Reinach, _Repertoire des vases peints grecs et etrusques_ (2

vols.); Furtwangler und Reichhold, "Griechische Vasenmalerei," _Wiener

Vorlegeblatter fur archaologische Ubungen_ (1887-1890).

VI. Special Schools and Sites.--A. Joubin, _La Sculpture grecque entre

les guerres mediques et l'epoque de Pericles_; C. Waldstein, _Essays

on the Art of Pheidias_ (1885); W. Klein, _Praxiteles_; G. Perrot,

_Praxitele_; A. S. Murray, _Sculptures of the Parthenon_; W. Klein,

_Euphronios_; E. Pottier, _Douris_; P. Gardner, _Sculptured Tombs of

Hellas_; E. A. Gardner, _Ancient Athens_; A. Botticher, _Olympia_;

Bernoulli, _Griechische Ikonographie_; P. Gardner, _The Types of Greek

Coins_ (1883); E. A. Gardner, _Six Greek Sculptors._

VII. Books related to the subject.--J. G. Frazer, _Pausanias's

Description of Greece_ (6 vols.); J. Lange, _Darstellung des Menschen

in der alteren griechischen Kunst_; E. Brucke, _The Human Figure; its

Beauties and Defects_; A. Michaelis, _Ancient Marbles in Great

Britain_ (1882); _Catalogue of Greek Sculpture in the British Museum_

(3 vols.); _Catalogue of Greek Vases in the British Museum_ (4 vols.);

J. B. Bury, _History of Greece_ (illustrated edition); Baumeister,

_Denkmaler des klassischen Altertums_ (3 vols.). (P. G.)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Grasshopper" to "Greek Language" Volume 12, Slice 4 · 第 60 / 63 题